May 14, 2008

Most Frequently Asked Questions: Economic Stimulus Payments

California taxpayers waiting and wondering about their tax stimulus payment from the IRS can visit the IRS website for answers to frequently asked questions by clicking here.

Other tax problems related to unpaid payroll taxes, unpaid income taxes or unfiled tax returns, call Los Angeles tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

May 7, 2008

Wesley Snipes Convicted

For his willfully failing to file an income tax return, Wesley Snipes was sentenced to three years in federal prison. He was charged with having failed to pay over $15,000,000 in taxes.

A jury acquitted Wesley Snipes of fraud and conspiracy charges and certain other tax charges even though they convicted him for failure to file his 1999, 2000, and 2001 tax returns.
According to the IRS, tax protestors Eddie Ray Kahn and Douglas P. Rosile (who themselves face 10 and 4-1/2 years' incarceration respectively) met Snipes in 1998 who followed their suggestion to (among other things) stop filing tax returns.

He also filed amended returns requesting payments from the government of millions of dollars in refunds from earlier years' filings.

Allegedly, Snipes doctored tax returns, and sent fake checks to the Treasury to evade paying his tax liabilities.

For what was technically a misdemeanor, Snipes was convicted and sentenced to time in prison.

According to Justice Department prosecutors, this represented a "singular opportunity….to deter tax crime nationwide." And "Snipes's long prison sentence should send a loud and crystal clear message to all tax defiers that if they engage in similar tax defier conduct, they face joining him and his co-defendants . . . as inmates in prison."

May 5, 2008

A Tax Morale Approach To Compliance

In an article this California tax lawyer thinks is worth reading, Marjorie E. Kornhauser (Arizona State) has published A Tax Morale Approach to Compliance: Recommendations for the IRS, 8 Fla. Tax Rev. 599 (2007).

Here is the introduction:

If people hate taxes so much why do they pay them? The common, seemingly obvious, answer—fear of being caught cheating—is only a partial answer. In fact, this “obvious” answer—based on the rational cost/benefit analysis of traditional economic theory— explains so little of tax compliance that the puzzle of tax compliance is why people pay taxes instead of evading them. The key to this puzzle is “tax morale,” the collective name for all the non-rational factors and motivations—such as social norms, personal values and various cognitive processes—that strongly affect an individual’s voluntary compliance with laws. Higher tax morale correlates with higher tax compliance. Although the exact components of tax morale are not yet fully delineated, Congress and the IRS should begin now to shape and administer income tax laws in accordance with tax morale findings. Delay can only increase the chance that voluntary compliance will deteriorate given the interaction of an individual’s tax morale with elements of the external environment, such as other people and institutions. The tax gap, for example, is more than a problem of lost revenue; it is a visible sign of non-compliance that can create a downward spiral. Non-compliance among other taxpayers can decrease an individual’s own tax morale and compliance. Once tax morale dips, it is hard to restore it to prior levels. Ironically, then, the more the tax gap is publicized, the greater this danger becomes. Consequently, Congress and the IRS should act now to narrow the tax gap and to foster compliance generally. This Report offers the IRS several concrete suggestions for improving individual taxpayer compliance based on the tax morale literature.

Part II discusses methodology and the limitations of empirical research.

Part III briefly describes the tax morale literature, focusing on the main findings regarding: 1) cognitive and affective processes; 2) personal and social values/norms, especially procedural justice, legitimacy, reciprocity, and trust; 3) external activation and suppression of tax morale; 4) demographic factors; and 5) a new tax morale model for tax administration.

Part IV contains recommendations for the IRS. It presents three major recommendations and several more specific suggestions for the IRS to improve individual taxpayers’ voluntary compliance. First, the IRS should establish a department devoted solely to exploring tax morale issues and implementing the findings. Second, the IRS should adopt a tax morale approach to tax compliance that incorporates the findings of the research and responds to—and strengthens—taxpayers’ internal motivations to comply. Third, using tax morale research, the IRS should implement ongoing educational (long - and short term) programs and media campaigns. Although sticks as well as carrots are needed to ensure compliance, this Report examines only the carrots.

