August 31, 2010

Do You Owe More Than $100,000 In Tax?

Often, before your tax problem is assigned to a revenue officer for collection “in the field”, tax collection is handled by a branch of the Internal Revenue Service called “ACS” (Automatic Collection Service). This is where the computer generated notices come from. ACS has developed this check sheet to help expedite the resolution on accounts in the Large Dollar Unit of ACS. The check sheet is for those accounts with a balance due of $100,000 or more.

To expedite the resolution on accounts in the Large Dollar Unit, please have the following information available when contacting ACS.

• Valid Power of Attorney (Form 2848) covering all tax periods
• Explain in detail why the taxpayer is not able to full pay or borrow to full pay
• Completed Collection Information Statement (Form 433- A, B or F)
• Number of individual’s living in the house hold
• Value of 401K/Retirement
• Copies of delinquent tax returns and /or ASFR returns
• Rental income
• Spouse’s income and source with name/address/phone number
• Three months of current bank statements (all accounts)
• Investment income
• Year make of vehicles, value, equity, balance owed, and monthly payments
• Employer’s information including work number
• Secured loan(s) - amount of loan and remaining balance(s)
• Life insurance policies, (whole or term), any borrowing ability? And/or value of policy
• Profit and Loss statements for self-employed taxpayers
• Three months of current pay stubs for both the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s wife
• Out-of-pocket medical expenses
• Commission statement
• Value of all property and/or available equity
• Substantiation of Court ordered payments
• Substantiation of payments being made
• Pension income and/or Social Security income

For additional help, call a tax attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

August 18, 2010

Online Payment Agreement

You don't need a tax lawyer if you owe the federal government (IRS) $25,000 or less in income tax, penalties and interest. Instead, you can access an online payment agreement.

For tax debts larger than $25,000, speak with a qualified tax attorney about your options. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

July 23, 2010

Received A Notice From The IRS?

The IRS has a video on YouTube covering receipt of a notice in the mail. It's short but worthwhile. Click here.

Have you received a notice? Call a tax attorney about solutions to your tax problem. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

July 21, 2010

Kinder And Gentler IRS: Understanding Your Notice

If you receive a letter or notice from the IRS, it will explain the reason for the correspondence and provide instructions. The notice you receive covers a very specific issue about your account or tax return. Generally, the IRS will send a notice if it believes you are due a larger refund, owe additional tax, there is a need for additional information or if there is a question about your tax return.

Redesigned notices are now being sent to us as taxpayers. Don't panic: instead, call a tax attorney. Call (310) 559-5259.

The redesigned notices cover these topics:

Balance Due

Additional Child Tax Credit

Refund

Overpayment

Direct Deposits

Tax Exemptions

Filing Requirements. You may no longer need to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax.

Filing Requirements. You may no longer need to file Form 941 and Form 940.

Payment Process

Filing Requirements. You may no longer owe excise tax.

July 8, 2010

Do You Have A Tax Dispute?

Do you have a tax dispute? If you are a California resident, you probably do. But since the IRS reaches across the world in its efforts to collect a tax debt, anyone anywhere can have a tax problem.

If so, then you need to determine if Appeals is right for you.

Appeals is the place for you if:

You received an IRS correspondence explaining you have the right to come to Appeals to dispute an IRS decision.

AND

You do not agree and are not signing an agreement form sent to you.

If you meet the above qualifiers listed above then you may be ready to request an Appeals conference or hearing.

If you've received an IRS correspondence and already know your case qualifies to be reviewed with Appeals then you should go to the Appeals homepage to determine your next steps.

You are ready to request an Appeals conference or hearing if you can explain why you disagree. If you believe the facts used by the IRS are incorrect, then you should have records or other support available to back up your position.

Appeals is not for you if:

Your only concern is that you cannot afford to pay the amount you owe.
The correspondence you received from the IRS was a bill and there was no mention of Appeals.

If you cannot identify the requirements, or if you do not meet the conditions for coming to Appeals as explained above, contact a qualified tax attorney for help. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

June 11, 2010

IRS Summons

In general, the IRS issues summonses only when the taxpayer (or other witness) will not voluntarily produce the information or other records. When a taxpayer or third person is willing to testify and produce documents voluntarily, a summons may not be required. With limited exceptions, the IRS has the power to issue an IRS summons without court approval. The Service should only issue a summons when it is prepared to seek judicial enforcement if the summoned party fails to fully comply.

The IRS typically asks that taxpayers provide information to the IRS. These IRS requests usually involve an "information document request." The IRS summons is the primary means for enforcing these information requests.

Internal Revenue Code Section 7602 provides the Service with summons authority.

Once served, the taxpayer must act to comply with the IRS summons or act to quash the summons. If the taxpayer fails to act, the IRS will seek to have a court enforce the IRS summons. If the taxpayer fails to act after a court has ordered enforcement, the court can and does impose sanctions on the taxpayer.

The summons does not require the witness to do anything other than appear on a given date to give testimony or produce existing books, papers and records or both. A summons cannot require a witness to prepare or create documents, including tax returns, that do not currently exist.

If the IRS issues an IRS summons, it is imperative that the taxpayer immediately contact an experienced tax attorney.

June 7, 2010

Bankruptcy And Your Taxes

Some tax liabilities are dischargeable in bankruptcy.

Usually older federal income tax debts are dischargeable in bankruptcy. The tax must be more than three years old. The tax return which reported the tax debt must have been filed with the Internal Revenue Service and if it was filed, then it must have been filed more than 240 days before filing the bankruptcy petition.

Some tax penalties may also be discharged in bankruptcy and you may be able to halt the accrual of interest during the bankruptcy proceeding. If the tax debt and penalties are not dischargeable in bankruptcy then it is still possible that the tax debt and penalties can be restructured in bankruptcy.

Many tax experts believe that unpaid payroll tax which has been converted into a personal liability of the responsible person who willfully failed to pay the tax is not dischargeable in bankruptcy.

In addition to being able to discharge federal income taxes in bankruptcy, filing a bankruptcy petition may stop the IRS’s collections activities. Therefore, bankruptcy may be an option to prevent the IRS from levying on bank accounts, wages or other assets.

If your tax debt is dischargeable in bankruptcy, it may be possible that the threat of filing bankruptcy can persuade the IRS to settle your debt on more favorable terms for you.

But there are disadvantages to filing bankruptcy. For instance, IRS liens may survive the bankruptcy process and to the extent that the tax debt is not discharged in bankruptcy, the IRS may view you (who now has fewer debts) as being in a better position to pay the IRS.

Call an experienced tax attorney to help you determine if bankruptcy is an option for resolving your tax debt.

June 3, 2010

Tax Deduction For Alimony Payments

As high as the divorce rate in California is, the tax rules regarding alimony payments become increasingly important. Not following the tax law may result in the IRS assessing significant taxes, penalties and interest. Preventing or solving this tax problem can easily be done with the proper advice from your tax lawyer.

Alimony payments may be included in gross income to the payee spouse and tax deductible by the payor spouse. If under federal tax law the payments do not qualify as alimony, the payments may be excluded from gross income of the payee spouse and may not be tax deductible by the payor spouse.

Recharacterizing alimony payments is very common for the IRS on audit. For the payor spouse, this may result in the IRS disallowing tax deductions for the alimony payments. For payee spouse, this may result in the IRS finding that the spouse failed to report alimony income.

These problems are avoidedable with proper tax planning. Separating and divorcing spouses can recognize significant federal income tax savings when aware of what payments do not qualify as alimony. Generally, payments do not qualify as alimony for purposes of federal tax law if:

• the spouses are members of the same household at the time the payments are made,

• the divorce decree or separation agreement designates the payments as non-alimony,

• the payments are not made pursuant to a divorce decree or separation agreement,

• the spouses are married and file a joint tax return (married couples who file a joint tax return may qualify for innocent spouse relief),

• the payments are child support,

• the payments consist of property rather than money,

• the payments are for the payee spouse’s bills (such as mortgage payments and real estate taxes),

• the payments call for significantly larger payments in the first three years following separation or divorce, and

• there is an obligation to continue the payments after the death of the payee spouse (either in the decree or agreement or in state law).

Divorce decrees or separation agreements should be written in a way that addresses these rules. As with other major financial transactions, taxpayers should consult with their tax attorney if they have any doubt about the taxation of their alimony or other payments.

May 31, 2010

Franchise Tax Board "Practice and Procedures"

Want to know the California's collection procedures are for delinquent taxes? Check out the "Collection Procedures Manual" here. Here is a list of topics in the Manual:

Introduction Section

Responsibility Section

Case Administration Section

Case Processing Section

Debtor Asset Location Section

Voluntary Case Resolution Section

Involuntary Case Resolution Section

Case Servicing Section

Special Processes Section

Glossary

Are you being audited by the California Franchise Tax Board? Here is the audit manual so you don't have to be surprised by what happen.

Is your partnership being audited? Read the partnership manual.

S corporations are an easy target for revenue collection. What is the Franchise Tax Board's approach to the audit? Here is the S corporation manual.

Want additional help from a tax attorney? Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

May 24, 2010

Report Tax Fraud In California

If you believe an individual or company is not complying with California's personal income tax or corporate income and franchise tax laws, you can report that information to Franchise Tax Board (FTB). No rewards are offered for reporting this information.

Income tax fraud is intentionally paying less tax than you owe.

Examples of income tax fraud are:

Not filing state income tax returns.

Preparing documents, books, and records that understate the true income or overstate the expenses of a business.

Making false or fraudulent claims for refunds.

Questionable tax practitioner practices.

Failing to report all income received.

Opening and closing of new businesses to evade taxes.

Claiming to be a resident of another state while residing in California.

Reporting Income Tax Fraud

1. What type of information should I provide when reporting a possible fraudulent activity?
Please include the following details if available:

Individual/business name

Individual/business address

Marital status

Spouse's name

Alleged tax violation

How you became aware of the alleged violation

Availability of supporting documents

Asset information (vehicles, property, etc.)

Your contact information (optional)

2. If FTB uses the information I provide to collect more taxes, will I receive a reward?
No. FTB does not pay rewards for informant information.

3. After I provide information to FTB, can I receive updates on the investigation?
No. Privacy and disclosure laws prohibit FTB from sharing information whether action is taken or not.

4. How do I modify information on a report I previously submitted?
If you need to provide additional information or wish to correct previous information, submit another report. On the second report, select the "Additional Information" box at the beginning of the report, and enter your referral number or the name of the person or business you reported.

5. Can the person I am reporting find out my identity?
No. We treat any information you provide as confidential unless compelled by law to do otherwise.

6. How do I know if you received my online referral report?
If your submission is successful, you will receive a confirmation window with a reference number. Keep the number or print the confirmation page.

7. Where do I send supporting documents?

Mail:
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
PO BOX 1565
RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95741

Fax: 916.843.2060

May 7, 2010

Get Help To Solve Your Tax Problems

The IRS provides information on recent tax changes as they impact the following areas:

Businesses
Disaster Areas
Estates and Trusts
Exempt Organizations
Foreign Issues
Individuals
IRAs and Other Retirement Plans

Other tax topics are below.

The IRS provides information broken down by most popular categories. Those categories are at: Frequently Asked Question Categories

IRS Procedures
Filing Requirements/Status/Dependents/Exemptions
Itemized Deductions/Standard Deductions
Interest/Dividends/Other Types of Income
Pensions/Annuities/Retirement Plans (i.e., 401(k), etc.)
Social Security Income
Child Care Credit/Other Credits
Earned Income Tax Credit
Estimated Tax
Capital Gains, Losses/Sale of Home
Sale or Trade of Business, Depreciation, Rentals
Small Business/Self-Employed/Other Business
Aliens and U.S. Citizens Living Abroad
Electronic Filing (e-file)
Magnetic Media Filers
Other (Alternative Minimum Tax, Estates, Trusts, Tax Shelters, State Tax Inquiries)
Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs)

Finally, the IRS assembled its most frequently asked tax questions in one easy location. Top Frequently Asked Questions

What are the tax changes for this year?
Is there an age limit on claiming my children as dependents?
How much does an unmarried dependent student have to make before he or she has to file an income tax return?
If I claim my daughter as a dependent because she is a full-time college student, can she claim herself as a dependent when she files her return?
Can I receive a tax refund if I am currently in a payment plan for prior year's federal taxes?
For head of household filing status, do you have to claim a child as a dependent to qualify?
What is the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009?
What should I do if I made a mistake on my federal return that I have already filed?
What is a split refund?
How do I know if I have to file quarterly individual estimated tax payments?

Continue reading "Get Help To Solve Your Tax Problems" »

April 26, 2010

Family Fights $61 Million IRS Tax Bill

First the family of Norman F. Levy, the late New York City real estate tycoon, was swindled out of hundreds of millions of dollars by close friend Bernard L. Madoff, forcing the closing of two Levy charities. Then Levy heirs coughed up $220 million to the Madoff bankruptcy trustee to repay personal withdrawals made before Madoff's Ponzi fraud collapsed in 2008.

Now, adding insult to injury, the unlucky clan is fighting a $61 million estate tax bill from the Internal Revenue Service.

The whole story is reported in Forbes.com in an article published April 21, 2010

April 23, 2010

"Geithner Defense" Rejected By Tax Court

This past Monday, the Tax Court held that blaming TurboTax for errors on a return did not excuse the taxpayer from penalties. Lam v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2010-82 (Apr. 19, 2010).

Misuse of TurboTax, even if unintentional or accidental, is not a defense to the Internal Revenue Service imposing penalties. You must still show a reasonable cause for the underpayment of taxes to avoid penalties.

Need help with finding an accountant to prepare your tax return so you can avoid penalties if you are nervous about using software to prepare taxes, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259 for a referral. If you want your tax problem fixed, call Mitchell A. Port.

April 16, 2010

Even The Rich And Famous Can Have Tax Trouble

The Detroit News online at detnews.com under it's "Tax Watchdog" headline posts story after story about celebrity tax troubles. Those with tax problems - according to the article - include Corey Feldman, Faith Evans, Mel Blount, Emanuel Steward, Jesse James, Anjelica Huston, Ving Rhames and Dwight Yoakam.

Don't ignore your tax problems. Speak with an experienced tax attorney about a solution. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

April 14, 2010

Internal Revenue Code At Your Fingertips

A new app is available for your iPhone which provides access to the Internal Revenue Code and Federal Regulations.

Here is what LawToGo says about its app:

Updated periodically.

Searchable: You can search using keywords or terms plus you can create boolean expressions using "AND" or "OR". You can even specify a "hit" only if a word or term is within x number of words of another word or term. See the help screen in the search tab.

Comprehensive: Always and instantly have a law book at your finger tips.

Fast: Uses a fast and easy navigation format that allows users to go from general to specific in seconds.

Light: Stop lugging around books to meetings.

Reliable: No internet connection needed. The apps work in a concrete basement as well as in a 40th floor conference room because the data is stored right in your iPhone.

Landscape mode: Tilt your iPhone to adjust your view to see a law section in an easy to read landscape format.

Disclaimer: my blog does not endorse this or any other product but merely presents it for informational purposes only.

April 8, 2010

What The IRS Won't Seize Or Sell

Internal Revenue Code § 6334 discusses property exempt from an IRS levy. Here's a list:

There shall be exempt from levy—

(1) Wearing apparel and school books
Such items of wearing apparel and such school books as are necessary for the taxpayer or for members of his family;

(2) Fuel, provisions, furniture, and personal effects
So much of the fuel, provisions, furniture, and personal effects in the taxpayer’s household, and of the arms for personal use, livestock, and poultry of the taxpayer, as does not exceed $6,250 in value;

(3) Books and tools of a trade, business, or profession
So many of the books and tools necessary for the trade, business, or profession of the taxpayer as do not exceed in the aggregate $3,125 in value.

(4) Unemployment benefits
Any amount payable to an individual with respect to his unemployment (including any portion thereof payable with respect to dependents) under an unemployment compensation law of the United States, of any State, or of the District of Columbia or of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

(5) Undelivered mail
Mail, addressed to any person, which has not been delivered to the addressee.

(6) Certain annuity and pension payments
Annuity or pension payments under the Railroad Retirement Act, benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, special pension payments received by a person whose name has been entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor roll (38 U.S.C. 1562), and annuities based on retired or retainer pay under chapter 73 of title 10 of the United States Code.

(7) Workmen’s compensation
Any amount payable to an individual as workmen’s compensation (including any portion thereof payable with respect to dependents) under a workmen’s compensation law of the United States, any State, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

(8) Judgments for support of minor children
If the taxpayer is required by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, entered prior to the date of levy, to contribute to the support of his minor children, so much of his salary, wages, or other income as is necessary to comply with such judgment.

(9) Minimum exemption for wages, salary, and other income
Any amount payable to or received by an individual as wages or salary for personal services, or as income derived from other sources, during any period, to the extent that the total of such amounts payable to or received by him during such period does not exceed the applicable exempt amount determined under subsection (d).

(10) Certain service-connected disability payments
Any amount payable to an individual as a service-connected (within the meaning of section 101 (16) of title 38, United States Code) disability benefit under—
(A) subchapter II, III, IV, V,,[1] or VI of chapter 11 of such title 38, or
(B) chapter 13, 21, 23, 31, 32, 34, 35, 37, or 39 of such title 38.

(11) Certain public assistance payments
Any amount payable to an individual as a recipient of public assistance under—
(A) title IV or title XVI (relating to supplemental security income for the aged, blind, and disabled) of the Social Security Act, or
(B) State or local government public assistance or public welfare programs for which eligibility is determined by a needs or income test.

(12) Assistance under Job Training Partnership Act
Any amount payable to a participant under the Job Training Partnership Act (29 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) from funds appropriated pursuant to such Act.

(13) Residences exempt in small deficiency cases and principal residences and certain business assets exempt in absence of certain approval or jeopardy
(A) Residences in small deficiency cases
If the amount of the levy does not exceed $5,000—
(i) any real property used as a residence by the taxpayer; or
(ii) any real property of the taxpayer (other than real property which is rented) used by any other individual as a residence.

(B) Principal residences and certain business assets
Except to the extent provided in subsection (e)—
(i) the principal residence of the taxpayer (within the meaning of section 121); and
(ii) tangible personal property or real property (other than real property which is rented) used in the trade or business of an individual taxpayer.

(b) Appraisal
The officer seizing property of the type described in subsection (a) shall appraise and set aside to the owner the amount of such property declared to be exempt. If the taxpayer objects at the time of the seizure to the valuation fixed by the officer making the seizure, the Secretary shall summon three disinterested individuals who shall make the valuation.

(c) No other property exempt
Notwithstanding any other law of the United States (including section 207 of the Social Security Act), no property or rights to property shall be exempt from levy other than the property specifically made exempt by subsection (a).

(d) Exempt amount of wages, salary, or other income

(1) Individuals on weekly basis
In the case of an individual who is paid or receives all of his wages, salary, and other income on a weekly basis, the amount of the wages, salary, and other income payable to or received by him during any week which is exempt from levy under subsection (a)(9) shall be the exempt amount.

(2) Exempt amount
For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “exempt amount” means an amount equal to—
(A) the sum of—
(i) the standard deduction, and
(ii) the aggregate amount of the deductions for personal exemptions allowed the taxpayer under section 151 in the taxable year in which such levy occurs, divided by
(B) 52.

Unless the taxpayer submits to the Secretary a written and properly verified statement specifying the facts necessary to determine the proper amount under subparagraph (A), subparagraph (A) shall be applied as if the taxpayer were a married individual filing a separate return with only 1 personal exemption.

(3) Individuals on basis other than weekly
In the case of any individual not described in paragraph (1), the amount of the wages, salary, and other income payable to or received by him during any applicable pay period or other fiscal period (as determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary) which is exempt from levy under subsection (a)(9) shall be an amount (determined under such regulations) which as nearly as possible will result in the same total exemption from levy for such individual over a period of time as he would have under paragraph (1) if (during such period of time) he were paid or received such wages, salary, and other income on a regular weekly basis.

(e) Levy allowed on principal residences and certain business assets in certain circumstances
(1) Principal residences

(A) Approval required
A principal residence shall not be exempt from levy if a judge or magistrate of a district court of the United States approves (in writing) the levy of such residence.

(B) Jurisdiction
The district courts of the United States shall have exclusive jurisdiction to approve a levy under subparagraph (A).

(2) Certain business assets
Property (other than a principal residence) described in subsection (a)(13)(B) shall not be exempt from levy if—

(A) a district director or assistant district director of the Internal Revenue Service personally approves (in writing) the levy of such property; or

(B) the Secretary finds that the collection of tax is in jeopardy.
An official may not approve a levy under subparagraph (A) unless the official determines that the taxpayer’s other assets subject to collection are insufficient to pay the amount due, together with expenses of the proceedings.

Consult with a tax attorney immediately. Call Mitchell A. Port and get help with your tax problem.

April 6, 2010

Checklist For Closing A Business

When closing a California business, you must file the final employment tax returns in addition to making final federal tax deposits of these taxes if you have employees. You must also file an annual tax return for the year you go out of business and attach a statement to your return showing the name of the person keeping the payroll records and the address where those records will be kept.

The annual tax return for an S corporation, corporation, partnership, limited liability company or trust includes check boxes near the top front page just below the entity information. For the tax year in which your business no longer exists, check the box that indicates this tax return is a final return. If there are Schedule K-1s, repeat the same procedure on the Schedule K-1.

You will also need to file returns reporting the exchange of like-kind property, reporting the disposition of business property and/or changing the form of your business.

Depending on your type of business structure you have, below is a list of common actions to take when closing your business:

Checklist

• Issue payment information to sub-contractors.
• Report information from 1099s issued.
• Report the sale or exchange of property used in your trade or business.
• File final employee pension/benefit plan.
• Issue final wage and withholding information to employees
• Report information from W-2s issued.
• File final tip income and allocated tips information return.
• Report capital gains or losses.
• Report partner's/shareholder's shares.
• Consider allowing S corporation election to terminate.
• Report business asset sales.
• Make final federal tax deposits
• File final quarterly or annual employment tax form.
• Report corporate dissolution or liquidation.

References/Related Topics

Closing a Business
Canceling an EIN – Closing Your Account
• Contact state and local agencies because there may be requirements relating to state and local governments as well.
• The SBA also provides advice on closing a business.

April 1, 2010

Employment Taxes

The obligation for a California business to pay taxes is fully clarified and easily understood on the IRS website. Steering clear of tax problems is a little easier when paying taxes is explained. However, sometimes tax controversies still happen after falling behind and the IRS wants all the back taxes paid.

Business tax topics are at the IRS website and cover the following:

Federal Income Tax and Social Security and Medicare Taxes

Independent Contractor (Self-Employed) or Employee?

Depositing Employment Taxes

Preparing and Filing Form W-2

Federal Unemployment (FUTA) Tax

Self-Employment Tax

Reporting Employment Taxes

Correcting/Adjusting Employment Taxes

e-file for Business and Self-Employed Taxpayers

Outsourcing Payroll Duties

Certain Taxpayers May Now File Their Employment Taxes Annually

Combined Annual Wage Reporting (CAWR)

References/Related Topics

• Businesses with Employees
• Employment Tax Forms
• Employment Tax Publications
• Obtaining Blank Federal Tax Deposit Coupons
• Virtual Small Business Tax Workshop, Lesson 9 - What you need to know about Federal Unemployment Taxes (FUTA)
• SSN Verification
• Tax Calendar for Small Businesses and Self-Employed
• Unemployment Insurance (UI) Taxes
• W-2 Online. Create, save, print, and submit Forms W-2 and W-2c online.
• Wage Reporting

Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 to help fix your tax problems.

March 30, 2010

Power Of Attorney And The IRS

There is an IRS publication which discusses who can represent you before the IRS and what forms or documents - like powers of attorney - are used to authorize a person to do that. Usually, attorneys, certified public accountants (CPAs), enrolled agents, and enrolled actuaries can represent taxpayers before the IRS. Under special circumstances, other individuals, including unenrolled return preparers, can represent you. To learn more, read Publication 947 on the IRS website. To speak with a qualified tax lawyer about this and other tax problems and tax solutions, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

March 15, 2010

I Got A Notice From The IRS: Now What?

1. Many of these letters can be dealt with simply and painlessly. Do not panic.

2. It’s important that you keep copies of any correspondence with your records.

3. Most correspondence can be handled without calling or visiting an IRS office. However, if you have questions, call the telephone number in the upper right-hand corner of the notice. Have a copy of your tax return and the correspondence available when you call to help us respond to your inquiry.

4. Each letter and notice offers specific instructions on what you are asked to do to satisfy the inquiry.

5. There are number of reasons the IRS sends notices to taxpayers. The notice may request payment of taxes, notify you of a change to your account or request additional information. The notice you receive normally covers a very specific issue about your account or tax return.

6. If you receive a correction notice, you should review the correspondence and compare it with the information on your return.

7. If you do not agree with the correction the IRS made, it is important that you respond as requested. Write to explain why you disagree. Include any documents and information you wish the IRS to consider, along with the bottom tear-off portion of the notice. Mail the information to the IRS address shown in the upper left-hand corner of the notice. Allow at least 30 days for a response.

8. If you agree with the correction to your account, usually no reply is necessary unless a payment is due.

9. Call a tax attorney for help. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

March 4, 2010

Federal Tax Liens Are A Serious Problem

The “National Taxpayer Advocate” 2009 Annual Report to Congress in part discusses the notice of federal tax lien (NFTL). The Report said that on average, a lien filing reduces a taxpayer’s credit score by 100 points. Unpaid tax liens may remain on a taxpayer’s credit history, leaving a derogatory mark on the credit history indefinitely. Released liens, including those paid off by the taxpayer, are not generally removed from the credit history until seven years from the date of release. Thus, an NFTL has a significant long-term impact on a taxpayer’s credit record. As a result, some lenders decline to extend credit to a taxpayer if the IRS has filed an NFTL against the taxpayer’s property. Others will charge substantially higher rates, even if the lien is subordinated. Impaired credit history can also affect a taxpayer’s ability to obtain insurance or rent an apartment on reasonable terms. Moreover, some licensing boards require members to maintain a clean credit history and some employers require employees to do so as a condition of employment. Thus, a lien filing can mean that employees lose their jobs and self-employed individuals cannot maintain the licensing necessary to remain in business. It can also hamper the taxpayer’s ability to stay compliant and obtain credit needed to pay preexisting tax debts.

Properly applied, the notice of federal tax lien (NFTL) can be an effective tool in tax collection. It gives the IRS a priority interest in the taxpayer’s property, such as a home or a car, and may enable the IRS to collect all or a portion of the tax debt if the taxpayer sells or refinances the property.

If improperly applied, however, tax liens have the potential to cause needless harm to taxpayers and undermine long-term tax collection.

If improperly applied, however, tax liens have the potential to cause needless harm to taxpayers and undermine long-term tax collection. Assume, for example, that a taxpayer loses his job during a recession and becomes unable to pay his tax bill. The filing of a tax lien can significantly harm the taxpayer’s credit and thus negatively affect his or her ability to obtain financing, find or retain a job, secure affordable housing or insurance, and ultimately pay the outstanding tax debt. Moreover, the government must consider that its role as a creditor is different from that of a private entity creditor. If the filing of a tax lien drives up the taxpayer’s costs and renders him or her unemployed or underemployed, the government may be forced to make outlays in the form of unemployment benefits, food stamps, and the like. Thus, the imprudent filing of a tax lien has the potential to badly damage the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s family and simultaneously reduce federal revenue – a lose-lose proposition.

For this reason, the decision whether to impose a tax lien should be made on a case-by-case
basis. Yet, the IRS files many liens systemically….

The results of research done by the Taxpayer Advocate suggest that the IRS’s use of liens may not be furthering the agency’s revenue collection objective and, equally significant, that the IRS has shown very little interest in evaluating the effectiveness of liens for itself.

A federal tax lien (FTL) arises when the IRS assesses a tax liability, sends the taxpayer notice and demand for payment, and the taxpayer does not fully pay the debt within ten days. An FTL is effective as of the date of assessment and attaches to all of the taxpayer’s property and rights to property, whether real or personal, including those acquired by the taxpayer after that date. This lien continues against the taxpayer’s property until the liability either has been fully paid or is legally unenforceable.

It is IRS policy not to use the NFTL as a negotiating tool. The IRS is required to release a lien not later than 30 days after the underlying liability either is fully satisfied through full payment of tax or is legally unenforceable (typically, by expiration of the statutory period for collecting the tax).

If you have tax problems, call a qualified tax attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

February 16, 2010

IRS Impersonators

During income tax filing season, there are a lot of IRS impersonation schemes. These schemes may take place by email, phone, fax, internet sites and social networking sites.

The IRS will not send you unsolicited e-mails about your tax situations, tax accounts or personal tax issues. If you receive such an e-mail, most likely it's a scam.

Some impersonations may be commercial internet sites that you unknowingly visit, thinking you’re accessing the genuine IRS Web site, IRS.gov. However, such sites have no connection to the IRS.

Many impersonations are identity theft scams that try to trick you into revealing personal and financial information that can be used to access your financial accounts. Some email scams contain links or attachments that download malicious code (virus) that infects your computer or direct you to a bogus form or site posing as a genuine IRS form or Web site when you click on them.

February 8, 2010

The IRS And YouTube

There exists an official YouTube channel of the Internal Revenue Service. It features videos produced by the IRS on various tax administration topics. Information is available about all kinds of topics, including the the appeals examination process, appeals collection process, tax tips, record keeping, choosing a tax preparer, how to track your tax refund, how to check your tax withholding and the homeowner credit claim.

January 25, 2010

Getting A Transcript Of Your Tax Information

Here are some things to know if you need copies of your federal tax return information from the IRS.

There are2 options for obtaining free copies of your federal tax return information — tax account transcripts and tax return transcripts.

A tax account transcript shows any later adjustments either you or the IRS made after the tax return was filed. This transcript shows basic data – including marital status, type of return filed, adjusted gross income and taxable income.

A tax return transcript shows most line items from your tax return as it was originally filed, including any accompanying forms and schedules. It does not reflect any changes you, your representative or the IRS made after the return was filed. In many cases, a return transcript will meet the requirements of lending institutions, such as those offering mortgages and student loans.

To request either transcript by phone, call 800-829-1040 and follow the prompts in the recorded message.

To request a tax return transcript through the mail, businesses, partnerships and individuals who need transcript information from other forms or need a tax account transcript must use the Form 4506T, Request for Transcript of Tax Return. Individual taxpayers should complete IRS Form 4506T-EZ, Short Form Request for Individual Tax Return Transcript. Form 4506T-EZ is only for individuals who filed a Form 1040 series return.

You should receive your tax account transcript within 30 calendar days from the time the IRS receives your request. Allow 10 working days for delivery of a tax return transcript.

If you still need an actual copy of a previously processed tax return, it will cost $57 per tax year and take much longer. Complete Form 4506, Request for Copy of Tax Form, and mail it to the IRS address listed on the form for your area. Allow 60 days for actual copies of your return. Copies are generally available for the current year as well as the past six years.

January 21, 2010

California's Largest Tax Scofflaws

California's Franchise Tax Board publishes an annual list of the state's largest tax debtors. Some of those on the list are people who habitually flout or violate the law. The amount of income tax due from taxpayers ranges from $9,940,513 to $100,000. Federal individual income taxes are probably unpaid as well - but the IRS does not publish the names of delinquent taxpayers. The FTB's list is here.

If you owe California or the IRS over $25,000 in unpaid tax, call an experienced tax attorney for help resolving your tax problem. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

January 14, 2010

IRS Audits Used To Collect Employment Tax Data

Next month, the Internal Revenue Service will begin its Employment Tax National Research Project (“ET NRP”). The last one was performed 25 years ago. The study is needed because business practices regarding employment tax issues may have changed significantly since the last IRS employment tax study.

Examinations comprising the study will be conducted to collect data that will allow the IRS to understand the compliance characteristics of employment tax filers.

The IRS will randomly select 2,000 taxpayers each year for the next three years. The examinations will be comprehensive in scope. Taxpayers will receive notices describing the ET NRP process.

When completed, this information will help the IRS select and audit future employment tax returns with the greatest compliance risk. The results will allow the IRS to gauge more accurately the extent to which businesses properly comply with employment tax law and related reporting requirements.

There are two main goals for the ET NRP:

To determine compliance characteristics so IRS can focus on the most noncompliant employment tax areas, and

To secure statistically valid information for computing the Employment Tax Gap.

Records pertaining to employment tax returns and issues will be subject to review during these examinations. Employers should have all of their records available to expedite these examinations.

January 12, 2010

Federal Tax Lien Filed In Error

There is any number of different ways by which the IRS mistakenly files a federal tax lien against you for your unpaid taxes. In California (and throughout the U.S.), federal tax lies are filed in the county in which you live: say, Los Angeles, Orange, Santa Barbara or Ventura county. If the IRS erroneously files a tax lien, you should file Form 12277: Application for Withdrawal of Filed Form 668(Y), Notice of Federal Tax Lien. This application is based on Internal Revenue Code section 6323(j).

Erroneously Filed Notice of Federal Tax Lien

Treasury Regulation Section 301.6326-1 defines an erroneously filed Notice of Federal Tax Lien (NFTL) as one which is filed during the presence of one of the following conditions:

1. The tax liability was assessed in violation of a bankruptcy stay.

2. The statute of limitations for collection expired prior to the filing of the NFTL.

3. The tax liability was satisfied prior to the NFTL filing.

4. The tax liability was assessed in violation of deficiency procedures in Internal Revenue Code Section 6213.

Within 14 days of when an erroneous NFTL is identified, a Form 668Z, Certificate of Release of Federal Tax Lien, and Letter 544, Letter of Apology - Improvident/Erroneous Filing of Notice of Federal Tax Lien, must be issued by Advisory.

At your written request, a copy of the release and letter of apology may be furnished to creditors or credit bureaus. You may be instructed to provide names, mailing addresses, and permission to disclose the information.

Filing and release fees will be abated on erroneously filed NFTLs.

Improvident or Inadvertent Lien Filing

If an improvidently or inadvertently filed NFTL has been released, no consideration will be given to a request that the NFTL also be withdrawn.

When a NFTL is improvidently or inadvertently filed and then subsequently released, the Internal Revenue Service will provide you with a Letter 544.

If the criteria for release of a lien that has been improvidently or inadvertently filed are not present, the Internal Revenue Service will consider withdrawal of the NFTL.

Remember, a lien is not a levy. These two things are different from each other. A lien is a claim used as security for the tax debt, while a levy actually takes the property to satisfy the tax debt. A levy is a legal seizure of your property to satisfy a tax debt.

For additional tax help, call Mitchell A. Port, a tax attorney in Los Angeles, for guidance. Call (310) 559-5259.

January 6, 2010

Tax Liens And Tax Levies

What is the difference between an IRS tax lien and an IRS tax levy?

A tax lien is a document filed in a public place such as a California County Recorder’s Office telling the world that you owe taxes. A tax lien lists the years for which taxes are owed the type of tax and the amount of the taxes owed. Credit reporting agencies will find the tax lien and report it on your credit report. If you want to sell any real property you own, the IRS or Franchise Tax Board of California will be paid out of the equity in your property by the escrow company. No money will be taken out of your bank account by the tax lien.

If the IRS or California FTB serves a tax levy on your bank then the bank is required to send all of your money to the IRS or FTB that is on deposit the day the levy is served. If the IRS or FTB sends a wage levy for delinquent taxes to your employer then your employer is required to send almost all of your earnings to the IRS or FTB less a small amount which is exempt.

Call a California tax attorney to discuss the help you need to fix your tax problem. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

January 4, 2010

IRS Warns Individuals and Businesses To Avoid Questionable Employment Tax Schemes

California business owners are subject to a variety of taxes by the State and also by the cities (including Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, Orange and Ventura). Some of those California businesses might have cash flow problems as a result. Some may be involved in one or more of the eight schemes where federal employment taxes are not properly withheld or paid by employers from their employees’ paychecks recently described by an IRS alert to taxpayers and business owners.

Regardless of the reason, federal law requires employment tax withholding and payment by employers. Nevertheless, there are many reasons employers don’t withhold or pay employment taxes. One reason may be because of a situation where an employer collects the taxes and elects to keep it during a period of financial difficulty rather than pay it to the Internal Revenue Service. Another reason may arise from an effort to use the government as a bank to 'borrow the money for a short time' with intentions to pay it back later. For a few tax protestors, it involves philosophical differences with the tax law of the United States that courts consistently reject.

Employment taxes consist of Social Security along with federal income tax withholding, Medicare taxes and unemployment taxes. Also, many states have withholding requirements for various employment related taxes.

The IRS takes a variety of steps to minimize employment tax non-compliance. These efforts have led to some criminal convictions resulting in jail-time and fines. The agency has a number of civil actions it can take like audits and filing tax liens against property the taxpayer owns.

Tax Prison

During the past three years, 117 individuals have been sentenced to confinement in a federal prison, a halfway house or home detention for criminal violations related to employment taxes. Approximately 77 percent of the persons sentenced for evading employment taxes served an average of 17 months confinement and were ordered to make restitution to the government for the taxes evaded, plus interest and penalties.

The eight most common types of employment tax non-compliance include:

1. Paying Employees in Cash. Paying employees in whole or partially in cash is a common method of evading income and employment taxes. There is nothing wrong with compensating an employee in cash, but employment taxes are owed regardless of how the employees are paid. And the IRS will build its case using all available information even if there are no payroll records or checks.

2. Misclassifying worker status. Sometimes employers incorrectly treat employees as independent contractors to avoid paying employment taxes. Generally if the payer has the right to control what work will be done and how it will be done, the worker is an employee. Employers who misclassify employees as independent contractors (and are not eligible for relief under Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978) will be liable for the employment taxes on wages paid to the misclassified worker and subject to penalties.

3. Pyramiding. "Pyramiding" of employment taxes is a fraudulent practice where a business withholds taxes from its employees but intentionally fails to remit them to the IRS. An often cause is a lack of profit or capital for operating costs, so the business owner uses the trust funds to pay other liabilities. The quarterly employment tax liabilities accumulate (or “pyramid”) until the employer has little hope of catching up. Businesses involved in pyramiding frequently shut down or file for bankruptcy and then start a new business under a different name starting the cycle over.

4. S Corporation Officers Compensation Treated as Corporate Distributions. In an effort to avoid employment taxes, some S Corporations are improperly treating officer compensation as a corporate distribution instead of wages or salary. By law, officers are employees of the corporation for employment tax purposes and compensation they receive for their services is subject to employment taxes.

5. Unreliable Third Party Payers. There are two primary categories of third party payers – Payroll Service Providers and Professional Employer Organizations. Payroll Service Providers typically perform services for employers such as filing employment tax returns and making employment tax payments. Professional Employer Organizations offer employee leasing meaning that they handle administrative, personnel, and payroll accounting functions for employees who have been leased to other companies that use their services. Many of these companies provide outstanding services to employers. Unfortunately, in some instances, companies of both types of services have failed to pay over to the IRS the collected employment taxes. When these employment service companies dissolve, millions in employment taxes can be left unpaid. Employers are urged to exercise due diligence in selecting and monitoring a third party payer. For example, when choosing a third party payer, employers should look for one that is reputable and uses the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS). This allows the business owner to verify payments made on their behalf. Also, an employer should never allow their address of record with the IRS be changed to that of the third party payer.

6. Offshore Employee Leasing. This scheme, which was designated as a Listed Transaction by the Service in 2003, misuses the otherwise legal business practice of employee leasing. Under the typical promotion, an individual taxpayer supposedly resigns from his or her current employer or professional corporation and signs an employment contract with an offshore employee leasing company. The offshore company indirectly leases the individual’s services back to the original employer using a domestic leasing company as an intermediary. The individual performs the same services before and after entering into the leasing arrangement. While the total amount paid for the individual’s services stays the same or increases, most of the funds are sent offshore as “deferred” compensation. The “deferred” compensation is then paid to the individual as a “loan” or ends up in an account under the individual’s control. Promoters of these arrangements improperly claim that neither employment taxes nor income taxes are owed on the “deferred” compensation. Because it is a Listed Transaction those who use the scheme are required to disclose their participation on current tax returns, and will be liable for the unpaid tax and subject to penalties and interest. Civil and criminal actions are being taken against promoters and participants in offshore leasing schemes – one promoter was convicted of defrauding the U.S. and sentenced to 70 months imprisonment, two other promoters have been ordered by the courts to stop marketing the scheme and a San Diego doctor plead guilty to tax evasion and is awaiting sentencing.

7. Frivolous Arguments. Unscrupulous individuals and promoters have used a variety of false or misleading arguments for not paying employment taxes. These schemes are based on an incorrect interpretation of “Section 861” and other parts of the tax law and have been refuted in court. One variation of this scheme involves the improper use of Form 941c, Supporting Statement to Correct Information on Form 941, to attempt to get a refund of previously paid employment taxes. Recent court cases have resulted in criminal convictions of promoters. Employer participants could also be held responsible for back payments of employment taxes, plus penalties and interest.

8. Filing False Payroll Tax Returns or Failing to File Payroll Tax Returns. Preparing false payroll tax returns intentionally understating the amount of wages on which taxes are owed or failing to file employment tax returns are methods commonly used to evade employment taxes.

Tax problems? Need tax help? Call a tax attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

January 1, 2010

Misplaced Your Employer Or Tax Identification Number?

If you applied for and received a taxpayer identification number for your trust or an employer identification number for your business but have since misplaced it, try the following actions to locate the number:

• If you used your EIN to open a bank account, or apply for any type of state or local license, you should contact the bank or agency to get your EIN.

• Ask the IRS to search for your EIN by calling the Business & Specialty Tax Line at (800) 829-4933. The hours of operation are 7:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. local time, Monday through Friday. An assistor will ask you for identifying information and provide the number to you over the telephone, as long as you are a person who is authorized to receive it. Examples of an authorized person include, but are not limited to, a sole proprietor, a partner in a partnership, a corporate officer, a trustee of a trust, or an executor of an estate.

• Find the computer-generated notice that was issued by the IRS when you applied for your EIN. This notice is issued as a confirmation of your application for, and receipt of an EIN.

December 28, 2009

Are You Being Audited Or Examined By The IRS?

Under IRS audit or exam? Help yourself and know what to expect. The IRS publishes information – Guides - telling you what it looks for during an audit. The Audit Techniques Guides (ATGs) contain examination techniques, common and unique industry issues, business practices, industry terminology and other information to assist examiners in performing examinations. These Guides focus on developing highly trained examiners for a particular market segment. These Guides cover all types of business, such as:

Construction Industry

Factoring of Receivables

Golden Parachutes

Retail Industry

Veterinary Medicine

Get help and use an experienced professional. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

December 8, 2009

Troublesome Tax Issues?

The Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is an independent organization within the IRS whose employees assist taxpayers who are seeking help in resolving problems with the Internal Revenue Service, who believe that an IRS system or procedure is not working as it should or who are experiencing economic harm. Here are some things you should know about TAS:

1. The service is confidential, suited to meet your needs and FREE.

2. TAS employees know the IRS and how to navigate it. They say they will listen to your problem, help you understand what needs to be done to resolve it, and stay with you every step of the way until your problem is resolved.

3. TAS helps taxpayers whose problems are causing financial difficulty or significant cost, including the cost of professional representation. This includes businesses as well as individuals.

