March 11, 2010

It Is Time To Prepare Your Living Trust, Will And Powers Of Attorney

The Los Angeles Times ran an article on March 7, 2010 by Kathy M. Kristof in the personal finance section discussing the need to either amend your existing living trust or have one prepared along with a will, durable power of attorney for property management and an advance health care directive. Here is what the Times said:

If you're rich, the best estate planning advice would be to die quickly. If you're not, the best advice is to either review or rewrite your estate planning documents to make sure your heirs aren't left high and dry if you die.

That's because estate taxes that could allow Uncle Sam to nab up to 45% of your bequeathed assets are currently -- and very temporarily -- kaput.

A decadelong phase-out of the estate tax eliminated the tax completely as of January. The catch: If nothing's done, estate taxes will boomerang back to historic levels in 2011. That means any bequest of more than $1 million would be hit with a heavy levy on any amount above that limit after December.

But estate planning isn't just about taxes, and it's not just for the rich.

The legal vacuum that was created by the temporary elimination of the estate tax has created potential pitfalls even for people with modest estates.

For example, if you were to die this year and had an old "by-pass" trust, the elimination of the estate tax could cause you to accidentally disinherit your spouse, said Clay Stevens, director of strategic planning for Aspiriant, a wealth management firm in Los Angeles.

These trusts, aimed at reducing estate taxes, often have boilerplate provisions for bequeathing children an amount equivalent to the estate tax "exclusion." This year, that exclusion is unlimited, so everything goes to your kids and unintentionally there would be nothing left for a spouse, he said.

Then, too, as long as the estate tax is phased out, so is something called the "step-up" that reduced capital gains taxes on your appreciated assets after you died.

You can still get that break if you make a few strategic fixes to your estate plan this year, Stevens said. But, if you do nothing, your heirs could face capital gains taxes on all but a pittance of your appreciated property.

"This is the one year when you can't procrastinate," said Herbert E. Nass, a New York lawyer and author of "101 Biggest Estate Planning Mistakes." "Absolutely everyone should review their documents."

What if you have no documents? Then get cracking.

Studies indicate that the vast majority of Americans don't have wills, trusts or powers of attorney. That can leave heirs in a rough spot, said Danielle Mayoras, coauthor with her husband, Andy, of "Trial & Errors: Famous Fortune Fights."

Act now, avoid trouble later

Ignoring your estate plan can land your children with ill-suited guardians or give them a pile of cash that they're too young to handle, she said.

If you become incapacitated before you die, it can mean that your care could be dictated by a stranger -- or even an enemy. And, doing nothing can cause your heirs to bicker and battle in court -- sometimes for decades.

"People never think their family is going to end up fighting," Andy Mayoras said. "But, especially in this economy, families are fighting over money more and more."

Nass contends that neglect of an estate plan may have cost one wealthy New Yorker his life. Wall Street titan Ted Ammon, in the throes of an acrimonious 2001 divorce, was killed by his estranged wife's boyfriend, Nass said. The boyfriend went to prison, but the estranged wife got the estate because Ammon hadn't yet changed his will.

"That was big news out here for a long time," he said.

What do you need? First and foremost you need a will, which distributes your assets at death. Wills can be simple -- a matter of a few paragraphs -- or very complex. It depends on your wishes and whether you expect to draw up additional documents, such as a trust.

If you don't want a trust, your will should name personal guardians for any minor children, economic guardians who can distribute assets to your children and other heirs, and an executor who will make sure the terms of the will are carried out. Finally, it should include a simple statement about what you own and who should get it.

If you're leaving assets through a will, it's wise to also execute powers of attorney for both financial and healthcare matters, Stevens adds. That will give somebody you trust the ability to pay your bills and make medical decisions for you if you become incapacitated before you die.

But if you want your heirs to be able to avoid probate -- a time-consuming and costly legal process that involves a court reviewing the distribution of assets bequeathed through a will -- you'd be better off to also create a trust. If you have a trust, your will essentially can be a one-liner: "I want all my nonretirement assets to go into my trust."

(Retirement accounts such as IRAs should be left directly to people, not trusts. That gives your heirs the ability to withdraw those assets, and pay taxes on them, over a longer period of time.)

A trust would then distribute the assets based on the formula you'd drawn up. Trusts can accommodate difficult issues, such as whether you want to attach a few strings to your bequests as you might if you're leaving assets to heirs who are not financially or personally responsible.

Divide and conquer . . . the IRS

Trusts also typically contain clauses that dictate who would handle your financial affairs should you become unable to handle them yourself. And many include a "by-pass" or a "two-step" provision that essentially splits the trust in two.

