June 23, 2009

Offer In Compromise Co-Pay Repeal

To submit an Offer In Compromise (OIC) with the Internal Revenue Service in order to pay pennies on the dollar, a nonrefundable 20% downpayment is required. Combined with a very low acceptance rate by the Internal Revenue Service of OICs, the downpayment has the effect of discouraging people from applying for an Offer.

A Congressional bill was recently introduced the title to which tells it all: “Repeal of the Partial Payment Requirement on Submissions of Offers in Compromise”. If this is enacted into law, the struggle with your tax debts may be a bit easier.

If you have a tax problem and need a tax lawyer, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

June 10, 2009

Unfiled Tax Return: IRS Can Collect Anywhere - Even Los Angeles

The Internal Revenue Service has filed a $819,848 federal tax lien against Sen. John Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign. The campaign says the tax return was filed and lost by the IRS while the IRS says no tax return was ever filed. Sen. Kerry's office blamed IRS clerical error for the claim and said his campaign owes no penalties.

The liability described in the tax lien is based on Internal Revenue Code Section 6721 entitled "Failure to File Correct Information Returns".

The Massachusetts Democrat said the IRS mishandled payroll tax forms that he said were correctly filed by his campaign in 2005.

Avoid this tax problem. Speak with a qualified tax attorney in Los Angeles from anywhere in the U.S. about your situation. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

June 5, 2009

Late Tax Payment - Late Filed Tax Return

Filing a past due return may not be as difficult as you think. Los Angeles, California taxpayers should file all tax returns that are due, regardless of whether or not full payment can be made with the return. Same is true for California tax returns.

Whether paying taxes with a timely filed tax return, or filing late and paying taxes late after receiving a bill from the IRS (and the bill is correct), LA's taxpayers are encouraged to pay the taxes they owe in full.

Prevent the IRS from levying bank accounts, wages, or other income, or taking other assets. Prevent the IRS from filing a Notice of Federal Tax Lien that may have a detrimental effect on your credit standing.

If you don't file your tax return, the IRS will file a substitute return for you, which will not include any additional exemptions or expenses you may be entitled to and may overstate your real tax liability. Once the tax is assessed the IRS will start the collection process, which can include placing a levy on wages or bank accounts or filing a federal tax lien against your property.

Call a tax professional - call attorney Mitchell A. Port.

June 3, 2009

Free Tax Help

Get Free Help.

The IRS offers free tax assistance in person, by telephone, computer and by fax. The IRS can assist taxpayers with obtaining forms, publications and answers to a wide range of tax questions. The IRS can also help find free tax preparation for those who qualify.

In Person

Taxpayers needing face-to-face help solving individual or business tax problems can get help every business day in every IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center.

By Phone

Call the toll-free customer service line at 1-800-829-1040.

Use Your Computer

Through the Internet, you can access a wealth of free tax information on the IRS Web site. Taxpayers can check out links such as Forms and Publications to download necessary forms, instructions or publications; get the FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions) to get answers to questions

By Fax

You can receive faxed forms and publications by calling 1-703-368-9694 (not a toll-free call). Simply follow the directions from the prompts.

Be careful when providing the IRS with your information while you are trying to information from them. Hire a tax professional if you are concerned you might inadvertantly disclose information you may not want the IRS to have at this time.

June 1, 2009

IRS Now Hiring

There are jobs in California.

The IRS is recruiting hundreds of Internal Revenue Agents with a minimum 30 hours of college-level accounting coursework for openings around the country. To apply for these and other IRS jobs, go to the IRS job search on USAJOBS.

May 21, 2009

Do You Have A Foreign Financial Account?

Do You Have a Foreign Financial Account?

If you have authority over or own a foreign financial account, including a brokerage account, unit trust, mutual fund, bank account or other types of financial accounts, then you may be required to report the account yearly to the IRS. Under the Bank Secrecy Act, each United States person must file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), if

1. The value of the account exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year, and

2. The person has financial interest in, signature authority (or other authority that is comparable to signature authority) over one or more accounts in a foreign country.

The FBAR is a tool to help the United States government identify persons who may be using foreign financial accounts to circumvent United States law. Investigators use FBARs to help identify or trace funds used for illicit purposes or to identify unreported income maintained or generated abroad.

A United States person is not prohibited from owning foreign accounts. The FBAR is required because foreign financial institutions may not be subject to the same reporting requirements as domestic financial institutions.

Definition of Terms

What is an FBAR?

Who must file an FBAR?

When is the FBAR due?

Where are FBAR forms available?

What are the exceptions to the FBAR filing requirement?

How do foreign account holders report their accounts to the IRS?

Where do account holders file the FBAR?

How long should account holders retain records of the foreign accounts?

What is a United States person?

Would a foreign athlete or entertainer that occasionally visits the U.S. in order to compete or perform in an event, be considered a United States person for FBAR purposes?

What is a foreign country?

What is a financial account?

Does more than one form need to be filed for a husband and wife owning a joint account?

What constitutes signature or other authority over an account?

What does “maximum value of account” mean (for Box 15 on the FBAR)?

Is an FBAR required if the account generates neither interest nor dividend income?

How does an FBAR filer amend a previously filed FBAR?

What is the statute of limitations for assessing civil penalties for violations of the FBAR requirements?

What happens if an account holder is required to file an FBAR and fails to do so?

An American citizen, X, gives a person who is a citizen or resident of the U.S. power of attorney to X’s Canadian bank accounts. X files an FBAR form annually. Does the power of attorney also need to file an FBAR?

A fiduciary who is a U.S. person has control as a trustee for an IRA with a foreign account. Should an FBAR be filed?

Does the term “other authority over a financial account” mean that a person, who has the power to direct how an account is invested, but who cannot make disbursements to the accounts, has to file an FBAR?

Must a U.S. person file an FBAR on a Eurodollar account in the Cayman Islands?

A N.Y. corporation owns a foreign company that has foreign accounts. The corporation will file an FBAR for the foreign company’s accounts. Do the primary owners of the U.S. Company also have to file?

A company has over 25 foreign accounts. What should they enter in Part ll of the FBAR?

A person is a non-resident alien and only visits the United States to manage his personal interests, such as rental property. Does that person have to file an FBAR?

Reporting and Filing Information

A person who holds a foreign account may have a reporting obligation even though the account produces no taxable income. Checking the appropriate block on Form 1040 Schedule B, and filing Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, satisfies the account holder’s reporting obligation.

A foreign account holder must mail the Form TD F 90-22.1 on or before June 30 of the following year to:

U.S. Department of the Treasury
P.O. Box 32621
Detroit, MI 48232-0621.

The FBAR is not to be filed with the filer’s Federal income tax return.

The granting, by IRS, of an extension to file Federal income tax returns does not extend the due date for filing an FBAR. There is no extension available for filing the FBAR.

Account holders who do not comply with the FBAR reporting requirements may be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, or both.

Exceptions to the Reporting Requirement

There are exceptions to the reporting requirement. These exceptions include:

1. Accounts in U.S. military banking facilities operated by a United States financial institution to serve U.S. Government installations abroad are not considered to be accounts in a foreign country for purposes of the reporting requirement.

2. An officer or employee of a bank that is subject to the supervision of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of Thrift Supervision, or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, is not required to report having signature or other authority over a foreign account if the officer or employee has no personal interest in the account.

3. An officer or employee of a domestic corporation whose equity securities are listed on a national securities exchange or which has assets exceeding $10 million and 500 or more shareholders of record, is not required to report having signature or other authority over a foreign account if the person has no personal financial interest in the account, and the officer or employee has been advised in writing by the chief financial officer of the corporation that the corporation has filed a current report that includes the foreign account.

The IRS has launched a "tax amnesty" for those who turn themselves in within the next 5 months. It is critical that clients be made aware of this program, and be counseled on whether it is in their best interest to participate. The issues are complex, and require a balancing of a number of financial, tax and criminal considerations including the non-applicability of the federal authorized tax practitioner privilege. The "amnesty" will expire on September 22, 2009, so time is of the essence. Current year FBARs are due June 30th.

May 19, 2009

U.S. Tax Court Announces e-Filing Pilot

The United States Tax Court will begin a pilot eFiling program through Practitioner Access and Petitioner Access on May 7, 2009.

The pilot will be restricted to petitioners and practitioners in good standing with the Court who have registered for eAccess, agreed to its Terms of Use, and consented to eService. The pilot applies to all cases first calendared for trial or hearing after August 31, 2009.

For example, if you have registered for Practitioner Access, consented to eService, and your case is first calendared for trial or hearing on September 21, 2009, you may eFile in that case during the pilot, but not if the case was set for hearing or trial before September 1, 2009. You can also participate in the pilot if your case has not been set for trial. If your case is set for trial or hearing before September 1, 2009, you may not eFile in that case during the pilot.

Please note that eFiling in a particular case can be commenced only after the petition has been filed with the Tax Court in that case. All petitions must be submitted to the Court in paper form.

May 15, 2009

Tax Scams

The Internal Revenue Service issued its 2009 “dirty dozen” list of tax scams, including schemes involving phishing, hiding income offshore and false claims for refunds.

Tax schemes are illegal and can lead to problems for both scam artists and taxpayers who risk significant penalties, interest and possible criminal prosecution.

The IRS urges taxpayers to avoid these common schemes:

Filing False or Misleading Forms

The IRS is seeing scam artists file false or misleading returns to claim refunds that they are not entitled to. Frivolous information returns, such as Form 1099-Original Issue Discount (OID), claiming false withholding credits are used to legitimize erroneous refund claims. The new scam has evolved from an earlier phony argument that a “strawman” bank account has been created for each citizen. Under this scheme, taxpayers fabricate an information return, arguing they used their “strawman” account to pay for goods and services and falsely claim the corresponding amount as withholding as a way to seek a tax refund.

False Claims for Refund and Requests for Abatement

This scam involves a request for abatement of previously assessed tax using Form 843, Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement. Many individuals who try this have not previously filed tax returns. The tax they are trying to have abated has been assessed by the IRS through the Substitute for Return Program. The filer uses Form 843 to list reasons for the request. Often, one of the reasons given is "Failed to properly compute and/or calculate Section 83-Property Transferred in Connection with Performance of Service."

Hiding Income Offshore

The IRS aggressively pursues taxpayers and promoters involved in abusive offshore transactions. Taxpayers have tried to avoid or evade U.S. income tax by hiding income in offshore banks, brokerage accounts or through other entities. Recently, the IRS provided guidance to auditors on how to deal with those hiding income offshore in undisclosed accounts. The IRS draws a clear line between taxpayers with offshore accounts who voluntarily come forward and those who fail to come forward.

Taxpayers also evade taxes by using offshore debit cards, credit cards, wire transfers, foreign trusts, employee-leasing schemes, private annuities or life insurance plans. The IRS has also identified abusive offshore schemes including those that involve use of electronic funds transfer and payment systems, offshore business merchant accounts and private banking relationships.

Return Preparer Fraud

Dishonest return preparers can cause many headaches for taxpayers who fall victim to their ploys. Such preparers derive financial gain by skimming a portion of their clients’ refunds and charging inflated fees for return preparation services. They attract new clients by promising large refunds. Taxpayers should choose carefully when hiring a tax preparer. As the saying goes, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. No matter who prepares the return, the taxpayer is ultimately responsible for its accuracy. Since 2002, the courts have issued injunctions ordering dozens of individuals to cease preparing returns, and the Department of Justice has filed complaints against dozens of others, which are pending in court.

Phishing

Phishing is a tactic used by Internet-based scam artists to trick unsuspecting victims into revealing personal or financial information. The criminals use the information to steal the victim’s identity, access bank accounts, run up credit card charges or apply for loans in the victim’s name.

Phishing scams often take the form of an e-mail that appears to come from a legitimate source, including the IRS. The IRS never initiates unsolicited e-mail contact with taxpayers about their tax issues. Taxpayers who receive unsolicited e-mails that claim to be from the IRS can forward the message to phishing@irs.gov. Further instructions are available at IRS.gov. To date, taxpayers have forwarded scam e-mails reflecting thousands of confirmed IRS phishing sites. If you believe you have been the target of an identity thief, information is available at IRS.gov.

Zero Wages

Filing a phony wage- or income-related information return to replace a legitimate information return has been used as an illegal method to lower the amount of taxes owed. Typically, a Form 4852 (Substitute Form W-2) or a “corrected” Form 1099 is used as a way to improperly reduce taxable income to zero. The taxpayer also may submit a statement rebutting wages and taxes reported by a payer to the IRS. Sometimes fraudsters even include an explanation on their Form 4852 that cites statutory language on the definition of wages or may include some reference to a paying company that refuses to issue a corrected Form W-2 for fear of IRS retaliation. Taxpayers should resist any temptation to participate in any of the variations of this scheme.