Part V provides a short conclusion.

Solutions to tax problems and California tax help from a qualified tax attorney is available by calling Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

May 2, 2008

California's Collection Procedures Manual

Income tax owed but unpaid in California may be collected by the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) using any number of collection methods described in California's Collection Procedures Manual. The Manual describes the desired culture and philosophy for the Collection Program.

California's Collection Procedures Manual contains the following topics:

Introduction Section

Responsibility Section

Case Administration Section

Case Processing Section

Debtor Asset Location Section

Voluntary Case Resolution Section

Involuntary Case Resolution Section

Case Servicing Section

Special Processes Section

Glossary

If you have an income tax problem in California or with the IRS, call Mitchell A. Port for tax help at (310) 559.5259.

April 30, 2008

Closing Your California Business?

Want to dissolve, surrender or cancel your California-based business whether you operate as a domestic corporation, foreign corporation, limited liability company or partnership? The California Franchise Tax Board has a helpful brochure to tell you how. Click here.

Winding-down your Los Angeles County, Orange County, Ventura County or Santa Barbara County business can be done with the help of a qualified attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 if you would like assistance.

April 28, 2008

California's Enhanced Tax Revenue Collection Efforts

The California legislature is considering a bill that would allow the Franchise Tax Board (the FTB) to suspend occupational and professional licenses because of unpaid income tax liabilities and notify the applicable licensing agency of the suspension.

The bill would allow the FTB to suspend an individual’s occupational or professional license because of unpaid income tax liabilities. The FTB would suspend a license only after the following have been provided to the debtor:

Notice of State Income Tax Due,

Final Notice Before Levy,

Order To Withhold (OTW) is issued (if debtor’s bank information is available to the FTB),

Notice of State Tax Lien (issued when a state tax lien is recorded),

60-day preliminary suspension notice.

The FTB would be allowed The FTB to disclose to the licensing boards the reason for the suspension – unpaid taxes.

The FTB staff would provide a hearing, upon request, for license holders who would experience a financial hardship as a result of the suspension.

This bill would define the following:

“Hardship” means financial hardship, as determined by the FTB, where the licensee is financially unable to pay any part of their taxes including penalties, interest, and applicable fees and is unable to qualify for an installment payment arrangement pursuant to Section 19008 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.

“License” includes certificate, registration, or any other authorization to engage in a business or profession issued by a state governmental licensing entity.

“Licensee” means any individual authorized by a license, certificate, registration, or other authorization to engage in a business or profession issued by a state governmental licensing entity.

The bill would allow the Contractors State License Board and the FTB to have concurrent authority to suspend a contractor’s license.

This bill requires licensing boards to provide the FTB information at a time requested by the FTB.

This bill would allow a limited hearing for license holders with outstanding tax liabilities as of the date of enactment to substantiate that the license holder has paid the tax liability reflected in the notice of state tax lien.

ECONOMIC IMPACT

The revenue impact of this bill would depend on the number of delinquent taxpayers that possess an occupational or professional license. This estimate was calculated using the actual account balances of the department’s accounts receivables for the affected taxpayers, excluding accounts in bankruptcy and installment agreements. Taxpayers subject to this proposal are those with an outstanding liability of $1,000 or more and have owed that debt for one year or more.

It is estimated that 17,200 taxpayers with occupational and professional licenses will enter the collection process annually. Of the 17,200 taxpayers, it is estimated 38%, or 6,600, are expected to pay their delinquent debts upon notice from the FTB. Current departmental data indicates the average payment amount for compliant taxpayers would be approximately $2,000, resulting in an annual revenue increase of approximately $13 million (6,600 x $2,000 = $13.2 million). The average payment amount was calculated by the amount of payments made in response to filing enforcement notices.

Current departmental data also indicates unresolved cases of approximately 25,000 delinquent taxpayers with occupational and professional licenses in the collection process. Based on the 25,000 taxpayers, it is estimated that nearly 9,500 taxpayers would comply upon notice from the FTB resulting in a revenue increase of $19 million in the first year ($2,000 x 9,500 = $19 million). The revenue for fiscal year ending 2009-10 is estimated to total $32 million ($19 million + $13 million).