4. You may be eligible for TAS help if you have tried to resolve your tax problem through normal IRS channels and have gotten nowhere, or you believe an IRS procedure just isn't working as it should.

5. TAS has at least one local taxpayer advocate in every state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. You can call your local advocate, whose number is in Publication 1546, Taxpayer Advocate Service. You can also call the toll-free case intake line at 1-877-777-4778.

You can also file Form 911, Request for Taxpayer Advocate Service Assistance, with the Taxpayer Advocate Service, or request that an IRS employee complete Form 911 on your behalf.

Call Your Local Taxpayer Advocate in California:

Laguna Niguel
24000 Avila Rd.
Stop 2000
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
949-389-4804

Los Angeles
300 N. Los Angeles St.
Stop 6710 LA
Los Angeles, CA 90012
213-576-3140

Oakland
1301 Clay St.
Suite 1540S
Oakland, CA 94612
510-637-2703

Sacramento
4330 Watt Ave.
Stop SA5043
Sacramento, CA 95821
916-974-5007

San Jose
55 Market St.
Stop 0004
San Jose, CA 95113
408-817-6850

December 4, 2009

IRS Helps With Your Tax Problems

The IRS and the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) worked together to develop a toolkit. TAS is an independent organization within the IRS whose employees assist taxpayers who are experiencing economic harm, who are seeking help in resolving tax problems that have not been resolved through normal channels, or who believe that an IRS system or procedure is not working as it should. It's purpose is to make it easier for you to:

• Understand why it’s important to follow the tax laws

• Get your tax refund quickly and fairly Learn about special tax credits

• Understand your options when you owe the IRS money

• Understand basic tax information

• Learn more about the tax end of starting a small business

• Help prevent identity theft

• Determine if you need an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN)

Specific tax topics include:

Help with Tax Problems

Receiving an IRS Notice
Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS)
Low Income Taxpayer Clinics (LITC)

Individuals

Federal Payment Levy Program
Cancellation of Debt
Income Tax Refund Delivery
Identity Theft
Taxpayers with Disabilities
Recovery Rebate Credit for Individuals
Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers (ITIN)

Home and Family

TaxTax Benefits for Education
Credit to Aid First-Time Homebuyers
Mortgages: Basic Information
Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and Family Credits

Businesses

Starting a Small Business
Recordkeeping for Small Businesses
Employers of Disabled Persons

General Tax Information

Collection and Payment Alternatives
Complying with Tax Laws
Choosing a Tax Preparer
Visiting an IRS Office

November 23, 2009

IRS Freedom of Information Act

In a policy statement issued by the Internal Revenue Service about the Freedom of Information Act, the IRS states the following:

The Internal Revenue Service is committed to full compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552. The FOIA provides that agency records are to be made available to the public unless required or permitted to be withheld. The FOIA accommodates the countervailing interests in disclosure and nondisclosure. The IRS is committed to administering the FOIA with respect to agency records in a manner consistent with preserving the fundamental values held by our society, including public accountability, safeguarding national security, enhancing the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies and the decision-making processes, protecting sensitive business information, and protecting personal privacy.

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, provides public access to agency records unless protected from disclosure by one of the FOIA’s nine exemptions or three exclusions. The FOIA applies to records created by Federal agencies and does not cover records held by Congress, the courts, or state and local government agencies. Each state has its own public access laws which should be consulted for access to state and local records.

The IRS provides guidance accessing FOIA information. Click on any of the following:

IRS FOIA Guide

How to Write Your Request

Example FOIA Letter

Optional Items

Proof of Identity and Right to Access

Fee Schedule

IRS Disclosure Offices

CAF Client Listing Request

Here's a sampling of frequently asked questions about FOIA:

This page answers Frequently Asked Questions about FOIA. Please also see How to Write a FOIA Request and the Guide to Accessing Treasury Records .

Who can make a request under the Freedom of Information Act?

What is a reasonable description of records?

What authorization is required if I make a FOIA requests about myself?

What authorization is required for FOIA information to be released to a third party?

What the FOIA does not require.

When can I expect a response?

How and Under what circumstances may I receive expedited processing?

What is the 30-day rule?

What will cause a delay in the processing of a request?

What if I can't specify exactly where the records are located, but I have some information?

Contract records, solicitation and winning bid records are sometimes available to the public. How do I know when a FOIA request is needed?

Will the FOIA allow me to see records on my neighbor/coworker who is being investigated by the Treasury?

Why should a request sent by fax also contain my signature?

Why should I send my request to the specific Treasury bureau and not one office at Departmental Offices (DO)?

Why should requests for tax records go to the IRS when the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized by law to make tax assessments?

Are there fees associated with a FOIA request and what are they?

What are the various requester fee categories?

What services are free and what are chargeable for the various fee categories?

How are fees determined?

Can a fee be waived?

Under what circumstances may records be withheld?

Can I appeal a denial of request?

November 19, 2009

California Tax Service Center

The Internal Revenue Service and California’s tax agencies (Franchise Tax Board, Employment Development Department and Board of Equalization) have formed a partnership called the Joint Tax Agency Communications Committee. The mission of the committee is to “speak with one voice” where feasible with regards to tax issues and to enhance education and outreach efforts by leveraging resources. The website is: California Tax Service Center.

These tax agencies have joined together to streamline and improve taxpayer resources and educational programs. One-stop tax help is the goal.

Income tax, payroll tax, and sales and use tax FAQs are now at one joint website. Information is available in one place for things like forms and publications, filing online, payment options, reporting requirements, rates and schedules, important dates, as well as credits and deductions.

"In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes."

For tax help from a tax lawyer, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

October 22, 2009

California's Tax Preparers' Mistakes On Our Tax Returns

The IRS is interested in what are the top mistakes on individual income tax returns filed on paper and by e-file. Errors are categorized by whether you filed Form 1040EZ, 1040A, or 1040.

1. We computed your recovery rebate credit for you.

2. We changed the amount of the recovery rebate credit you claimed on your tax return because the amount entered was computed incorrectly.

3. We changed the amount of tax shown on your return. The amount entered was incorrect based on your taxable income and filing status.

4. We changed the amount of taxable income on your return because there was an error in the subtraction of your exemption or combined standard deduction/exemption amount.

5. The refund amount or the amount you owe was computed incorrectly.

6. We changed the amount claimed as standard deduction on your tax return. You are entitled to a higher standard deduction if you and/or your spouse are age 65 or older and/or blind.

7. We changed the amount of taxable social security benefits on because there was an error in the computation of the taxable amount.

8. We didn't allow the recovery rebate credit you claimed. You do not qualify for the credit since there was no qualifying income.

9. For one or more of your dependents the last name doesn’t match our records or the records provided by the Social Security Administration.

If you owe tax and have a serious tax problem, call Los Angeles attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 for tax help.

October 19, 2009

Choose Your Tax Preparer Wisely

You are legally responsible for what’s on your tax returns even if prepared by someone else. As a result, it is important to choose carefully when hiring an individual or firm to prepare your personal income tax returns. So, if you pay someone to prepare your tax return, choose that preparer wisely.

The IRS has a long and helpful list of points to keep in mind when someone else prepares your return which you can read by clicking here.

Once the tax return is finished and you owe more money than you can pay, you may need to speak to a tax attorney to help with that tax problem. Mitchell A. Port can help.

October 7, 2009

Top Delinquent Taxpayers In California

This year's list of the top 250 delinquent taxpayers who owe the California Franchise Tax Board $100,000 or more in income tax is now available here. By the time they make it on the list, a tax lien has already been recorded.

Before making it to the list, the FTB sends the taxpayer a certified letter with a return receipt requested. The letter provides information about how to avoid being placed on the list. Here are the options:

• Pay the liability in full
• Establish an installment agreement
• Enter into an Offer in Compromise
• Substantiate a bankruptcy filing

The largest amount owed is $9,940,513.49 and the smallest amount is $217,909.17.

Negotiate a tax resolution with a qualified tax lawyer. Call attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 for help.

October 5, 2009

IRS Updates Mediation Procedures

PURPOSE

Revenue procedure 2009-44 updates the mediation procedure for cases in the Appeals administrative process. This revenue procedure expands and clarifies the types of cases that may be mediated in Appeals. Generally, this program is available for cases in which a limited number of legal and factual issues remain unresolved following settlement discussions in Appeals.

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

This revenue procedure modifies the Appeals mediation program to expand the types of cases that are eligible for mediation while also clarifying the types of cases that are ineligible.

SCOPE OF MEDIATION

.01 In general. Mediation may be used to resolve issues in cases that qualify under this revenue procedure while they are under consideration by Appeals. This procedure may be used only after Appeals settlement discussions are unsuccessful and, generally, when all other issues are resolved but for the issue(s) for which mediation is being requested.

.02 Applicability. Mediation is available for:
(1) Legal issues;

(2) Factual issues;

(3) A Compliance Coordinated Issue (CCI) or an Appeals Coordinated Issue (ACI). (CCI and ACI issues are listed online at www.irs.gov/appeals.) However, a CCI or ACI issue will not be eligible for mediation when the taxpayer has declined the opportunity to discuss the CCI or ACI issue with the Appeals CCI or ACI coordinator during the course of regular Appeals settlement discussions;

(4) An early referral issue when an agreement is not reached, provided the early referral issue meets the requirements for mediation;

(5) Issues for which a request for competent authority assistance has not yet been filed.

(6) Unsuccessful attempts to enter into a closing agreement; and

(7) Offer in compromise and Trust Fund Recovery Penalty cases.

.03 Inapplicability. Mediation will not be available for:
(1) Cases in which mediation is not appropriate under the general statutory authority and guidelines for use of alternative dispute resolution in the administrative process;

(2) Issues designated for litigation;

(3) Issues docketed in any court;

(4) Collection cases, except for certain offer in compromise and Trust Fund Recovery Penalty cases;

(5) Issues for which mediation would not be consistent with sound tax administration, such as, but not limited to, issues governed by closing agreements, by res judicata, or by controlling Supreme Court precedent;

(6) Frivolous issues;

(7) “Whipsaw” issues, such as, but not limited to, issues for which resolution with respect to one party might result in inconsistent treatment in the absence of participation of another party;

(8) Cases in which the taxpayer did not act in good faith during settlement negotiations, such as, but not limited to, cases in which the taxpayer failed to timely respond to document requests or offers to settle, or failed to address arguments and precedents raised by Appeals; and

(9) Issues that have been otherwise identified in subsequent guidance issued by the IRS as excluded from the mediation program.

APPLICATION PROCESS

.01 Mediation is optional. A taxpayer and Appeals may request mediation after consultation with each other.

.02 Filing requirements.
(1) Where to file. To request mediation, the taxpayer should send a written request to the appropriate Appeals Team Manager. The taxpayer should also send copies of the written request to the appropriate Appeals Area Director and to the Chief Appeals, 1099 14th Street, NW, Suite 4200E – East, Washington, DC 20005, Attn: AP:TS:TPP. (See Exhibit 1 of this revenue procedure for a listing of the addresses for each Appeals Area Director.)

(2) Required information.
The mediation request should include:

(a) The taxpayer’s name, taxpayer identification number, and address (and the name, title, address, and telephone number of a person to contact);

(b) The name of the Team Case Leader, Appeals Officer, or Settlement Officer;

(c) The taxable period(s) involved;

(d) A description of the issue for which mediation is being requested, including the dollar amount of the adjustment in dispute; and

(e) A representation that the issue is not an excluded issue listed in the “Scope of Mediation” section above.

.03 Review of Mediation Request. The Appeals Team Manager will confer with the Appeals Office of Tax Policy and Procedure before deciding to approve or deny a mediation request. Generally, the Appeals Team Manager will respond to the taxpayer and the Team Case Leader or Appeals Officer within two weeks after the Appeals Team Manager receives the request for mediation.

(1) Request approved. If Appeals approves the mediation request, the Appeals Team Manager will inform the taxpayer and the Team Case Leader or Appeals Officer and will schedule a conference or conference call that may include a representative from Appeals Tax Policy and Procedure Headquarters to discuss the mediation process.

(2) Request denied. If Appeals denies the mediation request, the Appeals Team Manager will promptly inform the taxpayer and the Team Case Leader or Appeals Officer. Although no formal appeal procedure exists for the denial of a mediation request, a taxpayer may request a conference with the Appeals Team Manager to discuss the denial. The denial of a mediation request is not subject to judicial review.

AGREEMENT TO MEDIATE

.01 Written agreement.
Upon approval of the request to mediate, the taxpayer and Appeals will enter into a written agreement to mediate. The agreement to mediate should:
(a) Be as concise as possible;

(b) Specify the issue(s) that the parties have agreed to mediate;

(c) Contain an initial list of witnesses, attorneys, representatives, and observers for each party;

(d) Identify the location and the proposed date of the mediation session; and

(e) Prohibit ex parte contacts between the mediator and the parties.

.02 Participants.
The parties to the mediation process will be the taxpayer and Appeals. Each party must have at least one participant with decision-making authority attending the mediation session. The agreement to mediate will set forth the procedures by which the parties inform each other and the mediator of the participants in the mediation, and will set forth any limitation on the number, identity, or participation of such participants. In general, the parties are encouraged to include, in addition to the required decision-makers, those persons with information and expertise that will be useful to the decision-makers and the mediator. In this regard, Appeals has the discretion to communicate ex parte with the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, the originating function, e.g., Compliance, or both, in preparation for or during the mediation session. Appeals also has the discretion to have Counsel, the originating function, or both, participate in the mediation proceeding to present the position and views of the IRS, and to rebut representations and arguments made by the taxpayer. Counsel's participation in this regard is separate from the review function outlined in Section 9.02 of this revenue procedure.

MEDIATION PROCESS

.01 Selection of mediator and expenses. An Appeals employee trained as a mediator will serve as the mediator under this revenue procedure. Appeals will pay all expenses associated with the use of an Appeals mediator. The taxpayer and the Appeals Team Manager will select the Appeals mediator from a list of trained employees who, generally, will be located in the same Appeals office or geographical area as the taxpayer, but will not be a member of the same team that was assigned to the case. Additionally, at the taxpayer’s expense, the taxpayer may elect to use a co-mediator who is not employed by the IRS. The taxpayer and the Appeals Team Manager will select the non-IRS co-mediator from any local or national organization that provides a roster of neutrals. A representative from the Appeals Office of Tax Policy and Procedure may participate in the negotiations to select a non-IRS co-mediator. Criteria for selecting a non-IRS co-mediator may include: completion of mediation training; previous mediation experience; substantive knowledge of tax law; or knowledge of industry practices. A mediator shall have no official, financial, or personal conflict of interest with respect to the parties, unless such interest is fully disclosed in writing to the taxpayer and the Appeals Team Manager and they agree that the mediator may serve.

.02 Appeals personnel as mediators and conflict statement. To address the inherent conflict arising from the Appeals mediator’s status as an employee of the IRS, the Appeals mediator will provide to the taxpayer a statement confirming his or her proposed service as a mediator and stating that (i) he or she is a current employee of the IRS, (ii) a conflict results from his or her continued status as an IRS employee, and (iii) this conflict will not interfere in the mediator’s ability to facilitate the case impartially.

MEDIATION SESSION

.01 Discussion summaries. Each party will prepare a discussion summary of the issues (including the party’s arguments in favor of the party’s position) for consideration by the mediator. The discussion summaries should be submitted to the mediator and the other party no later than two weeks before the mediation session is scheduled to occur.

.02 Confidentiality. The mediation process is confidential. Therefore, all information concerning any dispute resolution communication is confidential and may not be disclosed by any party, participant, observer or mediator except as provided by statute.

.03 Withdrawal. Either party may withdraw from the process anytime before reaching a settlement of the issue(s) being mediated by notifying the other party and the mediator in writing.

POST-SESSION PROCEDURES

.01 Mediator's report. At the conclusion of the mediation process, the mediator will prepare a brief written report and submit a copy to each party.

.02 Closing procedures. If the parties reach an agreement on all or some issues through the mediation process, Appeals will use established procedures, including preparation of a Form 906, Closing Agreement on Final Determination Covering Specific Matters. For offer in compromise cases with liabilities of $50,000 or more, any settlement or agreement reached through mediation must be reviewed by the Office of Chief Counsel before being finalized.

If the parties do not reach an agreement on an issue being mediated, they may request arbitration for the issue, provided the mediation issue meets the requirements for arbitration. If arbitration is not requested or approved, Appeals will not reconsider the mediated issue(s), and a statutory notice of deficiency will be issued with respect to all unagreed issues (or the case will be processed using established closing procedures if there is no deficiency).

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Use as precedent. A settlement reached by the parties through mediation will not be binding on the parties (or be otherwise controlling) for taxable years not covered by the agreement. Except as provided in the agreement, no party may use such settlement as precedent.

EFFECTIVE DATE
This procedure is effective October 5, 2009, the date this revenue procedure is published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

This type of tax problem necessitates the input of a qualified tax attorney. Mitchell A. Port is just such an attorney. Call Mitch at (310) 559-5259.

October 1, 2009

Tax Quotes

I like to pay taxes. With them I buy civilization.
~Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

The income tax created more criminals than any other single act of government.
~Barry Goldwater

The taxpayer - that's someone who works for the federal government but doesn't have to take the civil service examination.
~Ronald Reagan

Did you ever notice that when you put the words "The" and "IRS" together, it spells "THEIRS?"
~Author Unknown

Next to being shot at and missed, nothing is really quite as satisfying as an income tax refund.
~F.J. Raymond

Taxes grow without rain.
~Jewish Proverb

If we don't do something to simplify the tax system, we're going to end up with a national police force of internal revenue agents.
~Leon Panetta

Tax complexity itself is a kind of tax.
~Max Baucus

I can give you 1040 good reasons why I hate to pay taxes. Mitchell A. Port

Our new Constitution is now established, and has an appearance that promises permanency; but in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.
Benjamin Franklin - Letter to Jean-Baptiste Leroy (13 November 1789)

September 24, 2009

What Is The Tax Auditor Looking For?

The IRS recently updated its "Audit Technique Guides". These Guides contain examination techniques, common and unique industry issues, business practices, industry terminology and other information to assist examiners in performing examinations. If you have a construction business, a new vehicle dealership, a retail business or if you're in the laundromat business, learn what an auditor is trained to look for. Dozens of other audit guides for all kinds of economic and financial activities are available to help you before the audit begins.

If you want the help of a tax attorney during the audit and exam process, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

September 21, 2009

New Deadline For Disclosing Offshore Accounts

Earlier this morning the Internal Revenue Service announced that it is allowing a one-time extension of the deadline for special voluntary disclosures by those with unreported income from offshore accounts. Those taxpayers now have until Oct. 15, 2009.

PURPOSE OF EXTENSION:

By providing a short extention of the deadline, the IRS is providing relief for those taxpayers who had intended to come forward before the deadline, but faced various challenges in meeting it.

The extension will allow tax preparers and attorneys the necessary time to interview and advise their backlog of taxpayers with these undisclosed offshore accounts, and prepare the necessary paperwork to qualify for the special penalty provisions.

Remember, your tax preparer may also be extremely busy completing individual income tax returns (Forms 1040) for 2008 for those clients on extension. Speak with your advisor sooner than later in order to avoid missing the deadline.

IRS officials decided to extend this deadline after receiving repeated requests from tax practitioners and attorneys around the country following an influx of taxpayer requests.

LAST CHANCE! There will be no further extensions.

September 15, 2009

Penalties Will Be Limited

The IRS Tax Amnesty for Foreign Bank Account Report ("FBAR") filings is ending this coming September 23rd. Individuals and entities who have foreign financial accounts are required to file Form 90-22.1 with the IRS every June 30th.

Those who don't file by June 30th next year are subject to criminal penalties of up to five years in jail and a fine of $250,000. In addition, a willful failure to file the FBAR can result in a civil penalty of the GREATER of $100,000 or 50% of the balance in the account. This penalty can be imposed on an annual basis, and can exceed the balance in the account.

Those who come forward by September 23rd will have penalties limited.

Since early in the year, the IRS has been advertising its offshore voluntary disclosure program under which the IRS will not to bring criminal prosecutions of owners of foreign bank accounts if they work with the IRS Criminal Investigation Division by no later than September 23rd.

The IRS has a FAQs page worth reviewing too.

Get help NOW! Call tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

September 8, 2009

So Many Tax Payment Options In California

It is no surprise in California that the Franchise Tax Board provides many different payment options to pay your individual income tax.

The options are:

Check, money order, or cash - Mail your payment or pay in person.

Installment Agreement request - Complete and submit an online request to make monthly payments for tax, bill, or notice.

Credit Card - Pay with your Discover/NOVUS, MasterCard, Visa, or American Express. Make your payment online or by phone. Official Payments Corporation charges a convenience fee of 2.5% (minimum $1) to use this service.

Web Pay - Pay the current amount you owe and schedule payments up to one year in advance. Select the payment amount and payment date. We'll deduct the payment from your account on the day you selected.

Western Union - Pay online, by phone, or in person at one of their worldwide offices.

For California businesses who owe tax, there are also these options:

Check, money order, or cash - Mail your payment or pay in person.

Installment agreement request - Make monthly payments.

Electronic funds transfer for banks and corporations.

Still have trouble paying your taxes? For tax help, call attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

September 2, 2009

Installment Agreement - Online Payment Agreement

Don’t call a tax attorney for tax help if your tax problem is that you owe $25,000 or less in combined tax, penalties, and interest. You can use the online payment agreement (OPA) application to request a payment agreement.

Often, the application allows you to qualify, apply for an installment agreement, and receive immediate notification of approval. Sometimes you will need to mail in paperwork or speak with the Internal Revenue Service before they can determine your eligibility for an installment agreement. If that is the case, the OPA application will give you an address or a toll-free phone number to reach them.

The information you need to have when using the Online Payment Agreement is here.

The IRS even explains the three payment options you have.

If you want to know when to call the IRS, check here.

For less than $25,000 in tax, penalties and interest, do not call a tax attorney.

August 27, 2009

Did You Receive An IRS Notice?

One of the most unpleasant experiences my clients in Los Angeles, California and across the country have is when they receive a notice from the IRS about unpaid taxes, underpaid taxes or unfiled tax returns.

The IRS published its "Summertime Tax Tips" which provides a short list of eight things you should know about IRS notices in case you get one.

If you owe more than $50,000 in tax, call a qualified tax attorney for help. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

August 20, 2009

More On Offers In Compromise From The IRS

The IRS has excellent information on its website easily understood about Offers in Compromise. Those of us in Los Angeles, California and throughout the rest of the country who owe tax ought to consider an OIC.

Here's what the website covers:

What You Must Know Before You File an Offer in Compromise

All Taxpayers Do Not Qualify for an Offer in Compromise

Offer in Compromise Payments are Non-refundable

Federal Tax Liens are Not Released

Payments May be Designated

Refunds

Levies

Statutory Period for Collection Suspended

Five Year Compliance

OIC Payment and Application Fee Exceptions

Appeal

Approved Installment Agreement

Mandatory Acceptance

Work with a qualified tax attorney on your tax problem. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

August 17, 2009

Few Pay Pennies On The Dollar - Including Californians

Beware of promoters’ claims that tax debts can be settled through the offer in compromise program for "pennies on the dollar".

The preferred approach to the IRS is through your tax attorney so that your interests are protected from those at the tax agency who try and gather information from you to use it to your disadvantage.

Unless you have special circumstances (and some Californians do), an offer in compromise (OIC) will not be accepted if the IRS believes that the liability can be paid in full as a lump sum or through a payment agreement.

An offer is an agreement between you and the Internal Revenue Service that settles your tax liabilities for less than the full amount owed.

Usually, the IRS will not accept an OIC unless the amount you offer is equal to or greater than the reasonable collection potential (RCP). The RCP is how the IRS measures your ability to pay and includes the value that can be realized from your assets, such as real property, automobiles, bank accounts, and other property. The RCP also includes anticipated future income, less certain amounts allowed for basic living expenses.

Three Types of OICs

The IRS may accept an offer in compromise based on three grounds:

1. Doubt as to Collectibility - Doubt exists that you could ever pay the full amount of tax liability owed within the remainder of the statutory period for collection.

Example: You owe $20,000 for unpaid tax liabilities and agree that the tax you owe is correct. Your monthly income does not meet your necessary living expenses. You do not own any real property and do not have the ability to fully pay the liability now or through monthly installment payments.

2. Effective Tax Administration - There is no doubt that the tax is correct and there is potential to collect the full amount of the tax owed, but an exceptional circumstance exists that would allow the IRS to consider an OIC. To be eligible for compromise on this basis, you must demonstrate that the collection of the tax would create an economic hardship or would be unfair and inequitable.

Example: You have assets sufficient to satisfy the tax liability and provide full time care and assistance to a dependent child, who has a serious long-term illness. It is expected that you will need to use the equity in assets to provide for adequate basic living expenses and medical care for the child. There is no doubt that the tax is correct.

3. Doubt as to Liability - A legitimate doubt exists that the assessed tax liability is correct. Possible reasons to submit a doubt as to liability offer include: (1) the examiner made a mistake interpreting the law, (2) the examiner failed to consider your evidence or (3) you has new evidence.

Example: You were vice president of a corporation from 2004-2005. In 2006, the corporation accrued unpaid payroll taxes and you were assessed a trust fund recovery penalty as a responsible party of the corporation. You were no longer a corporate officer and had resigned from the corporation on 12/31/2005. Since you resigned prior to the payroll taxes accruing and was not contacted prior to the assessment, there is legitimate doubt that the assessed tax liability is correct.

OIC Payment Options

Usually, you must submit a $150 application fee and initial payment along with the Form 656, Offer in Compromise. You may chose to pay your offer in compromise in one of three payment options:

1. Lump Sum Cash Offer - Payable in non-refundable installments, the offer amount must be paid in five or fewer installments upon written notice of acceptance. A non-refundable payment of 20 percent of the offer amount along with the $150 application fee is due upon filing the Form 656.

If the offer will be paid in 5 or fewer installments in 5 months or less, the offer amount must include the realizable value of assets plus the amount that could be collected over 48 months of payments or the time remaining on the statute, whichever is less.

If the offer will be paid in 5 or fewer installments in more than 5 months and within 24 months, the offer amount must include the realizable value of assets plus the amount that could be collected over 60 months of payments, or the time remaining on the statute, whichever is less.

If the offer will be paid in 5 or fewer installments in more than 24 months, the offer amount must include the realizable value of assets plus the amount that could be collected over the time remaining on the statute.

2. Short Term Periodic Payment Offer - Payable in non-refundable installments; the offer amount must be paid within 24 months of the date the IRS received the offer. The first payment and the $150 application fee are due upon filing the Form 656. Regular payments must be made during the offer investigation.

The offer amount must include the realizable value of assets plus the total amount the IRS could collect over 60 months of payments or the remainder of the statutory period for collection, whichever is less.

3. Deferred Periodic Payment Offer - Payable in non-refundable installments; the offer amount must be paid over the remaining statutory period for collecting the tax. The first payment and the $150 application fee are due upon filing the Form 656. Regular payments must be made during the investigation.

The offer amount must include the realizable value of assets plus the total amount the IRS could collect through monthly payments during the remaining life of the statutory period for collection.

The IRS is not bound by either the offer amount or the terms proposed by you. The OIC investigator may negotiate a different offer amount and terms, when appropriate. The investigator may determine that the proposed offer amount is too low or the payment terms are too protracted to recommend acceptance. In this situation, the OIC investigator may advise you as to what larger amount or different terms would likely be recommended for acceptance.

Payments and Application Fees

When filing an offer in compromise, two separate remittance documents should be sent, one for the application fee and the other for the required offer payment.

The Form 656-PPV, Offer in Compromise Payment Voucher, included in the Form 656, should be completed and attached to any periodic payment(s) that becomes due. Failure to submit any required periodic payments, after the initial payment has been submitted, will result in the offer being declared withdrawn.

The OIC application fee reduces the assessed tax or other amounts due. The application fee will be returned if the OIC is deemed not to be processable. Unless the offer in compromise has been submitted under doubt as to liability or a completed Form 656-A and Offer in Compromise Application Fee and Payment Worksheet is included with the Form 656, the $150 application fee must be included with the offer or the IRS will return the offer.

August 11, 2009

New IRS Appeals Programs

At the end of last year, the IRS announced a two-year test of two programs: the post-Appeals mediation and arbitration procedures for Offer in Compromise (OIC) and Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP).

Under these two alternative dispute resolution programs, the taxpayer or Appeals may request nonbinding mediation. The taxpayer may decline Appeals’ request for mediation. Appeals will evaluate a taxpayer’s request for mediation based on the criteria detailed in Revenue Procedure 2002-44 and Announcement 2008-111. A request for binding arbitration must be made jointly by the taxpayer and Appeals. The mediation and arbitration procedures do not create any additional authority for settlement by Appeals.

During the test period, Appeals employees will advise the taxpayer of the availability of these alternative dispute strategies and the deadline for timely requesting such strategies when a rejection of an OIC is sustained or a proposed TFRP assessment is sustained. An OIC submitted during Collection Due Process (CDP) as an alternative to a Collection action is not eligible for these alternative dispute resolution strategies during the test period.

The Post-Appeals mediation process is available for both legal and factual issues. The mediator’s role is to facilitate settlement negotiations so the parties can reach their own agreement. The mediator does not have settlement authority over any issue.

The Arbitration procedure is available for factual issues only. The arbitrator’s role is to hear both sides of a disputed issue and then render a decision on the specific factual issue being arbitrated. This decision is binding on both parties. However, the arbitrator does not have the authority to decide that the offer in compromise itself must be accepted or that a person is/is not liable for the TFRP under § 6672. Neither party may appeal the decision of the arbitrator or contest the decision in any judicial proceeding.

Complete procedures for initiating a request for post-Appeals mediation or arbitration are in Announcement 2008-111. The agency will seek appropriate Offer in Compromise and Trust Fund Recovery Penalty cases for both post-Appeals mediation and arbitration during the two-year test period in order to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution for these cases.

For the two-year test period, Appeals will offer post-Appeals mediation and arbitration for OIC and TFRP cases for taxpayers whose appeals are considered at the Appeals office in Atlanta, Ga.; Chicago, Ill.; Cincinnati, Ohio; Houston, Texas; Indianapolis, Ind.; Louisville, Ky.; Phoenix, Ariz.; and San Francisco, Calif.

July 23, 2009

IRS Collection and Audit Letters

Whether you live in Los Angeles, California, anywhere else in California or across the U.S., if you get a letter from the IRS you must respond appropriately and timely. Here's a sampling of some of the letters commonly used:

Collection Letters

Letter 11 – Final Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing

Letter 1058 – Final Notice Reply Within 30 Days

Letter 1085 – 30-Day Letter Proposed 6020(b) Assessment

Letter 3172 – Notice of Federal Tax Lien Filing and Your Rights to a Hearing under IRC 6320

Examination Letters

Letter 525 – General 30 Day Letter

Letter 531 – Notice of Deficiency

Letter 692 – Request for Consideration of Additional Findings

Letter 1153 – Trust Funds Recovery Penalty Letter

Letter 1389 – 30 Day Letter, Tax Shelter Activity

Letter 3016 – IRC Section 6015 Preliminary Determination Letter (30 Day)

Letter 3391 – 30-Day Nonfiler Letter

Letter 3727 – 30-Day Letter Notifying Taxpayer No Change to Original Report Disallowing EIC Based on Failure to Meet Residency Test for Children Claimed

Letter 3728 – 30-Day Letter Notifying Taxpayer No Change to Original Report Partially Disallowing EIC Based on Failure to Meet Residency Test for 1 Child

Notices

CP 90 – Final Notice of Intent to Levy

CP 92 – Notice of Levy upon Your State Tax Refund

CP 242 – Notice of Levy upon Your State Tax Refund

CP 523 – IMF Installment Agreement Default Notice

CP 2000 - You receive this letter when the IRS receives income, deduction or credit information that does not match your return.

July 9, 2009

California IOUs: Use It To Pay Taxes

On July 7, 2009, the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) announced payment of current and past due personal and corporate taxes with California registered warrants (IOUs) is acceptable

By law, FTB cannot deposit the IOU until it is payable, but FTB will credit your account on the date the IOU is received to stop the accrual of interest. If the IOU is not sufficient to pay the outstanding balance, you should send an additional payment for the difference.

June 23, 2009

Offer In Compromise Co-Pay Repeal

To submit an Offer In Compromise (OIC) with the Internal Revenue Service in order to pay pennies on the dollar, a nonrefundable 20% downpayment is required. Combined with a very low acceptance rate by the Internal Revenue Service of OICs, the downpayment has the effect of discouraging people from applying for an Offer.

A Congressional bill was recently introduced the title to which tells it all: “Repeal of the Partial Payment Requirement on Submissions of Offers in Compromise”. If this is enacted into law, the struggle with your tax debts may be a bit easier.

If you have a tax problem and need a tax lawyer, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

June 10, 2009

Unfiled Tax Return: IRS Can Collect Anywhere - Even Los Angeles

The Internal Revenue Service has filed a $819,848 federal tax lien against Sen. John Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign. The campaign says the tax return was filed and lost by the IRS while the IRS says no tax return was ever filed. Sen. Kerry's office blamed IRS clerical error for the claim and said his campaign owes no penalties.

The liability described in the tax lien is based on Internal Revenue Code Section 6721 entitled "Failure to File Correct Information Returns".

The Massachusetts Democrat said the IRS mishandled payroll tax forms that he said were correctly filed by his campaign in 2005.

Avoid this tax problem. Speak with a qualified tax attorney in Los Angeles from anywhere in the U.S. about your situation. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

June 5, 2009

Late Tax Payment - Late Filed Tax Return

Filing a past due return may not be as difficult as you think. Los Angeles, California taxpayers should file all tax returns that are due, regardless of whether or not full payment can be made with the return. Same is true for California tax returns.

Whether paying taxes with a timely filed tax return, or filing late and paying taxes late after receiving a bill from the IRS (and the bill is correct), LA's taxpayers are encouraged to pay the taxes they owe in full.

Prevent the IRS from levying bank accounts, wages, or other income, or taking other assets. Prevent the IRS from filing a Notice of Federal Tax Lien that may have a detrimental effect on your credit standing.

If you don't file your tax return, the IRS will file a substitute return for you, which will not include any additional exemptions or expenses you may be entitled to and may overstate your real tax liability. Once the tax is assessed the IRS will start the collection process, which can include placing a levy on wages or bank accounts or filing a federal tax lien against your property.

Call a tax professional - call attorney Mitchell A. Port.

June 3, 2009

Free Tax Help

Get Free Help.

The IRS offers free tax assistance in person, by telephone, computer and by fax. The IRS can assist taxpayers with obtaining forms, publications and answers to a wide range of tax questions. The IRS can also help find free tax preparation for those who qualify.

In Person

Taxpayers needing face-to-face help solving individual or business tax problems can get help every business day in every IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center.

By Phone

Call the toll-free customer service line at 1-800-829-1040.

Use Your Computer

Through the Internet, you can access a wealth of free tax information on the IRS Web site. Taxpayers can check out links such as Forms and Publications to download necessary forms, instructions or publications; get the FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions) to get answers to questions

By Fax

You can receive faxed forms and publications by calling 1-703-368-9694 (not a toll-free call). Simply follow the directions from the prompts.

Be careful when providing the IRS with your information while you are trying to information from them. Hire a tax professional if you are concerned you might inadvertantly disclose information you may not want the IRS to have at this time.

June 1, 2009

IRS Now Hiring

There are jobs in California.

The IRS is recruiting hundreds of Internal Revenue Agents with a minimum 30 hours of college-level accounting coursework for openings around the country. To apply for these and other IRS jobs, go to the IRS job search on USAJOBS.

May 21, 2009

Do You Have A Foreign Financial Account?

Do You Have a Foreign Financial Account?

If you have authority over or own a foreign financial account, including a brokerage account, unit trust, mutual fund, bank account or other types of financial accounts, then you may be required to report the account yearly to the IRS. Under the Bank Secrecy Act, each United States person must file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), if

1. The value of the account exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year, and

2. The person has financial interest in, signature authority (or other authority that is comparable to signature authority) over one or more accounts in a foreign country.

The FBAR is a tool to help the United States government identify persons who may be using foreign financial accounts to circumvent United States law. Investigators use FBARs to help identify or trace funds used for illicit purposes or to identify unreported income maintained or generated abroad.

A United States person is not prohibited from owning foreign accounts. The FBAR is required because foreign financial institutions may not be subject to the same reporting requirements as domestic financial institutions.

Definition of Terms

What is an FBAR?

Who must file an FBAR?

When is the FBAR due?

Where are FBAR forms available?

What are the exceptions to the FBAR filing requirement?

How do foreign account holders report their accounts to the IRS?

Where do account holders file the FBAR?

How long should account holders retain records of the foreign accounts?

What is a United States person?

Would a foreign athlete or entertainer that occasionally visits the U.S. in order to compete or perform in an event, be considered a United States person for FBAR purposes?

What is a foreign country?

What is a financial account?

Does more than one form need to be filed for a husband and wife owning a joint account?

What constitutes signature or other authority over an account?

What does “maximum value of account” mean (for Box 15 on the FBAR)?

Is an FBAR required if the account generates neither interest nor dividend income?

How does an FBAR filer amend a previously filed FBAR?

What is the statute of limitations for assessing civil penalties for violations of the FBAR requirements?

What happens if an account holder is required to file an FBAR and fails to do so?

An American citizen, X, gives a person who is a citizen or resident of the U.S. power of attorney to X’s Canadian bank accounts. X files an FBAR form annually. Does the power of attorney also need to file an FBAR?

A fiduciary who is a U.S. person has control as a trustee for an IRA with a foreign account. Should an FBAR be filed?

Does the term “other authority over a financial account” mean that a person, who has the power to direct how an account is invested, but who cannot make disbursements to the accounts, has to file an FBAR?

Must a U.S. person file an FBAR on a Eurodollar account in the Cayman Islands?

A N.Y. corporation owns a foreign company that has foreign accounts. The corporation will file an FBAR for the foreign company’s accounts. Do the primary owners of the U.S. Company also have to file?

A company has over 25 foreign accounts. What should they enter in Part ll of the FBAR?

A person is a non-resident alien and only visits the United States to manage his personal interests, such as rental property. Does that person have to file an FBAR?

Reporting and Filing Information

A person who holds a foreign account may have a reporting obligation even though the account produces no taxable income. Checking the appropriate block on Form 1040 Schedule B, and filing Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, satisfies the account holder’s reporting obligation.

A foreign account holder must mail the Form TD F 90-22.1 on or before June 30 of the following year to:

U.S. Department of the Treasury
P.O. Box 32621
Detroit, MI 48232-0621.

The FBAR is not to be filed with the filer’s Federal income tax return.

The granting, by IRS, of an extension to file Federal income tax returns does not extend the due date for filing an FBAR. There is no extension available for filing the FBAR.

Account holders who do not comply with the FBAR reporting requirements may be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, or both.

Exceptions to the Reporting Requirement

There are exceptions to the reporting requirement. These exceptions include:

1. Accounts in U.S. military banking facilities operated by a United States financial institution to serve U.S. Government installations abroad are not considered to be accounts in a foreign country for purposes of the reporting requirement.

2. An officer or employee of a bank that is subject to the supervision of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of Thrift Supervision, or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, is not required to report having signature or other authority over a foreign account if the officer or employee has no personal interest in the account.

3. An officer or employee of a domestic corporation whose equity securities are listed on a national securities exchange or which has assets exceeding $10 million and 500 or more shareholders of record, is not required to report having signature or other authority over a foreign account if the person has no personal financial interest in the account, and the officer or employee has been advised in writing by the chief financial officer of the corporation that the corporation has filed a current report that includes the foreign account.

The IRS has launched a "tax amnesty" for those who turn themselves in within the next 5 months. It is critical that clients be made aware of this program, and be counseled on whether it is in their best interest to participate. The issues are complex, and require a balancing of a number of financial, tax and criminal considerations including the non-applicability of the federal authorized tax practitioner privilege. The "amnesty" will expire on September 22, 2009, so time is of the essence. Current year FBARs are due June 30th.

May 19, 2009

U.S. Tax Court Announces e-Filing Pilot

The United States Tax Court will begin a pilot eFiling program through Practitioner Access and Petitioner Access on May 7, 2009.

The pilot will be restricted to petitioners and practitioners in good standing with the Court who have registered for eAccess, agreed to its Terms of Use, and consented to eService. The pilot applies to all cases first calendared for trial or hearing after August 31, 2009.

For example, if you have registered for Practitioner Access, consented to eService, and your case is first calendared for trial or hearing on September 21, 2009, you may eFile in that case during the pilot, but not if the case was set for hearing or trial before September 1, 2009. You can also participate in the pilot if your case has not been set for trial. If your case is set for trial or hearing before September 1, 2009, you may not eFile in that case during the pilot.

Please note that eFiling in a particular case can be commenced only after the petition has been filed with the Tax Court in that case. All petitions must be submitted to the Court in paper form.

May 15, 2009

Tax Scams

The Internal Revenue Service issued its 2009 “dirty dozen” list of tax scams, including schemes involving phishing, hiding income offshore and false claims for refunds.

Tax schemes are illegal and can lead to problems for both scam artists and taxpayers who risk significant penalties, interest and possible criminal prosecution.

The IRS urges taxpayers to avoid these common schemes:

Filing False or Misleading Forms

The IRS is seeing scam artists file false or misleading returns to claim refunds that they are not entitled to. Frivolous information returns, such as Form 1099-Original Issue Discount (OID), claiming false withholding credits are used to legitimize erroneous refund claims. The new scam has evolved from an earlier phony argument that a “strawman” bank account has been created for each citizen. Under this scheme, taxpayers fabricate an information return, arguing they used their “strawman” account to pay for goods and services and falsely claim the corresponding amount as withholding as a way to seek a tax refund.

False Claims for Refund and Requests for Abatement

This scam involves a request for abatement of previously assessed tax using Form 843, Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement. Many individuals who try this have not previously filed tax returns. The tax they are trying to have abated has been assessed by the IRS through the Substitute for Return Program. The filer uses Form 843 to list reasons for the request. Often, one of the reasons given is "Failed to properly compute and/or calculate Section 83-Property Transferred in Connection with Performance of Service."

Hiding Income Offshore

The IRS aggressively pursues taxpayers and promoters involved in abusive offshore transactions. Taxpayers have tried to avoid or evade U.S. income tax by hiding income in offshore banks, brokerage accounts or through other entities. Recently, the IRS provided guidance to auditors on how to deal with those hiding income offshore in undisclosed accounts. The IRS draws a clear line between taxpayers with offshore accounts who voluntarily come forward and those who fail to come forward.

Taxpayers also evade taxes by using offshore debit cards, credit cards, wire transfers, foreign trusts, employee-leasing schemes, private annuities or life insurance plans. The IRS has also identified abusive offshore schemes including those that involve use of electronic funds transfer and payment systems, offshore business merchant accounts and private banking relationships.

Return Preparer Fraud

Dishonest return preparers can cause many headaches for taxpayers who fall victim to their ploys. Such preparers derive financial gain by skimming a portion of their clients’ refunds and charging inflated fees for return preparation services. They attract new clients by promising large refunds. Taxpayers should choose carefully when hiring a tax preparer. As the saying goes, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. No matter who prepares the return, the taxpayer is ultimately responsible for its accuracy. Since 2002, the courts have issued injunctions ordering dozens of individuals to cease preparing returns, and the Department of Justice has filed complaints against dozens of others, which are pending in court.