Abuse of Charitable Organizations and Deductions

The IRS continues to observe the misuse of tax-exempt organizations. Abuse includes arrangements to improperly shield income or assets from taxation and attempts by donors to maintain control over donated assets or income from donated property. The IRS also continues to investigate various schemes involving the donation of non-cash assets, including easements on property, closely-held corporate stock and real property. Often, the donations are highly overvalued or the organization receiving the donation promises that the donor can purchase the items back at a later date at a price the donor sets. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 imposed increased penalties for inaccurate appraisals and new definitions of qualified appraisals and qualified appraisers for taxpayers claiming charitable contributions.

Frivolous Arguments

Promoters of frivolous schemes encourage people to make unreasonable and unfounded claims to avoid paying the taxes they owe. The IRS has a list of frivolous legal positions that taxpayers should stay away from. Taxpayers who file a tax return or make a submission based on one of the positions on the list are subject to a $5,000 penalty. More information is available on IRS.gov.

Disguised Corporate Ownership

Some taxpayers form corporations and other entities in certain states for the primary purpose of disguising the ownership of a business or financial activity. Such entities can be used to facilitate underreporting of income, fictitious deductions, non-filing of tax returns, participating in listed transactions, money laundering, financial crimes, and even terrorist financing. The IRS is working with state authorities to identify these entities and to bring the owners of these entities into compliance.

Misuse of Trusts

For years, unscrupulous promoters have urged taxpayers to transfer assets into trusts. While there are many legitimate, valid uses of trusts in tax and estate planning, some promoted transactions promise reduction of income subject to tax, deductions for personal expenses and reduced estate or gift taxes. Such trusts rarely deliver the promised tax benefits and are being used primarily as a means to avoid income tax liability and hide assets from creditors, including the IRS.

The IRS has recently seen an increase in the improper use of private annuity trusts and foreign trusts to divert income and deduct personal expenses. As with other arrangements, taxpayers should seek the advice of a trusted professional before entering into a trust arrangement.

Abusive Retirement Plans

The IRS continues to uncover abuses in retirement plan arrangements, including Roth Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs). The IRS is looking for transactions that taxpayers are using to avoid the limitations on contributions to IRAs as well as transactions that are not properly reported as early distributions. Taxpayers should be wary of advisers who encourage them to shift appreciated assets into IRAs or companies owned by their IRAs at less than fair market value to circumvent annual contribution limits. Other variations have included the use of limited liability companies to engage in activity which is considered prohibited.

Fuel Tax Credit Scams

The IRS is receiving claims for the fuel tax credit that are unreasonable. Some taxpayers, such as farmers who use fuel for off-highway business purposes, may be eligible for the fuel tax credit. But some individuals are claiming the tax credit for nontaxable uses of fuel when their occupation or income level makes the claim unreasonable. Fraud involving the fuel tax credit is considered a frivolous tax claim, potentially subjecting those who improperly claim the credit to a $5,000 penalty.

How to Report Suspected Tax Fraud Activity

Suspected tax fraud can be reported to the IRS using Form 3949-A, Information Referral. Form 3949-A is available for download from the IRS Web site at IRS.gov. The completed form or a letter detailing the alleged fraudulent activity should be addressed to the Internal Revenue Service, Fresno, CA 93888. The mailing should include specific information about who is being reported, the activity being reported, how the activity became known, when the alleged violation took place, the amount of money involved and any other information that might be helpful in an investigation. The person filing the report is not required to self-identify, although it is helpful to do so. The identity of the person filing the report can be kept confidential.

May 11, 2009

Your Rights As A Taxpayer

The IRS publishes a thorough explanation of your rights as a taxpayer.

You have rights as a taxpayer when dealing with the IRS. Whether you file a Form 1040 or a complicated corporate return, you will benefit from knowing your rights as a taxpayer and being familiar with the IRS' obligations to protect them.

The Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is an IRS program that provides an independent system to assure that tax problems, which have not been resolved through normal channels, are promptly and fairly handled.

What should you do if you receive a notice from the IRS?

You have rights to representation - learn more about granting power of attorney.

The IRS accepts most taxpayer's returns as filed. If it inquires about your return or select it for examination, it does not suggest that you are dishonest. The inquiry or examination may or may not result in more tax. Learn about your rights during the examination process and get information about how audits are conducted.

It is your right to appeal any action taken by the IRS to change your account.

Learn about the collection process IRS may follow to collect overdue taxes, including a summary of your rights and other important information about the collection process.

For further tax help, call former IRS attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

May 5, 2009

Offers In Compromise For California Businesses

A request for an Offer in Compromise from the IRS or the California Franchise Tax Board can also be used by businesses to resolve outstanding corporate income and payroll taxes.

Similar to an Offer in Compromise for an individual, the offer for a business is computed based upon the business’s current assets and financial disclosure statement. The IRS uses the company’s reasonable collection potential to determine the Offer amount. The reasonable collection potential for a business is computed in a manner similar to that of an individual. However, unlike individual expenses, the IRS does not have “national standards” for business expenses. In most circumstances the IRS will allow all ordinary and necessary expenses of the business.

The IRS’s recent revisions to its Internal Revenue Manual make these types of Offers more difficult.

Offers submitted by an in-business taxpayer with payroll/trust fund recovery penalty liabilities will not be investigated unless the trust fund portion of the taxes are paid, the trust fund recovery penalties are assessed against all responsible persons, or the trust fund package has been forwarded for assessment.

To submit an Offer for an ongoing business, all of the responsible persons must either agree to be assessed with the trust fund recovery penalties, or pay the underlying trust fund amount.

Offers submitted by active businesses with trust fund liabilities no longer require that the Offer amount include the reasonable collection potential of both the entity and all responsible persons. Instead, the ongoing business is only required to offer an amount reflective of its reasonable collection potential.

This policy is likely due to the IRS’s renewed focus on the collection of the trust fund liabilities from all responsible persons, despite an Offer at the entity level.

The IRS will continue to collect the trust fund portion of the liability from the responsible persons despite the entity’s successful Offer; most responsible persons would not be motivated to file an Offer on behalf of the company due to their continued liability. The IRS’s interest in collecting from all responsible persons diminishes some of the benefits of an Offer for an ongoing business taxpayer.

These policies leave most responsible persons in a precarious situation because the Offer for the business will not alleviate their personal liabilities. Unless all of the responsible persons independently qualify for a personal Offer in Compromise, this might not be the best solution for the business. However, it may be the only solution available for the entity to remain in business.

For tax help on your unpaid payroll or income tax, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

May 1, 2009

Standards of Conduct for Attorneys, CPAs, EAs and Enrolled Actuaries

Standards of Conduct for Certified Public Accountants, Attorneys, Enrolled Actuaries and Enrolled Agents are available at the IRS website. Circular 230 contains regulations governing the practice of attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled agents, enrolled actuaries, and appraisers before the Internal Revenue Service.

April 15, 2009

California's Tax Season Finally Over

It's crunch time for California’s taxpayers and their accountants alike in the rush to get state and federal income taxes postmarked in by tonight's 11:59:59 p.m. deadline.

Some of my CPA friends can't wait to teach their teenagers how to drive.

My other friends who are tax preparers are just looking forward to getting some sleep.

Another California tax season over – at last.

April 10, 2009

Know IRS Procedures

Here is a link to the "Top Frequently Asked Questions for IRS Procedures".

Try this link to the "Frequently Asked Question Subcategories for IRS Procedures".

For tax assistance with the IRS or California's tax authorities such as the Franchise Tax Board or California State Board of Equalization, call a qualified tax attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

April 8, 2009

Tax Law Changes In California For 2008

Curious about what tax law changes occurred in California that impacts your income tax return (Form 540)? The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) publised a summary of those changes which you can view here.

Some of the tax changes cover these topics:

Electronic payments

Mortgage forgiveness debt relief

Net operating loss

Tax shelters

Business tax credit limitation

Estimated tax payments

Same-Sex married couples

Voluntary contributions

Third party designee

Conformity

Rice Straw Credit

Withholding on California Real Estate

Consult your tax preparer to determine whether any of these changes may apply and benefit you.

April 6, 2009

Internal Revenue Code: The Tax Laws

The IRS makes available the Tax Code, Regulations and Official Guidance at its website. Proper tax planning is available by proper use of the Code, Treasury Regulations and other government resources. Here is your source for last minute planning opportunities which can treat last year's income, expenses and deductions in a way advatageous to you.

April 3, 2009

California Revenue and Taxation Code

California's tax season means proper tax planning. A most important tool is the tax code. Access to the entire tax code for California is available by clicking here.

Here's a list of the tax code's table of contents.

CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL PROVISIONS ................................................... 1-38
DIVISION 1. PROPERTY TAXATION
PART 0.5. IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE XIIIA OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION

Continue reading "California Revenue and Taxation Code" »

April 1, 2009

Filing Your 1040

The IRS website is a fantastic resource during this tax season for providing information and answers to commonly asked questions. Here is a few of the topics covered:

2009 Tax Year Highlights

Recovery Rebate Credit

First-Time Homeowners Credit

Earned Income Tax Credit

Facing Difficult times financially?

Use Online Tools

Find out if you qualify for Earned Income Tax Credit

Calculate your optional itemized deduction for state and local sales taxes

See if you might be subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax

Find out the status of your refund and more

Products and Services in Spanish

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

Are you or your spouse a member of the U.S. Armed Forces?

Tax relief in disaster situations

Tips for Choosing a Tax Preparer

Commonly Requested Tax Forms and Instructions

Taxpayer Advocate Service

Need more assistance? The IRS wants to help; lots of information is available for individuals and businesses.

March 18, 2009

Madoff And Ponzi - How To Report Your Tax Obligation

Deductibility of Theft Losses:

The Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department are aware of investment arrangements that have been discovered to be fraudulent, resulting in significant losses to taxpayers. These arrangements often take the form of so-called "Ponzi" schemes, in which the party perpetrating the fraud receives cash or property from investors, purports to earn income for the investors, and reports to the investors income amounts that are wholly or partially fictitious.

The Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department recognize that whether and when investors meet the requirements for claiming a theft loss for an investment in a Ponzi scheme are highly factual determinations that often cannot be made by taxpayers with certainty in the year the loss is discovered.

Payments, if any, of purported income or principal to investors are made from cash or property that other investors invested in the fraudulent arrangement. The party perpetrating the fraud criminally appropriates some or all of the investors' cash or property.

Revenue Ruling 2009-9, 2009 I.R.B (March 2, 2009), describes the proper income tax treatment for losses resulting from these Ponzi schemes.

In view of the number of investment arrangements recently discovered to be fraudulent and the extent of the potential losses, this revenue procedure provides an optional safe harbor under which qualified investors (as defined in the revenue procedure) may treat a loss as a theft loss deduction when certain conditions are met.

This treatment provides qualified investors with a uniform manner for determining their theft losses. In addition, this treatment avoids potentially difficult problems of proof in determining how much income reported in prior years was fictitious or a return of capital, and alleviates compliance and administrative burdens on both taxpayers and the Service.

Under Revenue Procedure 2009-20, the IRS issued guidance on the examination of returns and claims for refund, credit or abatement. This revenue procedure provides an optional safe harbor treatment for taxpayers that experienced losses in certain investment arrangements discovered to be criminally fraudulent. This revenue procedure also describes how the Internal Revenue Service will treat a return that claims a deduction for such a loss and does not use the safe harbor treatment described in this revenue procedure.

March 16, 2009

Fix Your Tax Problem Fast

If you owe over $100,000 in unpaid income tax to the Internal Revenue Service or a large amount to the California Franchise Tax Board, you can quickly resolve your tax problem by having the following information available when contacting the Internal Revenue Service:

• Valid Power of Attorney (Form 2848) covering all tax periods
• Completed Form 433- A, B or F
• Explain in detail why the taxpayer is not able to full pay or borrow to full pay
• Copies of delinquent tax returns
• Rental income
• Three months of current bank statements (all accounts)
• Three months of current pay stubs for both yourself and your spouse
• Investment income
• Pension income and/or Social Security income
• Value of 401K or Retirement account
• Value of all property and/or available equity
• Employer’s information including work number
• Number of individual’s living in the household
• Secured loan(s) - amount of loan and remaining balance(s)
• Life insurance policies, (whole or term), any borrowing ability? And/or value of policy
• Profit and Loss statements for self-employed taxpayers
• Commission statement
• Year make of vehicles, value, equity, balance owed, and monthly payments
• Out-of-pocket medical expenses
• Substantiation of payments being made
• Substantiation of Court ordered payments
• Spouse’s income and source with name/address/phone number

Additional information and /or documentation may be needed to determine disposition of the account.