It is assumed that 50 percent of the $32 million would be collected in fiscal year 2009-2010, reducing revenue to $16 million. The remaining $16 million from fiscal year 2009-10 would be collected in 2010-11, in addition to the $13 million that is assessed annually, for a revenue impact of $29 million ($16 million + $13 million = $29 million) in 2010-11. Thereafter, the annual fiscal impact of $13 million would be collected. Because the revenue from this bill would be from tax liabilities from prior years, the estimates in the table are all accrued back one year.

If you are having an income tax collection problem with the FTB, call a tax attorney: call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 for help.

April 21, 2008

California Taxpayer Advocate

Like the IRS, California's Franchise Tax Board has its own taxpayer advocate. (See my earlier posting on August 27, 2007 entitled "What Has The IRS' Taxpayer Advocate Done Lately?"). It claims that "The Taxpayer Advocate's office is available to provide an independent review of your unresolved tax problems."

Your rights as a California taxpayer are described on the Franchise Tax Board's Advocate's website in English, Spanish, Chinese, Korean and Vietnamese.

There is also a comparison of California law with federal law concerning the taxpayers' bill of rights.

Common California Advocate Responsibilities Include:

Resolve problems when normal channels don’t work

Protect taxpayers’ rights

Determine whether to suspend collections while case is in review

Ensure courteous treatment of the public

Maintain independent status

Identify inequities

Provide independent review

Adhere to agency tax laws

Identify trends and issues

Encourage public suggestions

Propose changes

Promote understandable and simple:

Tax laws

Regulations

Policies

Procedures

Publications

Finally, there is a link to a list of taxpayer advocates in the California Board of Equalization (BOE), Employment Development Department (EDD), Franchise Tax Board (FTB) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

If you continue to have tax problems even when dealing with the taxpayer advocate, call tax attorney Mitchell A. Port for tax help at 310.559.5259.

April 11, 2008

Military Personnel May Qualify For New Tax Rebate

On March 20, 2008, the Internal Revenue Service issued a release which advises U.S. military taxpayers, serving in a designated combat zone, that their nontaxable combat duty pay will qualify as income for purposes of eligibility for the tax rebate payable under the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. The tax rebate is available in either 2008 or 2009.

Service members who would not otherwise file a federal income return, as a result of their nontaxable combat zone income, must now file Form 1040A, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, with the IRS by October 15 in order to receive the economic stimulus payment in 2008.

To receive the rebate, the service member must:

(i) show at least $3,000 in qualifying income (earned income, combat zone pay, Social Security benefits or Veterans Affairs benefits) on their tax return;

(ii) file their 2007 federal income tax return on or before Oct. 15, 2008 (a service members federal income tax filing deadline is extended by 180 days after leaving a combat zone) to receive the tax rebate in 2008; and

(iii) file Form 1040A with the IRS (report the nontaxable combat duty pay on Line 40b of Form 1040A).

April 7, 2008

Release of Lien Or Discharge Of Property

The Internal Revenue Service published final regulations related to the release of a Federal tax lien and discharge of property under sections 6325, 6503, and 7426 of the Internal Revenue Code. These regulations update existing regulations and contain procedures for processing a request made by a property owner for discharge of a Federal tax lien from his property under section 6325(b)(4).

These regulations are effective January 31, 2008 and apply to any release of lien or discharge of property that is requested after January 31, 2008.

Basis for Release of Lien:

1) Liability satisfied or unenforceable.

2) Bond accepted.

3) Certificate of release for a lien which has become legally unenforceable.

4) Satisfaction of tax liability.

5) Proof of full payment.

6) Notice of a Federal tax lien which lists multiple liabilities.

7) Taxpayer requests discharge of specific property from the lien.

If you have tax liens that should be released, call Mitchell A. Port.

April 2, 2008

Frivolous Tax Claims To Avoid

Songwriter and performer Paul Simon sang about the 50 ways to leave your lover. The IRS has identified about another 50 ways to take frivolous tax positions to avoid compliance with the federal tax laws.