Phishing

Phishing is a tactic used by Internet-based scam artists to trick unsuspecting victims into revealing personal or financial information. The criminals use the information to steal the victim’s identity, access bank accounts, run up credit card charges or apply for loans in the victim’s name.

Phishing scams often take the form of an e-mail that appears to come from a legitimate source, including the IRS. The IRS never initiates unsolicited e-mail contact with taxpayers about their tax issues. Taxpayers who receive unsolicited e-mails that claim to be from the IRS can forward the message to phishing@irs.gov. Further instructions are available at IRS.gov. To date, taxpayers have forwarded scam e-mails reflecting thousands of confirmed IRS phishing sites. If you believe you have been the target of an identity thief, information is available at IRS.gov.

Zero Wages

Filing a phony wage- or income-related information return to replace a legitimate information return has been used as an illegal method to lower the amount of taxes owed. Typically, a Form 4852 (Substitute Form W-2) or a “corrected” Form 1099 is used as a way to improperly reduce taxable income to zero. The taxpayer also may submit a statement rebutting wages and taxes reported by a payer to the IRS. Sometimes fraudsters even include an explanation on their Form 4852 that cites statutory language on the definition of wages or may include some reference to a paying company that refuses to issue a corrected Form W-2 for fear of IRS retaliation. Taxpayers should resist any temptation to participate in any of the variations of this scheme.

Abuse of Charitable Organizations and Deductions

The IRS continues to observe the misuse of tax-exempt organizations. Abuse includes arrangements to improperly shield income or assets from taxation and attempts by donors to maintain control over donated assets or income from donated property. The IRS also continues to investigate various schemes involving the donation of non-cash assets, including easements on property, closely-held corporate stock and real property. Often, the donations are highly overvalued or the organization receiving the donation promises that the donor can purchase the items back at a later date at a price the donor sets. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 imposed increased penalties for inaccurate appraisals and new definitions of qualified appraisals and qualified appraisers for taxpayers claiming charitable contributions.

Frivolous Arguments

Promoters of frivolous schemes encourage people to make unreasonable and unfounded claims to avoid paying the taxes they owe. The IRS has a list of frivolous legal positions that taxpayers should stay away from. Taxpayers who file a tax return or make a submission based on one of the positions on the list are subject to a $5,000 penalty. More information is available on IRS.gov.

Disguised Corporate Ownership

Some taxpayers form corporations and other entities in certain states for the primary purpose of disguising the ownership of a business or financial activity. Such entities can be used to facilitate underreporting of income, fictitious deductions, non-filing of tax returns, participating in listed transactions, money laundering, financial crimes, and even terrorist financing. The IRS is working with state authorities to identify these entities and to bring the owners of these entities into compliance.

Misuse of Trusts

For years, unscrupulous promoters have urged taxpayers to transfer assets into trusts. While there are many legitimate, valid uses of trusts in tax and estate planning, some promoted transactions promise reduction of income subject to tax, deductions for personal expenses and reduced estate or gift taxes. Such trusts rarely deliver the promised tax benefits and are being used primarily as a means to avoid income tax liability and hide assets from creditors, including the IRS.

The IRS has recently seen an increase in the improper use of private annuity trusts and foreign trusts to divert income and deduct personal expenses. As with other arrangements, taxpayers should seek the advice of a trusted professional before entering into a trust arrangement.

Abusive Retirement Plans

The IRS continues to uncover abuses in retirement plan arrangements, including Roth Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs). The IRS is looking for transactions that taxpayers are using to avoid the limitations on contributions to IRAs as well as transactions that are not properly reported as early distributions. Taxpayers should be wary of advisers who encourage them to shift appreciated assets into IRAs or companies owned by their IRAs at less than fair market value to circumvent annual contribution limits. Other variations have included the use of limited liability companies to engage in activity which is considered prohibited.

Fuel Tax Credit Scams

The IRS is receiving claims for the fuel tax credit that are unreasonable. Some taxpayers, such as farmers who use fuel for off-highway business purposes, may be eligible for the fuel tax credit. But some individuals are claiming the tax credit for nontaxable uses of fuel when their occupation or income level makes the claim unreasonable. Fraud involving the fuel tax credit is considered a frivolous tax claim, potentially subjecting those who improperly claim the credit to a $5,000 penalty.

How to Report Suspected Tax Fraud Activity

Suspected tax fraud can be reported to the IRS using Form 3949-A, Information Referral. Form 3949-A is available for download from the IRS Web site at IRS.gov. The completed form or a letter detailing the alleged fraudulent activity should be addressed to the Internal Revenue Service, Fresno, CA 93888. The mailing should include specific information about who is being reported, the activity being reported, how the activity became known, when the alleged violation took place, the amount of money involved and any other information that might be helpful in an investigation. The person filing the report is not required to self-identify, although it is helpful to do so. The identity of the person filing the report can be kept confidential.

May 11, 2009

Your Rights As A Taxpayer

The IRS publishes a thorough explanation of your rights as a taxpayer.

You have rights as a taxpayer when dealing with the IRS. Whether you file a Form 1040 or a complicated corporate return, you will benefit from knowing your rights as a taxpayer and being familiar with the IRS' obligations to protect them.

The Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is an IRS program that provides an independent system to assure that tax problems, which have not been resolved through normal channels, are promptly and fairly handled.

What should you do if you receive a notice from the IRS?

You have rights to representation - learn more about granting power of attorney.

The IRS accepts most taxpayer's returns as filed. If it inquires about your return or select it for examination, it does not suggest that you are dishonest. The inquiry or examination may or may not result in more tax. Learn about your rights during the examination process and get information about how audits are conducted.

It is your right to appeal any action taken by the IRS to change your account.

Learn about the collection process IRS may follow to collect overdue taxes, including a summary of your rights and other important information about the collection process.

For further tax help, call former IRS attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

May 5, 2009

Offers In Compromise For California Businesses

A request for an Offer in Compromise from the IRS or the California Franchise Tax Board can also be used by businesses to resolve outstanding corporate income and payroll taxes.

Similar to an Offer in Compromise for an individual, the offer for a business is computed based upon the business’s current assets and financial disclosure statement. The IRS uses the company’s reasonable collection potential to determine the Offer amount. The reasonable collection potential for a business is computed in a manner similar to that of an individual. However, unlike individual expenses, the IRS does not have “national standards” for business expenses. In most circumstances the IRS will allow all ordinary and necessary expenses of the business.

The IRS’s recent revisions to its Internal Revenue Manual make these types of Offers more difficult.

Offers submitted by an in-business taxpayer with payroll/trust fund recovery penalty liabilities will not be investigated unless the trust fund portion of the taxes are paid, the trust fund recovery penalties are assessed against all responsible persons, or the trust fund package has been forwarded for assessment.

To submit an Offer for an ongoing business, all of the responsible persons must either agree to be assessed with the trust fund recovery penalties, or pay the underlying trust fund amount.

Offers submitted by active businesses with trust fund liabilities no longer require that the Offer amount include the reasonable collection potential of both the entity and all responsible persons. Instead, the ongoing business is only required to offer an amount reflective of its reasonable collection potential.

This policy is likely due to the IRS’s renewed focus on the collection of the trust fund liabilities from all responsible persons, despite an Offer at the entity level.

The IRS will continue to collect the trust fund portion of the liability from the responsible persons despite the entity’s successful Offer; most responsible persons would not be motivated to file an Offer on behalf of the company due to their continued liability. The IRS’s interest in collecting from all responsible persons diminishes some of the benefits of an Offer for an ongoing business taxpayer.

These policies leave most responsible persons in a precarious situation because the Offer for the business will not alleviate their personal liabilities. Unless all of the responsible persons independently qualify for a personal Offer in Compromise, this might not be the best solution for the business. However, it may be the only solution available for the entity to remain in business.

For tax help on your unpaid payroll or income tax, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

May 1, 2009

Standards of Conduct for Attorneys, CPAs, EAs and Enrolled Actuaries

Standards of Conduct for Certified Public Accountants, Attorneys, Enrolled Actuaries and Enrolled Agents are available at the IRS website. Circular 230 contains regulations governing the practice of attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled agents, enrolled actuaries, and appraisers before the Internal Revenue Service.

April 15, 2009

California's Tax Season Finally Over

It's crunch time for California’s taxpayers and their accountants alike in the rush to get state and federal income taxes postmarked in by tonight's 11:59:59 p.m. deadline.

Some of my CPA friends can't wait to teach their teenagers how to drive.

My other friends who are tax preparers are just looking forward to getting some sleep.

Another California tax season over – at last.

April 10, 2009

Know IRS Procedures

Here is a link to the "Top Frequently Asked Questions for IRS Procedures".

Try this link to the "Frequently Asked Question Subcategories for IRS Procedures".

For tax assistance with the IRS or California's tax authorities such as the Franchise Tax Board or California State Board of Equalization, call a qualified tax attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

April 8, 2009

Tax Law Changes In California For 2008

Curious about what tax law changes occurred in California that impacts your income tax return (Form 540)? The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) publised a summary of those changes which you can view here.

Some of the tax changes cover these topics:

Electronic payments

Mortgage forgiveness debt relief

Net operating loss

Tax shelters

Business tax credit limitation

Estimated tax payments

Same-Sex married couples

Voluntary contributions

Third party designee

Conformity

Rice Straw Credit

Withholding on California Real Estate

Consult your tax preparer to determine whether any of these changes may apply and benefit you.

April 6, 2009

Internal Revenue Code: The Tax Laws

The IRS makes available the Tax Code, Regulations and Official Guidance at its website. Proper tax planning is available by proper use of the Code, Treasury Regulations and other government resources. Here is your source for last minute planning opportunities which can treat last year's income, expenses and deductions in a way advatageous to you.

April 3, 2009

California Revenue and Taxation Code

California's tax season means proper tax planning. A most important tool is the tax code. Access to the entire tax code for California is available by clicking here.

Here's a list of the tax code's table of contents.

CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL PROVISIONS ................................................... 1-38
DIVISION 1. PROPERTY TAXATION
PART 0.5. IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE XIIIA OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION

Continue reading "California Revenue and Taxation Code" »

April 1, 2009

Filing Your 1040

The IRS website is a fantastic resource during this tax season for providing information and answers to commonly asked questions. Here is a few of the topics covered:

2009 Tax Year Highlights

Recovery Rebate Credit

First-Time Homeowners Credit

Earned Income Tax Credit

Facing Difficult times financially?

Use Online Tools

Find out if you qualify for Earned Income Tax Credit

Calculate your optional itemized deduction for state and local sales taxes

See if you might be subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax

Find out the status of your refund and more

Products and Services in Spanish

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

Are you or your spouse a member of the U.S. Armed Forces?

Tax relief in disaster situations

Tips for Choosing a Tax Preparer

Commonly Requested Tax Forms and Instructions

Taxpayer Advocate Service

Need more assistance? The IRS wants to help; lots of information is available for individuals and businesses.

March 18, 2009

Madoff And Ponzi - How To Report Your Tax Obligation

Deductibility of Theft Losses:

The Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department are aware of investment arrangements that have been discovered to be fraudulent, resulting in significant losses to taxpayers. These arrangements often take the form of so-called "Ponzi" schemes, in which the party perpetrating the fraud receives cash or property from investors, purports to earn income for the investors, and reports to the investors income amounts that are wholly or partially fictitious.

The Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department recognize that whether and when investors meet the requirements for claiming a theft loss for an investment in a Ponzi scheme are highly factual determinations that often cannot be made by taxpayers with certainty in the year the loss is discovered.

Payments, if any, of purported income or principal to investors are made from cash or property that other investors invested in the fraudulent arrangement. The party perpetrating the fraud criminally appropriates some or all of the investors' cash or property.

Revenue Ruling 2009-9, 2009 I.R.B (March 2, 2009), describes the proper income tax treatment for losses resulting from these Ponzi schemes.

In view of the number of investment arrangements recently discovered to be fraudulent and the extent of the potential losses, this revenue procedure provides an optional safe harbor under which qualified investors (as defined in the revenue procedure) may treat a loss as a theft loss deduction when certain conditions are met.

This treatment provides qualified investors with a uniform manner for determining their theft losses. In addition, this treatment avoids potentially difficult problems of proof in determining how much income reported in prior years was fictitious or a return of capital, and alleviates compliance and administrative burdens on both taxpayers and the Service.

Under Revenue Procedure 2009-20, the IRS issued guidance on the examination of returns and claims for refund, credit or abatement. This revenue procedure provides an optional safe harbor treatment for taxpayers that experienced losses in certain investment arrangements discovered to be criminally fraudulent. This revenue procedure also describes how the Internal Revenue Service will treat a return that claims a deduction for such a loss and does not use the safe harbor treatment described in this revenue procedure.

March 16, 2009

Fix Your Tax Problem Fast

If you owe over $100,000 in unpaid income tax to the Internal Revenue Service or a large amount to the California Franchise Tax Board, you can quickly resolve your tax problem by having the following information available when contacting the Internal Revenue Service:

• Valid Power of Attorney (Form 2848) covering all tax periods
• Completed Form 433- A, B or F
• Explain in detail why the taxpayer is not able to full pay or borrow to full pay
• Copies of delinquent tax returns
• Rental income
• Three months of current bank statements (all accounts)
• Three months of current pay stubs for both yourself and your spouse
• Investment income
• Pension income and/or Social Security income
• Value of 401K or Retirement account
• Value of all property and/or available equity
• Employer’s information including work number
• Number of individual’s living in the household
• Secured loan(s) - amount of loan and remaining balance(s)
• Life insurance policies, (whole or term), any borrowing ability? And/or value of policy
• Profit and Loss statements for self-employed taxpayers
• Commission statement
• Year make of vehicles, value, equity, balance owed, and monthly payments
• Out-of-pocket medical expenses
• Substantiation of payments being made
• Substantiation of Court ordered payments
• Spouse’s income and source with name/address/phone number

Additional information and /or documentation may be needed to determine disposition of the account.

Call a qualified Los Angeles tax attorney for the right tax help. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

March 6, 2009

California’s Multi Tax Agency Form for Offer in Compromise

California's Franchise Tax Board, Employment Development Department and the State Board of Equalization now allow taxpayers behind in their tax payments to use one form when applying to more than one tax agency for an Offer in Compromise.

Are you an OIC candidate for taxes owed to California's tax agencies?

The Offer in Compromise (OIC) program is for taxpayers that do not have, and will not have in the foreseeable future, the income, assets, or means to pay the tax liability. It allows you to offer a lesser amount for payment of a nondisputed final tax liability. Although each case is evaluated based on its own unique set of facts and circumstances, California gives the following factors strong consideration in the evaluation:

The offer is in the best interest of California.

Your present and future expenses.

The amount of equity in your assets.

Your present and future income.

Your ability to pay.

The potential for changed circumstances.

California’s tax agencies will not recommend approval of offers if there are assets or income available to pay more than the amount offered.

Can California’s tax agencies process your application?

Your offers will be evaluated independently by each agency. The BOE, FTB, and EDD have different criteria for participation in their OIC programs.

For all agencies, you must agree that you owe the amount of the liability. If you dispute the liability, you should appeal through the appropriate agency’s appeal process.

For FTB, your application will be processed if all of the required FTB income tax returns have been filed. If you have no filing requirement, note it on your application.

For both BOE and EDD, you must be out of business and must not have a controlling interest or an association with the business or a successor to the business that incurred the liability. This includes operating a business of the same nature.

For EDD, you cannot have access to income to pay more than the accumulating interest and 6.7 percent of the outstanding liability on an annual basis.

For EDD, an offer will not be considered for liabilities assessed for fraud or where the employer has been convicted of a violation under the California Unemployment Insurance Code.

For BOE, an offer for a liability with a fraud assessment will not be considered if there is a criminal conviction of fraud. For other fraud assessments, an offer will be considered if a minimum of the tax plus the fraud penalty is offered.

Are collections suspended?

Submitting an offer does not automatically suspend collection activity. Wage garnishments already in place at the time of the offer will continue and will not be considered as partial payment of the offered amount. However, in many cases, collection action will be suspended until the OIC evaluation is completed. If delaying collection activity jeopardizes California’s ability to collect, collection efforts may continue. Interest will continue to accrue as prescribed by law.

Will California’s tax agencies require you to continue payments on an Installment Agreement?

All the agencies require that you continue making periodic payments as called for in any existing installment agreement while your offer is being considered.

Call Mitchell A. Port, a California tax attorney, for help with your tax problems. Call (310) 559-5259.

March 2, 2009

California Income Taxes: Get Some Relief

The California Franchise Tax Board explains that if you meet certain legal requirements, you may qualify for relief of payment on all or part of your unpaid income tax balance. California's Franchise Tax Board will work with you to determine if you meet the requirements for relief. One approach is to complete and submit a "Request for Innocent Joint Filer Relief".

Speak to a licensed California tax attorney to discuss fixing your tax problems. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

February 26, 2009

How To Prepare Your Request To Appeal An IRS Decision

INTEREST AND PENALTIES DO NOT STOP ACCRUING WHEN YOU FILE YOUR REQUEST FOR APPEAL

Review the letter and publication(s) that were sent to you by the IRS. The information will usually be straight-forward and will say:

When the request must be received

How to prepare a request for an appeal (protest)

What information you need to include in the request for an appeal

Where to mail the request


For specific information appealing Collection issues, refer to the Collection page.

For specific information appealing Examination issues, refer to the Examination page.

Interest and certain penalties will continue to accrue during the Appeals process and during any subsequent Appeals to the Courts on any amount not paid. In order to stop the accrual of interest and penalties on proposed adjustments, refer to Notice 1016, How to Stop Interest. For an explanation on how to stop interest from accruing on an unpaid balance, refer to Publication 594, What You Should Know About the IRS Collection Process.

Call a California tax attorney for help with your IRS appeal. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

February 20, 2009

Read This Before Choosing A Tax Preparer

The IRS has some great tax tips for California's taxpayers. Take a look at a recent tax tip about selecting your tax preparer. Here's what it said:

You are legally responsible for what’s on your tax returns even if they are prepared by someone else. So, it’s important to find a qualified tax professional. If you will be paying someone to do your tax return, choose a tax preparer wisely.

The most reputable preparers will request to see your records and receipts and will ask you multiple questions to determine your total income and your qualifications for expenses, deductions, and other items. By doing so, they have your best interest in mind and are trying to help you avoid penalties, interest, or additional taxes that could result from later IRS contacts.

Most tax return preparers are professional, honest and provide excellent service to their clients; you can use the following tips to choose a preparer who will offer the best service for their tax preparation needs.

Find out what the service fees are before the return is prepared. Avoid preparers who base their fee on a percentage of the amount of your refund or who claim they can obtain larger refunds than other preparers.

Only use a tax professional that signs your tax return and provides you with a copy for your records.

Avoid tax preparers that ask you to sign a blank tax form.

Choose a tax preparer that will be around to answer questions after the return has been filed.
Ask questions. Do you know anyone who has used the tax professional? Were they satisfied with the service they received?

Check to see if the preparer has any questionable history with the Better Business Bureau, the state’s board of accountancy for CPAs or the state’s bar association for attorneys. Find out if the preparer belongs to a professional organization that requires its members to pursue continuing education and also holds them accountable to a code of ethics.

Determine if the preparer’s credentials meet your needs. Does your state have licensing or registration requirements for paid preparers? Is he or she an Enrolled Agent, Certified Public Accountant, or Attorney? If so, the preparer can represent taxpayers before the IRS on all matters – including audits, collections, and appeals. Other return preparers can represent taxpayers only in audits regarding a return signed as a preparer.

Before you sign your tax return, review it and ask questions.

Do you need a referral to qualified tax return preparers? Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259 and ask for that referral.

February 18, 2009

California's Program To Suspend LLCs For Noncompliance

Beginning now, California’s Franchise Tax Board (FTB) will take action which helps the FTB bring Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) into tax compliance and reduce the State's budget deficit.

Read more about this in the Los Angeles Times article from January 12, 2009.

California’s FTB and California’s Secretary of State (SOS) are working together to implement a suspension/forfeiture process for Limited Liability Companies (LLCs).

The FTB will suspend/forfeit the rights, powers and privileges of LLCs for non-payment of taxes, penalties, or interest, and/or failure to file a return (California’s Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 23301, 23301.5 and 23304.1(d)). The LLC suspension/forfeiture process will be very similar to the one for corporations.

Implementing the suspension/forfeiture process will have a dramatic effect on LLCs that have failed to meet their filing and payment obligations. We will send notification to all entities at their last known addresses, 60 days before imposing suspension/forfeiture.

Non-registered LLCs acting and filing in California will be subject to contract voidability. The reasons for contract voidability are the same as for suspension/forfeiture: failure to file a return, and/or failure to pay taxes, penalties, or interest.

Get help with compliance. Call a tax attorney licensed in California. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

February 12, 2009

Help For Financially Distressed Taxpayers From The IRS

If you are behind on tax payments there could be additional help available if you are facing an unusual hardship situation.

As the new tax filing season begins, the IRS is taking steps to help people who owe back taxes. The IRS can help in the following areas, to mention just a few:

Hardship Situation. Postponement of Collection Actions: IRS employees will have greater authority to suspend collection actions in hardship cases where you are unable to pay. If you recently lost a job or face other financial problems, IRS assistors may be able to suspend collection in some situations without documentation to minimize the burden on you.

Home Equity Values in Flux Result in An Additional Review for Offers in Compromise: An Offer in Compromise (OIC), an agreement between a taxpayer and the IRS that settles the taxpayer’s tax debt for less than full amount owed, may be a viable option for taxpayers experiencing economic difficulties. However, the equity taxpayers have in real property can be a barrier to an OIC being accepted. With the uncertainty in the housing market, the IRS recognizes that the real-estate valuations used to assess ability to pay are not necessarily accurate. So in instances where the accuracy of local real-estate valuations is in question or other unusual hardships exist, the IRS is creating a new, second review of the information to determine if accepting an offer is appropriate.

The IRS May Provide Added Flexibility Where Installment Agreement Payments Are Missed: The IRS is allowing more flexibility for individuals with existing Installment Agreements who have difficulty making payments because of a job loss or other financial hardship. Depending on the situation, the IRS may allow a skipped payment or a reduced monthly payment amount. If you are in this situation you should contact the IRS.

Speedier Levy Releases: The IRS will speed the delivery of levy releases by easing requirements on taxpayers who request expedited levy releases for hardship reasons. Taxpayers seeking expedited releases of levies to an employer or bank should contact the IRS number shown on the notice of levy to discuss available options. When calling, taxpayers requesting a levy release due to hardship should be prepared to provide the IRS with the fax number of the bank or employer processing the levy.

Prevention of Offer in Compromise Defaults: Taxpayers who are unable to meet the periodic payment terms of an accepted OIC will be able to contact the IRS office handling the offer for available options to help them avoid default.

To talk with a California tax attorney who can help solve your tax problem, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

February 10, 2009

Top Ten Business Entity Errors That Delay Processing Your California Tax Return

California's business owners now have easy access to solutions made available by the Franchise Tax Board in response to errors made when trying to fulfill their California tax obligations. Here's a partial list of how business owners in the counties of Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, Orange and Ventura - and throughout the rest of California - can make unintended mistakes that delay processing those tax returns:

Incorrect math calculations, or incomplete or missing documents

Return account periods overlap

Omitting or using incorrect entity identification numbers

Incomplete entity name

One lump sum payment sent for multiple entities, or multiple payments sent in the same package/envelope

Incorrect payment amount claimed

Multiple tax returns filed for the same account period

Amended returns not clearly identified as amended

Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) filing incorrect forms

Using an incorrect form for the tax year account period indicated on the return

For tax help, speak with a tax lawyer. Mitchell A. Port is a tax attorney located in Los Angeles who can fix the problem. Call (310) 559-5259.

January 27, 2009

Use The Taxpayer Advocate To Help Fix Your Tax Problem

The Taxpayer Advocate independently represents your interests and concerns within the Internal Revenue Service. The Taxpayer Advocate Service is an independent organization within the IRS whose employees assist taxpayers who believe that an IRS system or procedure is not working as it should, who are seeking help in resolving tax problems that have not been resolved through normal channels, or who are experiencing economic harm. The goals of the Taxpayer Advocate Service are to protect individual and business taxpayer rights and to reduce taxpayer burden. This is accomplished in two ways:

Identifying issues that increase burden or create problems for taxpayers: Bringing those issues to the attention of IRS management and making legislative proposals where necessary;

Ensuring that taxpayer problems which have not been resolved through normal channels, are promptly and fairly handled.

Need further help? Call a qualified California tax attorney - call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

January 23, 2009

Tax Humor?

“The hardest thing in the world to understand is the income tax.” — Albert Einstein, physicist

“I am proud to be paying taxes in the United States. The only thing is – I could be just as proud for half the money.” — Arthur Godfrey, entertainer

"Like mothers, taxes are often misunderstood, but seldom forgotten.'' — Lord Bramwell, 19th Century English jurist

“Income tax has made more liars out of the American people than golf.” — Will Rogers, humorist

"The power of taxing people and their property is essential to the very existence of government.'' — James Madison, U.S. President

"To tax and to please, no more than to love and to be wise, is not given to men." — Edmund Burke, 18th Century Irish political philosopher and British statesman

"No government can exist without taxation. This money must necessarily be levied on the people; and the grand art consists of levying so as not to oppress.'' — Frederick the Great, 18th Century Prussian king

"The best measure of a man's honesty isn't his income tax return. It's the zero adjust on his bathroom scale.'' — Arthur C. Clarke, author

“People who complain about taxes can be divided into two classes: men and women.”
— Unknown

"Next to being shot at and missed, nothing is really quite as satisfying as an income tax refund.” — F. J. Raymond, humorist

A tax loophole is "something that benefits the other guy. If it benefits you, it is tax reform.''
— Russell B. Long, U.S. Senator

"Few of us ever test our powers of deduction, except when filling out an income tax form.''
— Laurence J. Peter, author

“Taxation with representation ain’t so hot either.” — Gerald Barzan, humorist

“Where there is an income tax, the just man will pay more and the unjust less on the same amount of income.” — Plato

"Taxes are what we pay for civilized society.'' — Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., U.S. Supreme Court Justice

January 21, 2009

Tax Calculation Of Innocent Spouse's Share Of Income

California is a community property state which means most property acquired during the marriage (except for gifts or inheritances) is owned jointly by both spouses and is divided upon divorce, annulment or death. Joint ownership is automatically presumed by law in the absence of specific evidence that would point to a contrary conclusion for a particular piece of property.

In a recent Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision, the taxpayer claimed that in determining her share of the community property interest in order to calculate how much income to pay tax on, the IRS should have made the “separate tax formula allocation . . . upon the basis of the spouse who earned the income and not upon the basis of a community property split.”

The only disputed issue before the court was how the separate tax liability should be calculated—the taxpayer argued that it should be calculated based on the wages she personally earned, and the IRS argued that it should be calculated based on fifty percent of all community income.

The court simply held that the taxpayer's argument is not supported by the IRS's revenue rulings or any other legal authority. The court relied on Revenue Ruling 2004-74 which provides that tax is simply not calculated on the share of community income earned by just one spouse but instead is calculated on the 50% interest attributable to the spouse who live in a community property state (like California).

Do you qualify for innocent spouse relief? Speak with a California tax attorney who understands community property law. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

January 15, 2009

Substitute For Return

Simply not filing a federal tax return for your California business or for your income earned in California, be it a payroll tax return or a corporate tax return, or an individual income tax return doesn’t mean you or your California based business won’t be assessed a tax.

Internal Revenue Code Section 6020(b) is the authority given to the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service to prepare and process tax returns for non-filing business and individual taxpayers. If the tax returns prepared for you by the government are taxable, as they almost certainly will be, then a tax is assessed and collection efforts will be made.

Final regulations were recently issued by the Internal Revenue Service and they affect any person who fails to file a required federal tax return.

The final regulations relate to tax returns prepared or signed by the Commissioner or other Internal Revenue Officers or employees under Section 6020 of the Internal Revenue Code. The final regulations provide guidance for preparing a substitute for return under Section 6020(b).

IRC 6020(b) provides a way to prepare returns and secure assessments from non-filing taxpayers who:

Have an open filing requirement

Do not file a return as required

Speaking with the formality of final tax regulations, here’s what they say: “If any person required by the Internal Revenue Code or by the regulations to make a tax return, fails to make such return at the time prescribed for it, or makes, willfully or otherwise, a false, fraudulent or frivolous return, the Commissioner or other authorized Internal Revenue Officer or employee shall make such return from his own knowledge and from such information as he can obtain through testimony or otherwise. The Commissioner or other authorized Internal Revenue Officer or employee may make the tax return by gathering information and making computations through electronic, automated or other means to make a determination of the taxpayer’s tax liability.”

File your unfiled tax returns for your California business or for you personally. Negotiate with a tax attorney’s help how you can pay the tax and how much of it must be paid. Call Mitchell A. Port, an attorney formerly with the IRS, at (310) 559-5259.

January 13, 2009

Tax Calendar For California Businesses

Attention California small business owners: The 2009 IRS Tax Calendar for Small Businesses and the Self-Employed (Publication 1518) is now available in English and Spanish. The Tax Calendar is a handy resource to help small business owners meet their tax obligations. The twelve month wall calendar is packed with useful information on retirement plans, common tax filing dates, general business taxes, electronic filing and paying options, business publications and forms and a lot more.

Each page highlights different tax issues and tips that may be relevant to small-business owners.

Tax problems may nevertheless still come up in California and elsewhere. Call a tax attorney for help. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

January 9, 2009

Compliance With IRS Employment Tax Filings Gets Easier For Some Of California's Employers

To reduce burden on small employers many of whom do business in Los Angeles County, Ventura County, Santa Barbara County and Orange County California, the IRS has simplified the rules for filing employment tax returns to report social security, Medicare, and withheld federal income taxes. Certain employers must file Form 944, Employer’s ANNUAL Federal Tax Return, instead of Form 941, Employer’s QUARTERLY Federal Tax Return.

For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, employers who estimate that their annual employment tax liability will be $1,000 or less can contact the IRS to request filing Form 944 instead of Forms 941 for a taxable year. Instructions for filing Form 944 are here. Only upon request will the IRS send a notification letter to qualified employers confirming that they may file Form 944 for that taxable year. Once employers receive this notice they must file Form 944 and cannot file Forms 941 instead for a taxable year until they contact the IRS to change their filing requirement to Form 941 for that taxable year and receive confirmation that their filing requirement has been changed.

The IRS will issue guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin informing employers how they can contact the IRS to participate in the Form 944 Program and how they can elect out if they later decide that they want to file Forms 941 instead of Form 944. Under the 2006 regulations, employers were only eligible to opt out if they estimated that their employment tax liability would exceed the $1,000 threshold or if they wanted to e-file Forms 941 quarterly instead. Because the program is being made voluntary, beginning in tax year 2010, employers will be able to opt out for any reason if they follow procedures to be provided in future guidance.

For payroll tax issues, call tax attorney Mitchell A. Port for further information and help.

January 7, 2009

Californians Get Tax Lien Relief

Currently, there are more than 1 million federal tax liens outstanding tied to both real and personal property - many filed in California. The IRS issues more than 600,000 federal tax lien notices annually. Filing a Notice of Federal Tax Lien is a formal process by which the government makes a legal claim to property as security or payment for a tax debt. It serves as a public notice to other creditors that the government has a claim on the property. The federal tax lien will make it difficult to address financial problems you may be having about your home.

In a recent announcement, the IRS said:

"An expedited process that will make it easier for financially distressed homeowners to avoid having a federal tax lien block refinancing of mortgages or the sale of a home.

If taxpayers are looking to refinance or sell a home and there is a federal tax lien filed, there are options. Taxpayers or their representatives, such as their lenders, may request that the IRS make a tax lien secondary to the lien by the lending institution that is refinancing or restructuring a loan. Taxpayers or their representatives may request that the IRS discharge its claim if the home is being sold for less than the amount of the mortgage lien under certain circumstances.

The process to request a discharge or a subordination of a tax lien takes approximately 30 days after the submission of the completed application, but the IRS will work to speed those requests in wake of the economic downturn.

“We don’t want the IRS to be a barrier to people saving or selling their homes. We want to raise awareness of these lien options and to speed our decision-making process so people can refinance their mortgages or sell their homes,” said Doug Shulman, IRS commissioner.

“We realize these are difficult times for many Americans,” Shulman said. “We will ensure we have the resources in place to resolve these issues quickly and homeowners can complete their transactions.”

In some cases, a federal tax lien can be made secondary to another lien, such as a lending institution’s, if the IRS determines that taking a secondary position ultimately will help with collection of the tax debt. That process is called subordination. Taxpayers or their representatives may apply for a subordination of a federal tax lien if they are refinancing or restructuring their mortgage. Without lien subordination, taxpayers may be unable to borrow funds or reduce their payments. Lending institutions generally want their lien to have priority on the home being used as collateral.

To apply for a certificate of lien subordination, people must follow directions in Publication 784, How to Prepare an Application for a Certificate of Subordination of a Federal Tax Lien. Again, there is no form but there must be a typed letter of request and certain documentation. The request should be mailed to one of 40 Collection Advisory Groups nationwide. See Publication 4235, Collection Advisory Group Addresses, for address information.

Taxpayers or their representatives may apply for a certificate of discharge of a tax lien if they are giving up ownership of the property, such as selling the property, at an amount less than the mortgage lien if the mortgage lien is senior to the tax lien. The IRS may also issue a certificate of discharge in other circumstances if the taxpayer has sufficient equity in other assets, can substitute other assets, or is able to pay the IRS its equity in the property. Without a tax lien discharge, the taxpayer may be unable to complete the home ownership change and the ownership title will remain clouded.

To apply for a tax lien discharge, applicants must follow directions in Publication 783, Instructions on How to Apply for a Certificate of Discharge of a Federal Tax Lien. There is no form but there must be a typed letter of request and certain documentation. The request should be mailed to one of 40 Collection Advisory Groups nationwide. See Publication 4235 for address information.

The IRS also urges people to contact the agency’s Collection Advisory Group early in the home sale or refinancing process so that it can begin work on their requests. People sometimes delay informing lenders of the tax liens, which only serves to delay the transaction.

January 5, 2009

California Passes Mandatory Electronic Payment Law

New Section 19011.5 of the California Revenue & Taxation Code requires some taxpayers to make their tax payments using an electronic method which California calls “mandatory e-pay”.
There is a one percent penalty of the amount paid unless the failure to pay electronically was for reasonable cause and not willful neglect.

As a California tax attorney, I don’t know and the law remains unclear whether the penalty applies to those who are employees and who make regular tax payments by having employee withholding done by their employer.

In California, beginning January 1, 2009, personal income taxpayers whose tax liability is greater than $80,000 or who make an estimated tax or extension payment that exceeds $20,000 for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, must send the payment electronically. Once either of these conditions is met, all payments regardless of type, amount, or tax year must be remitted electronically by credit card, Electronic Funds Withdrawal (EFW), or web pay.

Taxpayers whose tax thresholds fall below the mandatory e-pay amounts may request to discontinue making electronic payments. In March 2009, the California Franchise Tax Board will provide a waiver form for taxpayers to file.

On December 1, the California Franchise Tax Board sent courtesy letters to taxpayers who made a payment in 2008 that could qualify them for mandatory e-pay. The letter informed these taxpayers of the law change, and that they may meet the mandatory e-pay threshold in 2009.

December 29, 2008

Checklist To Close Your California Business

When closing a business in California, there is much to do. Some of the following suggestions may require help from your tax attorney or CPA.

You must file an annual return for the year you go out of business. If you have employees, you must file the final employment tax returns, in addition to making final federal tax deposits of these taxes.

The annual tax return for a partnership, corporation, S corporation, limited liability company or trust includes check boxes near the top front page just below the entity information. For the tax year in which your business ceases to exist, check the box that indicates this tax return is a final return. If there are Schedule K-1s, repeat the same procedure on the Schedule K-1.

You will also need to file returns to report disposing of business property, reporting the exchange of like-kind property, and/or changing the form of your business. Below is a list of typical actions to take when closing a business, depending on your type of business structure:

Checklist

Make final federal tax deposits
Electronic Federal Tax Paying System (EFTPS)
OR
Form 8109-B

File final quarterly or annual employment tax form
Form 940, Employer's Annual Federal Unemployment (FUTA) Tax Return
Form 941, Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return
Form 943, Employer's Annual Tax Return for Agricultural Employees
Form 943-A, Agricultural Employer's Record of Federal Tax Liability

Issue final wage and withholding information to employees
Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement

Report information from W-2s issued
Form W-3, Transmittal of Income and Tax Statements

File final tip income and allocated tips information return
Form 8027, Employer's Annual Information Return of Tip Income and Allocated Tips

Report capital gains or losses
Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return
Form 1065, U.S. Partnership Return of Income
Form 1120 (Schedule D), Capital Gains and Losses

Report partner's/shareholder's shares
Form 1065 (Schedule K-1), Partner's Share of Income, Credits, Deductions, etc.
Form 1120S (Schedule K-1), Shareholder's Share of Income, Credits, Deductions, etc.

File final employee pension/benefit plan
Form 5500, Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan

Issue payment information to sub-contractors
Form 1099-MISC, Miscellaneous Income

Report information from 1099s issued
Form 1096, Annual Summary and Transmittal of U.S. Information Returns

Report corporate dissolution or liquidation
Form 966, Corporate Dissolution or Liquidation

Consider allowing S corporation election to terminate
Form 1120S, Instructions

Report business asset sales
Form 8594, Asset Acquisition Statement

Report the sale or exchange of property used in your trade or business
Form 4797, Sales of Business Property

Contact local and California state agencies.

Speak with a California business attorney about this and your other business questions. Call Mitchell A. Port.

December 15, 2008

Tax Treatment Of Investment Advisory Costs

The IRS provided interim guidance with regard to the application of the 2-percent floor under Internal Revenue Code section 67 to certain investment advisory fees. Specifically, the IRS notice provides that, for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2009, non-grantor trusts and estates will not be required to “unbundled” a fiduciary fee into portions consisting of costs that are fully deductible and costs that are subject to the 2-percent floor.

On January 16, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Michael J. Knight, Trustee of William L. Rudkin Testamentary Trust v. Commissioner, 552 U.S. ___, 128 S. Ct. 782 (2008), holding that costs paid to an investment advisor by a nongrantor trust or estate generally are subject to the 2-percent floor for miscellaneous itemized deductions under § 67(a).

The IRS and the Treasury Department expect to issue regulations under § 1.67-4 of the Income Tax Regulations consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in Knight. The regulations, however, will not be issued in time to be applicable to the 2008 taxable year.

December 11, 2008

California Tax Information For Same-Sex Married Couples

An advance draft copy of a California tax form for same-sex married couples is now available. It is subject to change and Franchise Tax Board (FTB) approval before it is officially released. This form includes the 2008 legislative changes. It will likely be released by the FTB as Publication 776.

This publication is primarily to assist same-sex married couples (SSMC) in filing their California income tax returns, if they have SSMC adjustments. The FTB has also included information about the legal history of SSMC and community property that may be useful in completing the return.

On June 20, 2008, the FTB issued NOTICE 2008-5 on the subject of California Income Tax Treatment and Tax Return Filing Obligations of Same-Sex Married Couples. The purpose of the Notice is to advise same-sex married couples of their California income tax treatment and tax return filing obligations resulting from the California Supreme Court's recent decision in In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757.

California's FTB has more information on same-sex married couples' tax obligations at its website.

December 4, 2008

Lost Your IRS Appeals Case? Now You Can Mediate And Arbitrate Your Defeat

Two new Appeals programs are available from the IRS:

Applicable in California (and elsewhere) is a two-year test of two programs referred to as the post-Appeals mediation and arbitration procedures for Offer in Compromise (OIC) and Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP).

Beginning Dec. 1, 2008, for a two-year test period, Appeals will offer post-Appeals mediation and arbitration for OIC and TFRP cases for taxpayers whose appeals are considered at the Appeals office in Atlanta, Ga.; Chicago, Ill.; Cincinnati, Ohio; Houston, Texas; Indianapolis, Ind.; Louisville, Ky.; Phoenix, Ariz.; and San Francisco, Calif.

Under these two alternative dispute resolution programs, the taxpayer or Appeals may request nonbinding mediation. The taxpayer may decline Appeals’ request for mediation. Appeals will evaluate a taxpayer’s request for mediation based on the criteria detailed in Revenue Procedure 2002-44 and Announcement 2008-111. A request for binding arbitration must be made jointly by the taxpayer and Appeals. The mediation and arbitration procedures do not create any additional authority for settlement by Appeals.

During the test period, Appeals employees will advise the taxpayer of the availability of these alternative dispute strategies and the deadline for timely requesting such strategies when a rejection of an OIC is sustained or a proposed TFRP assessment is sustained. An OIC submitted during Collection Due Process (CDP) as an alternative to a Collection action is not eligible for these alternative dispute resolution strategies during the test period.


The Post-Appeals mediation process is available for both legal and factual issues. The mediator’s role is to facilitate settlement negotiations so the parties can reach their own agreement. The mediator does not have settlement authority over any issue.

The Arbitration procedure is available for factual issues only. The arbitrator’s role is to hear both sides of a disputed issue and then render a decision on the specific factual issue being arbitrated. This decision is binding on both parties. However, the arbitrator does not have the authority to decide that the offer in compromise itself must be accepted or that a person is/is not liable for the TFRP under § 6672. Neither party may appeal the decision of the arbitrator or contest the decision in any judicial proceeding.

Complete procedures for initiating a request for post-Appeals mediation or arbitration are in Announcement 2008-111. The agency will seek appropriate Offer in Compromise and Trust Fund Recovery Penalty cases for both post-Appeals mediation and arbitration during the two-year test period in order to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution for these cases.

Call a California tax attorney to assist in preserving your rights when it comes to resolving your tax problems. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

November 21, 2008

IRS Sells Real And Personal Property At Government Auctions

Unpaid individual income taxes and other unpaid federal taxes may be satisfied by the sale of property seized by the IRS.

Under authority of the Internal Revenue Code, the property described in the IRS website has been seized or acquired for nonpayment of internal revenue taxes and will be sold. The IRS posts legal notices covering the nature of title, redemption rights, effect of junior encumbrances, title offered, and forms of payment before making a bid.

The types of property sold are listed under the headings below and each state in the U.S. may contain some or all of these types of property for sale.

Internet Domain Names

Real Estate

Real Estate - Seeking Guaranteed Bids

Antiques, Art, Jewelry, Collectibles and Luxury Items

Misc. Property - Quick Notice Sales - Seeking Bidders

Household Goods - Personal Property

Commercial/Industrial Property, Equipment and Supplies

Financial Instruments, Notes, Patents

Automobiles, Motorcycles, Trucks and Boats

Liquor Licenses

Don't let your tax liability go unpaid. Call a California tax attorney for help. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

November 11, 2008

Internal Revenue Bulletins

The Internal Revenue Bulletin (IRB) is the authoritative instrument of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conventions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins, which are sold on a single-copy basis.

It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all substantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, modify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin.

All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indicated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal management are not published; however, statements of internal practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of taxpayers are published.

Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory requirements.

Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations, court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered, and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.

The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:

Part I.—1986 Code.

Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.

Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.

Part IV.—Items of General Interest.