Splitting the trust is aimed at saving estate taxes. That's because husbands and wives can leave each other all their assets without tax consequences, but if they want to leave money to anyone else, any amount over a set threshold is subject to tax.

The amount that's "excluded" from estate taxes has been a moving target for the last 10 years, but is unlimited today and likely to amount to $1 million in 2011.

As a result, savvy couples with estates in excess of $1 million (in any year but 2010) would each execute a by-pass trust, leaving the amount of the estate tax exclusion to their kids or other heirs and the rest to their spouse.

That would preserve the estate tax exemption for the spouse who is the first to die. In the case of someone with $2 million in assets, that could save heirs a tidy $550,000 -- or 55% of the second $1 million.

But the most important thing may be to simply make your wishes known so your heirs know that you've thought about them and how you'd like to provide for them when you're gone. That alone could eliminate a lot of family bickering.

Both Nass and the Mayorases wrote books about what celebrities have done wrong with estate planning. They say they did so to give parents and their children a way of bringing up the topic to explore how they could do it better.

"It's a way to get the dialogue started," Andy Mayoras said.

Danielle Mayoras adds that entertainer Ray Charles' estate plan provides a blueprint of how to do it right. He got his 12 children and their nine respective mothers in a room to talk about what he was planning, which was to give most of his money to charity. But everyone was provided for in some way, she said.

"The beauty of doing that is that everything is out in the open," she said. "It gives the family some comfort and the ability to talk about it."

Call Mitchell A. Port, an experienced estate planning attorney, for a consultation now. Call (310) 559-5259.

March 1, 2010

Communication Can Help With Unequal Distributions

Ever thought of providing in your California will or living trust for unequal distributions to your children, disinheriting a child or leaving gifts to charity or to friends, then this posting is important. Some parents believe that unequal distributions may be necessary because they have already helped to support or educate one of their children or feel that one of their children has a spendthrift issue. There may also be times when a parent has remarried and wants to leave assets to his or her current spouse and is concerned that the children of the first marriage will not understand.

A recent article in the New York Times discusses having a conversation with your children about your plans before you die in order to decrease the chance that they will challenge your estate plan after you die. The article quotes a wealth mediator who says that the children and grandchildren may not like what you have chosen to do, but at least they can feel like they were informed and hopefully will respect your wishes. The kids may get angry at the situation but their anger will be directed at you, not at the favored beneficiaries after your death. Communication can also help relieve the tension between the adult children of a first marriage and the children and/or spouse of the second marriage. The article is worth reading.

If you want to discuss how to distribute your property to your beneficiaries with a qualified California tax lawyer, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

February 24, 2010

Changing Irrevocable Trusts In California

An irrevocable trust is one that usually cannot be amended, changed or revoked. Trusts can become irrevocable in several ways.

Some trusts for married couples become irrevocable at the first spouse’s death. A common example is an A/B trust, sometimes called an Exemption Trust or a Bypass Trust. With this type of trust, the deceased spouse's trust becomes irrevocable after the first death and cannot be amended, changed or revoked.

Irrevocable life insurance trusts and qualified personal residence trusts are made to be irrevocable at the time they are created. The life insurance trust is a type of trust that is created to hold life insurance and pass the insurance death benefit to the beneficiaries of the trust without any income or estate taxes on the placement of the policy in the trust or upon the insured’s death. Such a trust cannot be revoked, changed, or amended after it is created except by court order.

There are some times, however, where an irrevocable trust can be modified by court order. California Civil Code Section 3399 permits a contract like a trust to be reformed when the writing, through mistake or fraud, fails to express the intent of the parties. For instance, reforming a trust might be appropriate when due to a drafting error or scrivener's error.

California Probate Code Section 15409 also permits a trust to be changed if “owing to circumstances not known to the settlor (person creating the trust) and not anticipated by the settlor, the continuation of the trust under its terms would defeat or substantially limit the accomplishment of the purposes of the trust.” In this situation, what the court can do is extensive. The Probate Court can authorize acts that are forbidden by the terms of the trust or not authorized.

Under California Probate Code Section 15403, when all beneficiaries of an irrevocable trust consent to modification or termination of a trust the court can permit that to occur unless the court finds that a material purpose remains for continuance of the trust and that purpose outweighs the arguments for termination or modification.

Speak to a tax attorney about amending, changing or revoking an “irrevocable” trust. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

February 11, 2010

Extra Estate Planning Needed This Year

The New York Times ran an article last month describing the effect of suspending the estate tax so that no death tax is owed for those dying in 2010. Concepts like losing the step-up in basis and the application of capital gains taxes are explained. The article advises readers to update their wills, living trusts and other estate planning documents to take into account the changes in the laws applying to death taxes.