Call a qualified Los Angeles tax attorney for the right tax help. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

March 6, 2009

California’s Multi Tax Agency Form for Offer in Compromise

California's Franchise Tax Board, Employment Development Department and the State Board of Equalization now allow taxpayers behind in their tax payments to use one form when applying to more than one tax agency for an Offer in Compromise.

Are you an OIC candidate for taxes owed to California's tax agencies?

The Offer in Compromise (OIC) program is for taxpayers that do not have, and will not have in the foreseeable future, the income, assets, or means to pay the tax liability. It allows you to offer a lesser amount for payment of a nondisputed final tax liability. Although each case is evaluated based on its own unique set of facts and circumstances, California gives the following factors strong consideration in the evaluation:

The offer is in the best interest of California.

Your present and future expenses.

The amount of equity in your assets.

Your present and future income.

Your ability to pay.

The potential for changed circumstances.

California’s tax agencies will not recommend approval of offers if there are assets or income available to pay more than the amount offered.

Can California’s tax agencies process your application?

Your offers will be evaluated independently by each agency. The BOE, FTB, and EDD have different criteria for participation in their OIC programs.

For all agencies, you must agree that you owe the amount of the liability. If you dispute the liability, you should appeal through the appropriate agency’s appeal process.

For FTB, your application will be processed if all of the required FTB income tax returns have been filed. If you have no filing requirement, note it on your application.

For both BOE and EDD, you must be out of business and must not have a controlling interest or an association with the business or a successor to the business that incurred the liability. This includes operating a business of the same nature.

For EDD, you cannot have access to income to pay more than the accumulating interest and 6.7 percent of the outstanding liability on an annual basis.

For EDD, an offer will not be considered for liabilities assessed for fraud or where the employer has been convicted of a violation under the California Unemployment Insurance Code.

For BOE, an offer for a liability with a fraud assessment will not be considered if there is a criminal conviction of fraud. For other fraud assessments, an offer will be considered if a minimum of the tax plus the fraud penalty is offered.

Are collections suspended?

Submitting an offer does not automatically suspend collection activity. Wage garnishments already in place at the time of the offer will continue and will not be considered as partial payment of the offered amount. However, in many cases, collection action will be suspended until the OIC evaluation is completed. If delaying collection activity jeopardizes California’s ability to collect, collection efforts may continue. Interest will continue to accrue as prescribed by law.

Will California’s tax agencies require you to continue payments on an Installment Agreement?

All the agencies require that you continue making periodic payments as called for in any existing installment agreement while your offer is being considered.

Call Mitchell A. Port, a California tax attorney, for help with your tax problems. Call (310) 559-5259.

March 2, 2009

California Income Taxes: Get Some Relief

The California Franchise Tax Board explains that if you meet certain legal requirements, you may qualify for relief of payment on all or part of your unpaid income tax balance. California's Franchise Tax Board will work with you to determine if you meet the requirements for relief. One approach is to complete and submit a "Request for Innocent Joint Filer Relief".

Speak to a licensed California tax attorney to discuss fixing your tax problems. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

February 26, 2009

How To Prepare Your Request To Appeal An IRS Decision

INTEREST AND PENALTIES DO NOT STOP ACCRUING WHEN YOU FILE YOUR REQUEST FOR APPEAL

Review the letter and publication(s) that were sent to you by the IRS. The information will usually be straight-forward and will say:

When the request must be received

How to prepare a request for an appeal (protest)

What information you need to include in the request for an appeal

Where to mail the request


For specific information appealing Collection issues, refer to the Collection page.

For specific information appealing Examination issues, refer to the Examination page.

Interest and certain penalties will continue to accrue during the Appeals process and during any subsequent Appeals to the Courts on any amount not paid. In order to stop the accrual of interest and penalties on proposed adjustments, refer to Notice 1016, How to Stop Interest. For an explanation on how to stop interest from accruing on an unpaid balance, refer to Publication 594, What You Should Know About the IRS Collection Process.

Call a California tax attorney for help with your IRS appeal. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

February 20, 2009

Read This Before Choosing A Tax Preparer

The IRS has some great tax tips for California's taxpayers. Take a look at a recent tax tip about selecting your tax preparer. Here's what it said:

You are legally responsible for what’s on your tax returns even if they are prepared by someone else. So, it’s important to find a qualified tax professional. If you will be paying someone to do your tax return, choose a tax preparer wisely.

The most reputable preparers will request to see your records and receipts and will ask you multiple questions to determine your total income and your qualifications for expenses, deductions, and other items. By doing so, they have your best interest in mind and are trying to help you avoid penalties, interest, or additional taxes that could result from later IRS contacts.

Most tax return preparers are professional, honest and provide excellent service to their clients; you can use the following tips to choose a preparer who will offer the best service for their tax preparation needs.

Find out what the service fees are before the return is prepared. Avoid preparers who base their fee on a percentage of the amount of your refund or who claim they can obtain larger refunds than other preparers.

Only use a tax professional that signs your tax return and provides you with a copy for your records.

Avoid tax preparers that ask you to sign a blank tax form.

Choose a tax preparer that will be around to answer questions after the return has been filed.
Ask questions. Do you know anyone who has used the tax professional? Were they satisfied with the service they received?

Check to see if the preparer has any questionable history with the Better Business Bureau, the state’s board of accountancy for CPAs or the state’s bar association for attorneys. Find out if the preparer belongs to a professional organization that requires its members to pursue continuing education and also holds them accountable to a code of ethics.

Determine if the preparer’s credentials meet your needs. Does your state have licensing or registration requirements for paid preparers? Is he or she an Enrolled Agent, Certified Public Accountant, or Attorney? If so, the preparer can represent taxpayers before the IRS on all matters – including audits, collections, and appeals. Other return preparers can represent taxpayers only in audits regarding a return signed as a preparer.

Before you sign your tax return, review it and ask questions.

Do you need a referral to qualified tax return preparers? Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259 and ask for that referral.

February 18, 2009

California's Program To Suspend LLCs For Noncompliance

Beginning now, California’s Franchise Tax Board (FTB) will take action which helps the FTB bring Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) into tax compliance and reduce the State's budget deficit.

Read more about this in the Los Angeles Times article from January 12, 2009.

California’s FTB and California’s Secretary of State (SOS) are working together to implement a suspension/forfeiture process for Limited Liability Companies (LLCs).

The FTB will suspend/forfeit the rights, powers and privileges of LLCs for non-payment of taxes, penalties, or interest, and/or failure to file a return (California’s Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 23301, 23301.5 and 23304.1(d)). The LLC suspension/forfeiture process will be very similar to the one for corporations.

Implementing the suspension/forfeiture process will have a dramatic effect on LLCs that have failed to meet their filing and payment obligations. We will send notification to all entities at their last known addresses, 60 days before imposing suspension/forfeiture.

Non-registered LLCs acting and filing in California will be subject to contract voidability. The reasons for contract voidability are the same as for suspension/forfeiture: failure to file a return, and/or failure to pay taxes, penalties, or interest.

Get help with compliance. Call a tax attorney licensed in California. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

February 12, 2009

Help For Financially Distressed Taxpayers From The IRS

If you are behind on tax payments there could be additional help available if you are facing an unusual hardship situation.

As the new tax filing season begins, the IRS is taking steps to help people who owe back taxes. The IRS can help in the following areas, to mention just a few:

Hardship Situation. Postponement of Collection Actions: IRS employees will have greater authority to suspend collection actions in hardship cases where you are unable to pay. If you recently lost a job or face other financial problems, IRS assistors may be able to suspend collection in some situations without documentation to minimize the burden on you.

Home Equity Values in Flux Result in An Additional Review for Offers in Compromise: An Offer in Compromise (OIC), an agreement between a taxpayer and the IRS that settles the taxpayer’s tax debt for less than full amount owed, may be a viable option for taxpayers experiencing economic difficulties. However, the equity taxpayers have in real property can be a barrier to an OIC being accepted. With the uncertainty in the housing market, the IRS recognizes that the real-estate valuations used to assess ability to pay are not necessarily accurate. So in instances where the accuracy of local real-estate valuations is in question or other unusual hardships exist, the IRS is creating a new, second review of the information to determine if accepting an offer is appropriate.

The IRS May Provide Added Flexibility Where Installment Agreement Payments Are Missed: The IRS is allowing more flexibility for individuals with existing Installment Agreements who have difficulty making payments because of a job loss or other financial hardship. Depending on the situation, the IRS may allow a skipped payment or a reduced monthly payment amount. If you are in this situation you should contact the IRS.

Speedier Levy Releases: The IRS will speed the delivery of levy releases by easing requirements on taxpayers who request expedited levy releases for hardship reasons. Taxpayers seeking expedited releases of levies to an employer or bank should contact the IRS number shown on the notice of levy to discuss available options. When calling, taxpayers requesting a levy release due to hardship should be prepared to provide the IRS with the fax number of the bank or employer processing the levy.

Prevention of Offer in Compromise Defaults: Taxpayers who are unable to meet the periodic payment terms of an accepted OIC will be able to contact the IRS office handling the offer for available options to help them avoid default.

To talk with a California tax attorney who can help solve your tax problem, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

February 10, 2009

Top Ten Business Entity Errors That Delay Processing Your California Tax Return

California's business owners now have easy access to solutions made available by the Franchise Tax Board in response to errors made when trying to fulfill their California tax obligations. Here's a partial list of how business owners in the counties of Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, Orange and Ventura - and throughout the rest of California - can make unintended mistakes that delay processing those tax returns:

Incorrect math calculations, or incomplete or missing documents

Return account periods overlap

Omitting or using incorrect entity identification numbers

Incomplete entity name

One lump sum payment sent for multiple entities, or multiple payments sent in the same package/envelope

Incorrect payment amount claimed

Multiple tax returns filed for the same account period

Amended returns not clearly identified as amended

Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) filing incorrect forms

Using an incorrect form for the tax year account period indicated on the return

For tax help, speak with a tax lawyer. Mitchell A. Port is a tax attorney located in Los Angeles who can fix the problem. Call (310) 559-5259.

January 27, 2009

Use The Taxpayer Advocate To Help Fix Your Tax Problem

The Taxpayer Advocate independently represents your interests and concerns within the Internal Revenue Service. The Taxpayer Advocate Service is an independent organization within the IRS whose employees assist taxpayers who believe that an IRS system or procedure is not working as it should, who are seeking help in resolving tax problems that have not been resolved through normal channels, or who are experiencing economic harm. The goals of the Taxpayer Advocate Service are to protect individual and business taxpayer rights and to reduce taxpayer burden. This is accomplished in two ways:

Identifying issues that increase burden or create problems for taxpayers: Bringing those issues to the attention of IRS management and making legislative proposals where necessary;

Ensuring that taxpayer problems which have not been resolved through normal channels, are promptly and fairly handled.

Need further help? Call a qualified California tax attorney - call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

January 23, 2009

Tax Humor?

“The hardest thing in the world to understand is the income tax.” — Albert Einstein, physicist

“I am proud to be paying taxes in the United States. The only thing is – I could be just as proud for half the money.” — Arthur Godfrey, entertainer

"Like mothers, taxes are often misunderstood, but seldom forgotten.'' — Lord Bramwell, 19th Century English jurist

“Income tax has made more liars out of the American people than golf.” — Will Rogers, humorist

"The power of taxing people and their property is essential to the very existence of government.'' — James Madison, U.S. President

"To tax and to please, no more than to love and to be wise, is not given to men." — Edmund Burke, 18th Century Irish political philosopher and British statesman

"No government can exist without taxation. This money must necessarily be levied on the people; and the grand art consists of levying so as not to oppress.'' — Frederick the Great, 18th Century Prussian king

"The best measure of a man's honesty isn't his income tax return. It's the zero adjust on his bathroom scale.'' — Arthur C. Clarke, author

“People who complain about taxes can be divided into two classes: men and women.”
— Unknown

"Next to being shot at and missed, nothing is really quite as satisfying as an income tax refund.” — F. J. Raymond, humorist

A tax loophole is "something that benefits the other guy. If it benefits you, it is tax reform.''
— Russell B. Long, U.S. Senator

"Few of us ever test our powers of deduction, except when filling out an income tax form.''
— Laurence J. Peter, author

“Taxation with representation ain’t so hot either.” — Gerald Barzan, humorist

“Where there is an income tax, the just man will pay more and the unjust less on the same amount of income.” — Plato

"Taxes are what we pay for civilized society.'' — Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., U.S. Supreme Court Justice

January 21, 2009

Tax Calculation Of Innocent Spouse's Share Of Income

California is a community property state which means most property acquired during the marriage (except for gifts or inheritances) is owned jointly by both spouses and is divided upon divorce, annulment or death. Joint ownership is automatically presumed by law in the absence of specific evidence that would point to a contrary conclusion for a particular piece of property.