Interested in knowing more about how the IRS works? Call a tax attorney with experience working with the IRS. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

November 7, 2008

Billions in Federal Payroll Taxes Owed

The Government Accounting Office (GAO) was asked to review and report on the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) processes and procedures to prevent and collect unpaid payroll taxes. Specifically, GAO was asked to determine (1) the magnitude of unpaid federal payroll tax debt, (2) the factors affecting IRS’s ability to enforce compliance or pursue collections, and (3) whether some businesses with unpaid payroll taxes are engaged in abusive or potentially criminal activities with regard to the federal tax system.Over 1.6 million businesses owed over $58 billion in unpaid federal payroll taxes, including interest and penalties as of September 30, 2007. Payroll taxes consist of your income tax withheld, social security and Medicare contributions, and the employer’s contributions.

Some of these businesses “abuse” the federal tax system and took advantage of the existing tax enforcement and administration system to avoid fulfilling or paying federal tax obligations. Over a quarter of payroll taxes are owed by businesses with more than 3 years (12 tax quarters) of unpaid payroll taxes. Some of these business owners repeatedly accumulated tax debt from multiple businesses. For example, the IRS found 18 individuals were responsible for not remitting payroll taxes for a dozen different businesses and over 1,500 individuals to be responsible for nonpayment of payroll taxes at three or more businesses.

IRS has not always promptly filed liens against businesses to protect the government's interests and has not always taken timely action to hold responsible parties personally liable for unpaid payroll taxes.

Although IRS has tools at its disposal to prevent the further accumulation of unpaid payroll taxes and to collect the taxes that are owed, IRS's current approach does not provide for their full, effective use. IRS's overall approach to collection focuses primarily on gaining voluntary compliance - even for egregious payroll tax offenders - a practice that can result in minimal or no actual collections for these offenders.

If your business has payroll tax problems you are at risk of the IRS putting you out of business, and assessing the trust fund recovery penalty resulting in owners, and officers having substantial personal tax liability. If you would like assistance in dealing with these, and other types of tax problems contact Los Angeles tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

November 5, 2008

Medical Students As Employees: Does Employer Pay FICA?

The University of Chicago Hospitals (“UCH”) brought a refund action (in an appeal entitled "University of Chicago v. USA", Case No. 07-3686, decided October 29, 2008 by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals) against the United States to recover taxes it paid in 1995 and 1996 under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (“FICA”), §§ 3101-3128, on behalf of its medical residents. UCH maintained it was entitled to a refund because its residents qualified for the “student exception” from FICA tax under the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”), 26 U.S.C. § 3121(b)(10), and the controlling Treasury Regulation in place during the relevant time period, § 31.3121(b)(10)-2.

After the IRS took no action in response to the refund claim, UCH filed this refund action, seeking $5,572,705 it had paid in FICA contributions for its residents in those years.

The district court agreed initially to entertain the government’s motion on the question of whether medical residents are categorically not “students” under § 3121(b)(10) and therefore not exempt from FICA tax as a matter of law. If the answer to this question was “no”—that is, if residents may qualify for the student exception—then the case would proceed on the question of whether UCH’s residents were students within the meaning of § 3121(b)(10).

The district court rejected the government’s argument that residents were per se ineligible for the student exception.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted the government’s petition and affirmed the U.S. District Court holding that the student exception under § 3121(b)(10) is not per se inapplicable to medical residents as a matter of law; rather, a case-by- case analysis is required to determine whether medical residents qualify for the statutory exemption from FICA taxation. The implementing Treasury Regulation applicable at the time set forth a method for determining eligibility for the student exception— one that focused on the character of the employing organization as a school, college, or university and the relationship of the employee-student to that organization. This necessarily implies a case-specific analysis, not a categorical ineligibility for certain classes of employee-students.

Have a FICA tax problem? Speak with a Los Angeles tax attorney about it and call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

November 3, 2008

The IRS Mission

Simply put:

"Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all."

In carrying out its mission, the IRS creates tax problems for which you may need help from a qualified tax attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 and discuss how to fix your tax trouble.

October 29, 2008

California Employers: Do You Have Independent Contractors Or Employees?

Both California employers and California workers can ask the IRS to make a determination on whether a specific individual is an independent contractor or an employee by filing a Form SS-8, Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding, with the IRS. To read other articles on the topic of independent contractor, see previous blog entries by clicking here and here.

Are your workers independent contractors or employees? For more information, see the IRS website by clicking here.

October 8, 2008

IRS E-mails

WARNING: be on the alert for phone calls and e-mails you may receive claiming to come from the IRS or other federal agency and which mention your tax refund or economic stimulus payment. A scam is likely to be in the making. The scam’s purpose is to obtain personal and financial information — such as your Social Security number, name, credit card or even PIN numbers and bank account information to use to commit identity theft. The e-mails and calls usually state that the IRS needs the information to process a refund or stimulus payment or deposit it into the taxpayer's bank account. The e-mails often contain links or attachments to what appears to be the IRS Web site or an IRS "refund application form." Don’t be fooled no matter how genuine in appearance.

The IRS does not send taxpayers e-mails about their tax accounts. Additionally, the way to get a tax refund or stimulus payment, or to arrange for a direct deposit, is to file a tax return.

Read more about identity theft and suspicious IRS e-mails.

October 6, 2008

What New California Business Owners Need To Know About Federal Taxes

California businesses often start out small. As a new business owner you need to know your federal tax responsibilities. Here are links to basic federal tax information for start-up businesses. Links are also provided to help in making certain business decisions. The list is not all-inclusive. Other steps may be appropriate for your specific type of business such as contacting a qualified California business attorney who can help.

Is it a Business or a Hobby?

Selecting a Business Structure

Employer Identification Number (EIN)

Business Taxes

Recordkeeping

When Do I Start My Tax Year?

Selecting an Accounting Method

Checklist for Starting a Business

Establishing a Retirement Plan

Small Business Publications

Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 to discuss your California-based business.

October 3, 2008

California Worker Status: Employee or Independent Contractor

About a year and a half ago, I asked: What are the consequences of treating an employee as an independent contractor? Now, I ask: Are your California workers independent contractors or employees?

Knowing the proper worker classification can be critical to your business. Don’t guess. Act now to make certain you know for sure.

How you answer that question can have a significant impact on how much tax you pay as a California business owner. Whether your workers who may be based in Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County or Orange County are or are not independent contractors will affect the amount of taxes you must withhold from their pay. It will affect how much additional cost your business must bear to conform to California’s labor code and other laws, what documents and information those workers must provide to you, and what tax documents you must give to them.

California employers who erroneously classify workers as independent contractors can end up with large tax liabilities as well as penalties and interest for failing to pay employment taxes and failing to file required tax forms. Workers can avoid higher taxes and lost benefits if they know their proper status.

By filing a Form SS-8, Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding, with the Internal Revenue Service, both employers and workers can ask the IRS to make a determination on whether a specific individual is an independent contractor or an employee.

Generally, whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee depends on how much control you have as the owner. Your California workers are most likely employees if you have the right to control or direct not only what is to be done but also how it is to be done. If you can direct or control only the result of the work done, and not the means and methods of accomplishing the result, then your workers are probably independent contractors.

Three broad characteristics are used by the IRS to determine the relationship between businesses and workers - Financial Control, Behavioral Control and the Type of Relationship. Financial Control covers facts that show whether the business has a right to direct or control the financial and business aspects of the worker's job. Behavioral Control covers facts that show whether the business has a right to direct or control how the work is done through instructions, training, or other means. The Type of Relationship factor relates to how the workers and the business owner perceive their relationship.

Learn more about the determination of a worker’s status as an Independent Contractor or Employee at IRS.gov by selecting the Small Business link. Additional resources include IRS Publication 15-A, Employer's Supplemental Tax Guide, and Publication 1779, Independent Contractor or Employee.

October 1, 2008

IRS Enforcement Improving

The IRS seems to be growing more effective with enforcement in a number of key areas. The IRS is improving in areas important to maintaining an efficient and fair tax system while collecting billions of additional tax dollars. At the same time, the IRS says it continues to improve service to you and me.

Enforcement by the IRS increased in fiscal year 2007. For example, during 2007 the IRS audited 84 percent more returns of individuals with incomes of $1 million or more than during 2006. Overall, enforcement revenue reached $59.2 billion, up from $48.7 billion in 2006 and nearly $34.1 billion in 2002.

Highlights of the enforcement and services numbers for fiscal year 2007, which ended on September 30, include:

Individuals

The IRS filed 3.8 million levies and almost 700,000 tax liens during 2007, an increase from the previous year and a substantial increase from five years earlier.

Audit rates increased in 2007, both for overall individual rates and for higher-income taxpayers.

Overall, the total individual returns audited increased by 7 percent to 1,384,563 in 2007 from 1,293,681 in 2006. That’s the highest number since 1998.

One out of 11 individuals with incomes of $1 million or more faced an audit in 2007. Audits of individuals with incomes of $1 million or more increased from 17,015 during fiscal year 2006 to 31,382 during fiscal year 2007, an increase of 84 percent.

Audits of individuals with incomes over $200,000 reached 113,105 returns, up 29.2 percent from the prior year total of 87,885.

The IRS increased audits of individual returns with income of $100,000 or more, auditing 293,188 of these returns in 2007, up 13.7 percent from last year’s total of 257,851.

Businesses

With businesses, the IRS reviewed more tax returns of flow-through entities – S corporations and partnerships. Statistically, the IRS has placed more emphasis in the area of these flow-through returns. Though large corporate audits are slightly fewer, the Service has increased its focus on mid-market corporations – those with assets between $10 million and $50 million dollars.

Audits of businesses in general rose to 59,516, an increase of almost 14 percent from the prior year’s total of 52,223.

Audits of S Corporations increased to 17,681 during 2007, up 26 percent from the prior year’s total of 13,984.

Audits of partnerships increased to 12,195 during 2007, up almost 25 percent from the prior year’s total of 9,777.

Audits of mid-market corporations increased to 4,473, up 6 percent from last year’s total of 4,218.

Although the audits of large corporations declined slightly in 2007 to 9,644 audits, the number of audits is up 14 percent from the fiscal year 2002 level.

Taxpayer Services

More people visited the IRS internet site, IRS.gov. The IRS site was accessed more than 217 million times in 2007, up more than 10.5 percent from the same period in 2006.

The IRS helped more taxpayers find out about their refunds through the agency’s internet-based system ‘Where’s my Refund?’ The system was accessed 32.1 million times during 2007, up 30 percent from last year’s usage of 24.7 million.

The agency held a 94 percent customer satisfaction rating for its toll-free telephone service.

As in the prior year, the IRS accuracy was 91 percent on tax law questions answered through its toll-free telephone service.

More taxpayers chose to file electronically in 2007 than during the prior year, with 57 percent of individual tax filers choosing to e-file in 2007, up from 54 percent in 2006.

Have a problem with the Internal Revenue Service or California State tax agencies? Call a tax attorney - call Mitchell A. Port for tax help.

September 29, 2008

Know Your Tax Responsibilities As An Employer

California employers can outsource some of their payroll and related tax duties to a third-party payroll service. They can help assure deposit requirements with federal and California state authorities and filing deadlines are met.

Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County and Orange County California employers who outsource some or all of their payroll responsibilities should consider the following:

For the employer’s protection, employers should ask the payroll service provider if they have a fiduciary bond in place. This could protect the employer in the event of default.

If there are issues with an account, the IRS will send correspondence to the employer at the address of record. The IRS suggests that the employer does not change their address of record to that of the payroll service provider as it may significantly limit the employer’s ability to be informed of tax matters involving their business.

The employer is ultimately responsible for the deposit and payment of federal and California tax liabilities. Even though the third-party is making the deposits, the employer is the responsible party. If the third-party fails to make the federal tax payments, the IRS may assess penalties and interest on the employer’s account. The employer is liable for all taxes, penalties and interest due. The employer may also be held personally liable for certain unpaid federal taxes.

Employers should ensure that their service providers are using EFTPS (Electronic Federal Tax Payment System) so the employer can confirm payments made on their behalf. Everyone should use EFTPS and Treasury regulations require electronic payment for payroll taxes over $200,000 in a calendar year. EFTPS maintains a business’s payment history for 16 months and can be viewed on-line after enrollment. In addition, EFTPS allows employers to make any additional tax payments that their third-party provider is not making on their behalf such as estimated tax payments. The IRS recommends employers verify EFTPS payments as part of their bank account reconciliation process.

For payroll and other tax problems, contact Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559.5259.

September 25, 2008

Extension Of Time To File Estate Tax Return Not Extension Of Time To Pay Tax

A recently decided court case, Baccei v. United States, highlights the adverse consequences when an estate fails to follow instructions in obtaining an extension of time to pay.

The decedent died in September, 2005. Her estate consisted mainly of real estate. Her nephew was the executor of her estate and the trustee of her revocable trust.

The executor, through his attorney, retained an accountant to prepare the Federal estate tax return.

In June, 2006, the accountant filed Form 4768, requesting an automatic 6-month extension of time to file the estate tax return.

Form 4768 consists of four parts:

Part I, "Identification," requests information identifying the estate. The accountant completed Part I.

Part II, "Extension of Time to File Form 706, 706-A, 706-NA, or 706-QDT (Section 6081)" contains boxes to check to show for which return the estate is claiming an extension of time to file. The accountant completed Part II.

Part III is captioned "Extension of Time to Pay (Section 6161)," and requests a written statement explaining why the estate cannot pay the tax in full, and the extension date requested (not more than 12 months). The accountant did not complete Part III.

Part IV, "Payment to Accompany Extension Request," contains three lines. Line 1 is for the estimated amount of tax due. Line 2 is for the cash shortage (with an instruction to complete Part III.) Line 3 is for the balance due (with an instruction to subtract line 2 from line 1). The accountant completed Part IV.

The accountant filed the extension with a cover letter. The estate timely filed the estate tax return on extension. The return showed estate tax of over one and a half million dollars, which the estate paid with the return. The IRS asserted a sizeable late payment penalty which the estate paid and then sought a refund claiming that it had timely applied for an extension of time to pay the estate tax, and had established reasonable cause.

The court held for the government, saying that the estate did not request an extension of time to pay because Part III was not completed, and that neither the Form 4768 nor the cover letter specified the date to which an extension of time to pay the tax was requested.

The court noted that the statutes and regulations make a clear distinction between extensions of time to file and extensions of time to pay.

A 6-month extension of time to file is automatic - provided the Form 4768 is timely filed.

An extension of time to pay is discretionary, and can be requested for up to 12 months at a time. While the same Form 4768 can be used to request both extensions, they are nevertheless separate extensions.

September 22, 2008

Tax Fraud Or Tax Avoidance?

The Difference Between Legal Tax Avoidance and Illegal Tax Evasion

“Anyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the treasury. There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes. Over and over again the Courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: Taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.”

The IRS has a very interesting and detailed description of the types of tax problems people often either intentionally or negligently get involved with. You can read the entire article here but you can see the topics that are discussed below.

Nonfiler Enforcement

Money Laundering

Corporate Fraud

General Tax Fraud

Employment Tax Enforcement

Abusive Tax Schemes

Abusive Return Preparer

Tax Scams - How to Recognize and Avoid Them

All About Criminal Investigation (CI)

Program and Emphasis Areas for Criminal Investigation

Report Suspected Tax Fraud Activity

IRS Wants You to Know About Schemes, Scams and Cons

Civil tax problems? Speak with Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

September 12, 2008

Fix Your Tax Problem By Meeting With The IRS

IRS Taxpayer Assistance Centers (TAC) in California are your source for personal tax help when you believe your tax issue cannot be handled online or by phone, and you want face-to-face tax assistance.

The local California Taxpayer Assistance Center is a place where you can spread out your records and talk with an IRS representative across the counter. No appointment is necessary - just walk in. If you prefer, you may call a local number (see chart, below) to learn about available and alternate services, and to reschedule appointments with IRS personnel. If you have an ongoing, complex tax account problem or a special need, such as a disability, an appointment may be requested. All other issues will be handled without an appointment.

Continue reading "Fix Your Tax Problem By Meeting With The IRS" »

September 10, 2008

Complaints Against California Tax Attorneys

Complaints Against Enrolled Professionals

California's taxpayers who have a complaint against their attorney, accountant, enrolled agent or other practitioners who are specifically permitted to practice before the IRS can submit their complaints in writing in a letter format. The letter should include the tax practitioner's name, address, telephone number, designation (i.e., attorney, certified public accountant, enrolled agent, enrolled actuary, etc.), a detailed description of the allegations, and any documents that support those allegations.

Direct all referrals to:

Internal Revenue Service
Office of Professional Responsibility
SE:OPR, Room 7238/IR
1111 Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20224

You can send it by facsimile at 202-622-2207

Complaints Against Unenrolled Tax Return Preparers

Complaints against unenrolled tax return preparers can be reported by completing Form 3949-A and mailing it or a letter with similar information to Internal Revenue Service, Fresno, CA 93888.

For additional information, you may refer to Complaints Against Tax Professionals Frequently Asked Questions.

If you have questions concerning an allegation, you may email the IRS at OPR@irs.gov.

September 1, 2008

Willful Failure To Pay Over Employee Payroll Taxes

A conviction for willful failure to pay over employee payroll taxes is affirmed where “willfulness” does not require the government to prove that a defendant had the ability to meet his tax obligations.

In a decision made on August 22, 2008 by the federal court of appeals covering California (the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals), the court stated:

This case illustrates the enduring truth of Ben Franklin’s sage observation that “nothing is certain but death and taxes.” It is an appeal from a conviction for willful failure to pay over employee payroll taxes, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7202. The defendant-appellant, Jack Easterday, sought an “ability to pay instruction” in order to contend to the jury that his failure to pay over the taxes he owed was not “willful,” because he had spent the money on other business expenses and therefore could not pay it to the government when it was due. The district court refused to give the instruction, and Easterday subsequently was convicted and sentenced to thirty months in prison.

Payroll tax problems can have serious consequences. Consult with a qualified tax attorney about your tax problem. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

August 28, 2008

Tax Relief For Mortgage Debt Forgiven

There is now tax relief for homeowners. In a news brief issued by the IRS for the benefit of those with troubled loans, the government now says that if your mortgage debt is partly or entirely forgiven during 2007, 2008 or 2009 you may be able to claim special tax relief by filling out Form 982 and attaching it to your federal income tax return for that year. Usually, forgiveness of debt results in taxable income. However, under the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007, you may be able to exclude from tax up to $2 million of debt forgiven on your primary residence. The limit is $1 million for a married person filing a separate return.

Debt reduced through mortgage restructuring, as well as mortgage debt forgiven in connection with a foreclosure, may qualify for this relief. The debt must have been used to buy, build or substantially improve your principal residence and must have been secured by that residence. Debt used to refinance qualifying debt is also eligible for the exclusion, but only up to the amount of the old mortgage principal, just before the refinancing.

Debt forgiven on second homes, rental property, business property, credit cards or car loans does not qualify for the new tax-relief provision. In some cases, however, other kinds of tax relief, based on insolvency, for example, may be available.

If you have other federal or California state tax problems, speak with a qualified tax attorney about finding a solution. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

August 15, 2008

Innocent Spouse: What Are The Tests?

The IRS issued a revenue procedure which lists the various factors necessary to satisfy to obtain equitable relief as an innocent spouse.

If you have a tax problem, and believe that you maybe qualify for innocent spouse relief contact the Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

August 1, 2008

Scammers Use Fax and Email To Pose As IRS

In May and June alone, taxpayers reported almost 700 separate phishing incidents to the IRS.

The most common scams involve tax refunds and, this year, economic stimulus payments. The Internal Revenue Service cautions taxpayers to be on the lookout for a new wave of scams using the IRS name in identity theft e-mails, or phishing, that have circulated during the last two months.

The IRS has an interesting news article where the full details are available.

Here is a part of the article:

How Scams Work

"To lure their victims, phishing scams use the name of a known institution, such as the IRS, to either offer a reward for taking a simple action, such as providing information, or threaten or imply an unpleasant consequence, such as losing a refund, for failing to take the requested action.

"The goal of the scams is to trick people into revealing personal and financial information, such as Social Security, bank account or credit card numbers, which the scammers can use to commit identity theft.

"Typically, identity thieves use a victim’s personal and financial data to empty the victim’s financial accounts, run up charges on the victim’s existing credit cards, apply for new loans, credit cards, services or benefits in the victim’s name, file fraudulent tax returns or even commit crimes. Most of these fraudulent activities can be committed electronically from a remote location, including overseas. Committing these activities in cyberspace allows scammers to act quickly and cover their tracks before the victim becomes aware of the theft.

"People whose identities have been stolen can spend months or years — and their hard-earned money — cleaning up the mess thieves have made of their reputations and credit records. In the meantime, victims may lose job opportunities or may be refused loans, education, housing or cars."

Topics in the article also include:

Refund e-Mail Scam

Tax Court Scam

Economic Stimulus Payments Scam

Company Report Scam

Substitute Form 1040 Fax Scam

What to Do

Do you have other tax problems with the IRS or California tax authorities? If so, speak with Mitchell A. Port, a tax attorney in Los Angeles, about your concerns.

July 30, 2008

Tax Questions And Answers

The Internal Revenue Service has a general questions and answers section you can read in detail here. Each year the IRS updates the answers to reflect the latest changes in tax regulations. These questions and answers came from taxpayers like you.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. IRS Procedures

1.1. General Procedural Questions

1.2. Address Changes

1.3. Amended Returns & Form 1040X

1.4. Code, Revenue Procedures, Regulations, Letter Rulings

1.5. Collection Procedural Questions

1.6. Copies & Transcripts

1.7. Extensions

1.8. Forms & Publications

1.9. Injured Spouse

1.10. Name Changes & Social Security Number Matching Issues

1.11. Notices & Letters

1.12. Refund Inquiries

1.13. Reporting Fraud

1.14. Signing the Return

1.15. W–2 - Additional, Incorrect, Lost, Non-receipt, Omitted

1.16. W–4 - Allowances, Excess FICA, Students, Withholding

2. Filing Requirements/Status/Dependents/Exemptions

2.1. Filing Requirements

2.2. Filing Status

2.3. Dependents & Exemptions

3. Itemized Deductions/Standard Deductions

3.1. Autos, Computers, Electronic Devices (Listed Property)

3.2. Education & Work-Related Expenses

3.3. Gifts & Charitable Contributions

3.4. Interest, Investment, Money Transactions (Alimony, Bad Debts, Applicable Federal Interest Rate, Gambling, Legal Fees, Loans, etc.)

3.5. 5. Medical, Nursing Home, Special Care Expenses

3.6. 6. Real Estate (Taxes, Mortgage Interest, Points, Other Property Expenses)

3.7. 7. Other Deduction Questions

4. Interest/Dividends/Other Types of Income

4.1. 1099–DIV Dividend Income

4.2. 1099–INT Interest Income

4.3. 1099–MISC, Independent Contractors, and Self-employed

4.4. 1099 Information Returns (All Other)

4.5. Alimony, Child Support, Court Awards, Damages

4.6. Employee Reimbursements, Form W–2, Wage Inquiries

4.7. Gifts & Inheritances

4.8. Grants, Scholarships, Student Loans, Work Study

4.9. Life Insurance & Disability Insurance Proceeds

4.10. Ministers' Compensation & Housing Allowance

4.11. Savings Bonds

4.12. Tips

5. Pensions/Annuities/Retirement Plans (i.e., 401(k), etc.)

5.1. General/Taxability Issues including Distributions, Early Withdrawals, 10% Additional Tax, Defaulted Loans

5.2. Rollovers

5.3. Types of Plans

5.4. Plan Operations

5.5. Plan Design

5.6. Correcting Plan Errors

6. Social Security Income

6.1. Back Payments

6.2. Regular & Disability Benefits

6.3. Survivors' Benefits

7. Child Care Credit/Other Credits

7.1. Child and Dependent Care Credit & Flexible Benefit Plans

7.2. Child Tax Credit

7.3. Credit for the Elderly or the Disabled

7.4. Hope & Life Time Learning Educational Credits

7.5. Other Credits

8. Earned Income Tax Credit

8.1. Qualifying Child Rules

8.2. Taxable & Nontaxable Income

8.3. Other EITC Issues

9. Estimated Tax

9.1. Businesses

9.2. Farmers & Fishermen

9.3. Individuals

9.4. Large Gains, Lump-sum Distributions, etc.

9.5. Penalty Questions

10. Capital Gains, Losses/Sale of Home

10.1. Property (Basis, Sale of Home, etc.)

10.2. Stocks (Options, Splits, Traders)

10.3. Mutual Funds (Costs, Distributions, etc.)

10.4. Losses (Homes, Stocks, Other Property)

11. Sale or Trade of Business, Depreciation, Rentals

11.1. Depreciation & Recapture

11.2. Rental Expenses versus Passive Activity Losses (PALs)

11.3. Personal Use of Business Property (Condo, Timeshare, etc.)

11.4. Sales, Trades, Exchanges

12. Small Business/Self-Employed/Other Business

12.1. Entities: Sole Proprietor, Partnership, Limited Liability Company/Partnership (LLC/LLP), Corporation, Subchapter S Corporation

12.2. Form 1099–MISC & Independent Contractors

12.3. Form W–2, FICA, Medicare, Tips, Employee Benefits

12.4. Form W–4 & Wage Withholding

12.5. Form SS–4 & Employer Identification Number (EIN)

12.6. Forms 941, 940, Employment Taxes

12.7. Income & Expenses

12.8. Schedule C & Schedule SE

12.9. Starting or Ending a Business

13. Aliens and U.S. Citizens Living Abroad

13.1. Canadian & U.S. Tax Issues

13.2. Exchange Rate

13.3. Foreign Income & Foreign Income Exclusion

13.4. Nonresident Alien - General

13.5. Nonresident Alien - Tax Withholding

13.6. Nonresident Alien - Students

13.7. U.S. Citizens Overseas

13.8. Other

14. Electronic Filing (e-file)

14.1. Age/Name/SSN Rejects, Errors, Correction Procedures

14.2. Amended Returns

14.3. Due Dates & Extension Dates for e-file

14.4. Forms W–2 & Other Attachments

15. Magnetic Media Filers

16. Other (Alternative Minimum Tax, Estates, Trusts, Tax Shelters, State Tax Inquiries)

17. Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs)

17.1. Distributions, Early Withdrawals, 10% Additional Tax

17.2. Rollovers

17.3. Roth IRA

17.4. Traditional IRA

Are you in tax trouble with any of these federal compliance procedures? Talk to a professional: talk with tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

July 28, 2008

Withholding Compliance

As a California business person, have you asked yourself any of the questions below concerning employees and their tax for which you may be responsible in part? The IRS has the answers to these question on its website at IRS.gov.

Here are the questions:

As an employee, what happens if the IRS determines that I do not have adequate withholding?

If an employer no longer has to submit Forms W-4 claiming complete exemption from withholding or claiming more than 10 allowances, how does the IRS determine adequate withholding?

If the IRS determines that an employee does not have enough federal income tax withheld, what will an employer be asked to do?

As an employer who has received a modification letter (letter 2808C) from the WHC program, do I wait for another 60 days to change the marital status and/or number of allowances per the modification letter?

I have been directed to lock in an employee’s withholding. What happens if I do not lock in the employee’s withholding as directed?

As an employer, after I lock in withholding on an employee based on a lock-in letter from the IRS, what do I do if I receive a revised Form W-4 from the employee?

Our employees can submit or change their Forms W-4 on line. How can I prevent them from changing their Forms W-4 after they have been locked-in by the IRS?

What should I do if an employee submits a valid Form W-4 that appears to be claiming an incorrect withholding amount?

What do I do if an employee hands me a substitute Form W-4 developed by the employee?

I heard my employer no longer has to routinely submit Forms W-4 to the IRS. How will this affect me as an employee?

What if I don’t want to submit a Form W-4 to my employer?

What do I do if an employee hands me an official IRS Form W-4 that is clearly altered?

In the past, as an employer, I was required to submit all Forms W-4 that claimed complete exemption from withholding (when $200 or more in weekly wages were regularly expected) or claimed more than 10 allowances. What Forms W-4 do I now have to submit to the IRS?

Tax problems? Would you like tax help? Tax compliance a problem? Want to settle with the IRS? Call Los Angeles tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

July 21, 2008

IRS Enforcement Getting Better

Don’t have tax problems or need tax help at the moment? California’s taxpayers beware: the IRS continues to make progress in a number of key enforcement areas. The IRS is showing improvements in areas critical to maintaining a fair, efficient tax system while bringing billions of additional dollars into the Treasury.

The IRS enforcement efforts increased again in fiscal year 2007. For instance, during 2007 the IRS audited 84 percent more returns of individuals with incomes of $1 million or more than during 2006. Overall, enforcement revenue reached $59.2 billion, up from $48.7 billion in 2006 and nearly $34.1 billion in 2002.

Highlights of the enforcement and services numbers for fiscal year 2007, which ended on September 30, include:

Individuals

• Audit rates increased in 2007, both for overall individual rates and for higher-income taxpayers.

• The IRS filed 3.8 million levies and almost 700,000 liens during 2007, an increase from the previous year and a substantial increase from five years earlier.

• Audits of individuals with incomes of $1 million or more increased 84 percent. One out of 11 individuals with incomes of $1 million or more faced an audit in 2007.

• Overall, the total individual returns audited increased by 7 percent. That’s the highest number since 1998.

• Audits of individuals with incomes over $200,000 reached 113,105 returns, up 29.2 percent from the prior year.

• The IRS increased audits of individual returns with income of $100,000 or more, up 13.7 percent from last year’s total.

Businesses

In the business arena, the IRS continued efforts to review more returns of flow-through entities – partnerships and S Corporations. Our business numbers reflect that we have placed more emphasis in the growing area of these flow-through returns. While large corporate audits are down slightly, we have increased our focus on mid-market corporations – those with assets between $10 million and $50 million dollars. The IRS enforcement budget in 2007 was similar to the budget in 2006, and in times of flat budgets, the agency cannot increase activity across the board but must address the areas where there is growth and potential risk.

• Audits of S Corporations increased to 17,681 during 2007, up 26 percent from the prior year.

• Audits of partnerships increased to 12,195 during 2007, up almost 25 percent.

• Audits of mid-market corporations increased to 4,473, up 6 percent from last year.

• Audits of businesses in general rose to 59,516, an increase of almost 14 percent from the prior year.

• Although the audits of large corporations dipped slightly in 2007 to 9,644 audits, the number of audits is up 14 percent.

Taxpayer Services

• More taxpayers chose to file electronically in 2007 than during the prior year, with 57 percent of individual tax filers choosing to e-file in 2007.

• More people visited the IRS internet site, IRS.gov. The IRS site was accessed more than 217 million times in 2007, up more than 10.5 percent.

• As in the prior year, the IRS accuracy was 91 percent on tax law questions answered through its toll-free telephone service.

For tax help with serious problems, call tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

July 15, 2008

Eliminate Interest On Tax

In almost every situation, the IRS never abates interest on unpaid taxes since the thinking is that not paying tax is like getting a loan which the IRS is not about to make interest-free.

But in a U.S. Tax Court case decided last week, the Court held that the IRS has the authority to abate interest. The sole issue for decision was whether the IRS’s decision not to abate interest with respect to the taxpayer’s income tax liability was an abuse of discretion.

The relevant part of the Select Steel, Inc. case was the Court's explanation for its decision that was as follows:

If, as part of a section 6330 proceeding, a taxpayer makes a request for abatement of interest, the Court has jurisdiction over the request for abatement of interest that is the subject of the Commissioner’s collection activities. Katz v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 329, 340-341 (2000).

Under section 6404(e)(1), as in effect for petitioner’s 1994 fiscal year, the Commissioner may abate part or all of an assessment of interest on any deficiency or payment of income taxes to the extent that the deficiency in payment is attributable in whole or in part to any error or delay by an officer or employee of the IRS in performing a ministerial act.

Although Congress amended section 6404(e)(1) in 1996 to permit the Commissioner to abate interest with respect to “unreasonable” error or delay resulting from “managerial” or ministerial acts, the amendment applies only to interest accruing with respect to deficiencies for taxable years beginning after July 30, 1996.

The term “ministerial act” means a procedural or mechanical act that does not involve the exercise of judgment or discretion and occurs during the processing of a taxpayer’s case after all the prerequisites to the act, such as conferences and review by supervisors, have taken place. Corson v. Commissioner, 123 T.C. 202, 207 (2004).

A decision concerning the proper application of Federal tax law is not a ministerial act. Id. An error or delay in performing a ministerial act is taken into account only if it is in no significant aspect attributable to the taxpayer and only if it occurs after the IRS has contacted the taxpayer in writing with respect to the deficiency or payment. Sec. 6404(e)(1).

Section 6404(e) is intended to apply only “in instances where failure to abate interest would be widely perceived as grossly unfair.” H. Rept. 99-426, at 844 (1985), 1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 2) 1, 844. Section 6404(h)(1) authorizes the Court to decide whether the Commissioner’s failure to abate interest was an abuse of discretion and, if so, to order an abatement. See Jones v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2008-56.

Generally, the taxpayer must prove that the Commissioner’s discretion was exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, or without sound basis in fact or law. Lee v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. 145, 149 (1999); Woodral v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 19, 23 (1999). However, “The Commissioner is in the best position to know what actions were taken by Internal Revenue Service officers and employees during the period for which petitioners’ abatement request was made and during any subsequent inquiry based upon that request.” Jacobs v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-123.

Do you have a similar situation and believe that interest should be eliminated? Do you have other tax problems you want to discuss with a California tax attorney? Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

June 13, 2008

California Lawyers Are Not All Alike

I read an ad and it went something like this:

"There's really no difference between law firms."

Many people believe that Los Angeles law firms are pretty much the same. I don't. I believe that what separates me from the pack is not what I do, but how I do it - aggressive not conservative, team player and not a one-man-band, problem solver not just a legal practitioner. My clients clearly understand and value this difference. How can I help you? Contact Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

I liked this because it describes me and my practice. If you need help with probate, Wills, living trusts, powers of attorney, tax problems or business transactions, please call me for your consultation.

June 11, 2008

Identity Theft, Phishing And Your Tax Information

Consumers have been warned in the past on the fraudulent use of the IRS name or logo by scammers trying to gain access to consumers’ financial information in order to steal their identity and assets. The Internal Revenue Service has issued several recent warnings with a lot of detail on how to prevent being scammed. When identity theft takes place over the internet, it is called phishing.

Phishing (as in “fishing for information” and “hooking” victims) is a scam where internet fraudsters send e-mail messages to trick unsuspecting victims into revealing personal and financial information that can be used to steal the victims’ identity. Current scams include phony e-mails which claim to come from the IRS and which lure the victims into the scam by telling them that they are due a tax refund.

Identity theft is somewhat different that phishing since it can not only be committed through e-mail (phishing) but it can also be done by other means such as regular mail, fax or telephone, or even by going through your trash.

Here are some of the warnings provided by the IRS on such scams:

IRS Warns of New E-Mail and Telephone Scams Using the IRS Name; Advance Payment Scams Starting

IRS Warns of New E-mail Scam Offering Cash for Participation in “Member Satisfaction Survey”

IRS Warns of Phony e-Mails Claiming to Come from the IRS

IRS Establishes e-Mail Box for Taxpayers to Report Phony e-Mails

Identity Theft and Your Tax Records

As soon as the IRS learns about designs involving use of the IRS name, it tries to alert consumers as well as authorities that can shut down the scheme. The most recent schemes are listed below.

Continue reading "Identity Theft, Phishing And Your Tax Information" »

June 6, 2008

Discharged Indebtedness Is Income And Is Taxable

During their marriage, the Stevenses purchased a dilapidated investment property in Chicago. (Investors are making similar purchases in Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara and Orange Counties, California, all of which may lead to a similar outcome as occurred in Chicago.) The couple borrowed $256,000 for the purchase of the property, only to realize shortly thereafter that not only did they not like each other, but they also could not make the payments. Rather than falling into foreclosure and ruining their credit, they entered into a short-sale agreement with the lender and, in 2003, found a buyer willing to purchase the property for $200,000.

Even though the lender had informed the Stevenses that they would report the discharge of indebtedness to the Internal Revenue Service and had mailed separate letters to Mr. Stevens and his ex-wife informing them of the exact dollar amount, neither reported the discharged indebtedness as income on their tax return.

Generally, a taxpayer must include income from the discharge of indebtedness under Section 61(a)(12) of the income tax regulations. However, there are exceptions to this rule. Section 108(a) provides that a taxpayer may exclude income from the discharge of indebtedness if the discharge occurs in a bankruptcy case, or when the taxpayer is insolvent, or if the indebtedness is qualified farm or business real estate debt.

The IRS determined and the Tax Court agreed that in addition to the tax deficiency, a 20 percent accuracy-related penalty under Code Section 6662(a) to be applicable because Mr. Stevens understated his income tax by $21,323 on his return. Because Mr. Stevens’ understatement of tax was greater than 10 percent of the tax required to be shown on the return or $5,000, the understatement was a substantial understatement of income tax pursuant to Code Section 6662(d)(1)(A). Mr. Stevens argued that he should not be held liable for the penalty because of his reliance on Ms. Stevens to report all of the relief from indebtedness income (Form 1099-C income) from the cancellation of indebtedness on her income tax return since both Forms 1099-C were mailed to her address.

The argument that Mr. Stevens had relied on his ex-wife to report the income from the indebtedness did not hold water with the Court.

The Tax Court concluded that Mr. Stevens failed to show that his reliance on Ms. Stevens’ reporting the full amount of income and paying the requisite tax on that income was reasonable. Mr. Stevens admitted that he knew Ms. Stevens had received both Forms 1099-C and that the amount at issue, $74,494.96, should have been reported--either in full or in part--on one of or both of the Stevenses’ returns for that year. The record is silent as to any facts that would have led to a reasonable assumption on the part of Mr. Stevens that he was not responsible for reporting the amount contained on the Form 1099-C in income.

The lesson, of course, is not to trust your ex-spouse to pay your taxes. The Court did state that Mr. Stevens could look to civil remedy against his ex-wife, as they did own the property as joint tenants and should be equally responsible for the declaration of the income tax.

You can read the entire Court decision here.

Need help negotiating with the IRS the amount of tax to be paid on relief from indebtedness income? Call tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 for tax help.

June 4, 2008

Developments In The IRS Estate Tax Division

Estate tax audits continue to be scattered across the country. With the drop in the number of federal estate tax returns expected to be filed because of the increased filing threshold resulting from the provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, the IRS offered voluntary early retirement to many Estate and Gift tax employees across the nation.

A great deal of employees accepted the buy-out and thereby created a coverage problem for local audits. The workload nevertheless has to be handled.

Here is a list of estate tax managers and their contact numbers located throughout the U.S.:

ESTATE TAX MANAGERS

Kym Taborn
Van Nuys, California
(Covers Los Angeles)
818 756 4522

Janet Holman
Oakland, California
(Covers Oakland, Los Angeles, San Jose)
510 637 4557

Ralph Perez
New York
212 436 1114

Virginia Hunt
New York
(Covers Albany, Syracuse, NYC)
212 436 1145

Faiza-Vardag-Muzaffar
New York
212 436 1094

Patrick Leahy
New York City
212 436 1146

Stephen Gordon
New York City
212 436 1082

Thomas Fleming
Boston
(Covers MA, ME, NH, VT)
617 316 2326

Richard Murray
Boston
(Covers MA, CT)
617 316 2328

Louis Kaufman
Philadelphia

(Covers PA, DE)
215 861 1585

Elliot Pleener
New Jersey
(Covers NJ, MD, DC, VA)
973 993 7401

Vacant
Trenton N.J.
(Covers International)

Elizabeth Williamson
NC
(Covers NC, VA)
336 378 2873

Martin Horn
Nashville
(Covers AR, GA, TN)
615 250 5573

George Dewey Jacksonville
Jacksonville
(Covers SC, N&C. FL)
904 665 1300

Martin Basson Plantation
Plantation
(Covers S. FL)
954 423 7232

Elaine McCarroll
Cleveland
(Covers MI, Cleveland OH)
216 520 7170

Donald Grigsby
Cincinnati
(Covers IN, KY, Roanoke, VA, OH)
513 263 4071

Frederick Herzog
New Orleans
(Covers LA, OK, MS)
504 558 3245

James McMullen (Acting)Chicago
Chicago
(Covers Chicago & Milwaukee)
312 566 2207

Jerry Voeller
St. Paul
(Covers MN, CO, SD, MT, ID)
651 312 7757

Vacant
MO, IA, S. IL

Michelle Moser
Omaha
(Covers KS, MO, NE, New Orleans)
402 221 3779

Lee Schwemer
Ft. Worth, TX
(Covers Dallas, Ft. Worth, Lubbock)
817 759 2900 x 620

Vacant
AZ, San Diego, Laguna Niguel

James Hammerstrom
WA
(Covers WA, OR, HI)
425 468 6009

Kyle Martin
Oakland, CA
(Covers UT, Denver, San Jose, Bakersfield)
510 637 4549

Toby Stewart
Houston
(Covers NM, Houston, Austin)
713 209 4415

If you have an estate tax problem, call Los Angeles estate tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

May 27, 2008

No Right To A Civil Proceeding Before Bringing A Criminal Trial For Tax Evasion

Defendant-Appellant James Ellett appealed from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York convicting him, after a jury trial, of four counts of income tax evasion and one count of failure to file an income tax return. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held on May 23, 2008, that due process did not require that Ellett be given the opportunity to litigate his tax position civilly or administratively before being prosecuted for tax evasion.

To read the case, click here.

May 23, 2008

Innocent Spouse Relief Requires Joint Tax Return

The Ninth Circuit - which has jurisdiction over all of us taxpayers living in California - upheld the Tax Court's holding that innocent spouse relief under Internal Revenue Code §6105 is available only if you have filed a joint return for the year in question. Christensen v. Commissioner, No. 06-71881 (9th Cir. 4/21/08), affirming T.C. Memo. 2005-299:

Christensen argues that Code §6015(f) is available to spouses who face joint liability under community property laws but do not file a joint return. We disagree. In light of the plain language of § 6015 and the context of the statute, we conclude that § 6015(f) is available only to spouses who file a joint return.

Call a qualified California tax lawyer for help seeking innocent spouse relief - call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

May 21, 2008

New IRS Publication On Innocent Spouse

Last month, the IRS released a revised Publication 971 for those seeking innocent spouse relief. Other articles in this blog on innocent spouse relief are: "Who Is An Innocent Spouse In California?", "Innocent Spouse Made Easier" and "California Taxpayers: Innocent Spouse Relief".

The revised IRS Publication provides this introduction:

When you file a joint income tax return, the law makes both you and your spouse responsible for the entire tax liability. This is called joint and several liability. Joint and several liability applies not only to the tax liability you show on the return but also to any additional tax liability the IRS determines to be due, even if the additional tax is due to income, deductions, or credits of your spouse or former spouse. You remain jointly and severally liable for the taxes, and the IRS still can collect from you, even if you later divorce and the divorce decree states that your former spouse will be solely responsible for the tax. In some cases, a spouse (or former spouse) will be relieved of the tax, interest, and penalties on a joint tax return.

Three types of relief are available to married persons who filed joint returns.