Call your California estate planning attorney now.

February 2, 2010

The Best And Most Wealth Friendly States For Trusts

A post on January 23, 2010 in Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog provides a chart listing the best states for trusts. The ranking factors considered are (1) state income tax in the state, (2) directed trust statute, (3) asset protection trust availability, (4) dynasty trust ability, and (5) the number of trust companies in the state.

The top four states include Alaska, Delaware, Nevada and South Dakota.

The next best include three states: Florida, New Hampshire and Wyoming.

Finally, the last group of states include: Colorado, Idaho, Ohio, Utah and Wisconsin.

January 18, 2010

Gift Tax Planning

If you give someone money or property during your life, you may be subject to federal gift tax. However, the IRS recently announced that the gift tax annual exclusion will remain unchanged in 2010 at $13,000. As long as your gifts to an individual are $13,000 or less, there is no gift tax return that is required to be filed and no gift taxes are due.

Most gifts are not subject to the gift tax and most estates are not subject to the estate tax. For example, there is usually no tax if you make a gift to your spouse or to a charity while you are alive or if your estate goes to your spouse or to a charity at your death. If you make a gift to someone else, the gift tax usually does not apply until the value of the gifts you give that person exceeds the annual exclusion of $13,000.

Even if tax applies to your gifts or your estate, it may be eliminated by the unified credit. Talk to your tax attorney about how to eliminate the gift and estate tax.

Gift tax returns are filed with the Internal Revenue Service when the value of your gift exceeds $13,000, unless you are making a gift to your spouse. Gifts to spouses are usually non-taxable.

A married couple can actually gift $26,000 to each individual without creating a gift tax liability; there is no need to report it to the Internal Revenue Service either.

With proper gift planning a family can transfer a significant amount of money to their children and grandchildren. For example, you and your spouse have 3 kids who are married and each kid has 2 of their own children. The number of people who can each receive a non-taxable gift is 12: 3 kids + 3 spouses + 6 grandchildren. A gift of $13,000 to each person by both you and your spouse can remove $312,000 a year from your estate. Do this for 10 years and you could remove over $3.1 million. Given that the current tax rate is 45%, this could save $1.4 million in estate taxes.

Generally, the person who receives your gift or your bequest will not have to pay any federal gift tax or estate tax because of it. Also, that person will not have to pay income tax on the value of the gift or inheritance received. Taxes on gifts or bequests are paid by the one making the gift or by the one who dies and leaves behind an estate.

Making a gift or leaving your estate to your heirs does not ordinarily affect your federal income tax. You cannot deduct the value of gifts you make (other than gifts that are deductible charitable contributions).

For other estate planning ideas, talk to Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259 – a tax attorney in Los Angeles, California.

December 17, 2009

No More Federal Estate Tax

The Wall Street Journal online reports that: "Senate Democratic leaders Wednesday failed in a last-ditch effort to pass a short-term extension to override the tax's expiration, a process put into motion during the Bush administration. That virtually ensures that the tax will disappear Jan. 1."

Nonetheless, California still requires in many situations the probate of an estate if you want to inherit property.

Speak to a probate and estate planning attorney to learn about your options. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

November 30, 2009

Estate And Gift Taxes

Since there are no California estate taxes due when a person dies, this post is about federal estate and gift taxes. Estate and gift tax law may be one of the most complex subjects in the Internal Revenue Code. For tax help, I strongly recommend that you consult with an estate tax practitioner (attorney or CPA) who has a lot of experience in these areas of law. You may also find additional information in Publication 950 or some of the other forms and publications offered on the IRS Forms Page as well as on the Forms Page dedicated to estate and gift taxes.

Below are some of the more common questions and answers about Estate Tax issues:

When can I expect the Estate Tax Closing Letter?
What is included in the Estate?
I own a 1/2 interest in a farm (or building or business) with my brother (sister, friend, other). What is included?
What is excluded from the Estate?
What deductions are available to reduce the Estate Tax?
What other information do I need to include with the return?
What is "Fair Market Value?"
What about the value of my family business/farm?
What if I do not have everything ready for filing by the due date?
Who should I hire to represent me and prepare and file the return?
Do I have to talk to the IRS during an examination?
What if I disagree with the examination proposals?
What happens if I sell property that I have inherited?

Below are some of the more common questions and answers about Gift Tax issues:

Who pays the gift tax?
What is considered a gift?
What can be excluded from gifts?
May I deduct gifts on my income tax return?
How many annual exclusions are available?
What if my spouse and I want to give away property that we own together?
What other information do I need to include with the return?
What is "Fair Market Value?"
Who should I hire to represent me and prepare and file the return?
Do I have to talk to the IRS during an examination?
What if I disagree with the examination proposals?
What if I sell property that has been given to me?