Congress passed recent legislation amending the Internal Revenue Code requiring the Treasury Secretary to prescribe, and periodically revise, a list of tax positions identified as frivolous. Notice 2007-30, 2007-14 I.R.B. 883, contained the prescribed list. The list was recently revised to add more positions identified as frivolous.

Frivolous Positions. Positions that are the same as or similar to the following are frivolous:

Continue reading "Frivolous Tax Claims To Avoid" »

March 20, 2008

Tax Scams – The Top Twelve

There is no secret formula that can eliminate a person’s tax obligations. People should be wary of anyone peddling any of these scams. Taxpayers in California anecdotaly seem especially vulnerable. Consult a tax attorney (perhaps in Los Angeles) if you have doubts about an "opportunity" being presented to you.

The Internal Revenue Service issued its 2008 list of the 12 most egregious tax schemes and scams.

Tax schemes can lead to problems for both scam artists and taxpayers. Tax return preparers and promoters also risk significant penalties, interest and possible criminal prosecution.

Avoid these common schemes:

1. Return Preparer Fraud

Dishonest tax return preparers can cause many problems for taxpayers who fall victim to their schemes. These scam artists make their money by skimming a portion of their clients’ refunds and charging inflated fees for return preparation services. They attract new clients by promising large refunds. Some preparers promote the filing of fraudulent claims for refunds on items such as fuel tax credits to recover taxes paid in prior years. Taxpayers should choose carefully when hiring a tax preparer, especially one who promises something that seems too good to be true.

2. Hiding Income Offshore

Individuals continue to try to avoid paying U.S. taxes by illegally hiding income in offshore bank and brokerage accounts or using offshore debit cards, credit cards, wire transfers, foreign trusts, employee leasing schemes, private annuities or life insurance plans. The IRS and the tax agencies of U.S. states and possessions continue to aggressively pursue taxpayers and promoters involved in such abusive transactions.

3. False Claims for Refund and Requests for Abatement

This scam involves a request for abatement of previously assessed tax using Form 843, “Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement.” Many individuals who try this have not previously filed tax returns. The tax they are trying to have abated has been assessed by the IRS through the Substitute for Return Program. The filer uses Form 843 to list reasons for the request. Often, one of the reasons given is "Failed to properly compute and/or calculate Section 83-Property Transferred in Connection with Performance of Service."

4. Misuse of Trusts

For years, unscrupulous promoters have urged taxpayers to transfer assets into trusts. They promise reduction of income subject to tax, deductions for personal expenses and reduced estate or gift taxes. However, some trusts do not deliver the promised tax benefits. As with other arrangements, taxpayers should seek the advice of a trusted professional before entering into a trust.

5. Zero Wages

Filing a phony wage- or income-related information return to replace a legitimate information return has been used as an illegal method to lower the amount of taxes owed. Typically, a Form 4852 (Substitute Form W-2) or a “corrected” Form 1099 is used as a way to improperly reduce taxable income to zero. The taxpayer also may submit a statement rebutting wages and taxes reported by a payer to the IRS. Sometimes fraudsters even include an explanation on their Form 4852 that cites statutory language on the definition of wages or may include some reference to a paying company that refuses to issue a corrected Form W-2 for fear of IRS retaliation. Taxpayers should resist any temptation to participate in any of the variations of this scheme.

6. Frivolous Arguments

Promoters of frivolous schemes encourage people to make unreasonable and unfounded claims to avoid paying the taxes they owe. Most recently, the IRS expanded its list of frivolous legal positions that taxpayers should stay away from. Taxpayers who file a tax return or make a submission based on one of these positions on the list are subject to a $5,000 penalty. The most recent update of the list of frivolous positions includes: misinterpretation of the 9th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution regarding objections to military spending, erroneous claims that taxes are owed only by persons with a fiduciary relationship to the United States, a nonexistent “Mariner’s Tax Deduction” related to invalid deductions for meals and the misuse of the fuel tax credit (see below). The complete list of frivolous arguments is on the IRS Web site at IRS.gov.