1. Innocent spouse relief.
2. Separation of liability relief.
3. Equitable relief.

Married persons who did not file joint returns, but who live in community property states [like California], may also qualify for relief. See Community Property Laws, later. This publication explains these types of relief, who may qualify for them, and how to get them. You can also use the Innocent Spouse Tax Relief Eligibility Explorer at www.irs.gov to see if you qualify for innocent spouse relief.

If you have a tax problem and believe that you may be entitled to innocent spouse relief, and wish to have a California tax lawyer represent you please contact Mitchell A. Port.

May 14, 2008

Most Frequently Asked Questions: Economic Stimulus Payments

California taxpayers waiting and wondering about their tax stimulus payment from the IRS can visit the IRS website for answers to frequently asked questions by clicking here.

Other tax problems related to unpaid payroll taxes, unpaid income taxes or unfiled tax returns, call Los Angeles tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

May 7, 2008

Wesley Snipes Convicted

For his willfully failing to file an income tax return, Wesley Snipes was sentenced to three years in federal prison. He was charged with having failed to pay over $15,000,000 in taxes.

A jury acquitted Wesley Snipes of fraud and conspiracy charges and certain other tax charges even though they convicted him for failure to file his 1999, 2000, and 2001 tax returns.
According to the IRS, tax protestors Eddie Ray Kahn and Douglas P. Rosile (who themselves face 10 and 4-1/2 years' incarceration respectively) met Snipes in 1998 who followed their suggestion to (among other things) stop filing tax returns.

He also filed amended returns requesting payments from the government of millions of dollars in refunds from earlier years' filings.

Allegedly, Snipes doctored tax returns, and sent fake checks to the Treasury to evade paying his tax liabilities.

For what was technically a misdemeanor, Snipes was convicted and sentenced to time in prison.

According to Justice Department prosecutors, this represented a "singular opportunity….to deter tax crime nationwide." And "Snipes's long prison sentence should send a loud and crystal clear message to all tax defiers that if they engage in similar tax defier conduct, they face joining him and his co-defendants . . . as inmates in prison."

May 5, 2008

A Tax Morale Approach To Compliance

In an article this California tax lawyer thinks is worth reading, Marjorie E. Kornhauser (Arizona State) has published A Tax Morale Approach to Compliance: Recommendations for the IRS, 8 Fla. Tax Rev. 599 (2007).

Here is the introduction:

If people hate taxes so much why do they pay them? The common, seemingly obvious, answer—fear of being caught cheating—is only a partial answer. In fact, this “obvious” answer—based on the rational cost/benefit analysis of traditional economic theory— explains so little of tax compliance that the puzzle of tax compliance is why people pay taxes instead of evading them. The key to this puzzle is “tax morale,” the collective name for all the non-rational factors and motivations—such as social norms, personal values and various cognitive processes—that strongly affect an individual’s voluntary compliance with laws. Higher tax morale correlates with higher tax compliance. Although the exact components of tax morale are not yet fully delineated, Congress and the IRS should begin now to shape and administer income tax laws in accordance with tax morale findings. Delay can only increase the chance that voluntary compliance will deteriorate given the interaction of an individual’s tax morale with elements of the external environment, such as other people and institutions. The tax gap, for example, is more than a problem of lost revenue; it is a visible sign of non-compliance that can create a downward spiral. Non-compliance among other taxpayers can decrease an individual’s own tax morale and compliance. Once tax morale dips, it is hard to restore it to prior levels. Ironically, then, the more the tax gap is publicized, the greater this danger becomes. Consequently, Congress and the IRS should act now to narrow the tax gap and to foster compliance generally. This Report offers the IRS several concrete suggestions for improving individual taxpayer compliance based on the tax morale literature.

Part II discusses methodology and the limitations of empirical research.

Part III briefly describes the tax morale literature, focusing on the main findings regarding: 1) cognitive and affective processes; 2) personal and social values/norms, especially procedural justice, legitimacy, reciprocity, and trust; 3) external activation and suppression of tax morale; 4) demographic factors; and 5) a new tax morale model for tax administration.

Part IV contains recommendations for the IRS. It presents three major recommendations and several more specific suggestions for the IRS to improve individual taxpayers’ voluntary compliance. First, the IRS should establish a department devoted solely to exploring tax morale issues and implementing the findings. Second, the IRS should adopt a tax morale approach to tax compliance that incorporates the findings of the research and responds to—and strengthens—taxpayers’ internal motivations to comply. Third, using tax morale research, the IRS should implement ongoing educational (long - and short term) programs and media campaigns. Although sticks as well as carrots are needed to ensure compliance, this Report examines only the carrots.

Part V provides a short conclusion.

Solutions to tax problems and California tax help from a qualified tax attorney is available by calling Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

May 2, 2008

California's Collection Procedures Manual

Income tax owed but unpaid in California may be collected by the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) using any number of collection methods described in California's Collection Procedures Manual. The Manual describes the desired culture and philosophy for the Collection Program.

California's Collection Procedures Manual contains the following topics:

Introduction Section

Responsibility Section

Case Administration Section

Case Processing Section

Debtor Asset Location Section

Voluntary Case Resolution Section

Involuntary Case Resolution Section

Case Servicing Section

Special Processes Section

Glossary

If you have an income tax problem in California or with the IRS, call Mitchell A. Port for tax help at (310) 559.5259.

April 30, 2008

Closing Your California Business?

Want to dissolve, surrender or cancel your California-based business whether you operate as a domestic corporation, foreign corporation, limited liability company or partnership? The California Franchise Tax Board has a helpful brochure to tell you how. Click here.

Winding-down your Los Angeles County, Orange County, Ventura County or Santa Barbara County business can be done with the help of a qualified attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 if you would like assistance.

April 28, 2008

California's Enhanced Tax Revenue Collection Efforts

The California legislature is considering a bill that would allow the Franchise Tax Board (the FTB) to suspend occupational and professional licenses because of unpaid income tax liabilities and notify the applicable licensing agency of the suspension.

The bill would allow the FTB to suspend an individual’s occupational or professional license because of unpaid income tax liabilities. The FTB would suspend a license only after the following have been provided to the debtor:

Notice of State Income Tax Due,

Final Notice Before Levy,

Order To Withhold (OTW) is issued (if debtor’s bank information is available to the FTB),

Notice of State Tax Lien (issued when a state tax lien is recorded),

60-day preliminary suspension notice.

The FTB would be allowed The FTB to disclose to the licensing boards the reason for the suspension – unpaid taxes.

The FTB staff would provide a hearing, upon request, for license holders who would experience a financial hardship as a result of the suspension.

This bill would define the following:

“Hardship” means financial hardship, as determined by the FTB, where the licensee is financially unable to pay any part of their taxes including penalties, interest, and applicable fees and is unable to qualify for an installment payment arrangement pursuant to Section 19008 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.

“License” includes certificate, registration, or any other authorization to engage in a business or profession issued by a state governmental licensing entity.

“Licensee” means any individual authorized by a license, certificate, registration, or other authorization to engage in a business or profession issued by a state governmental licensing entity.

The bill would allow the Contractors State License Board and the FTB to have concurrent authority to suspend a contractor’s license.

This bill requires licensing boards to provide the FTB information at a time requested by the FTB.

This bill would allow a limited hearing for license holders with outstanding tax liabilities as of the date of enactment to substantiate that the license holder has paid the tax liability reflected in the notice of state tax lien.

ECONOMIC IMPACT

The revenue impact of this bill would depend on the number of delinquent taxpayers that possess an occupational or professional license. This estimate was calculated using the actual account balances of the department’s accounts receivables for the affected taxpayers, excluding accounts in bankruptcy and installment agreements. Taxpayers subject to this proposal are those with an outstanding liability of $1,000 or more and have owed that debt for one year or more.

It is estimated that 17,200 taxpayers with occupational and professional licenses will enter the collection process annually. Of the 17,200 taxpayers, it is estimated 38%, or 6,600, are expected to pay their delinquent debts upon notice from the FTB. Current departmental data indicates the average payment amount for compliant taxpayers would be approximately $2,000, resulting in an annual revenue increase of approximately $13 million (6,600 x $2,000 = $13.2 million). The average payment amount was calculated by the amount of payments made in response to filing enforcement notices.

Current departmental data also indicates unresolved cases of approximately 25,000 delinquent taxpayers with occupational and professional licenses in the collection process. Based on the 25,000 taxpayers, it is estimated that nearly 9,500 taxpayers would comply upon notice from the FTB resulting in a revenue increase of $19 million in the first year ($2,000 x 9,500 = $19 million). The revenue for fiscal year ending 2009-10 is estimated to total $32 million ($19 million + $13 million).

It is assumed that 50 percent of the $32 million would be collected in fiscal year 2009-2010, reducing revenue to $16 million. The remaining $16 million from fiscal year 2009-10 would be collected in 2010-11, in addition to the $13 million that is assessed annually, for a revenue impact of $29 million ($16 million + $13 million = $29 million) in 2010-11. Thereafter, the annual fiscal impact of $13 million would be collected. Because the revenue from this bill would be from tax liabilities from prior years, the estimates in the table are all accrued back one year.

If you are having an income tax collection problem with the FTB, call a tax attorney: call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 for help.

April 21, 2008

California Taxpayer Advocate

Like the IRS, California's Franchise Tax Board has its own taxpayer advocate. (See my earlier posting on August 27, 2007 entitled "What Has The IRS' Taxpayer Advocate Done Lately?"). It claims that "The Taxpayer Advocate's office is available to provide an independent review of your unresolved tax problems."

Your rights as a California taxpayer are described on the Franchise Tax Board's Advocate's website in English, Spanish, Chinese, Korean and Vietnamese.

There is also a comparison of California law with federal law concerning the taxpayers' bill of rights.

Common California Advocate Responsibilities Include:

Resolve problems when normal channels don’t work

Protect taxpayers’ rights

Determine whether to suspend collections while case is in review

Ensure courteous treatment of the public

Maintain independent status

Identify inequities

Provide independent review

Adhere to agency tax laws

Identify trends and issues

Encourage public suggestions

Propose changes

Promote understandable and simple:

Tax laws

Regulations

Policies

Procedures

Publications

Finally, there is a link to a list of taxpayer advocates in the California Board of Equalization (BOE), Employment Development Department (EDD), Franchise Tax Board (FTB) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

If you continue to have tax problems even when dealing with the taxpayer advocate, call tax attorney Mitchell A. Port for tax help at 310.559.5259.

April 11, 2008

Military Personnel May Qualify For New Tax Rebate

On March 20, 2008, the Internal Revenue Service issued a release which advises U.S. military taxpayers, serving in a designated combat zone, that their nontaxable combat duty pay will qualify as income for purposes of eligibility for the tax rebate payable under the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. The tax rebate is available in either 2008 or 2009.

Service members who would not otherwise file a federal income return, as a result of their nontaxable combat zone income, must now file Form 1040A, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, with the IRS by October 15 in order to receive the economic stimulus payment in 2008.

To receive the rebate, the service member must:

(i) show at least $3,000 in qualifying income (earned income, combat zone pay, Social Security benefits or Veterans Affairs benefits) on their tax return;

(ii) file their 2007 federal income tax return on or before Oct. 15, 2008 (a service members federal income tax filing deadline is extended by 180 days after leaving a combat zone) to receive the tax rebate in 2008; and

(iii) file Form 1040A with the IRS (report the nontaxable combat duty pay on Line 40b of Form 1040A).

April 7, 2008

Release of Lien Or Discharge Of Property

The Internal Revenue Service published final regulations related to the release of a Federal tax lien and discharge of property under sections 6325, 6503, and 7426 of the Internal Revenue Code. These regulations update existing regulations and contain procedures for processing a request made by a property owner for discharge of a Federal tax lien from his property under section 6325(b)(4).

These regulations are effective January 31, 2008 and apply to any release of lien or discharge of property that is requested after January 31, 2008.

Basis for Release of Lien:

1) Liability satisfied or unenforceable.

2) Bond accepted.

3) Certificate of release for a lien which has become legally unenforceable.

4) Satisfaction of tax liability.

5) Proof of full payment.

6) Notice of a Federal tax lien which lists multiple liabilities.

7) Taxpayer requests discharge of specific property from the lien.

If you have tax liens that should be released, call Mitchell A. Port.

April 2, 2008

Frivolous Tax Claims To Avoid

Songwriter and performer Paul Simon sang about the 50 ways to leave your lover. The IRS has identified about another 50 ways to take frivolous tax positions to avoid compliance with the federal tax laws.

Congress passed recent legislation amending the Internal Revenue Code requiring the Treasury Secretary to prescribe, and periodically revise, a list of tax positions identified as frivolous. Notice 2007-30, 2007-14 I.R.B. 883, contained the prescribed list. The list was recently revised to add more positions identified as frivolous.

Frivolous Positions. Positions that are the same as or similar to the following are frivolous:

Continue reading "Frivolous Tax Claims To Avoid" »

March 20, 2008

Tax Scams – The Top Twelve

There is no secret formula that can eliminate a person’s tax obligations. People should be wary of anyone peddling any of these scams. Taxpayers in California anecdotaly seem especially vulnerable. Consult a tax attorney (perhaps in Los Angeles) if you have doubts about an "opportunity" being presented to you.

The Internal Revenue Service issued its 2008 list of the 12 most egregious tax schemes and scams.

Tax schemes can lead to problems for both scam artists and taxpayers. Tax return preparers and promoters also risk significant penalties, interest and possible criminal prosecution.

Avoid these common schemes:

1. Return Preparer Fraud

Dishonest tax return preparers can cause many problems for taxpayers who fall victim to their schemes. These scam artists make their money by skimming a portion of their clients’ refunds and charging inflated fees for return preparation services. They attract new clients by promising large refunds. Some preparers promote the filing of fraudulent claims for refunds on items such as fuel tax credits to recover taxes paid in prior years. Taxpayers should choose carefully when hiring a tax preparer, especially one who promises something that seems too good to be true.

2. Hiding Income Offshore

Individuals continue to try to avoid paying U.S. taxes by illegally hiding income in offshore bank and brokerage accounts or using offshore debit cards, credit cards, wire transfers, foreign trusts, employee leasing schemes, private annuities or life insurance plans. The IRS and the tax agencies of U.S. states and possessions continue to aggressively pursue taxpayers and promoters involved in such abusive transactions.

3. False Claims for Refund and Requests for Abatement

This scam involves a request for abatement of previously assessed tax using Form 843, “Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement.” Many individuals who try this have not previously filed tax returns. The tax they are trying to have abated has been assessed by the IRS through the Substitute for Return Program. The filer uses Form 843 to list reasons for the request. Often, one of the reasons given is "Failed to properly compute and/or calculate Section 83-Property Transferred in Connection with Performance of Service."

4. Misuse of Trusts

For years, unscrupulous promoters have urged taxpayers to transfer assets into trusts. They promise reduction of income subject to tax, deductions for personal expenses and reduced estate or gift taxes. However, some trusts do not deliver the promised tax benefits. As with other arrangements, taxpayers should seek the advice of a trusted professional before entering into a trust.

5. Zero Wages

Filing a phony wage- or income-related information return to replace a legitimate information return has been used as an illegal method to lower the amount of taxes owed. Typically, a Form 4852 (Substitute Form W-2) or a “corrected” Form 1099 is used as a way to improperly reduce taxable income to zero. The taxpayer also may submit a statement rebutting wages and taxes reported by a payer to the IRS. Sometimes fraudsters even include an explanation on their Form 4852 that cites statutory language on the definition of wages or may include some reference to a paying company that refuses to issue a corrected Form W-2 for fear of IRS retaliation. Taxpayers should resist any temptation to participate in any of the variations of this scheme.

6. Frivolous Arguments

Promoters of frivolous schemes encourage people to make unreasonable and unfounded claims to avoid paying the taxes they owe. Most recently, the IRS expanded its list of frivolous legal positions that taxpayers should stay away from. Taxpayers who file a tax return or make a submission based on one of these positions on the list are subject to a $5,000 penalty. The most recent update of the list of frivolous positions includes: misinterpretation of the 9th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution regarding objections to military spending, erroneous claims that taxes are owed only by persons with a fiduciary relationship to the United States, a nonexistent “Mariner’s Tax Deduction” related to invalid deductions for meals and the misuse of the fuel tax credit (see below). The complete list of frivolous arguments is on the IRS Web site at IRS.gov.

7. Disguised Corporate Ownership

Some people are going as far as forming domestic shell corporations in certain states for the purpose of disguising the ownership of a business or financial activity. Once formed, these anonymous entities can be used to facilitate underreporting of income, non-filing of tax returns, engaging in listed transactions, money laundering, financial crimes and even terrorist financing. The IRS is working with state authorities to identify these entities and to bring the owners of these entities into compliance.

8. Abusive Retirement Plans

The IRS continues to uncover abuses in retirement plan arrangements, including Roth Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs). The IRS is looking for transactions that taxpayers are using to avoid the limitations on contributions to Roth IRAs. Taxpayers should be wary of advisers who encourage them to shift appreciated assets into Roth IRAs or companies owned by their Roth IRAs at less than fair market value. In one variation of the scheme, a promoter has the taxpayer move a highly appreciated asset into a Roth IRA at cost value, which is below annual contribution limits even though the fair market value far exceeds the amount allowed.

9. Scams Related to the Economic Stimulus Payment

Some scam artists are trying to trick individuals into revealing personal financial information that can be used to access their financial accounts by making promises relating to the economic stimulus payment, often called a “rebate.” To obtain the payment, eligible individuals in most cases will not have to do anything more than file a 2007 federal tax return. But some criminals posing as IRS representatives are trying to trick taxpayers into revealing their personal financial information by falsely telling them they must provide information to get a payment. For instance, a potential victim is told by phone or e-mail that he or she is eligible for a rebate but must provide a bank account number (or similar information) to get the payment. If the target is unwilling, the victim is then told that he cannot receive the rebate unless the information is provided. Individuals should remember that the only way to get a stimulus payment is to file a 2007 tax return. The IRS urges taxpayers to be extra-vigilant. The IRS will not contact taxpayers by phone or e-mail about their stimulus payment.

10. Abuse of Charitable Organizations and Deductions

The IRS continues to observe the misuse of tax-exempt organizations. Misuse includes arrangements to improperly shield income or assets from taxation, attempts by donors to maintain control over donated assets or income from donated property and overvaluation of contributed property. In addition, IRS examiners are seeing an upturn in instances where taxpayers try to disguise private tuition payments as contributions to charitable or religious organizations.

11. Phishing

Phishing is a tactic used by Internet-based thieves to trick unsuspecting victims into revealing personal information they can then use to access the victims’ financial accounts. These criminals use the information obtained to empty the victims’ bank accounts, run up credit card charges and apply for loans or credit in the victims’ names. Phishing scams often take the form of an e-mail that appears to come from a legitimate source. Some scam e-mails falsely claim to come from the IRS. To date, taxpayers have forwarded more than 33,000 of these scam e-mails, reflecting more than 1,500 different schemes, to the IRS. The IRS never uses e-mail to contact taxpayers about their tax issues. Taxpayers who receive unsolicited e-mail that claims to be from the IRS can forward the message to a special electronic mailbox, phishing@irs.gov, using instructions contained in an article titled “How to Protect Yourself from Suspicious E-Mails or Phishing Schemes.” Remember: the only official IRS Web site is located at www.irs.gov.

12. Fuel Tax Credit Scams

The IRS is receiving claims for the fuel tax credit that are unreasonable. Some taxpayers, such as farmers who use fuel for off-highway business purposes, may be eligible for the fuel tax credit. But some individuals are claiming the tax credit for nontaxable uses of fuel when their occupation or income level makes the claim unreasonable. Fraud involving the fuel tax credit was recently added to the list of frivolous tax claims, potentially subjecting those who improperly claim the credit to a $5,000 penalty.

For tax and legal advice from a former IRS attorney now working throughout Southern California, particularly in Los Angeles County, Orange County, Santa Barbara County and Ventura County, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

March 17, 2008

The Tax Collection Manual

IRS tax issues can be the bane of our existence. The tax office of your local income tax preparer is often the best place to find relief. If you wish to learn as much as you can from authoritative tax collection sources, look at the IRS’ own publications. One such tax collection source is the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) published by the federal government. How the government may go about resolving your tax problems is explained in the Manual. The IRM contain the policies, procedures, instructions, guidelines, and delegations of authority which direct the operation and administration of the Internal Revenue Service’s tax collection arm. Topics include tax administration, personnel and office management, and others. Below is a list of the topics covered in “Part Five Collecting Process”:

5.1 General Collecting Procedures

5.2 Reports

5.3 Entity Case Management System (ENTITY)

5.4 Case Processing

5.5 Insolvencies, Decedents Estates and Estate Taxes

5.6 Collateral Agreements

5.7 Trust Fund Compliance

5.8 Offer in Compromise

5.9 Bankruptcy

5.10 Seizure and Sale

5.11 Notice of Levy

5.12 Federal Tax Liens

5.13 Collection Quality Measurement

5.14 Installment Agreements

5.15 Financial Analysis

5.16 Currently Not Collectible

5.17 Legal Reference Guide for Revenue Officers

5.18 Liability Determination

5.19 Liability Collection

5.20 Abusive Tax Avoidance Transactions

Tax help is available from a qualified tax attorney in Los Angeles, California. Call Mitchell A. Port, Esq. at 310.559.5259 to discuss your tax problems.

March 10, 2008

How To Report Tax Cheats Or Fight Back

Has your ex-spouse or former employee turned you in? Are you the victim of a false claim?

The Internal Revenue Service has a Whistleblower Office – it even has a director for it: he is Stephen Whitlock. Recently, the IRS outlined ways informants can report violations of the tax law and possibly claim a reward based on the amount of additional tax, penalties and interest that is owed.

If you earn a reward, you have to pay your own income tax on it. All awards will be subject to normal tax reporting and withholding requirements.

To be eligible for an award under the new procedures, the tax, penalties, interest, additions to tax, and additional amounts in dispute must exceed $2 million for any taxable year and, if the taxpayer is an individual, the individual’s gross income must exceed $200,000 for any taxable year in question.

The Whistleblower Office was created about a year ago, December. To make a claim, an informant must file new Form 211, Application for Award for Original Information, which asks informants for an explanation of how the informant obtained the information, to provide an estimate of the tax owed and the facts in the case.

The IRS’ Whistleblower Office will make the final determination about whether an award will be paid and the amount of the award for claims that it processes. Awards will be paid in proportion to the value of information furnished voluntarily with respect to proceeds collected.

Under the new procedures, the amount of award will be at least 15%, but no more than 30%, of the collected proceeds in cases in which the IRS determines that the information submitted by the informant substantially contributed to the collection of tax. The award percentage may be reduced in some circumstances, which are described in IRS guidance.

Has your ex-spouse or former employee turned you in? Are you the victim of a false claim? Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259 for tax help.

March 7, 2008

IRS Publications And Forms

The Internal Revenue Service has many forms and free publications on a wide variety of topics to help you understand and meet tax obligations, reporting and filing requirements. If you need IRS materials try one of these ways:

Walk-in: During the tax-filing season, many libraries and post offices offer free tax forms. Some libraries also have copies of commonly-requested publications. Braille materials may also be available. Many large grocery stores, copy centers, and office supply stores have forms you can photocopy or print from a CD.

Internet: You can access forms and publications on the IRS website 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at IRS.gov.

Mail: Send your order for tax forms and publications to National Distribution Center, P.O. Box 8903, Bloomington, IL 61702-8903. You should receive your products within 10 days after we receive your order.

Phone: Call 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676) to order current year forms, instructions and publications and prior year forms and instructions. You should receive your order within 10 days.

Try these links:

Publication 2053A, Quick and Easy Access to IRS Tax Help and Forms (PDF 40K)

Publication 910, Guide to Free Tax Services (PDF 636K)

Need other tax help? Have other tax problems you wish to discuss with a California tax attorney? Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

February 20, 2008

Offer In Compromise

The IRS has a full discussion of offers in compromise on its website. Click here for the full article. Here is what the article says:

An offer in compromise (OIC) is an agreement between a taxpayer and the Internal Revenue Service that settles the taxpayer's tax liabilities for less than the full amount owed. If the liabilities can be fully paid through an installment agreement or other means, the taxpayer will in most cases not be eligible for an OIC. For information concerning installment agreements, refer to Topic 202.

In most cases, the IRS will not accept an offer unless the amount offered by the taxpayer is equal to or greater than the reasonable collection potential (the RCP). The RCP is how the IRS measures the taxpayer's ability to pay. The RCP includes the value that can be realized from the taxpayer's assets, such as real property, automobiles, bank accounts, and other property. In addition to property, the RCP also includes anticipated future income, less certain amounts allowed for basic living expenses.

The IRS may accept an OIC based on three grounds. First, acceptance is permitted if there is doubt as to liability. This ground is only met when genuine doubt exists that the IRS has correctly determined the amount owed. Second, acceptance is permitted if there is doubt that the amount owed is collectible. This means that doubt exists that the taxpayer could ever pay the full amount owed. Third, acceptance is permitted based on effective tax administration. An offer may be accepted based on effective tax administration when there is no doubt that the liabilities have been correctly determined and no doubt that the full amount owed can be collected, but requiring payment in full would either create an economic hardship or would be unfair and inequitable because of exceptional circumstances.

When submitting an OIC, taxpayers must....

Continue reading "Offer In Compromise" »

February 13, 2008

FTB Publicizes Names Of Delinquent Taxpayers

Is your name on the list? Keep it off!

The California Franchise Tax Board is going after taxpayers who owe about $200,000 up to almost $27 million in back income taxes by listing their names and debts on the agency's website. California Revenue & Taxation Code Section 19195 directs the Franchise Tax Board to publish an annual list of the top 250 taxpayers with liened state income tax delinquencies greater than $100,000.

Of California's roughly 20 million taxpayers, about 250 owe huge debts. Before the FTB publishes the list, each taxpayer who may potentially be on the list gets a letter which provides them an opportunity to voluntarily settle their liability.

The notification letters, titled Notice of Public Disclosure, provide taxpayers 30 days to pay their debts or obtain FTB approval to make installment payments, pay the liability in full, enter into an Offer in Compromise, or substantiate a bankruptcy filing.

The California State Board of Equalization is also required by law to post similar information concerning back sales and use taxes every quarter, removing amounts that are being addressed through bankruptcy, payment arrangement, appeal or litigation.

Get tax help now! Call Mitchell A. Port, a California tax attorney experienced in resolving tax problems.

February 11, 2008

Time To Choose A Tax Return Preparer - Some Advice

While most tax return preparers are professional and honest, you can use the following tips to choose a preparer who will offer the best service for your tax preparation needs.

If you choose to use a paid tax preparer, it is important that you find a qualified tax professional. Taxpayers are ultimately responsible for everything on their return even when it’s prepared by someone else.

The most reputable preparers will request to see your records and receipts and will ask you multiple questions to determine your total income and your qualifications for expenses, deductions, and other items. By doing so, they have your best interest in mind and are trying to help you avoid penalties, interest, or additional taxes that could result from later IRS contacts.

Get References. Ask questions and get references from clients who have used the tax professional before. Were they satisfied with the service received?

Plan Ahead. Choose a preparer you will be able to contact after the return is filed and one who will be responsive to your needs.

Ask about service fees. Avoid preparers who claim they can obtain larger refunds than other preparers, or those who guarantee a refund or base fees on a percentage of the amount of the refund.

Research. Check to see if the preparer has any questionable history with the Better Business Bureau, the state’s board of accountancy for CPAs or the state’s bar association for attorneys. Find out if the preparer belongs to a professional organization that requires its members to pursue continuing education and also holds them accountable to a code of ethics.

Determine if the preparer’s credentials meet your needs. Does your state have licensing or registration requirements for paid preparers? Is he or she an Enrolled Agent, Certified Public Accountant, or Attorney? If so, the preparer can represent taxpayers before the IRS on all matters – including audits, collections, and appeals. Other return preparers can represent taxpayers only in audits regarding a return signed as a preparer.

Want a referral to a qualified tax return preparer from a California tax attorney? Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

February 8, 2008

Have You Been Mistakenly Treated As An Independent Contractor? There's A Solution

Did you believe you were an employee at your job rather than an independent contractor? Did your employer mistakenly treat you as an independent contractor perhaps because it was perceived as a way to save Social Security and Medicare Taxes on wages? If you were erroneously treated as an independent contractor, the Internal Revenue Service has developed a new form for employees who have been misclassified as independent contractors by an employer.

Form 8919, Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on Wages, will now be used to figure and report the employee’s share of uncollected social security and Medicare taxes due on their compensation.

By using Form 8919, the worker’s social security and Medicare taxes will be credited to their social security record. To facilitate this process, the IRS will electronically share Form 8919 data with the Social Security Administration.

Generally, a worker who receives a Form 1099 for services provided as an independent contractor must report the income on Schedule C and pay self-employment tax on the net profit, using Schedule SE. However, sometimes the worker is incorrectly treated as an independent contractor when they are actually an employee. When this happens, Form 8919 will be used beginning for tax year 2007 by workers who performed services for an employer but the employer did not withhold the worker’s share of social security and Medicare taxes.

In addition, the worker must meet one of several criteria indicating they were an employee while performing the services. The criteria can be reviewed at this site:

In the past, misclassified workers often used Form 4137 to report their share of social security and Medicare taxes. Misclassified workers should no longer use this form. Instead, Form 4137 should now only be used by tipped employees to report social security and Medicare taxes on allocated tips and tips not reported to their employers.

Whether you are an employee or the employer, tax help is available to be sure you comply with the new rule. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259 for tax help.

February 6, 2008

Federal Court Reverses The U.S. Tax Court

An IRS appeals officer is disqualified by statute from conducting a Collection Due Process (CDP) hearing regarding the taxpayers' 2001 and 2002 tax liabilities when the officer had previously considered those liabilities during a CDP hearing involving a prior year's tax liability.

The taxpayer had requested that the Internal Revenue Service appeals officer recuse himself from hearing the collection due process matter since he had already been involved with the same taxpayer on a related matter. The IRS refused to appoint someone else to hear the new tax matter. The U.S. Tax Court agreed with the IRS.

In a recent decision (Cox v. Comm'r Internal Revenue, No. 06-9004), the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the Tax Court in the Tax Court's decision upholding a levy for certain tax liabilities against petitioners-taxpayers as contrary to the provisions of Internal Revenue Code section 6330(b)(3).

The question the court was asked to answer was to define the use of the term “no prior involvement” in a taxpayer’s matter when assigning a hearing officer to a collection due process case. The law requires the appointment of an impartial appeals officer to hear CDP matters who “has had no prior involvement with respect to the unpaid tax specified in [the CDP Notice] before the first hearing”.

In it’s holding, the court of appeals said all that is required to recuse the Internal Revenue Service’ appeals officer is that he in fact did have prior involvement with the same liabilities for which the taxpayers sought another remedy.

If you think you should have a new hearing officer at your collection due process hearing and you are being denied your request, you ought to retain an experienced tax attorney to help preserve your legal rights. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259 for help.

February 4, 2008

Harebrained Tax Schemes

The Truth about Frivolous Tax Arguments is the Internal Revenue Service’s response to anyone who contemplates arguing on legal grounds against paying their fair share of taxes. It discusses and rebuts many of the more common frivolous arguments made by individuals and groups that oppose compliance with federal tax laws.

This 74-page document is updated at least once a year by the IRS and is designed to help individuals and groups understand their responsibilities and not violate the law.

The document explains many of the common frivolous arguments made in recent years and it describes the legal responses that refute these claims. This document is available on IRS.gov and will help taxpayers avoid wasting their time with frivolous arguments and incurring penalties.

In 2006, Congress increased the amount of the penalty for frivolous tax returns from $500 to $5,000. The increased penalty amount applies when a person submits a tax return or other specified submission, and any portion of the submission is based on a position the IRS identifies as frivolous.

A section of this document explains the penalties that the courts may impose on those who pursue tax cases on frivolous grounds. It should be noted that the cases cited as relevant legal authority are illustrative and are not intended to provide an all-inclusive list relating to frivolous tax arguments.

February 1, 2008

Government Sues To Close San Diego Tax Preparation Firm

In November, 2007, the U.S. government sued the owners of a San Diego, California tax preparation firm, asking a federal court to shut them down and permanently bar them from preparing tax returns for others. The civil injunction suit was filed in San Diego, California against Roosevelt Kyle and Rebecca Tyree, both of San Diego, and their businesses—Century One Resorts Ltd., COA Financial Group LLC, and Eagle Financial Services LLC.

According to the government’s complaint, the defendants operate their business in National City, California, and have prepared more than 12,000 federal tax returns since 2000. The suit alleges that Kyle and Tyree understated their customers’ tax liabilities by preparing returns with fabricated business-expense and charitable deductions. The complaint alleges that the Internal Revenue Service estimates that the defendants’ misconduct has caused losses to the U.S. Treasury totaling $18 million.

According to the complaint, the IRS has penalized Kyle three times in the past for understating customers’ tax liabilities. In 2002 a federal jury found Kyle guilty of failing to file his own 1995-1998 tax returns.

Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259 if you would like a referral to a California tax return preparer who is fair, has integrity, is honest and helpful.

January 30, 2008

Tax Avoidance Or Tax Evasion?

Employment Tax Evasion Schemes

California employers: be careful! Employment tax evasion schemes can take a variety of forms. Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Orange County and Ventura County employers use a few of the most common techniques. Some of the more prevalent methods of evasion include pyramiding, employee leasing, paying employees in cash, filing false payroll tax returns or failing to file payroll tax returns.

Filing False Payroll Tax Returns or Failing to File Payroll Tax Returns

Preparing false payroll tax returns understating the amount of wages on which taxes are owed, or failing to file employment tax returns are methods commonly used to evade employment taxes.

Employment Leasing

Employee leasing is another legal business practice, which is sometimes subject to abuse. Employee leasing is the practice of contracting with outside businesses to handle all administrative, personnel, and payroll concerns for employees. In some instances, employee-leasing companies fail to pay over to the IRS any portion of the collected employment taxes. These taxes are often spent by the owners on business or personal expenses. Often the company dissolves, leaving millions in employment taxes unpaid.

Pyramiding

"Pyramiding" of employment taxes is a fraudulent practice where a business withholds taxes from its employees but intentionally fails to remit them to the IRS. Businesses involved in pyramiding frequently file for bankruptcy to discharge the liabilities accrued and then start a new business under a different name and begin a new scheme.

Paying Employees in Cash

Paying employees, whole or partially, in cash is a common method of evading income and employment taxes resulting in lost tax revenue to the government and the loss or reduction of future social security or Medicare benefits for the employee.

Other schemes include:

Unreliable Third Party Payers.

Frivolous Arguments.

Offshore Employee Leasing.

Misclassifying worker status.

Filing False Payroll Tax Returns or Failing to File Payroll Tax Returns.

S Corporation Officers Compensation Treated as Corporate Distributions.

For further reading, look at IR-2004-47, titled "IRS Warns Businesses, Individuals to Watch for Questionable Employment Tax Practices."

To resolve and fix these and other tax problems, call Mitchell A. Port at 310. 559.5259.

January 28, 2008

This Tax Season, Select A Professional Tax Preparer

It’s important for you to find qualified tax professionals if they need help preparing and filing you income tax returns. You are legally responsible for what’s on your own individual income tax returns even if prepared by someone else. It is important to choose carefully when hiring an individual or firm to prepare personal income tax returns. If you pay someone to prepare your tax return, choose that preparer wisely. Here are some points to keep in mind when someone else prepares your return:

Never sign a blank tax return, and do not sign in pencil.

Review and ensure you understand the entries and are comfortable with the accuracy of the return before you sign.

A Paid Preparer is required by law to sign the return and fill in the preparer areas of the form. The preparer should also include their appropriate identifying number on the return. Although the Preparer signs the return, you are responsible for the accuracy of every item on your return. In addition, the preparer must give you a copy of the return.

Review the completed return to ensure all tax information, your name, address and Social Security number(s) are correct. Make sure that none of these spaces is left blank.

A Third Party Authorization Check Box on Form 1040 allows you to designate your Paid Preparer to speak to the IRS concerning how your return was prepared, payment and refund issues and mathematical errors.

If you have provided specific authorization in a power of attorney filed with the IRS, you may have copies of notices or refund checks mailed to your preparer or representative; but only you can sign and cash your refund check.

Unqualified tax preparers may overlook legitimate deductions or credits that could cause you to pay more tax than you should. Unqualified preparers may also make costly mistakes causing their clients to incur assessed deficiencies, penalties, and interest. Here are some suggestions to consider when hiring a tax professional:

Avoid preparers who claim they can obtain larger refunds than other preparers. If your returns are prepared correctly, every preparer should derive substantially similar numbers.

Understand that the most reputable preparers will request to see your receipts and will ask you multiple questions to determine your qualifications for expenses, deductions and other items. By doing so they have your best interest in mind and are trying to help you avoid penalties, interest or additional taxes that could result from an IRS examination.

A paid preparer must sign the return as required by law.

Find out if the preparer is affiliated with a professional organization that provides or requires its members to pursue continuing education and holds them accountable to a code of ethics.

Choose a preparer you will be able to contact and one who will be responsive to your needs. Ask who will actually prepare the return before engaging services. Avoid firms where your work may be delegated down to someone with less training or some unknown worker. You should know exactly who works with your tax matters at all times and how to contact him or her; after all, you are paying for it. Determine if the preparer is exporting your return to a foreign country for preparation. Foreign countries do not have the same security and privacy laws as the United States nor is there any recourse should your information be compromised as a result of lax or nonexistent privacy procedures.

Beware of a preparer who guarantees results or who bases fees on a percentage of the amount of the refund. A practitioner may not charge a contingent fee (percentage of your refund) for preparing an original tax return.

Investigate whether the preparer has any questionable history with the Better Business Bureau, the state’s board of accountancy for CPAs, the state’s bar association for attorneys or the IRS Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) for enrolled agents or the oversight agency in states that license or register tax preparers.

Determine if the preparer’s credentials meet your needs or if your state mandates licensing or registration requirements for paid preparers. Is he or she an Enrolled Agent, Certified Public Accountant (CPA) or Tax Attorney? Only attorneys, CPAs and enrolled agents can represent taxpayers before the IRS in all matters including audits, collection actions and appeals. Other return preparers may represent taxpayers only in audits regarding a return that they signed as a preparer.

Check IRS.gov for information regarding abusive shelters and other tax schemes and scams.

The IRS can help you prepare your own returns without the assistance of a paid preparer. Before seeking a paid preparer, you might consider how much information is available directly from the IRS through the IRS Web site. Check these links:

Free Tax Return Preparation For You by Volunteers

e-file for Individual Taxpayers

Free File

Tax evasion is both risky and a crime, punishable by up to five years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine. Remember, no matter who prepares a tax return, you are legally responsible for all of the information on that tax return.

Unfortunately, unscrupulous tax return preparers do exist and can cause financial and legal problems for their clients. Examples of improper actions by unscrupulous preparers include the preparation and filing of false paper or electronic income tax returns that claim inflated personal or business expenses, false deductions, unallowable credits or excessive exemptions.

Report suspected tax fraud and abusive return preparers by completing Form 3949-A and mailing it or a letter with similar information to:

Internal Revenue Service
Fresno, CA 93888

Call Mitchell A. Port, a California tax attorney at 310.559.5259, for a referral to a tax professional who will work together with you this tax season and going-forward on your tax planning needs.

January 23, 2008

California's State Tax Agencies

In the State of California there are several agencies that administer a variety of taxes. The following is a list of state agencies that can assist you in determining your tax obligations and provide you with information about tax reporting and taxpayer rights. Other state and local agencies may issue California permits and assess fees or taxes; they are not listed here.

The Employment Development Department (EDD) issues employer account numbers (sometimes called state employer identification numbers, SEINs, state ID numbers, or reserve account numbers) and administers California's payroll taxes, including State Disability Insurance, Employment Training Tax, Unemployment Insurance, and California Personal Income Tax withholding.

The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) administers corporate and personal income and franchise taxes for the State of California. For questions, you can contact the Franchise Tax Board from inside the U.S. at (800) 852-5711 or from outside the U. S. at (916) 845-6500 (not toll-free).

The State Board of Equalization (BOE) is responsible for the administration and collection of the states sales and use, fuel, alcohol, tobacco, and other special taxes and fees, and issues seller's permits. The BOE is involved in California property tax assessment and administration. The BOE also acts as the appellate body for personal income and franchise tax appeals. For more information call 1-800-400-7115.

The California Tax Service Center provides information relating to income, payroll, sales and use tax for businesses in one handy location.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) administers federal payroll taxes, including social security, Medicare, federal unemployment insurance and federal income tax withholding, and issues federal employer identification numbers.

Need help dealing with any of these tax authorities for tax problems you or your California based business have? Please call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

January 21, 2008

Taxable Income, Tax Credits, And Tax Deductions And Exclusions Q&A

The Internal Revenue Service implemented a Q&A called Tax Trails which is available to anyone, including my clients in Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Orange County and Ventura County, California. It is an interactive session which poses questions that you can answer by selecting Yes or No. It's designed to be very simple. Your choice then brings about a hypertext link to the next appropriate question until an answer is possible.

Q&A topics cover these areas:

Continue reading "Taxable Income, Tax Credits, And Tax Deductions And Exclusions Q&A" »

January 18, 2008

Can The IRS File A Federal Tax Lien On Property Not Belonging To The Taxpayer?

After the IRS filed a notice of federal tax lien for a plaintiff’s husband's unpaid employment taxes on certain real property, to which plaintiff and her husband's friend held legal title, the plaintiff brought a quiet title action against the U.S. Last month, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the District Court’s holding (read the case here) that the lien was enforceable only as to the half-interest held by the friend. The reason for vacating the District Court’s decision and sending the case back to that Court was because: 1) a formal transfer of legal title from plaintiff's husband to plaintiff is not required in order to enforce the lien; but 2) a remand was needed to determine whether the IRS could establish that the husband held an interest in the property under Utah law.

Continue reading "Can The IRS File A Federal Tax Lien On Property Not Belonging To The Taxpayer?" »

January 16, 2008

Need Information From The IRS About Your Tax Return?

For individuals requesting transcripts:

You have two options for getting copies of your federal tax return information--tax return transcripts and tax account transcripts--by phone or by mail.

Request transcripts by calling 1-800-829-1040, or order by mail using IRS Form 4506T (Request for Transcript of Tax Return). There is no charge or fee for transcripts. Allow two weeks for delivery.

A tax return transcript shows most line items from your tax return (Form 1040EZ, 1040A or 1040) as it was originally filed, including any forms and schedules you attached to your return. It does not reflect any changes your representative, the IRS or you made after the return was filed. In many cases, a return transcript will meet the requirements for those applying for student loans and lending institutions offering mortgages.

A tax account transcript shows any later adjustments either the IRS or you made after the tax return was filed. This transcript shows basic data, including type of return filed, adjusted gross income, taxable income and marital status.

Tax problems, tax controversy, tax help, tax consulting? Please call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

January 14, 2008

California Estate Income Tax Clearance Certificate

A. Estate Income Tax Clearance Certificates.

For certain estates, California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 19513 prohibits the probate court from allowing the final account of the fiduciary unless the Franchise Tax Board certifies that all taxes have been paid or secured as required by law. The Estate Income Tax Clearance Certificate is only required if an estate meets BOTH of the following TWO requirements:

(1) Had assets with a fair market value exceeding $1,000,000 on the date of death, AND

(2) Is to distribute assets exceeding $250,000 to one or more nonresident beneficiaries.