Finally, you may need to know about filing estate and gift tax returns which you can read about by clicking here.

November 13, 2009

SCINs, GRATs and IDGTs

"The Intelligent Investor" published in the October 3, 2009 Wall Street Journal says that "... with yields near lows, now is the time to stop moaning about the lack of income and to start turning rock-bottom interest rates to your advantage."

The article discusses self-cancelling installment notes (SCINs), grantor retained annuity trusts (GRATs) and intentionally defective grantor trusts (IDGTs).

These techniques, when used properly, move assets out of your estate at discounted prices so that less of your estate is subject to estate tax when you die.

Speak to your estate planning attorney before interest rates rebound. Or, call a tax lawyer; call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

November 11, 2009

What Is A Qualified Disclaimer?

Internal Revenue Code section 2518 allows a California beneficiary to sign a qualified disclaimer, resulting in treatment of the disclaimed property as if the California disclaimant had predeceased the decedent. Utilizing disclaimers as part of the estate plan builds in flexibility.

Treasury Regulation section 25.2518-2 lists the following “Requirements for a Qualified Disclaimer”.

(a) In general. For the purposes of section 2518(a), a disclaimer shall be a qualified disclaimer only if it satisfies the requirements of this section. In general, to be a qualified disclaimer—

(1) The disclaimer must be irrevocable and unqualified:

(2) The disclaimer must be in writing;

(3) The writing must be delivered to the person specified in paragraph (b) (2) of this section within the time limitations specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section;

(4) The disclaimant must not have accepted the interest disclaimed or any of its benefits; and

(5) The interest disclaimed must pass either to the spouse of the decedent or to a person other than the disclaimant without any direction on the part of the person making the disclaimer.

More of the Regulation is below.

If you would like information about how a qualified disclaimer can keep the IRS at bay, call your tax attorney or call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

Whether your concerns are immediate or long-term, a qualified California estate planning attorney will be able to counsel you on the best options available to you to meet your individual needs.

Continue reading "What Is A Qualified Disclaimer?" »

October 27, 2009

Estate Tax Deductions

Pursuant to Internal Revenue Code section 2053(a), “the value of the taxable estate shall be determined by deducting from the value of the gross estate such amounts: (1) For funeral expenses, (2) for administration expenses, (3) for claims against the estate, and (4) for unpaid mortgages on, or any indebtedness in respect of, property where the value of the decedent's interest therein, undiminished by such mortgage or indebtedness, is included in the value of the gross estate, as are allowable by the laws of the jurisdiction, whether within or without the United States, under which the estate is being administered.”

The amount an estate may deduct for claims against the estate has been a highly litigious issue. The lack of consistency in the case law has resulted in different estate tax treatment of estates that are similarly situated, depending only upon the jurisdiction in which the executor resides. The Treasury Department and the IRS believe that similarly-situated estates should be treated consistently by having Code section 2053(a)(3) construed and applied in the same way in all jurisdictions.

The Internal Revenue Service issued final regulations relating to the amount deductible from a decedent's gross estate for claims against the estate under Code section 2053(a)(3). In addition, the regulations update the provisions relating to the deduction for certain state death taxes to reflect the statutory amendments made in 2001 to Code sections 2053(d) and 2058. The regulations primarily will affect estates of decedents against which there are claims outstanding at the time of the decedent's death.

October 15, 2009

How Can I Get A Copy Of That California Living Trust?

Who should get a copy of your California living trust? In a previous blog, the California Probate Code was quoted as follows:

"When a revocable trust or any portion of a revocable trust becomes irrevocable because of the death of one or more of the settlors of the trust, or because, by the express terms of the trust, the trust becomes irrevocable within one year of the death of a settlor because of a contingency related to the death of one or more of the settlors of the trust, the trustee shall provide a true and complete copy of the terms of the irrevocable trust, or irrevocable portion of the trust, to any beneficiary of the trust who requests it and to any heir of a deceased settlor who requests it."

Other than those mentioned in the Probate Code, no one else has the right to a copy of your trust upon your death. The terms of your trust remain private.

For your own peace of mind, you may want to give a copy of your trust to your successor trustee. You are not obligated to do that. Some people choose to give copies to their children who are the successor trustees and the only beneficiaries. Other clients of mine keep their trust private.

One of the advantages of having a revocable living trust is that it is private and not a public record. No one has the right to see the provisions of your trust unless you want them to.