In a recent Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision, the taxpayer claimed that in determining her share of the community property interest in order to calculate how much income to pay tax on, the IRS should have made the “separate tax formula allocation . . . upon the basis of the spouse who earned the income and not upon the basis of a community property split.”

The only disputed issue before the court was how the separate tax liability should be calculated—the taxpayer argued that it should be calculated based on the wages she personally earned, and the IRS argued that it should be calculated based on fifty percent of all community income.

The court simply held that the taxpayer's argument is not supported by the IRS's revenue rulings or any other legal authority. The court relied on Revenue Ruling 2004-74 which provides that tax is simply not calculated on the share of community income earned by just one spouse but instead is calculated on the 50% interest attributable to the spouse who live in a community property state (like California).

Do you qualify for innocent spouse relief? Speak with a California tax attorney who understands community property law. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

January 15, 2009

Substitute For Return

Simply not filing a federal tax return for your California business or for your income earned in California, be it a payroll tax return or a corporate tax return, or an individual income tax return doesn’t mean you or your California based business won’t be assessed a tax.

Internal Revenue Code Section 6020(b) is the authority given to the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service to prepare and process tax returns for non-filing business and individual taxpayers. If the tax returns prepared for you by the government are taxable, as they almost certainly will be, then a tax is assessed and collection efforts will be made.

Final regulations were recently issued by the Internal Revenue Service and they affect any person who fails to file a required federal tax return.

The final regulations relate to tax returns prepared or signed by the Commissioner or other Internal Revenue Officers or employees under Section 6020 of the Internal Revenue Code. The final regulations provide guidance for preparing a substitute for return under Section 6020(b).

IRC 6020(b) provides a way to prepare returns and secure assessments from non-filing taxpayers who:

Have an open filing requirement

Do not file a return as required

Speaking with the formality of final tax regulations, here’s what they say: “If any person required by the Internal Revenue Code or by the regulations to make a tax return, fails to make such return at the time prescribed for it, or makes, willfully or otherwise, a false, fraudulent or frivolous return, the Commissioner or other authorized Internal Revenue Officer or employee shall make such return from his own knowledge and from such information as he can obtain through testimony or otherwise. The Commissioner or other authorized Internal Revenue Officer or employee may make the tax return by gathering information and making computations through electronic, automated or other means to make a determination of the taxpayer’s tax liability.”

File your unfiled tax returns for your California business or for you personally. Negotiate with a tax attorney’s help how you can pay the tax and how much of it must be paid. Call Mitchell A. Port, an attorney formerly with the IRS, at (310) 559-5259.

January 13, 2009

Tax Calendar For California Businesses

Attention California small business owners: The 2009 IRS Tax Calendar for Small Businesses and the Self-Employed (Publication 1518) is now available in English and Spanish. The Tax Calendar is a handy resource to help small business owners meet their tax obligations. The twelve month wall calendar is packed with useful information on retirement plans, common tax filing dates, general business taxes, electronic filing and paying options, business publications and forms and a lot more.

Each page highlights different tax issues and tips that may be relevant to small-business owners.

Tax problems may nevertheless still come up in California and elsewhere. Call a tax attorney for help. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

January 9, 2009

Compliance With IRS Employment Tax Filings Gets Easier For Some Of California's Employers

To reduce burden on small employers many of whom do business in Los Angeles County, Ventura County, Santa Barbara County and Orange County California, the IRS has simplified the rules for filing employment tax returns to report social security, Medicare, and withheld federal income taxes. Certain employers must file Form 944, Employer’s ANNUAL Federal Tax Return, instead of Form 941, Employer’s QUARTERLY Federal Tax Return.

For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, employers who estimate that their annual employment tax liability will be $1,000 or less can contact the IRS to request filing Form 944 instead of Forms 941 for a taxable year. Instructions for filing Form 944 are here. Only upon request will the IRS send a notification letter to qualified employers confirming that they may file Form 944 for that taxable year. Once employers receive this notice they must file Form 944 and cannot file Forms 941 instead for a taxable year until they contact the IRS to change their filing requirement to Form 941 for that taxable year and receive confirmation that their filing requirement has been changed.

The IRS will issue guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin informing employers how they can contact the IRS to participate in the Form 944 Program and how they can elect out if they later decide that they want to file Forms 941 instead of Form 944. Under the 2006 regulations, employers were only eligible to opt out if they estimated that their employment tax liability would exceed the $1,000 threshold or if they wanted to e-file Forms 941 quarterly instead. Because the program is being made voluntary, beginning in tax year 2010, employers will be able to opt out for any reason if they follow procedures to be provided in future guidance.

For payroll tax issues, call tax attorney Mitchell A. Port for further information and help.

January 7, 2009

Californians Get Tax Lien Relief

Currently, there are more than 1 million federal tax liens outstanding tied to both real and personal property - many filed in California. The IRS issues more than 600,000 federal tax lien notices annually. Filing a Notice of Federal Tax Lien is a formal process by which the government makes a legal claim to property as security or payment for a tax debt. It serves as a public notice to other creditors that the government has a claim on the property. The federal tax lien will make it difficult to address financial problems you may be having about your home.

In a recent announcement, the IRS said:

"An expedited process that will make it easier for financially distressed homeowners to avoid having a federal tax lien block refinancing of mortgages or the sale of a home.

If taxpayers are looking to refinance or sell a home and there is a federal tax lien filed, there are options. Taxpayers or their representatives, such as their lenders, may request that the IRS make a tax lien secondary to the lien by the lending institution that is refinancing or restructuring a loan. Taxpayers or their representatives may request that the IRS discharge its claim if the home is being sold for less than the amount of the mortgage lien under certain circumstances.

The process to request a discharge or a subordination of a tax lien takes approximately 30 days after the submission of the completed application, but the IRS will work to speed those requests in wake of the economic downturn.

“We don’t want the IRS to be a barrier to people saving or selling their homes. We want to raise awareness of these lien options and to speed our decision-making process so people can refinance their mortgages or sell their homes,” said Doug Shulman, IRS commissioner.

“We realize these are difficult times for many Americans,” Shulman said. “We will ensure we have the resources in place to resolve these issues quickly and homeowners can complete their transactions.”

In some cases, a federal tax lien can be made secondary to another lien, such as a lending institution’s, if the IRS determines that taking a secondary position ultimately will help with collection of the tax debt. That process is called subordination. Taxpayers or their representatives may apply for a subordination of a federal tax lien if they are refinancing or restructuring their mortgage. Without lien subordination, taxpayers may be unable to borrow funds or reduce their payments. Lending institutions generally want their lien to have priority on the home being used as collateral.

To apply for a certificate of lien subordination, people must follow directions in Publication 784, How to Prepare an Application for a Certificate of Subordination of a Federal Tax Lien. Again, there is no form but there must be a typed letter of request and certain documentation. The request should be mailed to one of 40 Collection Advisory Groups nationwide. See Publication 4235, Collection Advisory Group Addresses, for address information.

Taxpayers or their representatives may apply for a certificate of discharge of a tax lien if they are giving up ownership of the property, such as selling the property, at an amount less than the mortgage lien if the mortgage lien is senior to the tax lien. The IRS may also issue a certificate of discharge in other circumstances if the taxpayer has sufficient equity in other assets, can substitute other assets, or is able to pay the IRS its equity in the property. Without a tax lien discharge, the taxpayer may be unable to complete the home ownership change and the ownership title will remain clouded.

To apply for a tax lien discharge, applicants must follow directions in Publication 783, Instructions on How to Apply for a Certificate of Discharge of a Federal Tax Lien. There is no form but there must be a typed letter of request and certain documentation. The request should be mailed to one of 40 Collection Advisory Groups nationwide. See Publication 4235 for address information.

The IRS also urges people to contact the agency’s Collection Advisory Group early in the home sale or refinancing process so that it can begin work on their requests. People sometimes delay informing lenders of the tax liens, which only serves to delay the transaction.

January 5, 2009

California Passes Mandatory Electronic Payment Law

New Section 19011.5 of the California Revenue & Taxation Code requires some taxpayers to make their tax payments using an electronic method which California calls “mandatory e-pay”.
There is a one percent penalty of the amount paid unless the failure to pay electronically was for reasonable cause and not willful neglect.

As a California tax attorney, I don’t know and the law remains unclear whether the penalty applies to those who are employees and who make regular tax payments by having employee withholding done by their employer.

In California, beginning January 1, 2009, personal income taxpayers whose tax liability is greater than $80,000 or who make an estimated tax or extension payment that exceeds $20,000 for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, must send the payment electronically. Once either of these conditions is met, all payments regardless of type, amount, or tax year must be remitted electronically by credit card, Electronic Funds Withdrawal (EFW), or web pay.

Taxpayers whose tax thresholds fall below the mandatory e-pay amounts may request to discontinue making electronic payments. In March 2009, the California Franchise Tax Board will provide a waiver form for taxpayers to file.

On December 1, the California Franchise Tax Board sent courtesy letters to taxpayers who made a payment in 2008 that could qualify them for mandatory e-pay. The letter informed these taxpayers of the law change, and that they may meet the mandatory e-pay threshold in 2009.

December 29, 2008

Checklist To Close Your California Business

When closing a business in California, there is much to do. Some of the following suggestions may require help from your tax attorney or CPA.

You must file an annual return for the year you go out of business. If you have employees, you must file the final employment tax returns, in addition to making final federal tax deposits of these taxes.

The annual tax return for a partnership, corporation, S corporation, limited liability company or trust includes check boxes near the top front page just below the entity information. For the tax year in which your business ceases to exist, check the box that indicates this tax return is a final return. If there are Schedule K-1s, repeat the same procedure on the Schedule K-1.

You will also need to file returns to report disposing of business property, reporting the exchange of like-kind property, and/or changing the form of your business. Below is a list of typical actions to take when closing a business, depending on your type of business structure:

Checklist

Make final federal tax deposits
Electronic Federal Tax Paying System (EFTPS)
OR
Form 8109-B

File final quarterly or annual employment tax form
Form 940, Employer's Annual Federal Unemployment (FUTA) Tax Return
Form 941, Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return
Form 943, Employer's Annual Tax Return for Agricultural Employees
Form 943-A, Agricultural Employer's Record of Federal Tax Liability

Issue final wage and withholding information to employees
Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement

Report information from W-2s issued
Form W-3, Transmittal of Income and Tax Statements

File final tip income and allocated tips information return
Form 8027, Employer's Annual Information Return of Tip Income and Allocated Tips

Report capital gains or losses
Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return
Form 1065, U.S. Partnership Return of Income
Form 1120 (Schedule D), Capital Gains and Losses

Report partner's/shareholder's shares
Form 1065 (Schedule K-1), Partner's Share of Income, Credits, Deductions, etc.
Form 1120S (Schedule K-1), Shareholder's Share of Income, Credits, Deductions, etc.

File final employee pension/benefit plan
Form 5500, Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan

Issue payment information to sub-contractors
Form 1099-MISC, Miscellaneous Income

Report information from 1099s issued
Form 1096, Annual Summary and Transmittal of U.S. Information Returns

Report corporate dissolution or liquidation
Form 966, Corporate Dissolution or Liquidation

Consider allowing S corporation election to terminate
Form 1120S, Instructions

Report business asset sales
Form 8594, Asset Acquisition Statement

Report the sale or exchange of property used in your trade or business
Form 4797, Sales of Business Property

Contact local and California state agencies.

Speak with a California business attorney about this and your other business questions. Call Mitchell A. Port.

December 15, 2008

Tax Treatment Of Investment Advisory Costs

The IRS provided interim guidance with regard to the application of the 2-percent floor under Internal Revenue Code section 67 to certain investment advisory fees. Specifically, the IRS notice provides that, for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2009, non-grantor trusts and estates will not be required to “unbundled” a fiduciary fee into portions consisting of costs that are fully deductible and costs that are subject to the 2-percent floor.