In determining if the assets exceed $1,000,000, include the fair market value of all assets on date of death, wherever situated, for decedents who were California residents. Nonresident decedents should only include the value of those assets located in California.

In determining if assets exceeding $250,000 are distributable to nonresident beneficiaries, the residency of a trust which is a beneficiary of the decedent’s estate is determined by the residency of the trust’s fiduciaries and beneficiaries.

Before issuing the Estate Income Tax Clearance Certificate, the FTB requires payment of all accrued taxes of the decedent and the estate. The FTB may also require a deposit by check, or bond to secure the payment of any taxes which may later become payable.

The Estate Income Tax Clearance Certificate is valid only to the end of the current taxable year. The FTB will only issue a new Estate Income Tax Clearance Certificate extending the expiration date when a return is filed for each subsequent year and the tax for that year, if any, is paid.

The Estate Income Tax Clearance Certificate is issued to the fiduciary or representative designated on the application. THE ACTUAL FILING OF THE ESTATE INCOME TAX CLEARANCE CERTIFICATE WITH THE COURT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FIDUCIARY OR REPRESENTATIVE.

B. Effect of the Estate Income Tax Clearance Certificate and Continuing Liability of the Fiduciary.

The Estate Income Tax Clearance Certificate issued under California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 19513 does not relieve the estate of liability for any taxes due or which may become due from the decedent or the estate. Neither does the certificate relieve the fiduciary of the personal liability for taxes and other expenses as imposed by California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 19516.

C. Other Information.

You do not need to submit a copy of the Final Account of the fiduciary unless the FTB requests it.

The FTB may require fiduciaries to withhold tax on California source income distributed to nonresident beneficiaries. Income from intangible personal property such as interest and dividend income or gain from the sale of stocks or bonds is generally not taxable to a nonresident beneficiary and therefore not subject to withholding. Failure to withhold when required may make the fiduciary personally liable for the amount due.

For information on determining requirements for withholding, telephone (888) 792‑4900 (toll free) or write to: Withholding Services and Compliance Section, Franchise Tax Board, PO Box 942867, Sacramento, CA 94267-0651.

Income earned by the estate in the final year in which its assets are distributed pursuant to a decree of final distribution is taxable to the beneficiaries. The estate must file a final return and properly report the income distribution. You should compute the return for the fractional part of the year prior to death on the basis of the method of accounting followed by the decedent. You can not include income and deductions for expenses, interest, taxes, and depletion accrued solely by reason of death in the return of a decedent for the period in which death occurred. Include those items in the return of the estate or beneficiary, as the case may be, upon receipt or payment.

D. Returns Required.

You must file a final fiduciary return (Form 541) for the year in which the estate closes if the filing requirements are met. You should also file a return to establish any excess deductions allowed to beneficiaries in the final year. The decedents final personal income tax return (Form 540, 540A, 540 2EZ, or Long or Short Form 540NR) must be marked “FINAL” at the top of the return in block letters. In addition, please furnish copies of any other returns filed for the decedent or the estate within the last 12 months. Write “COPY – DO NOT PROCESS” in bold letters on the face of each copy. If you submit original returns with this application, include an additional copy of each return with the words, “COPY – DO NOT PROCESS” in bold letters on the face of each copy. Mail the completed Estate Income Tax Request for Clearance Certificate and required returns to:

Estate Income Tax Clearance Unit, MS F150
Franchise Tax Board
PO Box 1468
Sacramento CA 95812-1468

For more information about this and other California probate matters, contact Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

January 9, 2008

Who Is An Innocent Spouse In California?

As a California tax attorney located in Los Angeles, I have posted other blogs on the topic of innocent spouse. This particular posting covers Q&A for California income tax. My other postings include: "Innocent Spouse Made Easier" posted on July 9, 2007 and "California Taxpayers: Innocent Spouse Relief" posted February 14, 2007.

1. Who is an innocent spouse in California and can I get relief of tax?

Generally in California, when a joint tax return is filed, each spouse is equally liable for all the tax, penalties, and interest for the particular joint tax year. This means the entire amount of tax, penalties, and interest may be collected from either spouse, even if only one spouse earned all of the income.

If certain legal requirements are met, a spouse may be fully or partially relieved of the joint tax, penalties, and interest. Six categories of relief are available:

Relief by court order.

Equitable relief.

Complete or partial innocent spouse relief.

Relief by separate allocation of liability.

Relief from the tax due amount on return(s) that have been filed.

Relief from community income.

2. Under what conditions is relief by court order allowed?

You may qualify for relief by court order if:

You have obtained a divorce from your spouse, and the court issued an order relieving you of the unpaid tax due from a joint liability.

You are in the process of obtaining a divorce and your joint gross income exceeds $150,000 or you owe more then $7,500 for the tax year(s) for which you are seeking relief, send the California Franchise Tax Board ("FTB") a letter requesting a Tax Revision Clearance Certificate, which you will provide to the court. After the court issues its order, you will need to provide the California FTB with a copy of the court order and it will determine the amount of your relief. In your letter requesting a Tax Revision Clearance Certificate be sure to include your name, address, telephone number and social security number.

However, note that the court is limited in the relief that it can provide. The court cannot:

Relieve you of your responsibility to pay tax on your own income.

Provide relief on taxes already paid.

3. Under what conditions is equitable relief allowed?

If you filed a joint return, and you do not qualify for traditional innocent spouse or separate allocation of liability relief, you may still be considered for equitable relief from tax that results from an audit or the underpayment of tax on your return. The following are some of the factors considered:

Continue reading "Who Is An Innocent Spouse In California?" »

January 7, 2008

Hiring A Lawyer In California

The California State Bar has a very interesting pamphlet offering advice on finding the right lawyer for you in California.

The pamphlet asks about 16 different questions to help you find and hire the right attorney.

The California State Bar has other useful pamphlets on topics such as California Wills, whether you need estate planning and whether you need a living trust in California.

To speak with an attorney in Los Angeles, please call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

January 3, 2008

Favorite Urban Tax Legends

My clients, including those in Ventura County, Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County and Orange County, are creative when explaining how they ended up with an IRS tax problem including unpaid income tax, unpaid payroll tax and unfiled tax returns. Here are some examples:

I don't have to claim the cash I received, only the checks.

Putting it on the corporate credit card automatically makes it deductible.

It's the accountant's job to figure out how to write that off.

If I'm in a California probate, I won't have to pay estate tax and income tax.

Filing late in the filing season near April 15 decreased your audit risk.

If you show you owe at least $1 instead of getting a refund, you are less likely to be audited.

The Amish don't pay income tax.

There is a Slavery Reparation tax credit for African Americans who never received their '40 acres and a mule'.

There are loopholes to benefit the rich which your tax professional doesn't even know.

I only have to claim the income for which I received a 1099.

I can deduct the cost of keeping my dog as a security system.

I can avoid estate tax at death if I give away all of my property right before I die.

Because the IRS didn't audit me, the deduction I have been taking all these years must be legal.

Filing an extension and filing near Oct 15 decreases your audit risk.

Taxpayers over age 65 who are still working don't have to pay Social Security tax.

Taxing labor/services is unconstitutional.

Attorneys can deduct their cable bill because Court TV is educational.

AMT is only for high income taxpayers.

"Only the little people pay taxes." - Leona Helmsley, Federal Inmate

The federal income tax is unconstitutional because the 16th Amendment was never properly ratified by the states.

The federal income tax is voluntary and applies only to those who volunteer to pay it.

You can incorporate your business in Nevada and pay no state income taxes, even though the corporation does business in your home state and other states.

Filing on extension and claiming a large refund increases your audit risk.

Life insurance proceeds are not taxable.

Nurses/police/EMTs on call can deduct the cost of their monthly phone bill since they need to have a phone to keep their job.

Firefighters can deduct the cost of their lunch since they are on duty 24 hours a shift.

Claiming an office in the home increases your audit risk.

S corp owners don't have to claim a salary.

You can claim your live-n girlfriend as a dependent.

Someone has to win the Irish Lottery.

The Internet Tax Fairness Act forbids states from imposing sales or use taxes on goods ordered over the internet and shipped from outside the buyer's state.

Newly arrived legal immigrants or refugees get a seven-year federal income tax holiday.

You can deduct the cost of your car and all its operating expenses (or mileage) as a business expense if you put advertising on the car.

You can deduct the cost of your vacation if you go on a job interview (keep that business card of the interviewer) while away.

Showing $495 as a non cash donation has less audit risk than showing $500.

Most IRS agents/officers are mean and hard to deal with.

I can deduct a gift of up to $12,000 given to my child.

Police officers can deduct $5 a day as Walking Around Money (WAM).

Criminals (i.e. drug dealers, etc.) are not required to pay taxes on their illegal business income.

If I don't file my return, I don't owe any tax.

Receiving a 1099 increases your audit risk.

Using the pre-printed IRS label increases your audit risk.

My tax at year end is determined by how I fill out my W-4.

If I go to one of those "pennies on the dollar" places, I will only owe them and the government "pennies on the dollar."

I don't pay taxes. I got a refund.

My return is easy, it'll only take you about 5 minutes to do.

For help dealing with the IRS, call an experienced tax attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

December 26, 2007

Personal Tax Help -- Face-to-Face With The IRS

IRS Taxpayer Assistance Centers (TAC) are your source for personal tax help in Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Orange County and Ventura County California when you believe your tax issue cannot be handled online or by phone, and you want face-to-face tax assistance. Taxpayer Assistance Centers are closed for all Federal Holidays.

To view a list of all Taxpayer Assistance Centers in your state, click on the map or state links below.

To search for the Taxpayer Assistance Center closest to you, enter your 5-digit ZIP Code into the Office Locator- Walk-In Site Search.

Tax problems? Tax trouble? Income taxes overdue? Have a tax debt? Unfiled tax returns? Want tax help? Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

December 14, 2007

Employment Tax Fraud: Some Samples

The following examples of employment tax fraud investigations are excerpts from public record documents on file in the court records in the judicial district in which the cases were prosecuted. Funny thing, though: as a tax attorney in California, only two of approximately twenty cases occurred in California despite its size and the number of businesses operating here.

Three People Sentenced in Tax and Insurance Fraud Scheme

Owner of Farm Labor Contracting Business Sentenced to 24 Months in Prison

Massachusetts Man Sentenced for Tax Evasion and Filing False Employment Tax Returns

Pennsylvania Businessman Sentenced to Prison for Tax Evasion

Oregon Woman to Serve 30 Months in Prison for Tax Evasion

Nursing Home Owner Sentenced to 30 Months in Prison for Failing to Pay Millions in Payroll Taxes

Chief Executive Officer of Company Sentenced for Failure to Pay Over Employment Taxes

Local Businesswoman Sentenced to More Than Five Years in Prison; Fined $1.2 Million for Tax Fraud

Owner of Altus Financial Sentenced to Federal Prison for Failing to Collect and Pay Employment Taxes

Ohio Attorney Sentenced for Tax Crimes

Landscaper Sentenced on Employment Tax Fraud Charges

Payroll Service Sentenced for Employment Tax Fraud

To read the entire story, as well as many other samples, click here.

If you believe you have a tax problem or simply want answers to your tax questions, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

December 11, 2007

Reporting Suspected Tax Fraud Activity

How To Report Abusive CPAs, Attorneys Or Enrolled Agents

Report suspicious actions by tax professionals - including California lawyers, CPAs or EAs - to the email address of the IRS Office of Professional Responsibility which is opr@irs.gov.

If you suspect or know of an individual or company that is not complying with the tax laws, you may report this activity on Form 3949-A and mail it to:

Internal Revenue Service
Fresno, CA 93888

If you do not want to use Form 3949-A, you may send a letter to that address. You should include the following information, if available:

Name and address of the person you are reporting

The taxpayer identification number (social security number for an individual or employer identification number for a business)

The estimated dollar amount of any unreported income

The years involved

A brief description of the alleged violation, including how you became aware of or obtained the information

Your name, address and daytime telephone number

Although you are not required to identify yourself, it is helpful to do so. Your identity can be kept confidential. You may also be entitled to a reward.

While a tax attorney may be unnecessary to help in this situation, you may wish to consult with Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259 nonetheless.

December 6, 2007

Doctrine of "Substantial Compliance" Has A High Bar To Satisfy

Those of us with federal tax problems in California are governed by the court decisions made the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; decisions by other Circuit Courts do not necessarily apply to California’s taxpayers directly. But in a recent decision Estate of Tamulis v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals involving the tax treatment of a charitable remainder trust—a trust in which the income goes to individuals during their lifetime (or some other period) but what remains after their rights expire goes to charity – the Court held against carrying out the charitable intent of the donor.

Here's the story. Father Tamulis, a Catholic priest, died in 2000, leaving an estate of $3.4 million. His will left the bulk of his estate to a living trust that he had created. The trust was to continue for the longer of 10 years or the joint lives of Tamulis’s brother and the brother’s wife. During that period they would have a life estate in a house owned by the trust and the trust would pay the real estate taxes on the house.

The net income of the trust, as “determined in accordance with normal accounting principles,” would go to two of the brother’s and sister-in-law’s grandchildren (that is, Tamulis’s grandnieces), minus $10,000 a year, which would go to their third child until she graduated from medical school. Upon the termination of the trust the assets would pass to a Catholic diocese.

The estate tax return, filed in 2001, claimed a charitable deduction of $1.5 million, represented to be the present value of the charitable remainder, which was described on the return as the “residue following 10 year term certain charitable remainder unitrust at 5% quarterly payments to two grand nieces.” In each of the years 2001 through 2004, the trust distributed no more than 5 percent of the fair market value of the trust’s assets, as valued at the beginning of each year, to the grandnieces and for the payment of the real estate taxes on their parents’ home.

The Internal Revenue Service refused to allow the charitable deduction. The charitable remainder, as defined in the trust instrument, was not a charitable remainder unitrust as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. In particular, the trust instrument did not specify either a fixed dollar amount, or the percentage of the trust’s fair market value, that would go to the income beneficiaries— to the grandnieces in cash and to their parents in the form of a life estate in the house and payment of the real estate taxes on it, which would be paid out of the trust’s income.

This was a fundamental defect, fixable only by a judicial proceeding to reform the trust, filed within 90 days after the estate tax return was due. The trustee (who was also the executor of Father Tamulis’s will) and the diocese realized that there was a problem. But more than eight months elapsed before the executor prepared a complaint to file in an Illinois state court (the trust is governed by Illinois law) to reform the trust. And for unexplained reasons the complaint was never filed. Instead, in 2003 the executor circulated to the income beneficiaries a proposed reformation of the trust to bring it into compliance with the Code. But the third grandniece did not sign it, and so the trust has never been reformed, with or without a judicial proceeding, although the trustee continues to administer it in accordance with the requirements of the Code, as her predecessor (the original trustee, who has died) had said in the estate tax return that he was doing.

Her argument, rejected by the Tax Court and renewed before the Seventh Circuit, is that the statement in the return, coupled with the trustee’s continued administration of the trust as if it were a qualified unitrust, should be deemed substantial compliance with the Code, although she concedes that it is not literal compliance.

There is a doctrine of substantial compliance with the often intricate and obscure provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The Seventh Circuit has criticized the Tax Court’s articulation of the doctrine for formlessness, and, noting that the courts of appeals do not defer to the legal rulings of that court any more than they do to the rulings of a district court, has ruled that the “doctrine of substantial compliance should not be allowed to spread beyond cases in which the taxpayer had a good excuse (though not a legal justification) for failing to comply with either an unimportant requirement or one unclearly or confusingly stated in the regulations or the statute.”

Tamulis’s charitable remainder trust flunks this test. The executor-trustee, represented by counsel, as he was, and well aware that a substantial tax deduction was at stake, had no excuse for failing to bring the required judicial proceeding to reform the trust. The requirement is not unimportant; it protects against efforts to bend trust law to get a tax benefit. Nor is the requirement stated unclearly or confusingly in the Code or in any regulation—it is perfectly clear. Until the trust was reformed, compliance with the spirit of the Code’s provisions dealing with charitable remainder trusts had depended largely on the good faith of the trustee.

When the conditions for applying the doctrine are not satisfied, it makes good sense to hold a taxpayer to the requirements of the tax code. The doctrine of substantial compliance “seeks to preserve the need to comply strictly with regulatory requirements that are important to the tax collection scheme and to forgive noncompliance for either unimportant and tangential requirements or requirements that are so confusingly written that a good faith effort at compliance should be accepted.” The doctrine is therefore inapplicable to this case.

Do you think you qualify to have the doctrine of substantial compliance apply to you? Speak with a California tax attorney and call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

December 3, 2007

U.S. Corporation Short-Form Income Tax Return, Form 1120-A, Is Obsolete

Last month, the IRS announced that effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2006, the U.S. Corporation Short-Form Income Tax Return, Form 1120-A, can no longer be filed. For the 2007 tax year, all domestic corporations must file Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return unless required to file a special return.

For this and other tax issues, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

November 28, 2007

California Registered Domestic Partners Exempt From Property Tax Increases

The California State Board of Equalization has promulgated a rule that grants to registered domestic partners certain property tax relief afforded to spouses. County assessors (including the assessors of Los Angeles County, Ventura County, Santa Barbara County and Orange County) unsuccessfully challenged the rule in the trial court and appealed, arguing that it was unconstitutional. The California State Court of Appeal disagreed (you may read the opinion here).

In 1978, California voters adopted Proposition 13, a constitutional amendment, which limits the amount of ad valorem tax assessed on real property unless there has been a “change in ownership.” After the California Legislature defined such a change of ownership to exclude, among other things, real property transfers between spouses, the voters adopted Proposition 58, placing the spousal transfer exclusion in the state Constitution. The California State Board of Equalization then promulgated a rule excluding from the definition of change of ownership a transfer of real property to a registered domestic partner via intestate succession upon the death of the person’s registered domestic partner. Thereafter, the California Legislature amended the statutory scheme to limit change of ownership by excluding any real property transfers between registered domestic partners from the reassessment of full cash value for property tax purposes.

Plaintiffs, who are California county assessors, filed an action for declaratory relief, asserting that neither the Legislature nor the California State Board Equalization had the authority to create the registered domestic partner exclusion from classification as a change in ownership.

As California State Court of Appeal explained, the trial court correctly held (1) the Legislature can create an exclusion from “change in ownership” for registered domestic partners, without violating the California Constitution, (2) when the Legislature amended provisions of the Family Code and Revenue and Taxation Code, it ratified the Board’s rule excluding certain real property transfers between registered domestic partners from the property tax reassessment provisions of Proposition 13, and (3) accordingly, the Board’s rule is not unconstitutional.

For estate planning and probate help involving domestic partnerships and other matters, please call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

November 26, 2007

Where's My Tax Refund?

You filed your tax return and you're expecting a refund. You have just one question and you want the answer now - Where's My Refund?

$110 million belongs to you through your tax refund. The IRS is looking for over 115,000 taxpayers who are due refund checks after those checks were returned as undeliverable. The refund checks, averaging about $953, can be claimed as soon as you update your address with the IRS. Some taxpayers have more than one check waiting.

You can ensure the IRS has your correct address by filing Form 8822, Change of Address. If you do not have access to the internet and think you may be missing a refund should first check their records or contact your tax preparer, then call the IRS toll-free assistance line at 1-800-829-1040 to update your address.

The Where’s My Refund? tool on IRS.gov enables you to check the status of your refunds. You must submit your social security number, filing status and amount of refund shown on your 2006 income tax return. The tool will provide the status of your refund and in some cases provide instructions on how to resolve delivery problems.

You can access a telephone version of “Where’s My Refund?” by calling 1-800-829-1954.

Whether you split your refund among several accounts, opted for direct deposit to one account or asked IRS to mail you a check, you can track your refund through this secure Web site. You can get refund information even if you filed just to request the telephone excise tax refund.

To get to your personal refund information, be ready to enter your:

Exact refund amount shown on your return

Filing status (Single, Married Filing Joint Return, Married Filing Separate Return, Head of Household, or Qualifying Widow(er))

Social Security Number (or IRS Individual Taxpayer Identification Number)

If you don’t receive your refund within 28 days from the original IRS mailing date shown on Where’s My Refund?, you can start a refund trace online.

If Where’s My Refund? shows that the IRS was unable to deliver your refund, you can change your address online.

Need tax help or have a California or federal tax problem? Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

November 19, 2007

New Coordinated Effort By The State And Federal Tax Authorities

Earlier this month, the Internal Revenue Service and more than two dozen state workforce agencies - including California's - announced they have entered into agreements to share the results of employment tax examinations.

California, Michigan, New Jersey, New York and North Carolina all are part of the team that developed the strategy, and they were instrumental in helping make sure the agreements meet the needs of the participating states as well as the needs of the IRS.

The agreements, part of the Questionable Employment Tax Practice (QETP) initiative, provide a centralized, uniform means for the IRS and state employment officials to exchange information and data. As a result, they can leverage resources and encourage businesses to comply with federal and state employment tax requirements.

These agreements present a united front for the IRS and its state partners to improve compliance with filing tax returns and paying employment taxes. Combining resources will help IRS and the states uncover employment tax avoidance schemes, reduce fraudulent filings and ensure proper worker classification.

The state agencies, the U.S. Department of Labor, the National Association of State Workforce Agencies, the Federation of Tax Administrators and the IRS worked together on various facets of the exchange agreements.

So far, 29 states have entered into individual information-sharing agreements with the IRS. The states that have signed partnership agreements with the IRS thus far are:

Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin.

In addition to coordinating compliance activities, the agreements call for collaborative outreach and education activities designed to help businesses understand their employment and unemployment tax responsibilities.

The exchange agreements are the first result of the QETP initiative. The QETP team will use the results of the project to find new opportunities for collaboration and to work toward improved employment tax compliance.

Do you have federal or California state tax problems? Contact Mitchell A. Port for help at 310.559.5259.

November 14, 2007

Family Limited Partnerships Still Work

On March 30, 2005, the Tax Court ruled that a decedent’s transfer of real property to a family limited partnership (“FLP”) and later FLP gifts were includable in the decedent’s estate under Internal Revenue Code Section 2036(a)(1) which recaptures in a decedent’s gross estate certain assets transferred while alive. The Estate appealed. On September 14, 2007, the Ninth Circuit upheld the Tax Court’s decision. Read the Ninth Circuit opinion here.

Virginia Bigelow, the decedent, transferred her 98.3% interest in a single family residence to a trust (“Trust”). (The decedent’s children held the other undivided interests.) The trustees of the Trust were Virginia and her son. The following year, the parties exchanged the property held by the Trust for another rental residence (“Property”) and bought out the children’s undivided interests. Two years later, the Trust and the decedent’s children formed the FLP. The Trust contributed the Property to the FLP and the children each contributed $100. The Trust was the sole general partner. Over the next three years, numerous gifts of FLP interests occurred. At decedent’s death, the decedent owned a 44% limited partner interest in the FLP and her Trust held the sole one percent general partner interest. The 44% limited interest was valued at a 37% discount from the underlying appraised value and the one percent general partner interest was valued at a 35% premium.

In addition, the loans on the Property were retained as liabilities by the decedent. However, the Property served as the ultimate collateral for the loans. Because the decedent was left with insufficient funds to pay off the loans, the Partnership distributed funds necessary to service one of the two loans. No other distributions were made. After Ms. Bigelow’s death, a reduction in her Partnership capital account was made to reflect the loan payment distribution.

The Estate appealed the Tax Court’s decision arguing there was no “implied agreement” for the decedent to use, enjoy or have the right to the income of the Property and that the transfers were completed under the “bona fide sale” exemption of Internal Revenue Code Section 2036.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the Tax Court’s deficiency determination, finding that Ms. Bigelow and the Bigelow children had an implied agreement that Ms. Bigelow would retain income and economic enjoyment from the transferred asset, and that the inter vivos transfer was not a bona fide sale for adequate and full consideration under Internal Revenue Code Section 2036(a).

To discuss putting an effective family limited partnership in place, please call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

November 9, 2007

Is Your Compensation Reasonable Or A Disguised Dividend?

Are you an employee of your own California corporation? How much are you paying yourself as salary? How much are you paying yourself as a year-end bonus? Are you unwittingly creating a tax problem for yourself?

An employer, including a California employer, is not entitled to deduct certain compensation paid if that compensation was not reasonable in amount. The excess monies paid are a disguised dividend which causes a tax problem for the employer who will have to pay tax on the amount deducted deduction that will be disallowed by the IRS.

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(a)(1) permits a corporation to deduct “a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services actually rendered.” The test for deductibility in the case of compensation payments is whether they are reasonable and are in fact payments purely for services.

A deduction for compensation that is, in fact, reasonable is an amount “as would ordinarily be paid for like services by like enterprises under like circumstances.”

The 9 Factor Test of Reasonableness

The reasonableness inquiry is governed by the nine - factor test based on a case called Owensby & Kritikos, Inc. v. Cmm'r., 819 F.2d 1315, 1323-24 (5th Cir. 1987).

These nine factors are:

1. The employee's qualifications;

2. The nature, extent and scope of the employee's work;

3. The size and complexities of the business;

4. A comparison of salaries paid with gross income and net income;

5. The prevailing general economic conditions;

6. Comparison of salaries with distributions to stockholders;

7. The prevailing rates of compensation for comparable positions in comparable concerns;

8. The salary policy of the taxpayer as to all employees; and

9. Compensation paid in prior years.

Courts will examine and weigh the totality of the facts and circumstances in determining reasonable compensation so that no one factor will be determinative of reasonableness.

The IRS's determination of reasonableness is presumptively correct which shifts the burden to the taxpayer to establish that he is entitled to a deduction larger than that allowed by the Service.

If you have been challenged by the IRS about your compensation deduction and would like to consult with a tax attorney, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559.5259.

November 5, 2007

California Businesses: Online EIN Application Processes Requests Very Quickly

California business owners can now request an Employer Identification Number (EIN) - a tax I.D. - through a web-based system that immediately processes requests and generates identification numbers in real time, the Internal Revenue Service recently announced.

Here's how it works. California business owners such as those in Los Angeles County, Orange County, Santa Barbara County and Ventura County, access the internet EIN system through IRS.gov and enter the required information. If the information passes the automatic validity checks, the IRS issues a permanent EIN. If the information does not pass the validity checks, the application is rejected. You then have an opportunity to correct the information and resubmit the application.

The internet EIN application is interactive and asks questions tailored to the type of entity you are establishing.

The system provides "help" screens throughout the application process. This means you will no longer have to print the EIN instructions and separately search for answers while requesting an EIN.

When the EIN application process is complete, you have the option to view, print and save your confirmation notice; you no longer have to wait for the IRS to mail it. Third parties authorized by you can also be provided with the EIN, but the third party cannot view, print or save the confirmation notice. Instead, the confirmation notice is mailed to you.

An EIN assigned through internet submission is immediately recognized by IRS systems. You can begin using the EIN immediately for most business purposes.

For tax help regarding other business activity - creating Subchapter S or C corporations, drafting contracts, liquidating a company - you may call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

October 29, 2007

Organization Of The IRS

Do you have a tax problem with the IRS but can't easily navigate through the government bureaucracy? Are you considering using a California tax attorney to negotiate around the tax maze? Do you want a glimpse of what the IRS structure is so as get answers to your tax controversy? Well, please keep reading....

In 1998 Congress enacted the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act prompting a comprehensive reorganization and modernization of the IRS. The IRS reorganized itself to closely resemble the private sector model of organizing around customers with similar needs.

The IRS is divided into three commissioner-level organizations to support its structure and ensure accountability:

Commissioner

Specialized IRS units report directly to the Commissioner’s office. The IRS Chief Counsel also reports to the Treasury General Counsel on certain matters.

Commissioner, Internal Revenue — Kevin M. Brown, Acting
IRS Chief Counsel — Donald L. Korb
Appeals — Sarah Hall Ingram, Chief
Taxpayer Advocate Service — Nina E. Olson, National Taxpayer Advocate
Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity — Diane Crothers, Chief
Research, Analysis, and Statistics — Mark Mazur, Director
Communications and Liaison — Frank Keith, Chief

Deputy Commissioner for Operations Support

The Deputy Commissioner reports directly to the Commissioner and oversees the integrated IRS support functions, facilitating economy of scale efficiencies and better business practices:

Deputy Commissioner for Operations Support — Linda Stiff
Modernization and Information Technology Services — Richard A. Spires, Chief Information Officer
Agency-Wide Shared Services — James P. Falcone, Chief
Mission Assurance and Security Services — Daniel Galik, Chief
Human Capital Officer — Robert Buggs, Chief
Chief Financial Officer — Janice J. Lambert, Chief

Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement

The Deputy Commissioner reports directly to the Commissioner and oversees the four primary operating divisions and other service and enforcement functions:

Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement — Kevin M. Brown
Wage and Investment Division — Richard J. Morgante, Commissioner
Large and Mid-Size Business Division — Deborah M. Nolan, Commissioner
Small Business/Self Employed Division — Kathy Petronchak, Commissioner
Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division — Steven T. Miller, Commissioner
Criminal Investigation — Eileen C. Mayer
Office of Professional Responsibility — Stephen Whitlock, Acting Director

See the basic structure of today's IRS in this picture of the IRS Organizational Chart.

Call Mitchell A. Port for tax help at 310.559.5259.

October 26, 2007

SPOTLIGHT #3: Useful California Business Law And Tax Links

What Government Assistance Is Available to California Employers and California Businesses?

Here's a collection of links to California State government web sites with useful information for businesses in Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Orange County and Ventura County. There is something here for you whether you are already conducting business in California, just starting in Los Angeles, Beverly Hills or Culver City, or expanding to a new state.

Visit the California State web sites here and find helpful information on doing business in California, links for California employers, California taxation and more.

California State Web Site

Doing Business in the State

Business
Permits and Licenses
Secretary of State
California Department of Corporations

Taxation

Board of Equalization
Franchise Tax Board

Employer Links

Department of Industrial Relations
Employment Development Department
New Hire Registry

General

State Agency Index
California Code of Regulations
Department of General Services
Small Business Assistance Center
Small Business and DVBE Services
County Web sites
City Web sites

For doing business and related tax matters in all the other States, the IRS website has terrific information. Go to State Links.

Do you have California business law questions or IRS or California State tax problems? Please call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

October 24, 2007

Trust Fund Tax Payments

When you pay your employees, you do not pay them all the money they earned. As an employer, you have the obligation of withholding taxes from their paychecks. Your employees trust that you pay the withholding to the Treasury by making Federal Tax Deposits. That is why they are called trust fund taxes. The income tax and employees' share of FICA (social security and Medicare) that you withhold from your employees' paychecks are part of their wages you pay to the federal government instead of to your employees.

Through this withholding, your employees pay their contributions toward retirement benefits (social security and Medicare) for current retirees and the income taxes that are owed and reported on their tax returns. Your matching share of FICA along with your employees' trust fund taxes, are paid to the government through the Federal Tax Deposit System. The withheld part of these taxes is your employees' money, and the matching portion is their retirement benefit. Refer to Employment Taxes and the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP) for more information.

Employment tax deposits are a current expense. Postponing paying them is not the same as making a late payment on your utility bill. Congress has established penalties for delays in turning over employment taxes to the Treasury. The longer it takes to pay that money, the more it will cost you. Refer to Publication 15, Circular E, Employer's Tax Guide, for more information.

Need answers to questions about your trust fund tax, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

October 22, 2007

Former IRS District Director Pleads Guilty To $1.3 Million Tax Fraud

No one is above the law – not even an employee of the Internal Revenue Service based in Vista, California. A former Internal Revenue Service (IRS) district director pleaded guilty recently to conspiring to defraud the government through his involvement in a tax fraud scheme promoted by “Renaissance, The Tax People, Inc.” During a hearing before a U.S. District judge, Jesse Ayala Cota admitted defrauding the government of more than $1.3 million and to earning more than $300,000 from his participation in the scheme.

This is an example of someone implying he has “insider information” to help others enrich themselves by buying into his bogus tax avoidance system. However, what he sold was long-term legal and financial problems for those who bought his advice.

Renaissance used Cota’s credentials as a former district director for the IRS to lend the tax fraud scheme legitimacy and to induce people to join and to remain members.

Cota admitted that during his participation in the conspiracy, those involved prepared or had others prepare false federal income tax returns resulting in a tax loss of approximately $1.3 million. Cota also admitted that from 1997 though April 2002, the conspirators, through Renaissance, operated a scheme to defraud the government and individuals by marketing a program to sell illegal tax deductions through false and misleading representations.

Cota also admitted that he and his co-conspirators falsely assured their clients and others that Renaissance’s tax system was legal. Cota acknowledged that a co-conspirator sent an e-mail message to customers falsely asserting that there existed written endorsements from “over 2,000 tax attorneys, enrolled agents and certified public accountants that every strategy contained in the Tax Relief System is absolutely sound, unassailable and proven over the past 40 years.” The e-mail also falsely claimed that “the training offered by Renaissance, the Tax People, through the Tax Relief System . . . was approved for continuing education credit for CPAs in all 50 states.”

Cota faces a potential maximum sentence of five years in prison followed by up to three years of supervised release, a $250,000 fine, and liability for the costs of prosecution. Sentencing is scheduled for January 2008.

For civil tax problems, rather than criminal tax controversies, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

October 19, 2007

SPOTLIGHT #2: The IRS - Income Tax Highlights

Perhaps you’ve had a chance to read the featured article on the history of the Los Angeles Superior Court (probate, civil and criminal) posted on October 15, 2007. Here is another article covering the highlights of the history of the IRS beginning with the enactment of a new income tax in 1862 and its repeal just 10 years later.

1862 - To help pay for Civil War expenses, President Lincoln signed into law a revenue-raising measure. The measure created the nation's first income tax as well as a Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The new law levied a 3% tax on income between $600 and $10,000 and a 5% tax on income of more than $10,000. (Those were the good ol' days.)

1867 - Responding to public opposition to the income tax, Congress cut the tax rate. From 1868 until 1913, 90% of all revenue came from taxes on wine, beer, liquor and tobacco.

1872 - Income tax repealed.

1894....

Continue reading "SPOTLIGHT #2: The IRS - Income Tax Highlights" »

October 17, 2007

New IRS Guidelines For "Allowable Living Expenses"

Just a couple of weeks ago, the Internal Revenue Service issued the 2007 allowable living expense standards. The new standards apply to those of us taxpayers with a tax debt living in California as well as to the rest of the country. Elsewhere in this blog in connection with installment agreements and the Offer In Compromise, I have discussed the so-called “national standards”. These standards enable the Internal Revenue Service to treat all taxpayers in the same region the same way when it comes to paying for allowable living expenses before paying back-taxes.

Allowable living expense standards, also known as collection financial standards, are used to determine the ability of a taxpayer to pay a delinquent tax liability. For purposes of federal tax administration the standards are effective Oct. 1, 2007.

This year the standards have been redesigned to incorporate:

a new category for out of pocket health care expenses;

the elimination of income ranges for national standards for food, clothing and other items;

a nationwide set of tables for national standard expenses, eliminating separate tables for Alaska and Hawaii;

an expanded number of household categories for housing and utilities;

an allowance for cell phone costs in housing and utilities;

equal allowances for first and second vehicles under transportation expenses;

fewer Metropolitan Statistical Areas for vehicle operating costs; and

a separate nationwide public transportation allowance.

To discuss this and other tax problems with a former IRS tax attorney, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

October 12, 2007

Techniques To Record Your Business Transactions

For a lot of reasons, including an IRS audit, a good recordkeeping system includes a summary of your business transactions. Business transactions are ordinarily summarized in ledgers and journals.

A ledger is a book that contains the totals from all of your journals. It is organized into different accounts.

A journal is a book where you record each business transaction shown on your supporting documents. You may have to keep separate journals for transactions that occur frequently.

Whether you keep ledgers and ledgers and how you keep them depends on the type of business you are in. For example, a recordkeeping system for a small business might include the following items:

Employee compensation records

Check disbursements journal

Daily summary of cash receipts

Monthly summary of cash receipts

Business checkbook

Depreciation worksheet

The system you use to record business transactions will be more effective as you follow good recordkeeping practices. Generally, it is best to record transactions on a daily basis. For example, record expenses when they occur, and identify the source of recorded receipts.

The responsibility to prove entries, deductions, and statements made on your tax returns is known as the burden of proof. You must be able to prove (substantiate) certain elements of expenses to deduct them. Generally, you can meet your burden of proof by having the information and receipts (where needed) for the expenses. You should keep adequate records to prove your expenses or have sufficient evidence that will support your own statement. Additional evidence is required for travel, entertainment, gifts, and auto expenses. You generally must have documentary evidence, such as receipts, canceled checks, or bills, to support your expenses.

For expert representation before the IRS or California Franchise Tax Board, please call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

October 10, 2007

Keeping Employment Tax Records

Records for employment taxes should be kept for at least four years. These should be available for IRS review. Records should include:

Dates and amounts of tax deposits you made.

Your employer identification number.

Dates of employment.

Amounts and dates of all wage, annuity, and pension payments.

Copies of returns filed.

The fair market value of in-kind wages paid.

Names, addresses, social security numbers, and occupations of employees and recipients.

Records of fringe benefits provided, including substantiation.

Periods for which employees and recipients were paid while absent due to sickness or injury and the amount and weekly rate of payments you or third-party payers made to them.

Copies of employees' and recipients' income tax withholding allowance certificates (Forms W-4, W-4P, W-4S, and W-4V).

Any employee copies of Form W-2 that were returned to you as undeliverable.

Amounts of tips reported.

Records of allocated tips.

Consider having your power of attorney, your California tax lawyer, represent you when questions arise concerning your taxes. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

October 8, 2007

How Long You Should Keep Records

It is fairly well-settled among tax lawyers and tax accountants that the length of time you should keep a document depends on the expense, action, or event the document records. Generally, you must keep your tax records that support deductions on a tax return or an item of income until the period of limitations runs out for that return.

The period of limitations is the period of time that the IRS can assess additional tax or in which you can amend your tax return to claim a credit or refund. Below is information containing the periods of limitations that apply to income tax returns. The years mentioned below refer to the period after the return was filed. Returns filed before the due date are treated as filed on the due date.

It is important to note that you should keep copies of your filed tax returns. They help in preparing future tax returns and making computations if you file an amended return.


1. You owe additional tax and situations (2), (3), and (4), below, do not apply to you; keep records for 3 years.

2. You do not report income that you should report, and it is more than 25% of the gross income shown on your return; keep records for 6 years.

3. You file a fraudulent return; keep records indefinitely.

4. You do not file a return; keep records indefinitely.

5. Keep all employment tax records for at least 4 years after the date that the tax becomes due or is paid, whichever is later.

6. You file a claim for a loss from worthless securities or bad debt deduction; keep records for 7 years.

7. You file a claim for credit or refund after you file your return; keep records for 3 years from the date you filed your original return or 2 years from the date you paid the tax, whichever is later.

For a more complete explanation, see my blog posting from August 6, 2007.

As you decide whether to keep a document or throw it away, consider whether the records are connected to assets. In other words, keep records relating to property until the period of limitations expires for the year in which you dispose of the property in a taxable disposition. You must keep these records to figure any amortization, depletion deduction, or depreciation and to figure the gain or loss when you sell or otherwise dispose of the property.

Generally, if you received property in a nontaxable exchange, your basis in that property is the same as the bases of the property you gave up, increased by any money you paid. You must keep the records on the old property, as well as on the new property, until the period of limitations expires for the year in which you dispose of the new property in a taxable disposition.

If you have an existing business confronting a serious IRS tax audit or other examination, a federal or California state tax problem and would like to speak with a California business lawyer and former IRS tax lawyer about serving as your power of attorney, this is an important posting. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

October 5, 2007

What Kind Of Records You Should Keep

As a business person operating in California, you may choose any recordkeeping system suited to your business that clearly shows your income and expenses. Generally, the law does not require any special kind of records. However, the business you are in affects the type of records you need to keep for federal tax purposes. Your recordkeeping system should also include a summary of your business transactions. This summary is usually made in your ledgers and accounting journals. Your books must show your gross income, as well as your deductions and credits.

Supporting Business Documents
Purchases, sales, payroll, and other transactions you have in your business will generate supporting documents such as invoices and receipts. Supporting documents include canceled checks, paid bills, sales slips, deposit slips, receipts and invoices. These documents contain the information you need to record in your books. It is important for you to keep these documents because they support the entries in your books and on your tax return. You should keep them in an orderly fashion and in a safe place. For instance, organize them by year and type of income or expense. For more detailed information refer to Publication 583, Starting a Business and Keeping Records.

The following are some of the types of records you should keep:

Continue reading "What Kind Of Records You Should Keep" »

October 1, 2007

Why You Should Maintain Business Records

California business owners must keep records. Indeed, everyone in business must keep records. Good records will help you do the following:

Monitor the progress of your business

Prepare your tax returns

Support items reported on tax returns

Keep track of deductible expenses

Identify source of receipts

Prepare your financial statements

Continue reading "Why You Should Maintain Business Records" »

September 26, 2007

Tax Fraud - Pick Your California Tax Return Preparer Carefully

When the IRS detects the false return, you the taxpayer — not the return preparer — must pay the additional taxes and interest and may be subject to penalties. This can be a very serious tax problem. Return preparer fraud generally involves the preparation and filing of false income tax returns by preparers who claim false deductions, inflated personal or business expenses, excessive exemptions on returns prepared for their clients or unallowable credits. Preparers may also manipulate income figures to obtain tax credits fraudulently. Sometimes, you may not have knowledge of the false expenses, deductions, exemptions and/or credits shown on your tax returns. While most preparers provide excellent service, be careful when choosing a tax preparer. You are ultimately responsible for all the information on the tax return even if someone else prepares a tax return. Consider the Following When Choosing Your Tax Preparer
No matter who prepares your tax return, you are ultimately responsible for all of the information on your tax return. Therefore, never sign a blank tax form. Use a reputable tax professional who signs your tax return and provides you with a copy for your records. Accept a referral to a preparer from a trusted friend or advisor. Avoid preparers who base their fee on a percentage of the refund amount. Ask questions. Do you know anyone who has used the tax professional? Were they satisfied with the service they received? Consider whether the individual or firm will be around to answer questions about the preparation of your tax return months or years after the return has been filed. Accountancy firms that have been around for awhile may continue to be around for awhile longer – at least long enough for your purposes. Review your tax return before and ask questions on entries you don't understand before you sign it. Find out the person’s credentials. Only attorneys, CPAs and enrolled agents can represent you before the IRS in matters including collection and appeals, and audits. Other return preparers may only represent taxpayers for audits of returns they actually prepared. Be careful with tax preparers who claim they can obtain larger refunds than other preparers.

Continue reading "Tax Fraud - Pick Your California Tax Return Preparer Carefully" »

September 24, 2007

Late Filed Tax Returns And IRS Civil Penalties

If your tax problems result from your not having filed your federal income tax return, three specific penalties will likely be assessed by the IRS when you file your delinquent returns. These are the failure-to-pay penalty, the failure-to-file penalty and the estimated-tax penalty.

The non-filing and non-payment penalties can be waived for reasonable cause when circumstances beyond your control explain not filing your tax return.

Unfortunately, at the time you file your delinquent tax returns, more often than not the Internal Revenue Service will calculate and assess these delinquency-related penalties and you must then request that the IRS consider a waiver of the penalty assessment.