When you transfer your investment and other accounts into the name of your trust, often you will take your trust into the financial institution and show them that you have one. Simply give the bank officer the first page and last page of your trust. You can also give the institution a copy of your Certification of Trust; the Certification is a document showing the name of your trust, listing the trust’s powers, and the current trustees. You do not have to provide any financial institution with a copy of your trust.

Contact Mitchell A. Port if you have any questions about your revocable living trust or any other estate planning issues. Keep the problems of death and taxes to a minimum.

October 13, 2009

Avoiding Living Trust Scams

In my Los Angeles, California neighborhood, I often see flyers and ads for cheap living trust seminars. As an estate planning attorney who drafts living trusts and charges considerably more for those services, I am suspicious of what these seminars really offer.

I attended a seminar once. The speaker was not an attorney and I got the impression you never get to meet with one even after signing up for the service. I assume non-lawyers draft the documents contrary to state law prohibiting the practice of law without a license. I’m told that an attorney will “review” the documents before you sign them. I wonder if that happens.

Often, those seminars seem to be designed to lure seniors in with a promise of bargain-rate estate planning. You may be offered a low-cost trust, but it's just a pretext for getting you to reveal confidential financial information about your assets. These document "mills" then send other “professionals” like insurance sales agents to your home to follow up with offers of annuities and other financial products that may mean disaster for those who buy them.

Common sense is often enough to avoid these scams:

Don't work with estate planners who aren't licensed to practice law.

Be suspicious of any living trust that's marketed at an extremely low-price.

Don't work with anyone who uses high pressure sales tactics.

Don't buy a financial product that you don't understand.

Use a trusted source for information geared toward legal services like estate planning designed for the everyday consumer.

To speak with an experienced estate planning attorney about these topics, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

September 11, 2009

Wills, Living Trusts, Powers Of Attorney, Health Care Directives

Read Michael Jackson's Will he prepared and signed in Los Angeles, California.

With the coverage of Michael Jackson's death, estate and guardianship questions involving his children, Michael Jackson's Will was made available through the internet shortly within it being filed with a Los Angeles Probate Court.

Don't be shocked that such an important and personal document is available to the public. That's the nature of wills -- they are public documents (once you die) when a probate proceeding is started. Any will admitted to probate court is a public record that anyone can read.

So what do you do if you don't want your estate planning wishes to be read by everyone? Do what Michael Jackson did and create a revocable living trust. He created his estate plan.

Estate planning is a term that may confuse people. Many people really don't know what documents make up an estate plan. The term estate planning somehow confers a meaning that someone must have an estate. And people think of estates as those lovely homes in Beverly Hills and the surrounding area. You don't have to be Michael Jackson or own an expensive home to benefit by having an estate plan.

Generally whenever someone dies, whatever they leave behind is called their estate whether it is assets or debts. So, estate planning is really planning for handling your affairs after you die.
In some instances, estate planning is also planning for incapacity.

The basic estate plan for most people generally consists of the following documents:
1. Will
2. Living Trust
3. Durable Power of Attorney
4. Advance Health Care Directive

Talk to a California estate planning attorney. Reduce the impact of death and taxes. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

August 24, 2009

Do I In California Need Estate Planning?

The State Bar of California has an excellent brochure answering many many questions commonly asked by my clients in Los Angeles and others throughout California.

As an estate planning attorney in Los Angeles, I highly recommend reading the pamphlet before you visit with your own estate planning lawyer so that you can be as well prepared as possible.

Don't have an estate planning attorney? Speak with Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 whose area of legal practice involves preparing wills, living trusts, powers of attorney, health care directives and other estate planning documents.

August 13, 2009

IRS Tax Code, Regulations And Official Guidance

Internal Revenue Code

Federal tax law begins with the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), enacted by Congress in Title 26 of the United States Code (26 U.S.C.). This version may not be current so check to be sure you are reading the most recent Code.

Treasury (Tax) Regulations

Treasury regulations (26 C.F.R.)--commonly referred to as Federal tax regulations-- pick up where the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) leaves off by providing the official interpretation of the IRC by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

Other Official Tax Guidance

In addition to participating in the promulgation of Treasury (Tax) Regulations, the IRS publishes a regular series of other forms of official tax guidance, including revenue rulings, revenue procedures, notices, and announcements. See Understanding IRS Guidance - A Brief Primer for more information about official IRS guidance versus non-precedential rulings or advice.

The authoritative instrument for the distribution of all forms of official IRS tax guidance is the Internal Revenue Bulletin (IRB), a weekly collection of these and other items of general interest to the tax professional community.