On January 16, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Michael J. Knight, Trustee of William L. Rudkin Testamentary Trust v. Commissioner, 552 U.S. ___, 128 S. Ct. 782 (2008), holding that costs paid to an investment advisor by a nongrantor trust or estate generally are subject to the 2-percent floor for miscellaneous itemized deductions under § 67(a).

The IRS and the Treasury Department expect to issue regulations under § 1.67-4 of the Income Tax Regulations consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in Knight. The regulations, however, will not be issued in time to be applicable to the 2008 taxable year.

December 11, 2008

California Tax Information For Same-Sex Married Couples

An advance draft copy of a California tax form for same-sex married couples is now available. It is subject to change and Franchise Tax Board (FTB) approval before it is officially released. This form includes the 2008 legislative changes. It will likely be released by the FTB as Publication 776.

This publication is primarily to assist same-sex married couples (SSMC) in filing their California income tax returns, if they have SSMC adjustments. The FTB has also included information about the legal history of SSMC and community property that may be useful in completing the return.

On June 20, 2008, the FTB issued NOTICE 2008-5 on the subject of California Income Tax Treatment and Tax Return Filing Obligations of Same-Sex Married Couples. The purpose of the Notice is to advise same-sex married couples of their California income tax treatment and tax return filing obligations resulting from the California Supreme Court's recent decision in In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757.

California's FTB has more information on same-sex married couples' tax obligations at its website.

December 4, 2008

Lost Your IRS Appeals Case? Now You Can Mediate And Arbitrate Your Defeat

Two new Appeals programs are available from the IRS:

Applicable in California (and elsewhere) is a two-year test of two programs referred to as the post-Appeals mediation and arbitration procedures for Offer in Compromise (OIC) and Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP).

Beginning Dec. 1, 2008, for a two-year test period, Appeals will offer post-Appeals mediation and arbitration for OIC and TFRP cases for taxpayers whose appeals are considered at the Appeals office in Atlanta, Ga.; Chicago, Ill.; Cincinnati, Ohio; Houston, Texas; Indianapolis, Ind.; Louisville, Ky.; Phoenix, Ariz.; and San Francisco, Calif.

Under these two alternative dispute resolution programs, the taxpayer or Appeals may request nonbinding mediation. The taxpayer may decline Appeals’ request for mediation. Appeals will evaluate a taxpayer’s request for mediation based on the criteria detailed in Revenue Procedure 2002-44 and Announcement 2008-111. A request for binding arbitration must be made jointly by the taxpayer and Appeals. The mediation and arbitration procedures do not create any additional authority for settlement by Appeals.

During the test period, Appeals employees will advise the taxpayer of the availability of these alternative dispute strategies and the deadline for timely requesting such strategies when a rejection of an OIC is sustained or a proposed TFRP assessment is sustained. An OIC submitted during Collection Due Process (CDP) as an alternative to a Collection action is not eligible for these alternative dispute resolution strategies during the test period.


The Post-Appeals mediation process is available for both legal and factual issues. The mediator’s role is to facilitate settlement negotiations so the parties can reach their own agreement. The mediator does not have settlement authority over any issue.

The Arbitration procedure is available for factual issues only. The arbitrator’s role is to hear both sides of a disputed issue and then render a decision on the specific factual issue being arbitrated. This decision is binding on both parties. However, the arbitrator does not have the authority to decide that the offer in compromise itself must be accepted or that a person is/is not liable for the TFRP under § 6672. Neither party may appeal the decision of the arbitrator or contest the decision in any judicial proceeding.

Complete procedures for initiating a request for post-Appeals mediation or arbitration are in Announcement 2008-111. The agency will seek appropriate Offer in Compromise and Trust Fund Recovery Penalty cases for both post-Appeals mediation and arbitration during the two-year test period in order to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution for these cases.

Call a California tax attorney to assist in preserving your rights when it comes to resolving your tax problems. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

November 21, 2008

IRS Sells Real And Personal Property At Government Auctions

Unpaid individual income taxes and other unpaid federal taxes may be satisfied by the sale of property seized by the IRS.

Under authority of the Internal Revenue Code, the property described in the IRS website has been seized or acquired for nonpayment of internal revenue taxes and will be sold. The IRS posts legal notices covering the nature of title, redemption rights, effect of junior encumbrances, title offered, and forms of payment before making a bid.

The types of property sold are listed under the headings below and each state in the U.S. may contain some or all of these types of property for sale.

Internet Domain Names

Real Estate

Real Estate - Seeking Guaranteed Bids

Antiques, Art, Jewelry, Collectibles and Luxury Items

Misc. Property - Quick Notice Sales - Seeking Bidders

Household Goods - Personal Property

Commercial/Industrial Property, Equipment and Supplies

Financial Instruments, Notes, Patents

Automobiles, Motorcycles, Trucks and Boats

Liquor Licenses

Don't let your tax liability go unpaid. Call a California tax attorney for help. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

November 11, 2008

Internal Revenue Bulletins

The Internal Revenue Bulletin (IRB) is the authoritative instrument of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conventions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins, which are sold on a single-copy basis.

It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all substantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, modify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin.

All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indicated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal management are not published; however, statements of internal practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of taxpayers are published.

Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory requirements.

Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations, court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered, and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.

The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:

Part I.—1986 Code.

Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.

Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.

Part IV.—Items of General Interest.

Interested in knowing more about how the IRS works? Call a tax attorney with experience working with the IRS. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

November 7, 2008

Billions in Federal Payroll Taxes Owed

The Government Accounting Office (GAO) was asked to review and report on the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) processes and procedures to prevent and collect unpaid payroll taxes. Specifically, GAO was asked to determine (1) the magnitude of unpaid federal payroll tax debt, (2) the factors affecting IRS’s ability to enforce compliance or pursue collections, and (3) whether some businesses with unpaid payroll taxes are engaged in abusive or potentially criminal activities with regard to the federal tax system.Over 1.6 million businesses owed over $58 billion in unpaid federal payroll taxes, including interest and penalties as of September 30, 2007. Payroll taxes consist of your income tax withheld, social security and Medicare contributions, and the employer’s contributions.

Some of these businesses “abuse” the federal tax system and took advantage of the existing tax enforcement and administration system to avoid fulfilling or paying federal tax obligations. Over a quarter of payroll taxes are owed by businesses with more than 3 years (12 tax quarters) of unpaid payroll taxes. Some of these business owners repeatedly accumulated tax debt from multiple businesses. For example, the IRS found 18 individuals were responsible for not remitting payroll taxes for a dozen different businesses and over 1,500 individuals to be responsible for nonpayment of payroll taxes at three or more businesses.

IRS has not always promptly filed liens against businesses to protect the government's interests and has not always taken timely action to hold responsible parties personally liable for unpaid payroll taxes.

Although IRS has tools at its disposal to prevent the further accumulation of unpaid payroll taxes and to collect the taxes that are owed, IRS's current approach does not provide for their full, effective use. IRS's overall approach to collection focuses primarily on gaining voluntary compliance - even for egregious payroll tax offenders - a practice that can result in minimal or no actual collections for these offenders.

If your business has payroll tax problems you are at risk of the IRS putting you out of business, and assessing the trust fund recovery penalty resulting in owners, and officers having substantial personal tax liability. If you would like assistance in dealing with these, and other types of tax problems contact Los Angeles tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

November 5, 2008

Medical Students As Employees: Does Employer Pay FICA?

The University of Chicago Hospitals (“UCH”) brought a refund action (in an appeal entitled "University of Chicago v. USA", Case No. 07-3686, decided October 29, 2008 by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals) against the United States to recover taxes it paid in 1995 and 1996 under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (“FICA”), §§ 3101-3128, on behalf of its medical residents. UCH maintained it was entitled to a refund because its residents qualified for the “student exception” from FICA tax under the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”), 26 U.S.C. § 3121(b)(10), and the controlling Treasury Regulation in place during the relevant time period, § 31.3121(b)(10)-2.

After the IRS took no action in response to the refund claim, UCH filed this refund action, seeking $5,572,705 it had paid in FICA contributions for its residents in those years.

The district court agreed initially to entertain the government’s motion on the question of whether medical residents are categorically not “students” under § 3121(b)(10) and therefore not exempt from FICA tax as a matter of law. If the answer to this question was “no”—that is, if residents may qualify for the student exception—then the case would proceed on the question of whether UCH’s residents were students within the meaning of § 3121(b)(10).

The district court rejected the government’s argument that residents were per se ineligible for the student exception.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted the government’s petition and affirmed the U.S. District Court holding that the student exception under § 3121(b)(10) is not per se inapplicable to medical residents as a matter of law; rather, a case-by- case analysis is required to determine whether medical residents qualify for the statutory exemption from FICA taxation. The implementing Treasury Regulation applicable at the time set forth a method for determining eligibility for the student exception— one that focused on the character of the employing organization as a school, college, or university and the relationship of the employee-student to that organization. This necessarily implies a case-specific analysis, not a categorical ineligibility for certain classes of employee-students.

Have a FICA tax problem? Speak with a Los Angeles tax attorney about it and call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

November 3, 2008

The IRS Mission

Simply put:

"Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all."

In carrying out its mission, the IRS creates tax problems for which you may need help from a qualified tax attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 and discuss how to fix your tax trouble.

October 29, 2008

California Employers: Do You Have Independent Contractors Or Employees?

Both California employers and California workers can ask the IRS to make a determination on whether a specific individual is an independent contractor or an employee by filing a Form SS-8, Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding, with the IRS. To read other articles on the topic of independent contractor, see previous blog entries by clicking here and here.

Are your workers independent contractors or employees? For more information, see the IRS website by clicking here.

October 8, 2008

IRS E-mails

WARNING: be on the alert for phone calls and e-mails you may receive claiming to come from the IRS or other federal agency and which mention your tax refund or economic stimulus payment. A scam is likely to be in the making. The scam’s purpose is to obtain personal and financial information — such as your Social Security number, name, credit card or even PIN numbers and bank account information to use to commit identity theft. The e-mails and calls usually state that the IRS needs the information to process a refund or stimulus payment or deposit it into the taxpayer's bank account. The e-mails often contain links or attachments to what appears to be the IRS Web site or an IRS "refund application form." Don’t be fooled no matter how genuine in appearance.

The IRS does not send taxpayers e-mails about their tax accounts. Additionally, the way to get a tax refund or stimulus payment, or to arrange for a direct deposit, is to file a tax return.

Read more about identity theft and suspicious IRS e-mails.

October 6, 2008

What New California Business Owners Need To Know About Federal Taxes

California businesses often start out small. As a new business owner you need to know your federal tax responsibilities. Here are links to basic federal tax information for start-up businesses. Links are also provided to help in making certain business decisions. The list is not all-inclusive. Other steps may be appropriate for your specific type of business such as contacting a qualified California business attorney who can help.

Is it a Business or a Hobby?

Selecting a Business Structure

Employer Identification Number (EIN)

Business Taxes

Recordkeeping

When Do I Start My Tax Year?

Selecting an Accounting Method

Checklist for Starting a Business

Establishing a Retirement Plan

Small Business Publications

Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 to discuss your California-based business.

October 3, 2008

California Worker Status: Employee or Independent Contractor

About a year and a half ago, I asked: What are the consequences of treating an employee as an independent contractor? Now, I ask: Are your California workers independent contractors or employees?

Knowing the proper worker classification can be critical to your business. Don’t guess. Act now to make certain you know for sure.

How you answer that question can have a significant impact on how much tax you pay as a California business owner. Whether your workers who may be based in Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County or Orange County are or are not independent contractors will affect the amount of taxes you must withhold from their pay. It will affect how much additional cost your business must bear to conform to California’s labor code and other laws, what documents and information those workers must provide to you, and what tax documents you must give to them.

California employers who erroneously classify workers as independent contractors can end up with large tax liabilities as well as penalties and interest for failing to pay employment taxes and failing to file required tax forms. Workers can avoid higher taxes and lost benefits if they know their proper status.

By filing a Form SS-8, Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding, with the Internal Revenue Service, both employers and workers can ask the IRS to make a determination on whether a specific individual is an independent contractor or an employee.

Generally, whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee depends on how much control you have as the owner. Your California workers are most likely employees if you have the right to control or direct not only what is to be done but also how it is to be done. If you can direct or control only the result of the work done, and not the means and methods of accomplishing the result, then your workers are probably independent contractors.