Continue reading "Late Filed Tax Returns And IRS Civil Penalties" »

September 10, 2007

Domestic Trust Schemes The IRS Deems Abusive

Domestic trusts are trusts created in California and the rest of the country. Here are some common abusive domestic trust schemes:

Family residence trust
My wife and I transfer family residences and furnishings to a trust, which sometimes rents the residence back to us. The trust deducts depreciation and the expenses of maintaining and operating the residence including gardening, pool service and utilities. The courts have consistently collapsed these types of trusts, taxing income to us and disallowing personal expenses.

Charitable trust
My wife and I transfer assets or income to a trust claiming to be a charitable organization. The trust or organization pays for personal, education or recreation expenses on behalf of me and my wife or family members. The trust then claims the payments as charitable deductions on its tax returns. These alleged charitable organizations often are not qualified and have no IRS exemption letter; hence, contributions are not deductible. Charitable deductions are not allowed when the donor receives personal benefit from the alleged gift.

Business trust
This involves the transfer of an ongoing business to a trust. Also called an unincorporated business organization, a pure trust or a constitutional trust, it gives the appearance that I have given up control of my business. In reality, through trustees or other entities controlled by me, I still runs the day-to-day activities and control the business's income stream. Such arrangements provide no tax relief. The courts have held that the business income is taxable to me under a variety of legal concepts, including lack of economic substance (sham theory), assignment of income, or that the arrangement is a grantor trust. In some circumstances, the trust could be taxed as a corporation.

Asset protection trust
These trusts are promoted as a means of avoiding liability for judgments against an individual or business. However, beware of any asset protection trust marketed as part of a package to reduce federal income or employment taxes. The courts can ignore such trusts and order my property sold to satisfy the outstanding liabilities.

Equipment or service trust
This trust is formed to hold equipment that is rented or leased to the business trust, often at inflated rates. The business trust reduces its income by claiming deductions for payments to the equipment trust. This type of arrangement has the same pitfalls as the business trust, and it will result in no tax reduction.

Do you think you are involved in one of these and would like to extricate yourself? Call Mitchell A. Port, a California tax attorney, at (310) 559-5259.

September 6, 2007

501(c)(3) Determinations Recently Revoked

Did you know that the Internal Revenue Service publishes a list of tax-exempt organizations which have lost their tax-exempt status? You can see a recent list by clicking here. Some of those troubled by tax problems are in California. No longer exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, these organizations no longer qualify to receive tax-deductible contributions under Code section 170(c)(2).

When the Internal Revenue Service revokes recognition of section 501(c)(3) status, Publication 78 does not immediately reflect the change. Instead, the IRS publishes the change in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (IRB), which can be accessed by clicking on the organization’s name here. Here is a cumulative list of such organizations published in the IRB from November 2005 to present. Click here for a page listing revocations back to January 2005.

Want to form a 501(c)(3) and it's equivalent in California? Call Mitchell A. Port for a consultation at (310) 559-5259.

September 4, 2007

Clarifying Income Tax Withholding Requirements

Are you a California taxpayer with a tax problem involving income tax withholding? Have you found that your employer in Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Orange County or Ventura County can be more helpful without having to consult with a tax attorney? The IRS published a list of 13 questions and answers about compliance with income tax withholding requirements. Here they are:

Q1: In the past, as an employer, I was required to submit all Forms W-4 that claimed complete exemption from withholding (when $200 or more in weekly wages were regularly expected) or claimed more than 10 allowances. What Forms W-4 do I now have to submit to the IRS?
A1: Employers are no longer required to routinely submit Forms W-4 to the IRS. However, in certain circumstances, the IRS may direct you to submit copies of Forms W-4 for certain employees in order to ensure that the employees have adequate withholding. You are now required to submit the Forms W-4 to IRS only if directed to do so in a written notice or pursuant to specified criteria set forth in future published guidance.
________________________________________
Q2: If an employer no longer has to submit Forms W-4 claiming complete exemption from withholding or claiming more than 10 allowances, how does the IRS determine adequate withholding?
A2: The IRS is making more effective use of information contained in its records along with information reported on Form W-2 wage statements to ensure that employees have enough federal income tax withheld.
________________________________________
Q3: If the IRS determines that an employee does not have enough federal income tax withheld, what will an employer be asked to do?
A3: If the IRS determines that an employee does not have enough withholding, we will notify you to increase the amount of withholding tax by issuing a “lock-in” letter that specifies the maximum number of withholding allowances permitted for the employee. You will also receive a copy for the employee that identifies the maximum number of withholding exemptions permitted and the process by which the employee can provide additional information to the IRS for purposes of determining the appropriate number of withholding exemptions. If the employee still works for you, you must furnish the employee copy to the employee. If the employee no longer works for you, you must send a written response to the IRS office designated in the lock-in letter indicating that the employee is no longer employed by you. The employee will be given a period of time before the lock-in rate is effective to submit for approval to the IRS a new Form W-4 and a statement supporting the claims made on the Form W-4 that would decrease federal income tax withholding. The employee must send the Form W-4 and statement directly to the IRS office designated on the lock-in letter. You must withhold tax in accordance with the lock-in letter as of the date specified in the lock-in letter, unless otherwise notified by the IRS. You will be required to take this action no sooner than 45 calendar days after the date of the lock-in letter. Once a lock-in rate is effective, an employer can not decrease withholding unless approved by the IRS.

Continue reading "Clarifying Income Tax Withholding Requirements" »

August 27, 2007

What Has The IRS' Taxpayer Advocate Done Lately?

The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) has released its 2006 Annual Report. TAP is a Federal Advisory Committee made up of citizen volunteers, representing all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, dedicated to helping the IRS identify ways to improve customer service and responsiveness to taxpayers needs.

By analyzing a large number of issues, setting priorities and conducting research, TAP has made important recommendations to improve the IRS and reduce taxpayer burden. The panel is a Federal Advisory committee established under the authority of the Department of the Treasury.

The 2006 TAP Annual Report illustrates the partnership between TAP and the IRS. Through this partnership TAP has been able to make positive changes to improve the tax administration system.

This annual report highlights important actions of the Panel and summarizes 58 new recommendations for improvement that TAP generated for IRS consideration in 2006. The Report also provides an update on the status of the 250 recommendations submitted to the IRS since TAP was established in 2002, many of which have been partially or fully implemented.

Take a look at the full report.

For more information about the IRS and tax problems you may have, please contact Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

August 23, 2007

Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage: The Income Tax Consequences

What are the economic consequences, including the impact on government tax collections, of same-sex marriages? The tax laws in California are complex and too involved for publication in this blog. However, in an interesting article written a few years ago, several scholars at various universities collaborated in an article which begins an analysis of this topic by stating that:

It is well-known that a couple's joint income tax burden can change with marriage. Many couples, especially two-earner couples with similar incomes, pay a marriage tax because their taxes when married are more than their combined tax liabilities as single filers.

This feature of the income tax suggests that legalizing same-sex marriages would increase income tax revenues, because gay and lesbian households are thought to consist primarily of two-earner couples.

In this paper we estimate the income tax effects of allowing same-sex couples to marry. We use estimates on the size of homosexual relationships, the percent who would marry if same-sex marriage becomes legal, and the average incomes of these couples, in order to generate estimates of the revenue impact.

Our calculations indicate that legalizing these marriages would lead to an annual increase in federal government income taxes of between $0.3 billion and $1.3 billion, with the likely impact toward the higher range of the estimates.

If you or someone you know owes income tax as a result of being in a same-sex marriage, a referral to a qualified tax attorney for help is important. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

August 20, 2007

I'll See You In Court

How does the IRS determine which cases it will pursue? Why do some tax cases end up in court? In an address to the Tax Court Judicial Conference, former Chief Counsel B. John Williams of the Internal Revenue Service spoke on his approach to designating cases for litigation. You can read his comments to get insight into this aspect of tax administration by clicking here: "Designating Cases for Litigation".

August 17, 2007

Executive Compensation - IRS Audits Fringe Benefits And Perks

California business owners take heed: the Internal Revenue Service published the “Executive Compensation - Fringe Benefits Audit Techniques Guide” giving you a road-map to what it will examine when auditing your executive perks.

Corporate executives in Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County and Orange County and throughout California often receive extraordinary fringe benefits that are not provided to other employees. New income tax problems arose because of changes in the law.

In 1984, the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) was changed to include the term “fringe benefits” in the definition of gross income found in Code §61. A fringe benefit provided in connection with the performance of services, regardless of its form, is treated as compensation includible in income under Code §61. Any property or service that an executive receives in lieu of or in addition to regular taxable wages is a fringe benefit that may be subject to taxation.

Whether a fringe benefit is taxable depends on whether there is an exclusion under the law that applies to the benefit. For example, when Code §61 was amended to include the term “fringe benefits”, §132 was added to provide exclusions for certain commonly provided fringe benefits.

Section 132 provides exclusions for working condition fringes, qualified moving expenses, de minimis fringes, no additional cost services, qualified transportation fringes, qualified employee discounts and qualified retirement planning services.

Although fringe benefits are taxable, employers may not treat them as wages for income and employment tax purposes. Employers may classify a taxable fringe benefit under expense accounts other than compensation and thereby not subject the fringe benefit to income and employment taxes.

Continue reading "Executive Compensation - IRS Audits Fringe Benefits And Perks" »

August 13, 2007

CPA In Bakersfield, California, Prohibited From Advising Customers Not To File Tax Returns

After a two-day hearing in Fresno, California, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California recently issued a preliminary injunction against Lowell Baisden, a Certified Public Accountant. The injunction prevents him from promoting his tax scheme.

The California court found that Baisden’s tax scheme involved a plan which encouraged and assisted customers to create corporations into which they had their incomes deposited for the purpose of decreasing their tax liability. The court also found that Baisden prepared tax returns in California which characterized wages as rent, which is not subject to self-employment or employment taxes.

Several of Baisden’s customers are physicians and nurse anesthetists, many of whom have not filed past-due tax returns. According to Baisden’s plan, the customers created real estate and forestry corporations, but almost all of the income reported by the corporations was derived from their income from their jobs in the medical profession. Baisden reported deductions for the corporations for customers’ car expenses, lawn care expenses and expenses related to their personal residences.

The California court also found that Baisden prepared tax returns that identified customers as investors when they were actually physicians or nurses. The tax returns claimed business deductions for non-deductible personal expenses of customers or for which he and his customers did not have supporting documentation. The tax returns he prepared also failed to report compensation to owners of those corporations.

Finally, the court found that Baisden engaged in misconduct by falsely advising his clients not to comply with IRS document and meeting requests, filing meritless requests to delay civil audits, advising clients to make insufficient estimated tax payments, and advising customers not to file lawfully due returns.

Since 2001, the Justice Department has obtained injunctions against more than 230 tax preparers and tax-fraud promoters. More information about these cases is available on the Justice Department Web site. More information is available about the Justice Department’s Tax Division.

If you have a tax controversy you wish to discuss with a California tax attorney, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

August 10, 2007

Recordkeeping

Why Should I Keep Records?

Everyone in business - California businesses as well - must keep records. Keeping good records is very important to your business. This discussion involves advice I give to my clients in Los Angeles County, Ventura County, Orange County and Santa Barbara County, California. Good records will help you do the following:

Monitor the progress of your business

Keep track of deductible expenses

Identify source of receipts

Prepare your financial statements

Support items reported on tax returns

Prepare your tax returns

Continue reading "Recordkeeping" »

August 8, 2007

Why Pay Taxes? - The Truth about Frivolous Tax Arguments

Here’s an interesting read. Published by the IRS and read by tax attorneys like me as well as by others, The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments addresses some of the more common false "legal" arguments made by individuals and groups who oppose compliance with the federal tax laws.

These arguments are grouped under several general categories, with variations within each category. Each contention is briefly explained, followed by a discussion of the legal authority that rejects the contention. The second section deals with frivolous arguments encountered in collection due process cases. The final section illustrates penalties imposed on those pursuing frivolous cases.

Continue reading "Why Pay Taxes? - The Truth about Frivolous Tax Arguments" »

August 7, 2007

How Long Should You Keep Your Tax Records?

That question comes up often with my clients in Los Angeles County, Orange County, Santa Barbara County and Ventura County. It isn’t exactly a big tax problem for which a Los Angeles tax attorney like myself needs to offer tax help. But the length of time a document must be retained depends on the action, expense, or event the document records. Generally, records that support an item of income or deductions on a tax return must be retained until the period of limitations for that return runs out.

PERIOD OF LIMITATIONS DEFINED:

The period of limitations is the period of time in which a tax return can be amended to claim a credit or refund, or that the IRS can assess additional tax.

I've listed below the periods of limitations that apply to income tax returns. (Unless otherwise stated, the years refer to the period after the return was filed. Returns filed before the due date are treated as filed on the due date.)

KEEP RETURNS FOR 3 YEARS IF:

If you file a claim for credit or refund after you file your return; keep records for 3 years from the date you filed your original return or 2 years from the date you paid the tax, whichever is later.

KEEP RETURNS FOR 4 YEARS IF:

It is an employment tax record. Keep all such records for at least 4 years after the date that the tax becomes due or is paid, whichever is later.

KEEP RETURNS FOR 6 YEARS IF:

You do not report income that you should report, and it is more than 25% of the gross income shown on your return.

KEEP RECORDS FOR 7 YEARS IF:

You file a claim for a loss from worthless securities or bad debt deduction;

KEEP RECORDS INDEFINITELY IF:

You have filed a fraudulent return, or

You do not file a return;

BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE:

The following questions should be applied to each record as you decide whether to keep a document or throw it away.

PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO RECORDS CONNECTED WITH PROPERTY:

Records relating to property must be retained until the period of limitations expires for the year in which you dispose of the property in a taxable disposition.

Those records are needed to figure any depreciation, amortization, or depletion deduction and to figure the gain or loss when you sell or otherwise dispose of the property.

Generally, if property is received in a nontaxable exchange, your basis in that property is the same as the bases of the property you gave up, increased by any money you paid. Records must be retained on the old property, as well as on the new property, until the period of limitations expires for the year in which you dispose of the new property in a taxable disposition.

THE TIME IS UP. NOW WHAT?

Even when records are no longer needed for tax purposes, they should be retained until it is certain they will not be needed for other purposes. For example, an insurance company or creditors may require the records to be held for a period of time beyond what the IRS requires.

If you have concerns about this issue and other tax controversies and tax problems, please call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 to discuss the tax help you need.

August 3, 2007

What You Can Do If You Owe Tax Of $25,000 Or Less

The Online Payment Agreement (OPA) allows eligible individuals to apply for an installment agreement to pay off their tax liability. To qualify, you must have your bill from the IRS and have filed all required tax returns. You must owe less than $25,000 and be able to pay the entire liability within 60 months.

Paying your taxes in full and on time avoids unnecessary penalties and interest. However, if you cannot pay your taxes in full, you may request a payment agreement.

This application will allow you or your authorized representative (Power of Attorney) to self qualify, apply for an installment agreement, and receive immediate notification of approval.

There may be times when you will need to mail in paperwork or speak with us before we can determine your eligibility for an installment agreement. If that is the case, the OPA application will give you an address or a toll-free phone number to reach the IRS.

Continue reading "What You Can Do If You Owe Tax Of $25,000 Or Less" »

August 1, 2007

Attention All Tax Non-Filers

My clients in Los Angeles County, Ventura County, Santa Barbara County and Orange County who are “taxpayers” present tax problems in two flavors: those who don’t pay their tax and those who don’t file their tax returns. Some tax problems involve both non-filers and non-payment.

As a California tax attorney involved with tax controversies, I have a checklist when helping the client who is a non-filer:

Create a workable plan to deal with all aspects of the client’s non-filing.

Instruct the client to obtain all tax-filing information.

Determine if Automated Substitute for Return (ASFR) assessments have been made or attempted by IRS.

Retain the services of a competent accountant to prepare necessary returns.

Obtain copies of last-filed tax returns.

Advise the client to consider filing status decisions in the preparation of tax returns.

Have the client prepare drafts of 433-A/B Financial Disclosure Forms.

Review with client collection alternatives: installment agreements, currently uncollectable status.

Consult with the Revenue Officer if the taxpayer’s delinquent account has been assigned to one.

Contact the IRS, if necessary, to obtain unreported income documents or request tax transcript.

Respond appropriately to all IRS correspondence requesting delinquent filed tax returns.

Prepare Form 843 for filing incident to Penalty Appeal Procedure, if necessary.

Review with client approximate likely penalty assessments.

Prepare factual grounds for reasonable cause waiver.

Review new procedures for filing of offers in compromise.

Refer client to bankruptcy attorney, if appropriate and taxes appear dischargeable.

Insure that the client remains current in order to qualify for collection alternatives. This includes making estimated tax payments and tax deposits as required by law and filing all extension requests and current returns. (Note: Under current offer in compromise procedures, a client who is not current will not have his offer returned as “non-processable” but will be contacted and given the opportunity to correct the situation, if possible.)

If you face the tax problem of having unfiled returns or unpaid federal or California State taxes, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 for tax help.

July 30, 2007

Initiation To Understanding IRS Guidance

When I was employed at a tax lawyer at the Office of Chief Counsel in Washington, D.C., I was involved in tax litigation. It was left to others to take the specifics of laws enacted by Congress and translate them into detailed regulations, rules and procedures.

Seven of the most common forms of guidance regarding IRS tax administration are explained briefly here.

Private Letter Ruling

A private letter ruling or PLR is issued in response to a written request submitted by a taxpayer and is binding on the IRS if the taxpayer fully and accurately described the proposed transaction in the request and carries out the transaction as described. PLRs are generally made public after all information has been removed that could identify the taxpayer to whom it was issued. A PLR is a written statement issued to a taxpayer that interprets and applies tax laws to the taxpayer's specific set of facts. A PLR is issued to establish with certainty the federal tax consequences of a particular transaction before the transaction is consummated or before the taxpayer's return is filed. A PLR may not be relied on as precedent by other taxpayers or IRS personnel.

Revenue Ruling

Revenue rulings are published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin for the information of and guidance to taxpayers, IRS personnel and tax professionals. A revenue ruling is the conclusion of the IRS on how the law is applied to a specific set of facts and is an official interpretation by the IRS of the Internal Revenue Code, related statutes, tax treaties and regulations. For example, a revenue ruling may hold that taxpayers can deduct certain automobile expenses.

Revenue Procedure

A revenue procedure is also published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin for the information of and guidance to taxpayers, IRS personnel and tax professionals. A revenue procedure is an official statement of a procedure that affects the rights or duties of taxpayers or other members of the public under the Internal Revenue Code, related statutes, tax treaties and regulations and that should be a matter of public knowledge. While a revenue ruling generally states an IRS position, a revenue procedure provides return filing or other instructions concerning an IRS position. For example, a revenue procedure might specify how automobile expenses should be computed by those entitled to the deduction by applying a certain mileage rate in lieu of calculating actual operating expenses.

Continue reading "Initiation To Understanding IRS Guidance" »

July 26, 2007

Make Designated 100 Percent Penalty Tax Payments

How does the Internal Revenue Service apply partial payments made by a California business entity (or any other State entity) before January 1, 2003 on its Form 941 employer tax liability where the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (“TFRP”) liability has been assessed and the Letter 1153 (DO) has been sent to the responsible person before June 19, 2000?

Partial payments made by businesses in Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County or Orange County, California to the IRS without written direction to designate payments to the trust fund portion for the most recent tax period will be applied by the Service “in the order of priority that the Service determines will serve its best interest.” (emphasis added).

Generally, the order of priority that the IRS determines will serve its best interest means that undesignated payments are applied first to the liability with the shortest or most imminent statute of limitations for collections, then to the liability with the next shortest statue and so on and so forth. The tax period or liability with the shortest collection statute is not always the earliest or oldest tax period or liability.

A voluntary partial payment made by a California business entity before January 1, 2003 on its Form 941 employer tax liability, where the TFRP liability has been assessed and the Letter 1153 (DO) has been sent to the responsible person before June 19, 2000, will be applied pursuant to the taxpayer’s written instructions.

A partial involuntary and/or undesignated payment made under the same circumstances will be applied first to the non-trust fund portion of tax, then to assessed lien fees and collection costs, then assessed penalties, then assessed interest, then accrued penalties and accrued interest, and then finally to the trust fund portion of the tax.

Continue reading "Make Designated 100 Percent Penalty Tax Payments" »

July 14, 2007

IRS Summertime Tax Tip

Gambling winnings are fully taxable and must be reported on your tax return. All gambling winnings must be reported regardless of whether any portion is subject to withholding. In addition, you may be required to pay an estimated tax on your gambling winnings. For information on tax withholding on gambling income, refer to Publication 505, Tax Withholding and Estimated Tax. The IRS has a terrific article on gambling income which you can read in the IRS Newsroom.

When the unpaid tax on gambling winnings is a serious tax collection problem, call tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

July 13, 2007

Protecting A New Business From Creditors' (the IRS) Claims

In an IRS Office of Chief Counsel Release 200036045, dated May 16, 2000, two issues were raised:

First: Whether the terms of a trust prevent the attachment of the federal tax lien.

Second: What collection device, if any, should be used to collect from the taxpayer's interest in the trust.

The Chief Counsel’s Release arrived at two conclusions:

First: The taxpayer has a property interest in the trust subject to the federal tax lien, despite the spendthrift, discretionary, and remainder interest provisions. The Internal Revenue Service believed that this property interest is limited to the payments to be made as provided for by the trust.

Second: A suit to foreclose the federal tax lien would be the collection action, if any, that the Internal Revenue Service would recommend.

The Chief Counsel’s Release draws a distinction between fully discretionary trusts and those requiring payments for support: “Where a trust gives the trustee uncontrolled, absolute discretion with respect to the distributions, if any, made to a beneficiary, the beneficiary has no basis to compel the trustee to make a distribution. Therefore, he does not have any interest which is subject to the federal tax lien. On the other hand, a beneficiary does have a right to property subject to the federal tax lien where, under state law, he can force the trustee to act, as is the case with a support trust.”

Strategic Planning Lessons Learned:

First: A trust created by parents or other third parties can help to protect business assets from creditors and estate taxation.

Second: Giving a trust beneficiary the power to withdraw assets for his or her support makes the trust assets subject to an IRS lien for outstanding taxes.

If you want to discuss your own situation with a California tax attorney, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

July 9, 2007

Innocent Spouse Relief Made Easier

Attention all California taxpayers in Los Angeles County, Ventura County, Santa Barbara County and Orange County: The Internal Revenue Service announced the other day that it redesigned Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief. The intent behind the redesign is to help reduce follow-up questions and reduce the burden on taxpayers. Perhaps your tax problem can be resolved by qualifying for innocent spouse relief. Please review my post made last Valentine's Day, February 14th, entitled "California Taxpayers - Innocent Spouse Relief" for a more thorough discussion on this hot topic.

The form will ask more questions initially. The IRS believes that by collecting critical information early in the process, that will mean faster processing of the request. Previously, Form 12510, Questionnaire for the Requesting Spouse, was separate from Form 8857. The redesign will combine and streamline the two forms. As the IRS believes with most forms it redesigns, this redesigned form will be easier to understand and complete and will help educate us about the process.

The new design will eliminate an estimated 30,000 follow-up letters annually. This will result in reduced burden, quicker responses to taxpayers and less cost to the government. The revisions were based on suggestions from an IRS process improvement team.

When you and your spouse file a joint return, both of you are jointly and individually responsible for the tax. Innocent Spouse relief provides an opportunity for one of you to be relieved from the joint debt under certain circumstances. If you believe that only your spouse or former spouse should be responsible for the tax, you can request relief from the tax liability.

Speak to a qualified California tax attorney about how you might qualify for this relief. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

June 23, 2007

Payroll Tax Fraud War Stories

Readers of my California tax attorney blog love war stories of those who have participated in and been convicted of tax fraud and tax evasion, both criminal tax offenses. The payroll tax problem that took place in California was particularly interesting to me. These tax controversies highlight the severity of the punishment when convicted of a crime. The Internal Revenue Service posts stories to site examples of employment tax fraud investigations that are excerpts from public record in the judicial district in which the cases were prosecuted. Here are a few of those stories:

Nursing Home Owner Convicted of Failing to Pay Over $9.6 Million in Payroll Taxes

In San Francisco, CA, Jack Easterday was convicted by a federal jury on 107 counts of willful failure to pay employment taxes owed to the government. Easterday, who is the owner of numerous nursing home facilities, was convicted of failing to pay more than $9.6 million in taxes. However, evidence at trial, which will be considered for sentencing purposes, showed that Easterday failed to pay more than $16 million in payroll taxes from 1998 to 2005. Evidence at trial also showed the IRS had attempted to collect the taxes from Easterday for years before the charges were filed. He thwarted the efforts of the IRS to collect the taxes by, among other things, paying himself and his wife exorbitant salaries and directors fees, while he was pleading poverty to the IRS collection agents.

Continue reading "Payroll Tax Fraud War Stories" »

June 21, 2007

Free Tax Sites

Have a tax problem? Want to try and solve it yourself without hiring tax attorneys? Don't really need tax help at the moment? Think spending money on tax lawyers when you already owe money is something to avoid for the time being?

Below is a convenient (unendorsed) list of tax help sites - none necessarily based in California - for your review.

JURIST

Legalbitstream

TaxLinks

Tax Sites

State-Specific Sites

Country-Specific Sites

Tax Scholarship

When you want to consult with a tax attorney in Los Angeles who services clients throughout California for Franchise Tax Board matters and throughout the country for IRS tax problems, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

June 19, 2007

Your Tax Lawyer And The IRS - Powers Of Attorney

If you want a tax attorney to represent you on a federal tax problem, file Form 2848 Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative with an IRS office. Signing Form 2848 allows the IRS tax attorney named by you to represent you before the IRS and to receive your tax information.

Your tax lawyer must be a person authorized to practice before the IRS. Tax lawyers have to apply to practice before the IRS and be granted permission to do so.

Generally, when you appoint a California tax lawyer on the Power of Attorney form, that tax attorney’s authority includes, among many things: signing a waiver agreeing to a tax assessment, extending the time for assessing and collecting tax, and waiving restrictions on the assessment and collection of deficiencies of tax. The tax attorney can also substitute another representative such as your CPA if you permit this on the power of attorney. In limited circumstances, a tax attorney can be authorized to sign an income tax return for you if you permit this on the power of attorney.

If you want to limit what the tax lawyers can do on your behalf, the power of attorney enables you to do that too.

When completing the Form 2848, you must show the name, taxpayer identification number (TIN), and address of the taxpayer, as well as, the name and address of the representative(s), the type of tax, the tax form number and the year(s) and/or period(s) for which the power is granted. You can list returns for any number of specified years and/or periods that have already ended and returns for years and/or periods that will end no later than three years from the date the form is signed.

For example, you may list income tax, Form 1040, for Calendar Year 2004 and employment tax, Form 941, for the third and fourth quarters of 2003. The Form 2848 will be returned to you for correction if you use a general reference to "all years", "all periods," or "all taxes".

If you and your spouse filed a joint return and the same tax lawyer will represent both of you, the power of attorney must be signed and dated by both husband and wife. If either one of you does not wish to be represented, only the spouse who wishes to be represented should sign and date the Form. If you and your spouse filed a joint return, but wish to be represented by different tax attorneys, each of you must complete your own Power of Attorney.

For additional information look at Publication 947, Practice Before the IRS and Power of Attorney.

Mitchell A. Port is authorized to practice before the IRS. He is also admitted to practice before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and federal district court. To speak with a California tax attorney about tax problems, call Mitchell at 310.559.5259

June 16, 2007

Beware! New E-mail Tax Scams

The other day, the Internal Revenue Service today alerted us in California and elsewhere to the latest versions of an e-mail scam intended to fool us into believing we are under investigation by the agency’s Criminal Investigation division.

The latest versions appear aimed at business taxpayers as well as individual taxpayers.

The IRS’s news release states that the e-mail purports to be from IRS Criminal Investigation falsely states that we are under a criminal probe for submitting a false tax return to the California Franchise Tax Board. The e-mail entices us to click on a link or open an attachment to learn more about the complaint against us. The e-mail link and attachment is a Trojan Horse that can take over our computer hard drive and allow someone to have remote access to the computer.

The IRS urged us not to click the link in the e-mail or open the attachment. Similar e-mail variations suggest a customer has filed a complaint against a company and the IRS can act as an arbitrator.

Keep in mind that the IRS does not send out unsolicited e-mails or ask for detailed personal and financial information. Additionally, the IRS never asks people for the PIN numbers, passwords or similar secret access information for their credit card, bank or other financial accounts.

The IRS also sees other e-mail scams that involve tricking victims into revealing private personal and financial information over the Internet, a practice that is known as “phishing” for information.

Recipients of questionable e-mails claiming to come from the IRS should not open any attachments or click on any links contained in the e-mails. Instead, they should forward the e-mails to phishing@irs.gov (follow the instructions).

Since the establishment of the mail box last year, the IRS has received more than 17,700 e-mails from taxpayers reporting more than 240 separate phishing incidents. To date, investigations have identified host sites in at least 27 different countries, as well as in the United States.

Other widespread e-mail tells taxpayers the IRS is holding a refund (often $63.80) for them and seeks financial account information. Another fraudulent e-mail scams try to entice taxpayers to click their way to a fake IRS Web site and ask for bank account numbers. Still another email claims the IRS’s ‘anti-fraud commission’ is investigating their tax returns.

June 6, 2007

For Fun In The California Sun

When it comes to taxes, everyone (including us in Los Angeles, California) has an opinion – even when there isn’t a tax problem requiring tax help.

"Like mothers, taxes are often misunderstood, but seldom forgotten.'' — Lord Bramwell, 19th Century English jurist

“Income tax has made more liars out of the American people than golf.” — Will Rogers, humorist

"Few of us ever test our powers of deduction, except when filling out an income tax form.''
— Laurence J. Peter, author

"To tax and to please, no more than to love and to be wise, is not given to men." — Edmund Burke, 18th Century Irish political philosopher and British statesman

A tax loophole is "something that benefits the other guy. If it benefits you, it is tax reform.''
— Russell B. Long, U.S. Senator

“People who complain about taxes can be divided into two classes: men and women.”
— Unknown

"No government can exist without taxation. This money must necessarily be levied on the people; and the grand art consists of levying so as not to oppress.'' — Frederick the Great, 18th Century Prussian king

"The best measure of a man's honesty isn't his income tax return. It's the zero adjust on his bathroom scale.'' — Arthur C. Clarke, author

"The power of taxing people and their property is essential to the very existence of government.'' — James Madison, U.S. President

“I am proud to be paying taxes in the United States. The only thing is – I could be just as proud for half the money.” — Arthur Godfrey, entertainer

"Next to being shot at and missed, nothing is really quite as satisfying as an income tax refund.” — F. J. Raymond, humorist

“The hardest thing in the world to understand is the income tax.” — Albert Einstein, physicist

“Taxation with representation ain’t so hot either.” — Gerald Barzan, humorist

“Where there is an income tax, the just man will pay more and the unjust less on the same amount of income.” — Plato

"Taxes are what we pay for civilized society.'' — Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., U.S. Supreme Court Justice

June 4, 2007

Offer In Compromise Revised - Tax Help Made Easier

A few months ago, in March, the IRS announced the release of Form 656, Offer in Compromise. The Form 656 package was last revised in 2004 to help us correctly and completely prepare an offer and reduce the chances of an offer being returned for omissions. The IRS declares that the new form retains the taxpayer burden reduction features while adding significant changes as a result of the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 (TIPRA). These changes include:

Continue reading "Offer In Compromise Revised - Tax Help Made Easier" »

June 1, 2007

Tax Problem: Are You In California Engaged In A Business Or In A Hobby?

According to IRS estimates, incorrect deduction of hobby expenses account for a portion of the overstated adjustments, deductions, exemptions and credits that add up to $30 billion per year in unpaid taxes. No doubt California contributes significantly to those billions. Tax help is available, however, to address this tax problem before it becomes a major controversy with the Internal Revenue Service.

The Internal Revenue Service provides guidelines to determine whether an activity is a business or a hobby (which is defined as an activity not engaged in for profit). Those of us living and working in Los Angeles County, Orange County, Santa Barbara County or Ventura County would benefit by reviewing those guidelines before a tax problem arises.

The rules for determining if an activity qualifies as a business and what limitations apply if the activity is not a business are explained by the Internal Revenue Service in Publication 535.

In general, taxpayers may deduct ordinary and necessary expenses for conducting a trade or business. An ordinary expense is an expense that is common and accepted in the taxpayer’s trade or business. A necessary expense is one that is appropriate for the business. Generally, an activity qualifies as a business if it is carried on with the reasonable expectation of earning a profit.

In order to make this determination, taxpayers should consider the following factors:

Does the activity make a profit in some years?

Does the time and effort put into the activity indicate an intention to make a profit?

Have you made a profit in similar activities in the past?

Can you expect to make a profit in the future from the appreciation of assets used in the activity?

If there are losses, are they due to circumstances beyond your control or did they occur in the start-up phase of the business?

Has the taxpayer changed methods of operation to improve profitability?

Do you or your advisors have the knowledge needed to carry on the activity as a successful business?

Do you depend on income from the activity?

Continue reading "Tax Problem: Are You In California Engaged In A Business Or In A Hobby?" »

May 29, 2007

Tax Season Sets New Records

New records were set for the number of returns e-filed by home computer users, the number of balance-due returns filed electronically and the number and amount of direct-deposit refunds. Among the highlights of new statistics recently released:

A record 22 million taxpayers e-filed from a home computer, up 11 percent over the same time last year and eclipsing 2006’s year-long total of 20.3 million.

The number of balance-due returns filed electronically surged 14.2 percent to a record 9.4 million. For all of last year, almost 8.9 million balance-due returns were filed electronically.

The over 76.7 million e-filed returns accepted through May 4 topped the more than 73.2 million electronically-filed returns received for all of 2006. It’s also an 8.9 percent increase over last year at this time, with most of the increase coming in March and April. Based on current trends, the agency expects about 58 percent of all returns to be e-filed this year. Taxpayers who filed for extensions can use e-file until Oct. 15.

The average refund this year is $2,255, a 2.5 percent increase over last year at this time. More than 59 million refunds, a new record, were deposited directly into savings, checking and brokerage accounts, representing more than 61 percent of all refunds issued. Those who choose direct deposit get their refunds at least a week sooner. Available year-round, direct deposit eliminates the chance of a lost, stolen or undeliverable refund. Taxpayers claiming refunds who have not yet filed may want to consider using direct deposit to get a head start on their 2007 IRA contribution.

This filing season visits to IRS.gov, the agency’s popular Web site, climbed almost 10 percent to more than 140 million.

Nearly $158 billion have been directly deposited so far this year, an 11 percent jump over last year at this time. This surpasses the 2006 year-end total of $149.2 billion.

These statistics are neatly layed out in this chart: Download file

May 24, 2007

Leading Law Firm Pays IRS $39.4 Million Penalty

Sidley Austin LLP Pays IRS $39.4 Million Penalty


The IRS reached a settlement yesterday with the law firm of Sidley Austin LLP, which paid a civil tax shelter promoter penalty of $39.4 million. The penalty results from the firm’s failure to comply with tax shelter registration requirements and promotion of abusive tax shelters.

The firm issued opinions in connection with potentially abusive tax shelters to over 700 high-net worth individuals and corporations. Some of the packages marketed to these individuals included listed transactions such as BOSS (Bond & Option Sale Strategy), variants of the so-called “Son of BOSS” shelter that went by names of BLIPS (Bond Linked Issue Premium Structure), COBRA (Currency Options Bring Reward Alternatives), and COINS (Currency Option Investment Strategy), and others that went by the names of OPIS (Offshore Portfolio Investment Strategy), FLIP (Foreign Leveraged Investment Program), and POPS (Partnership Option Portfolio Securities).

The firm also issued tax opinions in connection with certain potentially abusive non-listed transactions involving distressed assets, bond and equity strips and lease strips.

“Sidley Austin has paid a significant penalty for its role in promoting abusive tax shelters,” said IRS Acting Commissioner Kevin M. Brown. “The firm has also taken concrete steps to prevent a recurrence of this behavior in the future, which they have agreed to maintain going forward. We appreciate their actions and their cooperation in our ongoing investigations.”

May 22, 2007

Tax Court Trumps Court Of Federal Claims Says U.S. Supreme Court

A 1986 amendment to the Internal Revenue Code §6404(e)(1) permits the U.S. Treasury Secretary to abate interest that accrues on unpaid federal income taxes if the interest assessment is attributable to IRS error or delay.

Later, the federal courts uniformly held that the Secretary’s decision not to abate was not subject to judicial review. In 1996, Congress added what is now §6404(h), which states that the Tax Court has “jurisdiction over any action brought by a taxpayer who meets the requirements referred to in section 7430(c)(4)(A)(ii) to determine whether the Secretary’s failure to abate . . . was an abuse of discretion, and may order an abatement, if such action is brought within 180 days after the date of the mailing of the Secretary’s final determination not to abate . . . .” §6404(h)(1).

The IRS denied petitioner Hincks’ request for abatement of interest assessed in 1999 for the period March 21, 1989, to April 1, 1993. The Hincks then filed suit in the Court of Federal Claims seeking review of the refusal to abate.

The court granted the Government’s motion to dismiss, and the Federal Circuit affirmed, holding that §6404(h) vests exclusive jurisdiction to review interest abatement claims in the Tax Court. The Supreme Court held that the Tax Court provides the exclusive forum for judicial review of a failure to abate interest under §6404(e)(1).

May 21, 2007

Robert L. Schulz And “We The People” Sued By Feds To Stop Tax Scam

The Tax Scheme Cost U.S. Treasury $21 Million.

The Justice Department has sued to stop Robert L. Schulz from selling a tax fraud scheme said to have cost the U.S. more than $21 million. Also named in the suit are two corporations, We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education Inc., and We the People Congress Inc.

Many of my California clients - particularly those in Los Angeles County, Orange County, Ventura County and Santa Barbara County - have used We the People to prepare their California living trusts, California Wills, California durable powers of attorney and California advance health care directive only to meet with me later to remedy problems arising in connection with poorly prepared estate plans.

The government says Schulz used the two We the People entities to market a nationwide tax fraud scheme, called the Tax Termination Package, to employers and employees. According to the government, the Tax Termination Package includes We the People forms, which the defendants tell their customers can be used to replace forms the IRS requires employers and employees must use in connection with federal tax withholding from wages.

The suit says that Schulz and the We the People entities state that use of the replacement forms will allow customers to legally stop tax withholding and that these statements are false. According to the complaint, the defendants base the scheme on frivolous arguments about federal tax laws that federal courts have repeatedly rejected. These schemes are on the IRS’s 2007 list of the Dirty Dozen tax scams.

People who sell tax scams and their customers temporarily enrich themselves at the expense of law-abiding taxpayers. The Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service are determined to stamp out these scams.

Since 2001 the Justice Department has obtained more than 230 injunctions stopping the promotion of tax fraud schemes and the preparation of fraudulent returns.

May 16, 2007

What To Do If You Receive An IRS Notice

It’s a moment all of us dread. A letter arrives from the IRS — and it’s not a refund check. Don’t panic; many of these letters can be dealt with easily and painlessly. Tax help may be required from a qualified California tax attorney for certain types of IRS tax problems so you may want to inquire with your tax lawyer before you respond to the IRS.

Each year, the IRS sends millions of letters and notices to us to notify us of a change to our account, request payment of taxes, or request additional information. Each letter and notice offers specific instructions on what we are asked to do to satisfy the inquiry. The notice we receive normally covers a very specific issue about our account or tax return. You should review the correspondence and compare it with the information on your return.

Agree? If you agree with the correction to your account, no reply is necessary unless a payment is due.

Disagree? If you do not agree with the correction the IRS made, it is important that you respond as requested and write to explain why you disagree. Include any documents and information you wish the IRS to consider, along with the bottom tear-off portion of the notice. Mail the information to the IRS address shown in the upper left-hand corner of the notice. Allow about 30 days for a reply.

Questions? If you have questions, call the telephone number in the upper right-hand corner of the notice. Have your tax return and the correspondence available when you call so your account can be accessed. Most correspondence can be handled without calling or visiting an IRS office, if you follow the instructions in the letter or notice.

Be sure to keep copies of any correspondence with your records. Sometimes, the IRS sends another letter or notice requesting more information or providing more information to you.

For additional information about IRS notices and bills, Publication 594, What You Should Know about the IRS Collection Process, is a good resource. Information about penalties and interest charges is available in Publication 17, Your Federal Income Tax.

For questions you may have about the notice or letter you received, please call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 to obtain the tax help you may need.

May 14, 2007

California Real Estate Investors Use Family Limited Partnerships

The IRS issued new guidelines for family limited partnerships (FLPs) applicable to many of my clients in Los Angeles County, Ventura County, Santa Barbara County and Orange County.

Those FLP guidelines focus on 4 issue of concern to California real estate investors and those considering using the FLP as an estate planning tool. Those issues are:

Whether the fair market value of transfers of family limited partnership or corporation interests, by death or gift, is properly discounted from the pro rata value of the underlying assets.

Whether the fair market value at date of death of I.R.C. §§ 2036 or 2038 transfers should be included in the gross estate.

Whether there is an indirect gift of the underlying assets, rather than the family limited partnership interests, where the transfers of assets to the family limited partnership (funding) occurred either before, at the same time, or after the gifts of the limited partnership interests were made to family members.

Whether an accuracy-related penalty under I.R.C. § 6662 is applicable to any portion of the deficiency.

The Appeals Settlement Guidelines can be read in more detail at the IRS website.

These issues should be familiar to your tax advisor. Schedule a discussion about these new guidelines as soon as possible - get tax help which benefits you. If you would like to discuss this or other estate planning matters with Mitchell A. Port, call him at 310.559.5259.

May 11, 2007

What Does The Numbered Letter I Received From The IRS Mean?

The IRS published on its website an interesting list and explanation of some of its letters and notices most commonly received by the taxpaying public. Tax help in California and throughout the U.S. is available for a tax problem resulting from receipt of one of these letters or notices. Here's the partial list:

Examination Letters
Letter 525 – General 30 Day Letter

Letter 531 – Notice of Deficiency

Letter 692 – Request for Consideration of Additional Findings

Letter 1153 – Trust Funds Recovery Penalty Letter

Letter 1389 – 30 Day Letter, Tax Shelter Activity

Letter 3016 – IRC Section 6015 Preliminary Determination Letter (30 Day)

Letter 3391 – 30-Day Nonfiler Letter

Letter 3727 – 30-Day Letter Notifying Taxpayer No Change to Original Report Disallowing EIC Based on Failure to Meet Residency Test for Children Claimed

Letter 3728 – 30-Day Letter Notifying Taxpayer No Change to Original Report Partially Disallowing EIC Based on Failure to Meet Residency Test for 1 Child


Collection Letters
Letter 11 – Final Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing

Letter 1058 – Final Notice Reply Within 30 Days

Letter 1085 – 30-Day Letter Proposed 6020(b) Assessment

Letter 3172 – Notice of Federal Tax Lien Filing and Your Rights to a Hearing under IRC 6320


Notices
CP 90 – Final Notice of Intent to Levy

CP 92 – Notice of Levy upon Your State Tax Refund

CP 242 – Notice of Levy upon Your State Tax Refund

CP 523 – IMF Installment Agreement Default Notice

CP 2000 – Information Does Not Match Your Return

A more complete explanation of each of these is provided - click on this link.