7. Disguised Corporate Ownership

Some people are going as far as forming domestic shell corporations in certain states for the purpose of disguising the ownership of a business or financial activity. Once formed, these anonymous entities can be used to facilitate underreporting of income, non-filing of tax returns, engaging in listed transactions, money laundering, financial crimes and even terrorist financing. The IRS is working with state authorities to identify these entities and to bring the owners of these entities into compliance.

8. Abusive Retirement Plans

The IRS continues to uncover abuses in retirement plan arrangements, including Roth Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs). The IRS is looking for transactions that taxpayers are using to avoid the limitations on contributions to Roth IRAs. Taxpayers should be wary of advisers who encourage them to shift appreciated assets into Roth IRAs or companies owned by their Roth IRAs at less than fair market value. In one variation of the scheme, a promoter has the taxpayer move a highly appreciated asset into a Roth IRA at cost value, which is below annual contribution limits even though the fair market value far exceeds the amount allowed.

9. Scams Related to the Economic Stimulus Payment

Some scam artists are trying to trick individuals into revealing personal financial information that can be used to access their financial accounts by making promises relating to the economic stimulus payment, often called a “rebate.” To obtain the payment, eligible individuals in most cases will not have to do anything more than file a 2007 federal tax return. But some criminals posing as IRS representatives are trying to trick taxpayers into revealing their personal financial information by falsely telling them they must provide information to get a payment. For instance, a potential victim is told by phone or e-mail that he or she is eligible for a rebate but must provide a bank account number (or similar information) to get the payment. If the target is unwilling, the victim is then told that he cannot receive the rebate unless the information is provided. Individuals should remember that the only way to get a stimulus payment is to file a 2007 tax return. The IRS urges taxpayers to be extra-vigilant. The IRS will not contact taxpayers by phone or e-mail about their stimulus payment.

10. Abuse of Charitable Organizations and Deductions

The IRS continues to observe the misuse of tax-exempt organizations. Misuse includes arrangements to improperly shield income or assets from taxation, attempts by donors to maintain control over donated assets or income from donated property and overvaluation of contributed property. In addition, IRS examiners are seeing an upturn in instances where taxpayers try to disguise private tuition payments as contributions to charitable or religious organizations.

11. Phishing

Phishing is a tactic used by Internet-based thieves to trick unsuspecting victims into revealing personal information they can then use to access the victims’ financial accounts. These criminals use the information obtained to empty the victims’ bank accounts, run up credit card charges and apply for loans or credit in the victims’ names. Phishing scams often take the form of an e-mail that appears to come from a legitimate source. Some scam e-mails falsely claim to come from the IRS. To date, taxpayers have forwarded more than 33,000 of these scam e-mails, reflecting more than 1,500 different schemes, to the IRS. The IRS never uses e-mail to contact taxpayers about their tax issues. Taxpayers who receive unsolicited e-mail that claims to be from the IRS can forward the message to a special electronic mailbox, phishing@irs.gov, using instructions contained in an article titled “How to Protect Yourself from Suspicious E-Mails or Phishing Schemes.” Remember: the only official IRS Web site is located at www.irs.gov.

12. Fuel Tax Credit Scams

The IRS is receiving claims for the fuel tax credit that are unreasonable. Some taxpayers, such as farmers who use fuel for off-highway business purposes, may be eligible for the fuel tax credit. But some individuals are claiming the tax credit for nontaxable uses of fuel when their occupation or income level makes the claim unreasonable. Fraud involving the fuel tax credit was recently added to the list of frivolous tax claims, potentially subjecting those who improperly claim the credit to a $5,000 penalty.