August 3, 2009

Vesting Title To Property In California

The Los Angeles Times ran an article on June 21, 2009, which discussed in general terms the ways Californians can hold title to property. The Los Angeles Times described the following types of vesting:

Tenancy by the entirety

Tenancy in common

Joint tenancy with right of survivorship

Sole ownership

Trusts

The Los Angeles Times could have added information about community property as well as "community property with a right of survivorship".

To discuss which method is best for you, call an estate planning attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

July 15, 2009

Los Angeles Times Discusses Estate Planning

The LA Times ran an article on July 14 which in part discussed the risks and benefits of preparing a do-it-yourself Will in California or using cheap online sources for estate planning documents. It also discussed when using an estate planning attorney and paying a higher fee makes sense. Here's the full article.

June 25, 2009

California Estate Planning And Your Kids

With a play on words, the Wall Street Journal recently published an article entitled "Deciding if Your Kid is Trust-Worthy". Estate planners in California often ask clients the same question since having a living trust may make sense depending on, for instance, whether their children are worthy of getting property when they are young or at an older age.

California Wills, living trusts, durable powers of attorney for property management and the advance health care directive are usually prepared by lawyers. There are many forms available for free online but it is often inadvisable to use them.

Speak with an estate planning attorney about your own situation. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

June 16, 2009

LA Estate Planning Revisited

Estate planning for those of us in Los Angeles and throughout California where property values have been significantly impacted as a result of the recent economic slump can use this link to a great article from Money magazine on rethinking your estate planning options, given the uncertainty of future tax rates and exemptions.

Discuss your will, living trust and other estate planning needs with a qualified tax attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

May 13, 2009

IRS Releases New Mortality Tables

Internal Revenue Code Section 7520 requires that the Secretary of the Treasury revise the mortality assumptions underlying the IRS tables at least once every ten years to incorporate the most recently available mortality data. These tables were last updated on May 1, 1999, and new tables have now been issued effective for transactions occurring on or after May 1, 2009.

What is the effect on life expectancy under the new tables? It is interesting to look at the life expectancies and compare them under the old and the new tables.

At age 70, under the 1990 census table, the life expectancy of a 70 year old was 13.95 years and under the new table is rises to 14.27 years. Again, the increase in number of years is less dramatic than under the old tables as age come closer to biological limits.

At age 80, in comparing the 1980 and 1990 tables, the increase in life expectancy went from 7.98 years to 8.4 years. It only climbs to 8.42 years under the new table.

The tables will now impact charitable remainder trusts, qualified personal residence trusts and private annuities.

The actuarial tables and some of their uses are explained in more detail in the following IRS publications:

Publication 1457 provides examples for valuing annuities, life estates, and remainders generally.

Publication 1458 provides examples for valuing interests in unitrusts.

Publication 1459 provides examples for valuing remainder interests in depreciable property for income tax purposes.

For estate planning under the new tables, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

February 2, 2009

California Power Of Attorney

California Probate Code Section 4402 provides that a power of attorney is legally sufficient if the wording in the document complies closely with California Probate Code Section 4401, the form is properly completed and the principal's signature is acknowledged.

California Probate Code Section 4401 provides a free form power of attorney that meets the requirements of California Probate Code Section 4402. The powers granted by a power of attorney are broad and sweeping. Those powers are explained in Probate Code Sections 4400-4409 and Sections 4450-4465.

The power of attorney is just one piece of an entire basic estate plan. The other parts of a California estate plan consist of a living trust, a will and an advance health care directive. To discuss estate planning in more detail, call California attorney Mitchell A. Port.

January 29, 2009

California Living Trust: Using It May Avoid Probate

Two of the benefits of a California revocable living trust are continuity of management and avoidance of probate. These benefits are generally available only as to assets that are held in the name of the California living trust. Often, when property is left out of your living trust, it may have to be probated before heirs can obtain legal title and ownership. This blog post deals with title transfers.

Generally, you should transfer title to your assets from your individual name to:

"[Your name], Trustee, [your surname] Family Living Trust dated [the date the Trust is signed]"

So, title may look like this example: “Mitchell A. Port, Trustee, Port Family Living Trust dated February 2, 2009”

Title to your assets should be transferred to your California living trust – in most cases – for the types of property listed below. Various issues related to the type of property transferred into your California living trust are mentioned as well. You ought to address transferring the following assets:

1. Automobiles

2. Bank, Savings and Other Cash Accounts

3. Bonds, T-Bills, Commodities

4. Life Insurance; Pension, Profit Sharing, Retirement Plans

a. Life Insurance

b. Retirement [IRA] Accounts

c. Keogh, Pension, Profit Sharing Benefits

d. Current Retirement Benefits

5. Notes

a. Secured by Real Property

b. Secured by Personal Property

c. Unsecured

6. Partnerships and LLCs

a. Limited Partnerships and LLCs

b. General

7. Real Property

a. Reassessment

b. Loan Acceleration

c. Title Insurance

d. Homeowner's Exemption

e. Homeowner's Insurance

f. Purchases of Real Property

g. Sales of Real Property

8. Stock

a. Marketable Securities

b. Mutual Funds; Margin and Ready Asset Accounts

c. Closely Held Corporations

9. Prepare this list of information addressing the items below that would be useful in case of death or a health emergency and add it to your California estate planning book or some place easily locatable:

a. Bank Accounts and Safe-Deposit Boxes

All bank names - account numbers - personal contact, if available - location of safe-deposit box - contents of box - location of box key;

b. Credit Cards

Issuers - account numbers - expiration dates - special information (airline mileage points, balances owed);

c. Insurance

Home, car, life, health, long-term care: issuers - account numbers - agents - premium due dates;

d. Health Care

Contact information for physicians - current medications and dosages - Medicare claim number - Medigap policy number;

e. Taxes

Accountant information - location of past filings;

f. Investment And Retirement Accounts

Names of brokerage or plan administrators - account numbers - PIN numbers - Names of bankers or brokers;

g. House

Amount of mortgage payment or rent - due date - location of deeds and property titles - contact information for service people;

h. Miscellaneous

(i) Driver’s license number and expiration date; (ii) vehicle registration information; (iii) any items in storage and storage company phone number; (iv) contact information for neighbors and friends; (v) e-mail accounts, websites, and passwords; (vi) the combination to any safe in your home; and (vii) a list of the automatic payments from and deposits to bank accounts.

Consult with a California estate planning attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

December 22, 2008

Revocation Of California's Advance Health Care Directive

After working with your attorney in Los Angeles to avoid probate in California by preparing your will, living trust, durable power of attorney for property management and the advance health care directive, you now decide you want to revoke the directive. How?

California law provides that a patient having capacity may revoke the designation of an agent only by a signed writing or by personally informing the supervising health care provider. California law goes on to say that a patient having capacity may revoke all or part of an advance health care directive, other than the designation of an agent, at any time and in any manner that communicates an intent to revoke.

In other words, you may revoke the designation or authority only if, at the time of revocation, you have sufficient capacity to make a power of attorney for health care. The burden of proof is on the person who seeks to establish that you did not have capacity to revoke the designation or authority.

Discuss your estate plan with an experienced attorney. Call Mitchell A. Port in Los Angeles at 310.559.5259.

December 11, 2008

California Tax Information For Same-Sex Married Couples

An advance draft copy of a California tax form for same-sex married couples is now available. It is subject to change and Franchise Tax Board (FTB) approval before it is officially released. This form includes the 2008 legislative changes. It will likely be released by the FTB as Publication 776.

This publication is primarily to assist same-sex married couples (SSMC) in filing their California income tax returns, if they have SSMC adjustments. The FTB has also included information about the legal history of SSMC and community property that may be useful in completing the return.

On June 20, 2008, the FTB issued NOTICE 2008-5 on the subject of California Income Tax Treatment and Tax Return Filing Obligations of Same-Sex Married Couples. The purpose of the Notice is to advise same-sex married couples of their California income tax treatment and tax return filing obligations resulting from the California Supreme Court's recent decision in In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757.

California's FTB has more information on same-sex married couples' tax obligations at its website.

December 8, 2008

California Statutory Wills Are Free

Questions and answers about California’s Statutory Will are presented here and in California Probate Code Section 6240.

The following information, in question and answer form, is not a part of the California Statutory Will. It is designed to help you understand about Wills and to decide if this Will meets your needs. This Will is in a simple form.

1. Does a Will avoid probate? No. With or without a Will, assets in your name alone usually go through the court probate process. The court's first job is to determine if your Will is valid.

2. Are there different kinds of Wills? Yes. There are handwritten Wills, typewritten Wills, attorney-prepared Wills, and statutory Wills. All are valid if done precisely as the law requires. You should see a lawyer if you do not want to use this Statutory Will or if you do not understand this form.

3. What can a Will do for me? In a Will you may designate who will receive your assets at your death. You may designate someone (called an "executor") to appear before the court, collect your assets, pay your debts and taxes, and distribute your assets as you specify. You may nominate someone (called a "guardian") to raise your children who are under age 18. You may designate someone (called a "custodian") to manage assets for your children until they reach any age from 18 to 25.