Continue reading "What Does The Numbered Letter I Received From The IRS Mean?" »

May 9, 2007

I Just Received A Notice Of Deficiency From The IRS - A 90-Day Letter - What Do I Do?

The notorious 90-day letter. This gives us our day in court – Tax Court, that is. Matters like this are not part of the California court system since State law does not apply; however, the Tax Court has a branch . If the IRS has made proposed adjustments to your account, and you didn't respond or couldn't reach an agreement, then you will receive a notice of deficiency. The notice of deficiency allows you to go to the Tax Court and tells you the procedures to follow. If you don't go to Tax Court in the time allotted you will receive a bill for the amount of tax due.

Q. I recently received a Notice of Deficiency. I sent in additional information to the IRS and now they say I owe less than what is in the notice. Either way - I still don’t agree with the IRS. Should I file a petition with the Tax Court as the notice directs, or should I continue to work with the IRS?

A.
Nothing can extend the 90-day period for filing a petition. There are no exceptions. If you don’t file a petition before the end of the 90-day period and you do not resolve the matter with the IRS, the IRS will close your case and your right to any appeal will be lost. You should continue to work with the IRS, but as the 90th day comes near and if you are unsure of the outcome with the IRS, you should file a Tax Court petition to protect your appeal rights.
Once you file a petition and your case becomes docketed before the Tax Court your file will go to an Appeals office. Someone from the Appeals office will contact you to try to resolve your issues without the need for a trial.

Q. I received the Notice of Deficiency saying I need to file a petition with the United State Tax Court if I don’t agree. How do I do this?

A. If you don't agree with the decision then write to the Tax Court address shown on the first page of the letter or visit their web site at www.ustaxcourt.gov to review the procedures and obtain forms.

Q. I never appealed my IRS office or field audit, and when I got the Notice of Deficiency, I did not file a petition with the Tax Court. Now the IRS is sending me bills and I don’t think I owe the tax. What do I do now?

A. Your case is closed as far as any question about how much tax you owe, so there is nothing for you to appeal. You have three options to get your case re-opened so the IRS can consider whether you owe any additional amounts:

Follow the instructions in Form 656 and file an Offer in Compromise, Doubt as to Liability.

Follow the instructions in Publication 3598 and request an Audit Reconsideration. Note that you must submit new information the IRS did not previously consider in order to have an audit reconsideration.

Pay the amount due in full and file a claim for refund. If the IRS disallows your claim you will have the right to appeal at that time.

To discuss this and other tax controversies, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 for tax help.

May 2, 2007

Tax Audits And Examinations Are On The Rise

I don't suggest planning based on the odds of the IRS catching you. To the contrary, such planning is both unethical and foolish. In general, tax help, and in particular help from a California tax attorney, could be more necessary than ever for those who attempt to play the odds.

Audits are definitely up this year - in almost all categories - as compared to prior years!

Odds are that playing fast-and-loose with the information you report doesn't pay. Whether you live in Los Angeles County, Orange County, Santa Barbara County or Ventura County, tax problems can easily arise when tax avoidance is overly aggressive.

The latest IRS data book has just been released. It contains some eye opening information on the number and percentages of audited income tax returns and where the IRS concentrates.

Here's the most recent tax audit data for the number of tax returns examined by the IRS: Download file

Continue reading "Tax Audits And Examinations Are On The Rise" »

April 30, 2007

Stepping Up Tax Collection Enforcement In California

The tax man is poised to gain more clout. So said The Wall Street Journal earlier this month. Tax help may become necessary more than ever especially for those who are near my office who live and work in Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County and Orange County. Using a tax attorney, even a Los Angeles based tax attorney for enforcement issues arising anywhere in the country, may become more ubiquitous.

The tax gap must be reduced if Congress is to fund programs and reduce the budget deficit without significant tax increases. Tax law enforcement is the clarion call once again. The tax collector wants to close the annual $290 billion tax gap.

The IRS will have new tools to track under-reported income. “The primary focus would be requiring certain business middlemen, such as credit-card processors, to provide more data about other businesses’ transactions” said The Wall Street Journal. The data would be used to report to the IRS each year on the aggregate amounts charged at a variety of businesses, such as restaurants and dry cleaners. The IRS could use the data to cross-check income that businesses report on their tax returns.

Congress is looking at whether to apply new reporting requirements to processors of online transactions. Congress may also require stock brokers to report the initial purchase price of stocks sold rather than just the sales price as the law now requires; this will provide better data on investment gains.

An underfunded IRS may also see an increase in its budget to enhance operations.

Field audits, office examinations and tax collection actions will reduce tax avoidance activities followed by the 17% of taxpayers who are not paying their full tax burden. Improving tax collection and compliance by one percent brings in another $25 billion a year.

Taxpayer rights will be protected, says the IRS, even in the face of new collection efforts.

When faced with enforced collection, using a tax attorney with Internal Revenue Service tax experience, a master’s degree in tax law, and an employment history with the Internal Revenue Service, is an option available now. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

April 27, 2007

Is Your Work A Hobby Or A Business?

Tax Court litigation arose in Los Angeles County, California which surprised my client who currently conducts his business in West Los Angeles. The IRS issued a Notice of Deficiency (the so-called “90 day letter”) disallowing business expenses my client knew were legitimate. The earlier IRS audit claimed my client was engaged in a hobby and hobby losses are not deductible. Through his accountant, my client retained me as his tax attorney to fight the IRS to contest the proposed income tax, penalty and interest assessment.

My client sold his former business in Orange County years before he began a new phase of his career when we met. My client’s new business was to seek out ideas in the technology field for the purpose of identifying exploitable opportunities around which he could assemble a team of experts to build another going-concern to deploy to the public and later sell at a profit.

To uncover profitable business opportunities and as one of several methods methodically employed, my client did what other early-stage investors did by forming a private equity firm specializing in advising, investing in and acquiring middle market companies. The private equity firm was a sole proprietorship and not an entity in California such as an LLC, partnership, subchapter C or S corporation.

He looked for opportunity in corporate divestitures, succession planning of family-owned businesses, entrepreneurial exits and restructurings of public and private entities. He sought to make investments or acquisitions providing them with control so as to be able to drive a business in the manner he thought would have been in the interest of making a profit. He focused on continually building value in his companies by partnering with strong management teams, adding experienced leadership and developing growth strategies.

Continue reading "Is Your Work A Hobby Or A Business?" »

April 24, 2007

Avoiding Employment Taxes

Most California employers are conscientious about collecting and paying over their employment taxes. Some of my clients is Los Angeles County, Orange County, Ventura County and Santa Barbara County have problems with access to capital and cannot help it when they become unable to pay the FICA tax. But for other California employers, federal employment tax avoidance is intentional and takes various forms. Some of the more common methods of avoidance include paying employees in cash, employee leasing, filing false payroll tax returns or failing to file payroll tax returns, and pyramiding.

Paying Employees in Cash

The loss or reduction of future social security or Medicare benefits for the employee is one of the consequences when paying employees in whole or partially in cash. Cash payments are a common method of avoiding income and employment taxes.

Employment Leasing

Employee leasing is commonly used by employers who contract with outside businesses to handle all personnel, administrative, and payroll duties for employees. Employee leasing is a legal business practice which is sometimes abused. At times, employee-leasing companies fail to pay to the IRS any portion of the collected employment taxes. These taxes are often spent by the owners on business or personal expenses. Often the employee-leasing company dissolves and leaves unpaid millions in employment taxes. The company owners are likely to become personally liable for a large portion of the unpaid tax which the IRS diligently works to collect.

Filing False Payroll Tax Returns or Failing to File Payroll Tax Returns

Employment taxes are avoided when employers prepare and file false payroll tax returns which understate the amount of wages on which taxes are owed. Employers also fail to file employment tax returns to avoid employment taxes.

Pyramiding

Pyramiding of employment taxes is where a business withholds taxes from its employees quarter after quarter but intentionally fails to pay them to the IRS. Often, a business involved in pyramiding will file for bankruptcy to discharge the non-trust fund portion of the liabilities accrued and then start a new business under a new name and begin a new scheme. Despite the bankruptcy, the company owners are likely to become personally liable for a large portion of the unpaid trust fund portion of the tax which the IRS diligently works to collect.

In each of these situations, the employer is bound to be contacted by the IRS. At the time of contact, if not sooner, the employer ought to reach his California tax attorney who is knowledgeable about resolving tax controversies. For tax help, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

April 21, 2007

California Tax Help - Employee or Independent Contractor

What are the consequences of treating an employee as an independent contractor?

If you as a California employer classify an employee as an independent contractor and you have no reasonable basis for doing that, you will be held liable for employment taxes for that worker. Internal Revenue Code section 3509 has additional information about the consequences to the California employer as that section discusses several onerous penalties applied against the employer.

If you do not pay those employment taxes, re-read my blog posting on February 16, 2007 regarding the application of the 100% penalty assessment to California employers which is a technique used by the IRS to convert the payroll tax, employee social security tax and Medicare tax from a deductible tax payable by your business to a non-deductible tax that is owed by you personally.

To determine how to treat payments you make for services, knowing about the business relationship that exists between you and the worker performing the services is important. The worker performing the services may be:

An independent contractor

A common-law employee

A statutory employee

A statutory nonemployee

Continue reading "California Tax Help - Employee or Independent Contractor" »

April 18, 2007

Proving That A Tax Return Was Timely Filed

Just filed your income tax return in California?

New reasons continue to crop up to use a California tax attorney for tax help in potential tax controversy situations. I have heard that the IRS may no longer be accepting certified mail return receipts as proof of timely filing of a return. The reason is that some taxpayers have been mailing empty envelopes to the IRS and I guess accusing them of losing the returns and then showing their mailing receipt as proof of mailing.

However, I think the Treasury Regulations are still in place to the effect that an officially postmarked certified mail receipt is still good evidence of mailing, as long as the postmark on the receipt was actually placed on the receipt by the post office, not by a private party.

There seems to be two issues: (i) What was mailed to the IRS? and (ii) When was it mailed? (Under the "mailbox rule", a return is timely filed if it is placed in the mail on or before the due date, even if it delivered thereafter.)

To prove that more than an empty envelope was delivered, perhaps printing the certified mail number on the first two pages (including signature page) of a return and copying the package in which it's sent which would show a certified mail number that matched the one on the return pages.

A more elaborate procedure could involve having a witness (unrelated to the taxpayer) watch the taxpayer putting the tax return into the envelope. Then copy the face of the envelope as the witness watches. The witness then accompanies the taxpayer to the post office to see that adequate postage was purchased and attached to the envelope. Then have the witness prepare a memo reflecting their observations.

Maybe you can send a "packing slip" listing the contents of the envelope and ask the IRS to return the packing slip as an "Acknowledgement of Receipt Only".

Another approach might involve including a small check with the tax return whether or not tax is due. The cashing of the check (which is done immediately upon receipt and which he can verify online with his bank) confirms that the return was received.

As for the issue of timing, the IRS can claim it will no longer accept certified mail, return receipt requested as proof of filing, but until the Treasury Regulations are changed, and the Courts hold the Regs are correct, there is no basis for the IRS to win such an argument. It is still case law as well as statutory law.

If you have concerns about this issue and other tax controversies and tax problems, please call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 to discuss the tax help you need.

April 15, 2007

Who’s Not Paying Their Federal Income Tax?

You’ve heard it before: all the uncollected taxes owed to the IRS are almost enough to eliminate the federal deficit. That would make additional money available to California taxpayers who pay more to the federal government than they receive in return. All of us in Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Orange County and Ventura County might see improved infrastructure and services.

How much uncollected federal tax is there? To answer this, the Internal Revenue Service developed the concept of the tax gap as a way to gauge taxpayers’ compliance with their federal tax obligations.

The tax gap measures the extent to which taxpayers do not file their tax returns and pay the correct tax on time. I have not seen a state-by-state breakdown to tell you how much we in California underpay our federal income tax.

The IRS released preliminary results from a major research project assessing compliance with the tax laws. The study shows a majority of American taxpayers pay their taxes timely and accurately, but the U.S. still has a large tax gap.

Not surprisingly, individual income tax accounts for about half of all tax liabilities.

The preliminary findings show the gross tax gap — which is the difference between what taxpayers should pay and what they actually pay on a timely basis — exceeds $300 billion per year.

The tax gap can be divided into three components: underreporting, underpayment and nonfiling.

Continue reading "Who’s Not Paying Their Federal Income Tax?" »

April 11, 2007

California Dentist Sentenced To Prison For Tax Fraud

A dentist from Danville, California, was sentenced today by San Francisco U.S. District Court to serve 24 months in prison, followed by a term of three years of supervised release after being convicted by a federal jury of conspiring to defraud the United States and evading his income taxes from 1998 through 2001.

According to the indictment and evidence introduced at trial, in approximately 1995, the California dentist became a client of Tower Executive Resources, a Denver organization that promoted a tax evasion scheme involving the use of false invoices and secret offshore bank accounts. The dentist’s medical practice paid bogus expenses to Tower to generate false tax deductions. Tower then deposited the bulk of the funds into a secret offshore bank account that the dentist controlled.

Over a 10-year period, the dentist sent approximately $300,000 to a secret offshore bank account through the Tower system. In addition, when the IRS learned of the Tower scheme and audited the dentist’s tax liabilities, he stopped filing income tax returns and falsely claimed that he believed the law did not require him to file returns.

The dentist's father, an oral surgeon in California, was also charged in the same indictment with conspiracy to defraud the United States and attempting to evade tax on income he earned from his medical practice through his participation in the Tower program. He is currently awaiting trial.

The Department of Justice made the announcement in a news release today.

March 9, 2007

My Bank Account Was Levied; The IRS Just Levied My Wages

When I worked as a revenue officer for the IRS in Los Angeles County, California, I took your money out of your bank account or levied your salary earned at your job by simply mailing a form – a levy - to the bank or to your boss. Those were the good ol’ days. These days, as a tax lawyer I help those who are at the receiving end of a levy.

The IRS issues a levy to satisfy a tax debt by seizing your property. Levies and liens are not the same. To secure its claim for unpaid taxes, the IRS files a lien in the county where you have property, be it in Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County, or Orange County. In contrast, a levy actually takes the property to satisfy your tax debt.

If your property is levied or seized, contact your tax attorney first and then have your attorney contact the employee who took the action. You also may ask the manager to review your case. If the matter is still unresolved, the manager can explain your rights to appeal to the Office of Appeals.

The IRS may seize and sell any type of real or personal property that you own or have an interest in throughout the United States if you do not pay your taxes (or make arrangements to settle your debt). For instance, the IRS

Can seize and sell property that you hold such as your car, boat, or house, or --

Can levy property that is yours but is held by someone else such as your wages, commissions, bank accounts, California State tax refund, licenses, rental income, accounts receivables, retirement accounts, dividends, and the cash loan value of your life insurance.

Often, the IRS will levy only after 3 requirements are met:

Continue reading "My Bank Account Was Levied; The IRS Just Levied My Wages" »

March 6, 2007

The IRS “Liened” My Property So What Do I Do Now?

Liens give the IRS a legal claim to your property as security or payment for your tax debt. A Notice of Federal Tax Lien is filed in the California county where you live whether it is Los Angeles County, Ventura County, Santa Barbara County or Orange County.

The lien may be filed only after the IRS assesses the tax liability, sends you a Notice and Demand for Payment which is a bill that tells you how much you owe in taxes, and you neglect or refuse to fully pay the debt within 10 days after being notified about it. If you want to pay in installments, the IRS will likely file a lien until the debt is paid in full. In either case, consult with a tax attorney immediately.

Once these requirements are met, a lien is created for the amount of your tax debt and may include some penalties and interest. By filing notice of this lien, everyone knows that the IRS has a claim against all your property, including property you acquire after the lien is filed. The courts use this notice to establish priority of claims against you in certain situations, such as sales of real estate or bankruptcy proceedings.

All your property such as your house or car and all your rights to property such as your accounts receivable, if you are a business, is attached by the lien. To add insult to injury, the IRS charges you the fee required by the county to record the lien.

Once a lien is filed, your credit rating will be harmed. Getting a loan to buy a house or a car, getting a new credit card, or signing a lease will probably be very difficult because few will extend credit to you when the IRS has a prior claim. Therefore, resolving your tax liability as quickly as possible before the lien is filed is important.

You can obtain a Release of the Notice of Federal Tax Lien within 30 days after you satisfy the tax due (including interest and other additions) by paying the debt or by having it adjusted, or within 30 days after you guarantee payment of the debt by submitting a bond accepted by the IRS. Refer to Publication 1450, Request for Release of Federal Tax Lien. Usually 10 years after a tax is assessed, a lien releases automatically if it has not been re-filed. Just call the IRS to get the pay-off amount.

Continue reading "The IRS “Liened” My Property So What Do I Do Now?" »

March 3, 2007

Beware of Tax Cheats in California

Tax scams are all around us. Don’t fall victim to them! These schemes take several forms, ranging from promises of large tax refunds to illegal ways of escaping your tax obligations. These scams emanate from everywhere including Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, Orange, Ventura; no county in California is immune.

No matter what you are told, remember these three things:

Sign a tax return only after looking it over to make sure it is accurate.

Anyone who promises you a bigger refund without knowing your tax situation is probably misleading you.

You are responsible and liable for the content of your income tax return.

Here’s a sample of some common tax schemes to be avoided:

Frivolous Arguments: Scam artists have been known to make absurd claims that the Sixteenth Amendment concerning congressional power to establish and collect income taxes was never ratified; that wages are not income; that filing a return and paying taxes are merely voluntary; and that being required to file Form 1040 violates the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination or the Fourth Amendment right to privacy. Don’t believe these or other similar claims. Such arguments are false and have been thrown out of court. You always have the right to contest their tax liabilities in court but you have no right to disobey the law.

Telephone Tax Refund Abuse: Some individual taxpayers have requested large and improper amounts for the special refund of the telephone tax. In some cases, taxpayers appear to be requesting a refund of the entire amount of their phone bills, rather than just the three-percent tax on long-distance and bundled service. The IRS is investigating potential abuses. You may request a refund on your 2006 tax return if you paid long distance telephone excise taxes after February 28, 2003 and before August 1, 2006. Generally, the telephone tax refund will be $30 to $60.

Identity Theft: The IRS does not use e-mail to contact us about issues related to our accounts. If you have any doubt whether a contact from the IRS is authentic call 800-829-1040 to confirm it. It pays to be choosy when it comes to disclosing personal information. Identity thieves have used stolen personal data to access financial accounts, run up charges on credit cards and apply for new loans. The IRS is aware of several identity theft scams involving scammers posing as the IRS itself.

Return Preparer Fraud: Avoid being victimized by dishonest tax return preparers who can cause endless headaches for you. These preparers derive financial gain by skimming a portion of your refund and charging inflated fees to prepare your tax return. They attract new clients by promising large refunds. Beware.

If you think you're about to be scammed, call a qualified tax attorney to discuss it before it happens. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

February 28, 2007

Are You A California Real Estate Investor?

The Wall Street Journal recently ran an article regarding a tax controversy experienced by a California real estate investor living in Los Angeles represented by tax counsel in Westlake Village, Ventura County, discussing the investor’s ability to report his income and expenses as a full-time real estate investor. The IRS claims he is a passive investor and therefore is auditing past income tax returns to disallow certain items of expense, depreciation and other tax benefits related to real estate investing which might cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional tax, penalties, and interest.

The Los Angeles real estate investor’s attorney currently has five U.S. Tax Court cases involving people who say they are full time real estate professionals whom the IRS is trying to reclassify as passive investors. Two years ago, that tax controversy attorney didn’t have any cases like this. Perhaps there is a trend toward trying to sweep real estate investors, many of whom are investing in areas including Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Orange County where opportunities abound, in order to reclassify them passive investors.

The distinction between passive investors and full time active investors is crucial to the outcome of this kind of case. Generally, a full time real estate professional spends more than half of his working hours in real estate and more than 750 hours a year tending to real estate activities. Those professionals can fully deduct losses including depreciation, interest expense on loans and property taxes. Passive real estate investors are more limited in what losses and expenses they can deduct.

The IRS targets this group of investors because it is one of the areas where research shows there is a large tax gap, that is, taxpayers are underreporting income to the IRS which creates a tax gap of $13 billion from rents and royalties and $11 billion for capital gains. Approximately 3000 income tax returns of real estate professionals are currently under audit.

If you invest in real estate and have been selected for audit by the IRS or the California Franchise Tax Board for your business activities, contact Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259 to discuss your situation.

February 26, 2007

IRS Announces Military Personnel Can Receive Free Tax Help

Military-based Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program sites provide free tax preparation, tax advice, return filing and other tax assistance to military members and their families. The volunteers are trained to address specific tax issues, such as combat zone tax benefits.

If you, or your spouse, are a member of the military, you may be eligible to receive free assistance with the preparation and filing of your federal tax return. The U.S. Armed Forces participate in VITA.

The Armed Forces Tax Council oversees the operation of the military tax programs worldwide, and serves as the main conduit for outreach by the IRS to military personnel and their families. The AFTC consists of tax program coordinators for the Marine Corps, Air Force, Army, Navy and Coast Guard.

Military commanders support the program by detailing members of the military to prepare returns and by providing space and equipment for tax centers. The IRS supports these efforts by providing tax software and training.

To receive this free assistance, you should bring the following records to your military VITA site:

Continue reading "IRS Announces Military Personnel Can Receive Free Tax Help" »

February 22, 2007

Kids In California Pay Taxes Too

Some or all of your child's investment income – including investment income earned in California - may be taxed at your higher rate rather than your child's lower rate. Investment income includes interest, dividends, capital gains, and other unearned income. This is not to be confused with wages and other earned income received by your child of any age that are taxed at your child's normal rate.

In California, the amount not taxed is $850. You compute the California State tax by using Form 3803 "Parents' Election to Report Child's Interest and Dividends".

If you make this election, your child will not have to file a California State income tax return. You may report your child’s income on your California income tax return even if you do not do so on your federal income tax return. You may make this election in California if your child meets all of the following conditions:

Was under age 14 at the end of 2006, Note: A child born on January 1, 1993, is considered to be age 14 at the end of 2006;

Is required to file a 2006 return;

Made no estimated tax payments for 2006;

Had gross income for 2006 that was less than $8,500;

Had income only from interest and dividends;

Did not have any overpayment of tax shown on his or her 2005 return
applied to the 2006 estimated taxes; and

Had no state income tax withheld from his or her income (backup
withholding).

Computing the federal income tax applicable to your child only applies to children who are under the age of 18. For 2006, it applies if your child's total investment income for the year was more than $1,700.

Form 8615, “Tax for Children Under Age 18 With Investment Income of More Than $1,700”, is what you need to use to figure your child's tax. When you’re done, attach the Form to your child's federal income tax return.

Alternatively, as a parent you can choose to report your child's investment income on your own individual income tax return. Generally speaking, this option is available if your child's income consists entirely of interest and dividends (including capital gain distributions) and the amount received is less than $8,500. However, you ought to first speak with your accountant because choosing this option may reduce certain credits or deductions you may claim.

More information can be found in IRS Publication 929, "Tax Rules for Children and Dependents".

February 21, 2007

Victims of Tax Scams Live Throughout California

The Internal Revenue Service identifies some of the most common tax scams affecting us and warned people not to fall for these schemes presented by scam artists. We in California are not immune to the kinds of predatory tactics described here. As a Los Angeles tax attorney, I can be an excellent target of an unscrupulous promoter. Those of you living in Santa Barbara County, Ventura County, and Orange County can be particularly targeted because the scam artist believes the prize is bigger.

We should remember we are ultimately responsible for what is on our tax return even if some unscrupulous preparers have steered us in the wrong direction. If you use a tax professional, pick someone who is reputable. It isn’t all that comforting to us who fall prey to scamster to know that tax return preparers and promoters of tax schemes risk significant penalties, interest and possible criminal prosecution.

The IRS urges us to avoid these common schemes:

Continue reading "Victims of Tax Scams Live Throughout California " »

February 20, 2007

California Can Reward Tax Informants Just As The IRS Does

The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) had an informant reward program to encourage and reward informants who provide insightful information to identify and curtail abusive tax shelters and other abuses of the California tax code. Evidently, that statute has not been used because the complexity and sophistication of abusive tax shelters and other abusive tax schemes requires a greater degree of FTB discretion and clarity of the amount to pay informants and the funding mechanism used to pay informants. Since the California FTB lacks the flexibility to encourage and reward informants, the reward program is dormant.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) pays rewards! It has the discretion to pay rewards to informers for information about tax law violations. Except for Treasury and certain other federal employees, any informant is eligible for a reward. The amount of the reward normally will not be more than 15% of the additional taxes, penalties, and fines collected as a result of the informant’s information. The IRS will pay claims for reward applied for on Form 211 related to the value of the information given voluntarily and upon the informant’s own initiative with respect to taxes, fines, and penalties (but not interest) AFTER the Service collects.

The IRS may pay rewards it deems necessary for information that leads to detection or bringing to trial and punishment tax law violators and the actual underpayment of tax. The IRS may pay rewards whether the information relates to civil or criminal violations.

The Service will not pay any reward if it is less than $100.

Some of the grounds for rejecting claims include:

Continue reading "California Can Reward Tax Informants Just As The IRS Does" »

February 16, 2007

IRS Tax Controversy Settled for Huge Amount

The IRS claims the pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co. owed $3.8 billion in back taxes. Merck settled with the IRS yesterday for $3.4 billion. California taxes will likely be paid too because Merck had sales in California.

The details of the tax problem have not been disclosed. But apparently it revolved around a 1993 transaction in which Merck created a partnership in Bermuda, a tax haven, to finance its purchase of another company.

The company Merck purchased sold two cholesterol drugs and Merck paid the partnership that it set up royalties from those drug sales. Merck deducted the royalty payments as business expenses when it filed its U.S. corporate income tax return.

By setting up the partnership, Merck deducted money it essentially paid itself.

Both Merck and the IRS see the settlement in its own best interests. In view of the time and uncertainty of taking complex tax issues to court when so much is at stake, each side won’t have to spend years litigating and millions of dollars.

Having a tax attorney who is accustomed to dealing with complicated fact patterns analyze your situation so as to bring about the best possible result is invaluable.

February 16, 2007

The 100% Penalty and Your California Tax Attorney’s Help

To influence prompt payment by California employers for workers in Los Angeles County, Ventura County, Santa Barbara County and Orange County of withheld income and employment taxes including social security taxes, Congress passed a law that provides for the trust fund recovery penalty (“TFRP”).

The TFRP is the same as the so-called 100% penalty. These taxes are called trust fund taxes because as a California employer you actually hold the employee's money in trust until you make a federal tax deposit in that amount. As an employer in California, you are fully liable for 100% of the amount you collected from your employees that ought to be paid to the IRS. The TFRP may apply to you if these unpaid trust fund taxes cannot be collected right away by the IRS from your business. In order for the TFRP to be assessed, your business does not have to have stopped operating.

Who Can Be Responsible for the 100% Penalty

The TFRP may be assessed against you if you willfully fail to collect or pay the trust fund taxes and if you are responsible for collecting or paying withheld income and employment taxes, or for paying collected excise taxes.

For willfulness to exist, you as the responsible person:

(i) Must have been, or should have been, aware of the outstanding taxes and

(ii) Either intentionally disregarded your legal obligations or were plainly indifferent to its requirements (no evil intent or bad motive is required).

Using available funds to pay other creditors when your business is unable to pay the employment taxes is an indication of willfulness.

You may be considered a responsible person or part of a group of people who has the duty to perform and the power to direct the collection, accounting, and payment of trust fund taxes. As a responsible person you may be:

Continue reading "The 100% Penalty and Your California Tax Attorney’s Help" »

February 15, 2007

Paying Your Taxes In Full – California and Federal Tax Law

Whether paying with a timely filed income tax return, or filing late and paying late after receiving a tax bill from the IRS, we in California and all other taxpayers ought to pay the taxes we owe in full. This type of tax problem is often easily resolved. If you don’t pay your taxes and you don’t make any effort to pay them, the IRS can forcefully ask you to take action to pay the taxes, such as getting a loan or selling or mortgaging any assets you own. Mortgaging your home in Southern California, including areas like Los Angeles County, Ventura County, Orange County or Santa Barbara County, can be quite expensive but probably cheaper than IRS rates.

If you still make no effort to pay your tax bill after being asked by the IRS, or make some type of payment arrangement, the IRS will probably take more serious enforced collection action, such as levying your wages or other income, your bank accounts, or taking other assets by seizing them. The IRS could also file a Notice of Federal Tax Lien that will likely harm your credit standing.

Ways to Pay Taxes:

Payments can be made by check, money order, credit card, electronic funds transfer, cashier’s check, or cash.

If you choose to make an easy, safe and secure electronic payment, you can authorize an electronic funds withdrawal, use a credit card, or enroll in the U.S. Treasury’s Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS).

Electronic payment options give you an alternative to paying taxes by check or money order. Payments can be made any time 24/7. Best of all, the electronic funds withdrawal and EFTPS options are free.

Payments by credit card can be made through one of two official vendors:

Continue reading "Paying Your Taxes In Full – California and Federal Tax Law" »

February 14, 2007

California Taxpayers: Innocent Spouse Relief

If you qualify for innocent spouse relief, you can be relieved of responsibility for paying tax, interest, and penalties if your spouse or former spouse improperly reported items or left off items in your income tax return. This is true for California and for the federal government. California has an “Innocent Souse Relief Application”. Generally, the IRS says that if you qualify for innocent spouse relief, then the tax, interest, and penalties can only be collected from your spouse or former spouse and will not be collected from you. However, if you don’t qualify for innocent spouse relief, you are jointly and individually responsible for any tax, interest, and penalties and the IRS can collect these amounts from either one of you.

A consultation with a California tax lawyer might be prudent to determine if you qualify for relief.

To qualify for innocent spouse relief, you must meet all of these 4 conditions:

You filed a joint return which has an understatement of tax due to erroneous items (defined below) of your spouse or former spouse.

You request relief within 2 years after the date the IRS first attempted to collect the tax from you.

You establish that at the time you signed the joint return you did not know, and had no reason to know, that there was an understatement of tax (See Actual Knowledge or Reason To Know, defined below).

Taking into account all the facts and circumstances, it would be unfair to hold you liable for the understatement of tax. (See Indications of Unfairness for Innocent Spouse Relief, discussed more fully below in this blog).

To apply for this relief, complete the IRS Form 8857 "Request For Innocent Spouse Relief".

Continue reading "California Taxpayers: Innocent Spouse Relief" »

February 13, 2007

Unexpected Tax Due: California IRA Owners Beware

The IRS will not bail you out of adverse tax consequences resulting from your mistake when it comes to IRA withdrawals no matter how unintentional. Although the taxpayer did not live in California, the ruling impacts those who do live throughout the State of California. The IRS, in a Private Letter Ruling (defined as taxpayer-specific written decisions by the Internal Revenue Service in response to a taxpayer's request which sometimes applies to unpaid taxes), denied a taxpayer's request for permission to do a late rollover of an IRA distribution. Here was the situation:

The taxpayer’s daughter had a durable power of attorney to act on her father’s behalf because he suffered from a mental impairment disease.

In order to provide for her father’s future nursing home care, the daughter used that power and withdrew an amount from her father's IRA.

It was only later, after the expiration of the 60 day rollover period, that the daughter realized the tax consequences of the IRA withdrawal.

The private letter ruling was requested based upon the daughter not realizing the tax consequence of the withdrawal.

The IRS denied the request to do a late rollover because there was never any intention to do a rollover at the time of the IRA withdrawal.

The applicable rule, generally speaking, is that the amount withdrawn is not subject to income tax if the amount withdrawn from an IRA is re-deposited within 60 days of the withdrawal. If you fail to re-deposit the amount withdrawn within 60 days you may request a waiver from the IRS that would permit you to do a late rollover and avoid taxation.

In Revenue Procedure 2003-16 the IRS listed certain circumstances that they would consider in determining whether or not to grant permission for a late rollover. These include:

errors committed by a financial institution;

inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error;

the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and

the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

In this private letter ruling, the IRS stated that none of the factors described in Revenue Procedure 2003-16 were met since the daughter, using her power of attorney, withdrew the money from the IRA to provide future nursing home care for her father. Apparently, she did not consult with any professional as to whether this course of action was tax-wise.

Consult with a tax lawyer when you are about to take action with tax consequences.

February 12, 2007

Receipts Required For All Contributions - Even To Your Own California Family Foundation

The tax law requires a written receipt for every charitable contribution of $250 or more whether the charity is in California or elsewhere. You must obtain from the organization to which you made a contribution "a contemporaneous written acknowledgment." Follow this simple rule and avoid an unnecessary tax controversy.

At one time a canceled check was enough evidence for a charitable contribution deduction, but this is no longer the case since the 2006 Pension Protection Act tightened the requirements for smaller contributions.

The need for a receipt is less obvious in the case of a family foundation, and as a result the family and its California tax attorney must be very careful not to overlook this requirement. Briefly, a Californa family foundation is a fully qualified charitable organization and any transfer of money or property to the foundation must follow all of the rules governing charitable contributions, including the requirement of a contemporaneous written acknowledgment.

A person making a contribution to his or her own California family foundation might think that the actual charitable transfer will occur later when the foundation makes its grants to other entities located in different California counties such as Los Angeles County, Orange County, Ventura County or Santa Barbara County. Unfortunately, for tax purposes that is not the case.

This may seem like a pointless requirement. After all, when you make a contribution to your own family foundation you may be on both sides of the matter. You are the donor making the contribution and, as an officer of the foundation, you are also in a sense the donee.

Congress might logically have provided an exception for California family foundation contributions. But it didn't! As a result, however unnecessary it might seem, you must have the requisite receipt.

What happens if the receipt cannot be produced in timely fashion?

Continue reading "Receipts Required For All Contributions - Even To Your Own California Family Foundation" »

February 11, 2007

Know the Difference Between What Income Is Taxable or Nontaxable in California

Most income we receive is taxable both by California and by the federal government. But there are some situations when certain types of income are not taxed at all or partially taxed.

Examples of items that are not included in your income include:

Child support payments Gifts, bequests and inheritances Tax Exempt Interest from municipal bonds and tax exempt bond mutual funds. Although the interest is not taxable, it must be reported on your income tax return

Workers' compensation benefits

Adoption Expense Reimbursements for qualifying expenses

Meals and Lodging for the convenience of your employer

Compensatory Damages awarded for physical injury or physical sickness

Cash Rebates from a dealer or manufacturer

Examples of items that may or may not be included in your income are:

Life Insurance. Life insurance proceeds paid to you because of the death of the insured person are not taxable unless the policy was turned over to you for a price. If you surrender a policy for cash, you must include in income any proceeds that are more than the cost of the policy.

Scholarship or Fellowship Grant. If you are a candidate for a degree, you can exclude amounts you receive as a qualified scholarship or fellowship. Amounts used for room and board do not qualify

A complete list is available in IRS Publication 525, Taxable and Nontaxable Income. These examples are not all-inclusive.

If you believe the IRS has taxed income that is non-taxable, consult a tax attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

February 9, 2007

Tax Refunds to Those in California: You Have More Deposit Options

In every county throughout California, including Los Angeles County, Ventura County, Orange County, and Santa Barbara County, you have more choices for the direct deposit of your 2006 federal income tax refunds. Now, you can split refunds among up to three accounts held by as many as three different U.S. financial institutions, such as banks, mutual funds, brokerage firms or credit unions. Those financial institutions need not be in Los Angeles, Ventura, Orange or Santa Barbara counties but can be anywhere in California or outside of California.

The option of a split-refund is available to those of us who choose direct deposit regardless of whether we filed the original returns on paper or in electronic format. However, those of us filing Form 1040-EZ-T, Request for Refund of Federal Telephone Excise Tax, or Form 8379, Injured Spouse Allocation, cannot opt to split our refund.

You can continue to use the direct deposit line on Form 1040 to electronically send your refunds to one account. But if you want to split direct-deposit refunds among two or three accounts or financial institutions, you should complete new Form 8888, Direct Deposit of Refund to More Than One Account.

The IRS will electronically deposit refunds to your accounts held by a U.S. financial institution if an accurate account number and American Bankers Association (ABA) routing number is supplied and the financial institution accepts direct deposits for the type of accounts designated. If an error is made, the IRS assumes no responsibility for it.

You can take advantage of important differences in saving time when you do things electronically instead of by paper. For those of us filing our taxes electronically, the refund is deposited in our account within two weeks. A paper check refund takes three weeks. Those of us filing taxes on paper, the process is longer; we get our direct deposit refund within four to six weeks or paper checks within six weeks.

To speak about this topic with a California tax attorney, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

February 9, 2007

Tax Exempt Entities in California: IRS Offers You An Online Workshop To Operate A 501(c)(3)

Do you have a tax exempt entity in California? The Internal Revenue Service has launched a new web-based version of its popular Exempt Organizations Workshop covering tax compliance issues confronted by your small and mid-sized tax exempt organizations.

The free online workshop – Stay Exempt – Tax Basics for 501(c)(3)s – consists of five interactive modules on tax compliance topics for exempt organizations. They are:

Tax-Exempt Status – How can you keep your 501(c)(3) exempt?

Unrelated Business Income – Does your organization generate taxable income?

Employment Issues – How should you treat your workers for tax purposes?

Form 990 – Would you like to file an error-free return?

Required Disclosures – To whom do you have to show your records?

You can access this new training program at www.stayexempt.org. You can complete the modules in any order and repeat them as many times as you like. The online training website does not require registration and its visitors will remain anonymous.

If you would like the help of a tax lawyer, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

February 8, 2007

California Taxpayers: Are You Missing A Form 1099?

For certain types of income you receive from your work in California, Los Angeles, or elsewhere, you may get a Form 1099 for use with your federal and California state individual income tax return. You should receive your Form 1099 information returns by the January 31, 2007 deadline. Form 1099 is an information return provided by the one who pays your income.

If you have not received a Form 1099 within a few days after the deadline that you believe you should have received it, I recommend that you contact the person or company who paid you in order to get the missing information. If by February 15th you still don’t have the form, call the IRS for assistance at 800-829-1040.

If you don’t get the Form 1099 you expect, you may still be able to figure out the income earned from a particular source. For example, your bank may put a summary of the interest paid to you during the year on the December or January bank statement. In this way, you can still prepare your individual income tax return without waiting to get the Form 1099.

Different types of Form 1099 show income from various sources. The IRS calls this type of Form 1099 a 1099-series. Usually, you are not required to attach the 1099-series to your tax return except when you receive a Form 1099-R or Form 1099-INT that shows federal income tax withheld. I recommend that you keep a copy of all the 1099s that you receive with your tax records for the year.

There are several different forms in the Form 1099-series, including:

Form 1099–B, Proceeds From Broker and Barter Exchange Transactions

Form 1099–DIV, Dividends and Distributions

Form 1099–INT, Interest Income

Form 1099–MISC, Miscellaneous Income

Form 1099–OID, Original Issue Discount

Form 1099–R, Distributions from Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc.

Form SSA–1099, Social Security Benefit Statement

After you file your income tax return and later receive a Form 1099 for income that you did not fully include on that return, I suggest that you report the income and take credit for any federal income tax withheld by filing Form 1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return.

The IRS Web site at IRS.gov or its toll-free number at 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676) makes available the Form 1040X and instructions.

If you need the assistance of a California tax attorney, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

February 7, 2007

California's Franchise Tax Board, the IRS and Tax Payment Plans

For those of us who can’t resolve our California or federal tax debt immediately, an installment agreement can be a good payment option. You may be eligible for an installment agreement which allows for the full payment of the tax debt in smaller, more manageable monthly amounts. Your installment agreement, payment agreement, payment option or a payment plan are all the idea same since each one allows you to make payments over time on the tax you owe. That sounds like a good deal, but you can save money by paying the full amount you owe as quickly as possible to minimize the interest and penalties you’ll be charged.

You may be eligible for an installment agreement on past taxes but you must have filed all required tax returns and paid your estimated tax payments for current taxes if required.

How to Set Up an Installment Agreement

If you want to pay off a tax debt through an installment agreement, and owe:

$25,000 or less in combined tax, penalties, and interest can use the Online Payment Agreement (OPA) or call the number on the bill or notice (have the bill or notice available, along with the social security number). A fill-in Request for Installment Agreement, Form 9465, is available online that can be mailed to the address on the bill.

More than $25,000 in combined tax, penalties, and interest may still qualify for an installment agreement, but a Collection Information Statement, Form 433F may need to be completed. Call the number on the bill or mail the Request for Installment Agreement, Form 9465 and Form 433F to the address on the bill.

Eventually, you will receive a written notification telling you whether your terms for an installment agreement have been accepted or if they need to be modified.

To speak with a tax attorney, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

February 7, 2007

You Will Be Impacted By Tax Law Changes In 2006 - California Be Aware

You and I should be aware of important changes to the tax law before we complete our 2006 federal and California state income tax forms. Those changes will likely affect our California state tax returns too. It may be time to consult with a California tax attorney on this or other tax matters.

For more information, you may visit the IRS website at http://www.irs.gov/. Also, you can check out Publication 553, Highlights of 2006 Tax Changes, and your Form 1040 instruction book. The California Franchise Tax Board has its useful information posted at http://ftb.ca.gov/.

Here are some changes that may affect your tax return:

Continue reading "You Will Be Impacted By Tax Law Changes In 2006 - California Be Aware" »

February 6, 2007

California Tax Filing Deadline Extended to April 17

California - through the Franchise Tax Board - and the IRS has announced that tax returns and tax payments that would otherwise be due on April 16 (the first Monday after April 15) will be timely if filed or paid by Tuesday, Apr. 17. This is because of newly enacted legislation in Sacramento, California and Washington, D.C. designates April 16 as a holiday. This is not a federal holiday, the California Franchise Tax Board and IRS will be open for business, but nevertheless is a holiday for the rule about timely filing and paying.

Federal tax authorities say that most IRS forms, instructions and publications have already gone to print with the incorrect Apr. 16 date and will not be revised. California’s Franchise Tax Board takes a similar position.

The broadened Apr. 17 deadline applies to the following:

Calendar-year 2006 federal individual income tax returns, whether filed electronically or on paper (Forms 1040, 1040A or 1040EZ).

Tax-year 2006 balance-due payments, whether made electronically (direct debit or credit card) or by check.

For calendar-year taxpayers, individual estimated tax payments for the first quarter of 2007, whether made electronically or by check. In rare cases, estimated tax payments for the second, third and fourth quarters may be affected for individuals operating on a fiscal year that is not a calendar year.

Individual refund claims for tax year 2003, where the regular three-year statute of limitations is expiring.

For calendar-year taxpayers, tax-year 2006 contributions to a Roth or traditional IRA.

Corporation income tax returns, including S corporations (Forms 1120, 1120-A and 1120S) for a fiscal year ending on Jan. 31, 2007, and any balance due.

For calendar-year corporations, the estimated tax payment for the first quarter of 2007. In some cases, estimated tax payments for the second, third and fourth quarters may be affected for corporations operating on a fiscal year that is not a calendar year.

Calendar-year estate and trust income tax returns (Form 1041) and any balance due.

Calendar-year 2006 partnership returns (Form 1065).

Extension requests for any return whether submitted electronically or on Form 4868.

The March tax deposit for employers (generally, small businesses) required to deposit withholding taxes on a monthly basis.