For tax and legal advice from a former IRS attorney now working throughout Southern California, particularly in Los Angeles County, Orange County, Santa Barbara County and Ventura County, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

March 17, 2008

The Tax Collection Manual

IRS tax issues can be the bane of our existence. The tax office of your local income tax preparer is often the best place to find relief. If you wish to learn as much as you can from authoritative tax collection sources, look at the IRS’ own publications. One such tax collection source is the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) published by the federal government. How the government may go about resolving your tax problems is explained in the Manual. The IRM contain the policies, procedures, instructions, guidelines, and delegations of authority which direct the operation and administration of the Internal Revenue Service’s tax collection arm. Topics include tax administration, personnel and office management, and others. Below is a list of the topics covered in “Part Five Collecting Process”:

5.1 General Collecting Procedures

5.2 Reports

5.3 Entity Case Management System (ENTITY)

5.4 Case Processing

5.5 Insolvencies, Decedents Estates and Estate Taxes

5.6 Collateral Agreements

5.7 Trust Fund Compliance

5.8 Offer in Compromise

5.9 Bankruptcy

5.10 Seizure and Sale

5.11 Notice of Levy

5.12 Federal Tax Liens

5.13 Collection Quality Measurement

5.14 Installment Agreements

5.15 Financial Analysis

5.16 Currently Not Collectible

5.17 Legal Reference Guide for Revenue Officers

5.18 Liability Determination

5.19 Liability Collection

5.20 Abusive Tax Avoidance Transactions

Tax help is available from a qualified tax attorney in Los Angeles, California. Call Mitchell A. Port, Esq. at 310.559.5259 to discuss your tax problems.

March 10, 2008

How To Report Tax Cheats Or Fight Back

Has your ex-spouse or former employee turned you in? Are you the victim of a false claim?

The Internal Revenue Service has a Whistleblower Office – it even has a director for it: he is Stephen Whitlock. Recently, the IRS outlined ways informants can report violations of the tax law and possibly claim a reward based on the amount of additional tax, penalties and interest that is owed.

If you earn a reward, you have to pay your own income tax on it. All awards will be subject to normal tax reporting and withholding requirements.

To be eligible for an award under the new procedures, the tax, penalties, interest, additions to tax, and additional amounts in dispute must exceed $2 million for any taxable year and, if the taxpayer is an individual, the individual’s gross income must exceed $200,000 for any taxable year in question.

The Whistleblower Office was created about a year ago, December. To make a claim, an informant must file new Form 211, Application for Award for Original Information, which asks informants for an explanation of how the informant obtained the information, to provide an estimate of the tax owed and the facts in the case.

The IRS’ Whistleblower Office will make the final determination about whether an award will be paid and the amount of the award for claims that it processes. Awards will be paid in proportion to the value of information furnished voluntarily with respect to proceeds collected.

Under the new procedures, the amount of award will be at least 15%, but no more than 30%, of the collected proceeds in cases in which the IRS determines that the information submitted by the informant substantially contributed to the collection of tax. The award percentage may be reduced in some circumstances, which are described in IRS guidance.

Has your ex-spouse or former employee turned you in? Are you the victim of a false claim? Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259 for tax help.

March 7, 2008

IRS Publications And Forms

The Internal Revenue Service has many forms and free publications on a wide variety of topics to help you understand and meet tax obligations, reporting and filing requirements. If you need IRS materials try one of these ways:

Walk-in: During the tax-filing season, many libraries and post offices offer free tax forms. Some libraries also have copies of commonly-requested publications. Braille materials may also be available. Many large grocery stores, copy centers, and office supply stores have forms you can photocopy or print from a CD.

Internet: You can access forms and publications on the IRS website 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at IRS.gov.

Mail: Send your order for tax forms and publications to National Distribution Center, P.O. Box 8903, Bloomington, IL 61702-8903. You should receive your products within 10 days after we receive your order.

Phone: Call 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676) to order current year forms, instructions and publications and prior year forms and instructions. You should receive your order within 10 days.

Try these links:

Publication 2053A, Quick and Easy Access to IRS Tax Help and Forms (PDF 40K)

Publication 910, Guide to Free Tax Services (PDF 636K)

Need other tax help? Have other tax problems you wish to discuss with a California tax attorney? Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

February 20, 2008

Offer In Compromise

The IRS has a full discussion of offers in compromise on its website. Click here for the full article. Here is what the article says:

An offer in compromise (OIC) is an agreement between a taxpayer and the Internal Revenue Service that settles the taxpayer's tax liabilities for less than the full amount owed. If the liabilities can be fully paid through an installment agreement or other means, the taxpayer will in most cases not be eligible for an OIC. For information concerning installment agreements, refer to Topic 202.