Three broad characteristics are used by the IRS to determine the relationship between businesses and workers - Financial Control, Behavioral Control and the Type of Relationship. Financial Control covers facts that show whether the business has a right to direct or control the financial and business aspects of the worker's job. Behavioral Control covers facts that show whether the business has a right to direct or control how the work is done through instructions, training, or other means. The Type of Relationship factor relates to how the workers and the business owner perceive their relationship.

Learn more about the determination of a worker’s status as an Independent Contractor or Employee at IRS.gov by selecting the Small Business link. Additional resources include IRS Publication 15-A, Employer's Supplemental Tax Guide, and Publication 1779, Independent Contractor or Employee.

October 1, 2008

IRS Enforcement Improving

The IRS seems to be growing more effective with enforcement in a number of key areas. The IRS is improving in areas important to maintaining an efficient and fair tax system while collecting billions of additional tax dollars. At the same time, the IRS says it continues to improve service to you and me.

Enforcement by the IRS increased in fiscal year 2007. For example, during 2007 the IRS audited 84 percent more returns of individuals with incomes of $1 million or more than during 2006. Overall, enforcement revenue reached $59.2 billion, up from $48.7 billion in 2006 and nearly $34.1 billion in 2002.

Highlights of the enforcement and services numbers for fiscal year 2007, which ended on September 30, include:

Individuals

The IRS filed 3.8 million levies and almost 700,000 tax liens during 2007, an increase from the previous year and a substantial increase from five years earlier.

Audit rates increased in 2007, both for overall individual rates and for higher-income taxpayers.

Overall, the total individual returns audited increased by 7 percent to 1,384,563 in 2007 from 1,293,681 in 2006. That’s the highest number since 1998.

One out of 11 individuals with incomes of $1 million or more faced an audit in 2007. Audits of individuals with incomes of $1 million or more increased from 17,015 during fiscal year 2006 to 31,382 during fiscal year 2007, an increase of 84 percent.

Audits of individuals with incomes over $200,000 reached 113,105 returns, up 29.2 percent from the prior year total of 87,885.

The IRS increased audits of individual returns with income of $100,000 or more, auditing 293,188 of these returns in 2007, up 13.7 percent from last year’s total of 257,851.

Businesses

With businesses, the IRS reviewed more tax returns of flow-through entities – S corporations and partnerships. Statistically, the IRS has placed more emphasis in the area of these flow-through returns. Though large corporate audits are slightly fewer, the Service has increased its focus on mid-market corporations – those with assets between $10 million and $50 million dollars.

Audits of businesses in general rose to 59,516, an increase of almost 14 percent from the prior year’s total of 52,223.

Audits of S Corporations increased to 17,681 during 2007, up 26 percent from the prior year’s total of 13,984.

Audits of partnerships increased to 12,195 during 2007, up almost 25 percent from the prior year’s total of 9,777.

Audits of mid-market corporations increased to 4,473, up 6 percent from last year’s total of 4,218.

Although the audits of large corporations declined slightly in 2007 to 9,644 audits, the number of audits is up 14 percent from the fiscal year 2002 level.

Taxpayer Services

More people visited the IRS internet site, IRS.gov. The IRS site was accessed more than 217 million times in 2007, up more than 10.5 percent from the same period in 2006.

The IRS helped more taxpayers find out about their refunds through the agency’s internet-based system ‘Where’s my Refund?’ The system was accessed 32.1 million times during 2007, up 30 percent from last year’s usage of 24.7 million.

The agency held a 94 percent customer satisfaction rating for its toll-free telephone service.

As in the prior year, the IRS accuracy was 91 percent on tax law questions answered through its toll-free telephone service.

More taxpayers chose to file electronically in 2007 than during the prior year, with 57 percent of individual tax filers choosing to e-file in 2007, up from 54 percent in 2006.

Have a problem with the Internal Revenue Service or California State tax agencies? Call a tax attorney - call Mitchell A. Port for tax help.

September 29, 2008

Know Your Tax Responsibilities As An Employer

California employers can outsource some of their payroll and related tax duties to a third-party payroll service. They can help assure deposit requirements with federal and California state authorities and filing deadlines are met.

Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County and Orange County California employers who outsource some or all of their payroll responsibilities should consider the following:

For the employer’s protection, employers should ask the payroll service provider if they have a fiduciary bond in place. This could protect the employer in the event of default.

If there are issues with an account, the IRS will send correspondence to the employer at the address of record. The IRS suggests that the employer does not change their address of record to that of the payroll service provider as it may significantly limit the employer’s ability to be informed of tax matters involving their business.

The employer is ultimately responsible for the deposit and payment of federal and California tax liabilities. Even though the third-party is making the deposits, the employer is the responsible party. If the third-party fails to make the federal tax payments, the IRS may assess penalties and interest on the employer’s account. The employer is liable for all taxes, penalties and interest due. The employer may also be held personally liable for certain unpaid federal taxes.

Employers should ensure that their service providers are using EFTPS (Electronic Federal Tax Payment System) so the employer can confirm payments made on their behalf. Everyone should use EFTPS and Treasury regulations require electronic payment for payroll taxes over $200,000 in a calendar year. EFTPS maintains a business’s payment history for 16 months and can be viewed on-line after enrollment. In addition, EFTPS allows employers to make any additional tax payments that their third-party provider is not making on their behalf such as estimated tax payments. The IRS recommends employers verify EFTPS payments as part of their bank account reconciliation process.

For payroll and other tax problems, contact Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559.5259.

September 25, 2008

Extension Of Time To File Estate Tax Return Not Extension Of Time To Pay Tax

A recently decided court case, Baccei v. United States, highlights the adverse consequences when an estate fails to follow instructions in obtaining an extension of time to pay.

The decedent died in September, 2005. Her estate consisted mainly of real estate. Her nephew was the executor of her estate and the trustee of her revocable trust.

The executor, through his attorney, retained an accountant to prepare the Federal estate tax return.

In June, 2006, the accountant filed Form 4768, requesting an automatic 6-month extension of time to file the estate tax return.

Form 4768 consists of four parts:

Part I, "Identification," requests information identifying the estate. The accountant completed Part I.

Part II, "Extension of Time to File Form 706, 706-A, 706-NA, or 706-QDT (Section 6081)" contains boxes to check to show for which return the estate is claiming an extension of time to file. The accountant completed Part II.

Part III is captioned "Extension of Time to Pay (Section 6161)," and requests a written statement explaining why the estate cannot pay the tax in full, and the extension date requested (not more than 12 months). The accountant did not complete Part III.

Part IV, "Payment to Accompany Extension Request," contains three lines. Line 1 is for the estimated amount of tax due. Line 2 is for the cash shortage (with an instruction to complete Part III.) Line 3 is for the balance due (with an instruction to subtract line 2 from line 1). The accountant completed Part IV.

The accountant filed the extension with a cover letter. The estate timely filed the estate tax return on extension. The return showed estate tax of over one and a half million dollars, which the estate paid with the return. The IRS asserted a sizeable late payment penalty which the estate paid and then sought a refund claiming that it had timely applied for an extension of time to pay the estate tax, and had established reasonable cause.

The court held for the government, saying that the estate did not request an extension of time to pay because Part III was not completed, and that neither the Form 4768 nor the cover letter specified the date to which an extension of time to pay the tax was requested.

The court noted that the statutes and regulations make a clear distinction between extensions of time to file and extensions of time to pay.

A 6-month extension of time to file is automatic - provided the Form 4768 is timely filed.

An extension of time to pay is discretionary, and can be requested for up to 12 months at a time. While the same Form 4768 can be used to request both extensions, they are nevertheless separate extensions.

September 22, 2008

Tax Fraud Or Tax Avoidance?

The Difference Between Legal Tax Avoidance and Illegal Tax Evasion

“Anyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the treasury. There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes. Over and over again the Courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: Taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.”

The IRS has a very interesting and detailed description of the types of tax problems people often either intentionally or negligently get involved with. You can read the entire article here but you can see the topics that are discussed below.

Nonfiler Enforcement

Money Laundering

Corporate Fraud

General Tax Fraud

Employment Tax Enforcement

Abusive Tax Schemes

Abusive Return Preparer

Tax Scams - How to Recognize and Avoid Them

All About Criminal Investigation (CI)

Program and Emphasis Areas for Criminal Investigation

Report Suspected Tax Fraud Activity

IRS Wants You to Know About Schemes, Scams and Cons

Civil tax problems? Speak with Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

September 12, 2008

Fix Your Tax Problem By Meeting With The IRS

IRS Taxpayer Assistance Centers (TAC) in California are your source for personal tax help when you believe your tax issue cannot be handled online or by phone, and you want face-to-face tax assistance.

The local California Taxpayer Assistance Center is a place where you can spread out your records and talk with an IRS representative across the counter. No appointment is necessary - just walk in. If you prefer, you may call a local number (see chart, below) to learn about available and alternate services, and to reschedule appointments with IRS personnel. If you have an ongoing, complex tax account problem or a special need, such as a disability, an appointment may be requested. All other issues will be handled without an appointment.

Continue reading "Fix Your Tax Problem By Meeting With The IRS" »

September 10, 2008

Complaints Against California Tax Attorneys

Complaints Against Enrolled Professionals

California's taxpayers who have a complaint against their attorney, accountant, enrolled agent or other practitioners who are specifically permitted to practice before the IRS can submit their complaints in writing in a letter format. The letter should include the tax practitioner's name, address, telephone number, designation (i.e., attorney, certified public accountant, enrolled agent, enrolled actuary, etc.), a detailed description of the allegations, and any documents that support those allegations.

Direct all referrals to:

Internal Revenue Service
Office of Professional Responsibility
SE:OPR, Room 7238/IR
1111 Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20224

You can send it by facsimile at 202-622-2207

Complaints Against Unenrolled Tax Return Preparers

Complaints against unenrolled tax return preparers can be reported by completing Form 3949-A and mailing it or a letter with similar information to Internal Revenue Service, Fresno, CA 93888.

For additional information, you may refer to Complaints Against Tax Professionals Frequently Asked Questions.

If you have questions concerning an allegation, you may email the IRS at OPR@irs.gov.

September 1, 2008

Willful Failure To Pay Over Employee Payroll Taxes

A conviction for willful failure to pay over employee payroll taxes is affirmed where “willfulness” does not require the government to prove that a defendant had the ability to meet his tax obligations.

In a decision made on August 22, 2008 by the federal court of appeals covering California (the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals), the court stated:

This case illustrates the enduring truth of Ben Franklin’s sage observation that “nothing is certain but death and taxes.” It is an appeal from a conviction for willful failure to pay over employee payroll taxes, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7202. The defendant-appellant, Jack Easterday, sought an “ability to pay instruction” in order to contend to the jury that his failure to pay over the taxes he owed was not “willful,” because he had spent the money on other business expenses and therefore could not pay it to the government when it was due. The district court refused to give the instruction, and Easterday subsequently was convicted and sentenced to thirty months in prison.

Payroll tax problems can have serious consequences. Consult with a qualified tax attorney about your tax problem. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

August 28, 2008

Tax Relief For Mortgage Debt Forgiven

There is now tax relief for homeowners. In a news brief issued by the IRS for the benefit of those with troubled loans, the government now says that if your mortgage debt is partly or entirely forgiven during 2007, 2008 or 2009 you may be able to claim special tax relief by filling out Form 982 and attaching it to your federal income tax return for that year. Usually, forgiveness of debt results in taxable income. However, under the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007, you may be able to exclude from tax up to $2 million of debt forgiven on your primary residence. The limit is $1 million for a married person filing a separate return.

Debt reduced through mortgage restructuring, as well as mortgage debt forgiven in connection with a foreclosure, may qualify for this relief. The debt must have been used to buy, build or substantially improve your principal residence and must have been secured by that residence. Debt used to refinance qualifying debt is also eligible for the exclusion, but only up to the amount of the old mortgage principal, just before the refinancing.

Debt forgiven on second homes, rental property, business property, credit cards or car loans does not qualify for the new tax-relief provision. In some cases, however, other kinds of tax relief, based on insolvency, for example, may be available.

If you have other federal or California state tax problems, speak with a qualified tax attorney about finding a solution. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

August 15, 2008

Innocent Spouse: What Are The Tests?

The IRS issued a revenue procedure which lists the various factors necessary to satisfy to obtain equitable relief as an innocent spouse.

If you have a tax problem, and believe that you maybe qualify for innocent spouse relief contact the Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

August 1, 2008

Scammers Use Fax and Email To Pose As IRS

In May and June alone, taxpayers reported almost 700 separate phishing incidents to the IRS.

The most common scams involve tax refunds and, this year, economic stimulus payments. The Internal Revenue Service cautions taxpayers to be on the lookout for a new wave of scams using the IRS name in identity theft e-mails, or phishing, that have circulated during the last two months.

The IRS has an interesting news article where the full details are available.

Here is a part of the article:

How Scams Work

"To lure their victims, phishing scams use the name of a known institution, such as the IRS, to either offer a reward for taking a simple action, such as providing information, or threaten or imply an unpleasant consequence, such as losing a refund, for failing to take the requested action.

"The goal of the scams is to trick people into revealing personal and financial information, such as Social Security, bank account or credit card numbers, which the scammers can use to commit identity theft.

"Typically, identity thieves use a victim’s personal and financial data to empty the victim’s financial accounts, run up charges on the victim’s existing credit cards, apply for new loans, credit cards, services or benefits in the victim’s name, file fraudulent tax returns or even commit crimes. Most of these fraudulent activities can be committed electronically from a remote location, including overseas. Committing these activities in cyberspace allows scammers to act quickly and cover their tracks before the victim becomes aware of the theft.

"People whose identities have been stolen can spend months or years — and their hard-earned money — cleaning up the mess thieves have made of their reputations and credit records. In the meantime, victims may lose job opportunities or may be refused loans, education, housing or cars."

Topics in the article also include:

Refund e-Mail Scam

Tax Court Scam

Economic Stimulus Payments Scam

Company Report Scam

Substitute Form 1040 Fax Scam

What to Do

Do you have other tax problems with the IRS or California tax authorities? If so, speak with Mitchell A. Port, a tax attorney in Los Angeles, about your concerns.

July 30, 2008

Tax Questions And Answers

The Internal Revenue Service has a general questions and answers section you can read in detail here. Each year the IRS updates the answers to reflect the latest changes in tax regulations. These questions and answers came from taxpayers like you.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. IRS Procedures

1.1. General Procedural Questions

1.2. Address Changes

1.3. Amended Returns & Form 1040X

1.4. Code, Revenue Procedures, Regulations, Letter Rulings

1.5. Collection Procedural Questions

1.6. Copies & Transcripts

1.7. Extensions

1.8. Forms & Publications

1.9. Injured Spouse

1.10. Name Changes & Social Security Number Matching Issues

1.11. Notices & Letters

1.12. Refund Inquiries

1.13. Reporting Fraud

1.14. Signing the Return

1.15. W–2 - Additional, Incorrect, Lost, Non-receipt, Omitted

1.16. W–4 - Allowances, Excess FICA, Students, Withholding

2. Filing Requirements/Status/Dependents/Exemptions

2.1. Filing Requirements

2.2. Filing Status

2.3. Dependents & Exemptions

3. Itemized Deductions/Standard Deductions

3.1. Autos, Computers, Electronic Devices (Listed Property)

3.2. Education & Work-Related Expenses

3.3. Gifts & Charitable Contributions

3.4. Interest, Investment, Money Transactions (Alimony, Bad Debts, Applicable Federal Interest Rate, Gambling, Legal Fees, Loans, etc.)

3.5. 5. Medical, Nursing Home, Special Care Expenses

3.6. 6. Real Estate (Taxes, Mortgage Interest, Points, Other Property Expenses)

3.7. 7. Other Deduction Questions

4. Interest/Dividends/Other Types of Income

4.1. 1099–DIV Dividend Income

4.2. 1099–INT Interest Income

4.3. 1099–MISC, Independent Contractors, and Self-employed

4.4. 1099 Information Returns (All Other)

4.5. Alimony, Child Support, Court Awards, Damages

4.6. Employee Reimbursements, Form W–2, Wage Inquiries

4.7. Gifts & Inheritances

4.8. Grants, Scholarships, Student Loans, Work Study

4.9. Life Insurance & Disability Insurance Proceeds

4.10. Ministers' Compensation & Housing Allowance

4.11. Savings Bonds

4.12. Tips

5. Pensions/Annuities/Retirement Plans (i.e., 401(k), etc.)

5.1. General/Taxability Issues including Distributions, Early Withdrawals, 10% Additional Tax, Defaulted Loans

5.2. Rollovers

5.3. Types of Plans

5.4. Plan Operations

5.5. Plan Design

5.6. Correcting Plan Errors

6. Social Security Income

6.1. Back Payments

6.2. Regular & Disability Benefits

6.3. Survivors' Benefits

7. Child Care Credit/Other Credits

7.1. Child and Dependent Care Credit & Flexible Benefit Plans

7.2. Child Tax Credit

7.3. Credit for the Elderly or the Disabled

7.4. Hope & Life Time Learning Educational Credits

7.5. Other Credits

8. Earned Income Tax Credit

8.1. Qualifying Child Rules

8.2. Taxable & Nontaxable Income

8.3. Other EITC Issues

9. Estimated Tax

9.1. Businesses

9.2. Farmers & Fishermen

9.3. Individuals

9.4. Large Gains, Lump-sum Distributions, etc.

9.5. Penalty Questions

10. Capital Gains, Losses/Sale of Home

10.1. Property (Basis, Sale of Home, etc.)

10.2. Stocks (Options, Splits, Traders)

10.3. Mutual Funds (Costs, Distributions, etc.)

10.4. Losses (Homes, Stocks, Other Property)

11. Sale or Trade of Business, Depreciation, Rentals

11.1. Depreciation & Recapture

11.2. Rental Expenses versus Passive Activity Losses (PALs)

11.3. Personal Use of Business Property (Condo, Timeshare, etc.)

11.4. Sales, Trades, Exchanges

12. Small Business/Self-Employed/Other Business

12.1. Entities: Sole Proprietor, Partnership, Limited Liability Company/Partnership (LLC/LLP), Corporation, Subchapter S Corporation

12.2. Form 1099–MISC & Independent Contractors

12.3. Form W–2, FICA, Medicare, Tips, Employee Benefits

12.4. Form W–4 & Wage Withholding

12.5. Form SS–4 & Employer Identification Number (EIN)

12.6. Forms 941, 940, Employment Taxes

12.7. Income & Expenses

12.8. Schedule C & Schedule SE

12.9. Starting or Ending a Business

13. Aliens and U.S. Citizens Living Abroad

13.1. Canadian & U.S. Tax Issues

13.2. Exchange Rate

13.3. Foreign Income & Foreign Income Exclusion

13.4. Nonresident Alien - General

13.5. Nonresident Alien - Tax Withholding

13.6. Nonresident Alien - Students

13.7. U.S. Citizens Overseas

13.8. Other

14. Electronic Filing (e-file)

14.1. Age/Name/SSN Rejects, Errors, Correction Procedures

14.2. Amended Returns

14.3. Due Dates & Extension Dates for e-file

14.4. Forms W–2 & Other Attachments

15. Magnetic Media Filers

16. Other (Alternative Minimum Tax, Estates, Trusts, Tax Shelters, State Tax Inquiries)

17. Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs)

17.1. Distributions, Early Withdrawals, 10% Additional Tax

17.2. Rollovers

17.3. Roth IRA

17.4. Traditional IRA

Are you in tax trouble with any of these federal compliance procedures? Talk to a professional: talk with tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

July 28, 2008

Withholding Compliance

As a California business person, have you asked yourself any of the questions below concerning employees and their tax for which you may be responsible in part? The IRS has the answers to these question on its website at IRS.gov.

Here are the questions:

As an employee, what happens if the IRS determines that I do not have adequate withholding?

If an employer no longer has to submit Forms W-4 claiming complete exemption from withholding or claiming more than 10 allowances, how does the IRS determine adequate withholding?

If the IRS determines that an employee does not have enough federal income tax withheld, what will an employer be asked to do?

As an employer who has received a modification letter (letter 2808C) from the WHC program, do I wait for another 60 days to change the marital status and/or number of allowances per the modification letter?

I have been directed to lock in an employee’s withholding. What happens if I do not lock in the employee’s withholding as directed?

As an employer, after I lock in withholding on an employee based on a lock-in letter from the IRS, what do I do if I receive a revised Form W-4 from the employee?

Our employees can submit or change their Forms W-4 on line. How can I prevent them from changing their Forms W-4 after they have been locked-in by the IRS?

What should I do if an employee submits a valid Form W-4 that appears to be claiming an incorrect withholding amount?

What do I do if an employee hands me a substitute Form W-4 developed by the employee?

I heard my employer no longer has to routinely submit Forms W-4 to the IRS. How will this affect me as an employee?

What if I don’t want to submit a Form W-4 to my employer?

What do I do if an employee hands me an official IRS Form W-4 that is clearly altered?

In the past, as an employer, I was required to submit all Forms W-4 that claimed complete exemption from withholding (when $200 or more in weekly wages were regularly expected) or claimed more than 10 allowances. What Forms W-4 do I now have to submit to the IRS?

Tax problems? Would you like tax help? Tax compliance a problem? Want to settle with the IRS? Call Los Angeles tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

July 21, 2008

IRS Enforcement Getting Better

Don’t have tax problems or need tax help at the moment? California’s taxpayers beware: the IRS continues to make progress in a number of key enforcement areas. The IRS is showing improvements in areas critical to maintaining a fair, efficient tax system while bringing billions of additional dollars into the Treasury.

The IRS enforcement efforts increased again in fiscal year 2007. For instance, during 2007 the IRS audited 84 percent more returns of individuals with incomes of $1 million or more than during 2006. Overall, enforcement revenue reached $59.2 billion, up from $48.7 billion in 2006 and nearly $34.1 billion in 2002.

Highlights of the enforcement and services numbers for fiscal year 2007, which ended on September 30, include:

Individuals

• Audit rates increased in 2007, both for overall individual rates and for higher-income taxpayers.

• The IRS filed 3.8 million levies and almost 700,000 liens during 2007, an increase from the previous year and a substantial increase from five years earlier.

• Audits of individuals with incomes of $1 million or more increased 84 percent. One out of 11 individuals with incomes of $1 million or more faced an audit in 2007.

• Overall, the total individual returns audited increased by 7 percent. That’s the highest number since 1998.

• Audits of individuals with incomes over $200,000 reached 113,105 returns, up 29.2 percent from the prior year.

• The IRS increased audits of individual returns with income of $100,000 or more, up 13.7 percent from last year’s total.

Businesses

In the business arena, the IRS continued efforts to review more returns of flow-through entities – partnerships and S Corporations. Our business numbers reflect that we have placed more emphasis in the growing area of these flow-through returns. While large corporate audits are down slightly, we have increased our focus on mid-market corporations – those with assets between $10 million and $50 million dollars. The IRS enforcement budget in 2007 was similar to the budget in 2006, and in times of flat budgets, the agency cannot increase activity across the board but must address the areas where there is growth and potential risk.

• Audits of S Corporations increased to 17,681 during 2007, up 26 percent from the prior year.

• Audits of partnerships increased to 12,195 during 2007, up almost 25 percent.

• Audits of mid-market corporations increased to 4,473, up 6 percent from last year.

• Audits of businesses in general rose to 59,516, an increase of almost 14 percent from the prior year.

• Although the audits of large corporations dipped slightly in 2007 to 9,644 audits, the number of audits is up 14 percent.

Taxpayer Services

• More taxpayers chose to file electronically in 2007 than during the prior year, with 57 percent of individual tax filers choosing to e-file in 2007.

• More people visited the IRS internet site, IRS.gov. The IRS site was accessed more than 217 million times in 2007, up more than 10.5 percent.

• As in the prior year, the IRS accuracy was 91 percent on tax law questions answered through its toll-free telephone service.

For tax help with serious problems, call tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

July 15, 2008

Eliminate Interest On Tax

In almost every situation, the IRS never abates interest on unpaid taxes since the thinking is that not paying tax is like getting a loan which the IRS is not about to make interest-free.

But in a U.S. Tax Court case decided last week, the Court held that the IRS has the authority to abate interest. The sole issue for decision was whether the IRS’s decision not to abate interest with respect to the taxpayer’s income tax liability was an abuse of discretion.

The relevant part of the Select Steel, Inc. case was the Court's explanation for its decision that was as follows:

If, as part of a section 6330 proceeding, a taxpayer makes a request for abatement of interest, the Court has jurisdiction over the request for abatement of interest that is the subject of the Commissioner’s collection activities. Katz v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 329, 340-341 (2000).

Under section 6404(e)(1), as in effect for petitioner’s 1994 fiscal year, the Commissioner may abate part or all of an assessment of interest on any deficiency or payment of income taxes to the extent that the deficiency in payment is attributable in whole or in part to any error or delay by an officer or employee of the IRS in performing a ministerial act.