In most cases, the IRS will not accept an offer unless the amount offered by the taxpayer is equal to or greater than the reasonable collection potential (the RCP). The RCP is how the IRS measures the taxpayer's ability to pay. The RCP includes the value that can be realized from the taxpayer's assets, such as real property, automobiles, bank accounts, and other property. In addition to property, the RCP also includes anticipated future income, less certain amounts allowed for basic living expenses.

The IRS may accept an OIC based on three grounds. First, acceptance is permitted if there is doubt as to liability. This ground is only met when genuine doubt exists that the IRS has correctly determined the amount owed. Second, acceptance is permitted if there is doubt that the amount owed is collectible. This means that doubt exists that the taxpayer could ever pay the full amount owed. Third, acceptance is permitted based on effective tax administration. An offer may be accepted based on effective tax administration when there is no doubt that the liabilities have been correctly determined and no doubt that the full amount owed can be collected, but requiring payment in full would either create an economic hardship or would be unfair and inequitable because of exceptional circumstances.

When submitting an OIC, taxpayers must....

Continue reading "Offer In Compromise" »

February 13, 2008

FTB Publicizes Names Of Delinquent Taxpayers

Is your name on the list? Keep it off!

The California Franchise Tax Board is going after taxpayers who owe about $200,000 up to almost $27 million in back income taxes by listing their names and debts on the agency's website. California Revenue & Taxation Code Section 19195 directs the Franchise Tax Board to publish an annual list of the top 250 taxpayers with liened state income tax delinquencies greater than $100,000.

Of California's roughly 20 million taxpayers, about 250 owe huge debts. Before the FTB publishes the list, each taxpayer who may potentially be on the list gets a letter which provides them an opportunity to voluntarily settle their liability.

The notification letters, titled Notice of Public Disclosure, provide taxpayers 30 days to pay their debts or obtain FTB approval to make installment payments, pay the liability in full, enter into an Offer in Compromise, or substantiate a bankruptcy filing.

The California State Board of Equalization is also required by law to post similar information concerning back sales and use taxes every quarter, removing amounts that are being addressed through bankruptcy, payment arrangement, appeal or litigation.

Get tax help now! Call Mitchell A. Port, a California tax attorney experienced in resolving tax problems.

February 11, 2008

Time To Choose A Tax Return Preparer - Some Advice

While most tax return preparers are professional and honest, you can use the following tips to choose a preparer who will offer the best service for your tax preparation needs.

If you choose to use a paid tax preparer, it is important that you find a qualified tax professional. Taxpayers are ultimately responsible for everything on their return even when it’s prepared by someone else.

The most reputable preparers will request to see your records and receipts and will ask you multiple questions to determine your total income and your qualifications for expenses, deductions, and other items. By doing so, they have your best interest in mind and are trying to help you avoid penalties, interest, or additional taxes that could result from later IRS contacts.

Get References. Ask questions and get references from clients who have used the tax professional before. Were they satisfied with the service received?

Plan Ahead. Choose a preparer you will be able to contact after the return is filed and one who will be responsive to your needs.

Ask about service fees. Avoid preparers who claim they can obtain larger refunds than other preparers, or those who guarantee a refund or base fees on a percentage of the amount of the refund.

Research. Check to see if the preparer has any questionable history with the Better Business Bureau, the state’s board of accountancy for CPAs or the state’s bar association for attorneys. Find out if the preparer belongs to a professional organization that requires its members to pursue continuing education and also holds them accountable to a code of ethics.

Determine if the preparer’s credentials meet your needs. Does your state have licensing or registration requirements for paid preparers? Is he or she an Enrolled Agent, Certified Public Accountant, or Attorney? If so, the preparer can represent taxpayers before the IRS on all matters – including audits, collections, and appeals. Other return preparers can represent taxpayers only in audits regarding a return signed as a preparer.

Want a referral to a qualified tax return preparer from a California tax attorney? Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.