Although Congress amended section 6404(e)(1) in 1996 to permit the Commissioner to abate interest with respect to “unreasonable” error or delay resulting from “managerial” or ministerial acts, the amendment applies only to interest accruing with respect to deficiencies for taxable years beginning after July 30, 1996.

The term “ministerial act” means a procedural or mechanical act that does not involve the exercise of judgment or discretion and occurs during the processing of a taxpayer’s case after all the prerequisites to the act, such as conferences and review by supervisors, have taken place. Corson v. Commissioner, 123 T.C. 202, 207 (2004).

A decision concerning the proper application of Federal tax law is not a ministerial act. Id. An error or delay in performing a ministerial act is taken into account only if it is in no significant aspect attributable to the taxpayer and only if it occurs after the IRS has contacted the taxpayer in writing with respect to the deficiency or payment. Sec. 6404(e)(1).

Section 6404(e) is intended to apply only “in instances where failure to abate interest would be widely perceived as grossly unfair.” H. Rept. 99-426, at 844 (1985), 1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 2) 1, 844. Section 6404(h)(1) authorizes the Court to decide whether the Commissioner’s failure to abate interest was an abuse of discretion and, if so, to order an abatement. See Jones v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2008-56.

Generally, the taxpayer must prove that the Commissioner’s discretion was exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, or without sound basis in fact or law. Lee v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. 145, 149 (1999); Woodral v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 19, 23 (1999). However, “The Commissioner is in the best position to know what actions were taken by Internal Revenue Service officers and employees during the period for which petitioners’ abatement request was made and during any subsequent inquiry based upon that request.” Jacobs v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-123.

Do you have a similar situation and believe that interest should be eliminated? Do you have other tax problems you want to discuss with a California tax attorney? Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

June 13, 2008

California Lawyers Are Not All Alike

I read an ad and it went something like this:

"There's really no difference between law firms."

Many people believe that Los Angeles law firms are pretty much the same. I don't. I believe that what separates me from the pack is not what I do, but how I do it - aggressive not conservative, team player and not a one-man-band, problem solver not just a legal practitioner. My clients clearly understand and value this difference. How can I help you? Contact Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

I liked this because it describes me and my practice. If you need help with probate, Wills, living trusts, powers of attorney, tax problems or business transactions, please call me for your consultation.

June 11, 2008

Identity Theft, Phishing And Your Tax Information

Consumers have been warned in the past on the fraudulent use of the IRS name or logo by scammers trying to gain access to consumers’ financial information in order to steal their identity and assets. The Internal Revenue Service has issued several recent warnings with a lot of detail on how to prevent being scammed. When identity theft takes place over the internet, it is called phishing.

Phishing (as in “fishing for information” and “hooking” victims) is a scam where internet fraudsters send e-mail messages to trick unsuspecting victims into revealing personal and financial information that can be used to steal the victims’ identity. Current scams include phony e-mails which claim to come from the IRS and which lure the victims into the scam by telling them that they are due a tax refund.

Identity theft is somewhat different that phishing since it can not only be committed through e-mail (phishing) but it can also be done by other means such as regular mail, fax or telephone, or even by going through your trash.

Here are some of the warnings provided by the IRS on such scams:

IRS Warns of New E-Mail and Telephone Scams Using the IRS Name; Advance Payment Scams Starting

IRS Warns of New E-mail Scam Offering Cash for Participation in “Member Satisfaction Survey”

IRS Warns of Phony e-Mails Claiming to Come from the IRS

IRS Establishes e-Mail Box for Taxpayers to Report Phony e-Mails

Identity Theft and Your Tax Records

As soon as the IRS learns about designs involving use of the IRS name, it tries to alert consumers as well as authorities that can shut down the scheme. The most recent schemes are listed below.

Continue reading "Identity Theft, Phishing And Your Tax Information" »

June 6, 2008

Discharged Indebtedness Is Income And Is Taxable

During their marriage, the Stevenses purchased a dilapidated investment property in Chicago. (Investors are making similar purchases in Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara and Orange Counties, California, all of which may lead to a similar outcome as occurred in Chicago.) The couple borrowed $256,000 for the purchase of the property, only to realize shortly thereafter that not only did they not like each other, but they also could not make the payments. Rather than falling into foreclosure and ruining their credit, they entered into a short-sale agreement with the lender and, in 2003, found a buyer willing to purchase the property for $200,000.

Even though the lender had informed the Stevenses that they would report the discharge of indebtedness to the Internal Revenue Service and had mailed separate letters to Mr. Stevens and his ex-wife informing them of the exact dollar amount, neither reported the discharged indebtedness as income on their tax return.

Generally, a taxpayer must include income from the discharge of indebtedness under Section 61(a)(12) of the income tax regulations. However, there are exceptions to this rule. Section 108(a) provides that a taxpayer may exclude income from the discharge of indebtedness if the discharge occurs in a bankruptcy case, or when the taxpayer is insolvent, or if the indebtedness is qualified farm or business real estate debt.

The IRS determined and the Tax Court agreed that in addition to the tax deficiency, a 20 percent accuracy-related penalty under Code Section 6662(a) to be applicable because Mr. Stevens understated his income tax by $21,323 on his return. Because Mr. Stevens’ understatement of tax was greater than 10 percent of the tax required to be shown on the return or $5,000, the understatement was a substantial understatement of income tax pursuant to Code Section 6662(d)(1)(A). Mr. Stevens argued that he should not be held liable for the penalty because of his reliance on Ms. Stevens to report all of the relief from indebtedness income (Form 1099-C income) from the cancellation of indebtedness on her income tax return since both Forms 1099-C were mailed to her address.

The argument that Mr. Stevens had relied on his ex-wife to report the income from the indebtedness did not hold water with the Court.

The Tax Court concluded that Mr. Stevens failed to show that his reliance on Ms. Stevens’ reporting the full amount of income and paying the requisite tax on that income was reasonable. Mr. Stevens admitted that he knew Ms. Stevens had received both Forms 1099-C and that the amount at issue, $74,494.96, should have been reported--either in full or in part--on one of or both of the Stevenses’ returns for that year. The record is silent as to any facts that would have led to a reasonable assumption on the part of Mr. Stevens that he was not responsible for reporting the amount contained on the Form 1099-C in income.

The lesson, of course, is not to trust your ex-spouse to pay your taxes. The Court did state that Mr. Stevens could look to civil remedy against his ex-wife, as they did own the property as joint tenants and should be equally responsible for the declaration of the income tax.

You can read the entire Court decision here.

Need help negotiating with the IRS the amount of tax to be paid on relief from indebtedness income? Call tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 for tax help.

June 4, 2008

Developments In The IRS Estate Tax Division

Estate tax audits continue to be scattered across the country. With the drop in the number of federal estate tax returns expected to be filed because of the increased filing threshold resulting from the provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, the IRS offered voluntary early retirement to many Estate and Gift tax employees across the nation.

A great deal of employees accepted the buy-out and thereby created a coverage problem for local audits. The workload nevertheless has to be handled.

Here is a list of estate tax managers and their contact numbers located throughout the U.S.:

ESTATE TAX MANAGERS

Kym Taborn
Van Nuys, California
(Covers Los Angeles)
818 756 4522

Janet Holman
Oakland, California
(Covers Oakland, Los Angeles, San Jose)
510 637 4557

Ralph Perez
New York
212 436 1114

Virginia Hunt
New York
(Covers Albany, Syracuse, NYC)
212 436 1145

Faiza-Vardag-Muzaffar
New York
212 436 1094

Patrick Leahy
New York City
212 436 1146

Stephen Gordon
New York City
212 436 1082

Thomas Fleming
Boston
(Covers MA, ME, NH, VT)
617 316 2326

Richard Murray
Boston
(Covers MA, CT)
617 316 2328

Louis Kaufman
Philadelphia

(Covers PA, DE)
215 861 1585

Elliot Pleener
New Jersey
(Covers NJ, MD, DC, VA)
973 993 7401

Vacant
Trenton N.J.
(Covers International)

Elizabeth Williamson
NC
(Covers NC, VA)
336 378 2873

Martin Horn
Nashville
(Covers AR, GA, TN)
615 250 5573

George Dewey Jacksonville
Jacksonville
(Covers SC, N&C. FL)
904 665 1300

Martin Basson Plantation
Plantation
(Covers S. FL)
954 423 7232

Elaine McCarroll
Cleveland
(Covers MI, Cleveland OH)
216 520 7170

Donald Grigsby
Cincinnati
(Covers IN, KY, Roanoke, VA, OH)
513 263 4071

Frederick Herzog
New Orleans
(Covers LA, OK, MS)
504 558 3245

James McMullen (Acting)Chicago
Chicago
(Covers Chicago & Milwaukee)
312 566 2207

Jerry Voeller
St. Paul
(Covers MN, CO, SD, MT, ID)
651 312 7757

Vacant
MO, IA, S. IL

Michelle Moser
Omaha
(Covers KS, MO, NE, New Orleans)
402 221 3779

Lee Schwemer
Ft. Worth, TX
(Covers Dallas, Ft. Worth, Lubbock)
817 759 2900 x 620

Vacant
AZ, San Diego, Laguna Niguel

James Hammerstrom
WA
(Covers WA, OR, HI)
425 468 6009

Kyle Martin
Oakland, CA
(Covers UT, Denver, San Jose, Bakersfield)
510 637 4549

Toby Stewart
Houston
(Covers NM, Houston, Austin)
713 209 4415

If you have an estate tax problem, call Los Angeles estate tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

May 27, 2008

No Right To A Civil Proceeding Before Bringing A Criminal Trial For Tax Evasion

Defendant-Appellant James Ellett appealed from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York convicting him, after a jury trial, of four counts of income tax evasion and one count of failure to file an income tax return. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held on May 23, 2008, that due process did not require that Ellett be given the opportunity to litigate his tax position civilly or administratively before being prosecuted for tax evasion.

To read the case, click here.

May 23, 2008

Innocent Spouse Relief Requires Joint Tax Return

The Ninth Circuit - which has jurisdiction over all of us taxpayers living in California - upheld the Tax Court's holding that innocent spouse relief under Internal Revenue Code §6105 is available only if you have filed a joint return for the year in question. Christensen v. Commissioner, No. 06-71881 (9th Cir. 4/21/08), affirming T.C. Memo. 2005-299:

Christensen argues that Code §6015(f) is available to spouses who face joint liability under community property laws but do not file a joint return. We disagree. In light of the plain language of § 6015 and the context of the statute, we conclude that § 6015(f) is available only to spouses who file a joint return.

Call a qualified California tax lawyer for help seeking innocent spouse relief - call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

May 21, 2008

New IRS Publication On Innocent Spouse

Last month, the IRS released a revised Publication 971 for those seeking innocent spouse relief. Other articles in this blog on innocent spouse relief are: "Who Is An Innocent Spouse In California?", "Innocent Spouse Made Easier" and "California Taxpayers: Innocent Spouse Relief".

The revised IRS Publication provides this introduction:

When you file a joint income tax return, the law makes both you and your spouse responsible for the entire tax liability. This is called joint and several liability. Joint and several liability applies not only to the tax liability you show on the return but also to any additional tax liability the IRS determines to be due, even if the additional tax is due to income, deductions, or credits of your spouse or former spouse. You remain jointly and severally liable for the taxes, and the IRS still can collect from you, even if you later divorce and the divorce decree states that your former spouse will be solely responsible for the tax. In some cases, a spouse (or former spouse) will be relieved of the tax, interest, and penalties on a joint tax return.

Three types of relief are available to married persons who filed joint returns.

1. Innocent spouse relief.
2. Separation of liability relief.
3. Equitable relief.

Married persons who did not file joint returns, but who live in community property states [like California], may also qualify for relief. See Community Property Laws, later. This publication explains these types of relief, who may qualify for them, and how to get them. You can also use the Innocent Spouse Tax Relief Eligibility Explorer at www.irs.gov to see if you qualify for innocent spouse relief.

If you have a tax problem and believe that you may be entitled to innocent spouse relief, and wish to have a California tax lawyer represent you please contact Mitchell A. Port.

May 14, 2008

Most Frequently Asked Questions: Economic Stimulus Payments

California taxpayers waiting and wondering about their tax stimulus payment from the IRS can visit the IRS website for answers to frequently asked questions by clicking here.

Other tax problems related to unpaid payroll taxes, unpaid income taxes or unfiled tax returns, call Los Angeles tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

May 7, 2008

Wesley Snipes Convicted

For his willfully failing to file an income tax return, Wesley Snipes was sentenc