4. Does my Will give away all of my assets? Do all assets go through probate? No. Money in a joint tenancy bank account automatically belongs to the other named owner without probate. If your spouse, domestic partner, or child is on the deed to your house as a joint tenant, the house automatically passes to him or her. Life insurance and retirement plan benefits may pass directly to the named beneficiary. A Will does not necessarily control how these types of "nonprobate" assets pass at your death.

5. What happens if I die without a Will? If you die without a Will, what you own (your "assets") in your name alone will be divided among your spouse, domestic partner, children, or other relatives according to state law. The court will appoint a relative to collect and distribute your assets.

6. May I change my Will? Yes. A Will is not effective until you die. You may make and sign a new Will. You may change your Will at any time, but only by an amendment (called a codicil). You can give away or sell your assets before your death. Your Will only acts on what you own at death.

7. When should I change my Will? You should make and sign a new Will if you marry, divorce, or terminate your domestic partnership after you sign this Will. Divorce, annulment, or termination of a domestic partnership automatically cancels all property stated to pass to a former husband, wife, or domestic partner under this Will, and revokes the designation of a former spouse or domestic partner as executor, custodian, or guardian. You should sign a new Will when you have more children, or if your spouse or a child dies, or a domestic partner dies or marries. You may want to change your Will if there is a large change in the value of your assets. You may also want to change your Will if you enter a domestic partnership or your domestic partnership has been terminated after you sign this Will.

8. May I add or cross out any words on this Will? No. If you do, the Will may be invalid or the court may ignore the crossed out or added words. You may only fill in the blanks. You may amend this Will by a separate document (called a codicil). Talk to a lawyer if you want to do something with your assets which is not allowed in this form.

9. Who may use this Will? This Will is based on California law. It is designed only for California residents. You may use this form if you are single, married, a member of a domestic partnership, or divorced. You must be age 18 or older and of sound mind.

10. Are there any reasons why I should NOT use this Statutory Will? Yes. This is a simple Will. It is not designed to reduce death taxes or other taxes. Talk to a lawyer to do tax planning, especially if (i) your assets will be worth more than $600,000 or the current amount excluded from estate tax under federal law at your death, (ii) you own business-related assets, (iii) you want to create a trust fund for your children's education or other purposes, (iv) you own assets in some other state, (v) you want to disinherit your spouse, domestic partner, or descendants, or (vi) you have valuable interests in pension or profit-sharing plans. You should talk to a lawyer who knows about estate planning if this Will does not meet your needs. This Will treats most adopted children like natural children. You should talk to a lawyer if you have stepchildren or foster children whom you have not adopted.

11. What can I do if I do not understand something in this Will? If there is anything in this Will you do not understand, ask a lawyer to explain it to you.

12. Where should I keep my Will? After you and the witnesses sign the Will, keep your Will in your safe deposit box or other safe place. You should tell trusted family members where your Will is kept.

13. What is an executor? An "executor" is the person you name to collect your assets, pay your debts and taxes, and distribute your assets as the court directs. It may be a person or it may be a qualified bank or trust company.

14. What is a custodian? Do I need to designate one? A "custodian" is a person you may designate to manage assets for someone (including a child) who is under the age of 25 and who receives assets under your Will. The custodian manages the assets and pays as much as the custodian determines is proper for health, support, maintenance, and education. The custodian delivers what is left to the person when the person reaches the age you choose (from 18 to 25). No bond is required of a custodian.

15. What is a guardian? Do I need to designate one? If you have children under age 18, you should designate a guardian of their "persons" to raise them.

16. Should I ask people if they are willing to serve before I designate them as executor, guardian, or custodian? Probably yes. Some people and banks and trust companies may not consent to serve or may not be qualified to act.

17. Should I require a bond? You may require that an executor post a "bond." A bond is a form of insurance to replace assets that may be mismanaged or stolen by the executor. The cost of the bond is paid from the estate's assets.

18. What happens if I make a gift in this Will to someone and that person dies before I do? A person must survive you by 120 hours to take a gift under this Will. If that person does not, then the gift fails and goes with the rest of your assets. If the person who does not survive you is a relative of yours or your spouse, then certain assets may go to the relative's descendants.

19. What is a trust? There are many kinds of trusts, including trusts created by Wills (called "testamentary trusts") and trusts created during your lifetime (called "revocable living trusts"). Both kinds of trusts are long-term arrangements in which a manager (called a "trustee") invests and manages assets for someone (called a "beneficiary") on the terms you specify. Trusts are too complicated to be used in this Statutory Will. You should see a lawyer if you want to create a trust.

20. What is a domestic partner? You have a domestic partner if you have met certain legal requirements and filed a form entitled "Declaration of Domestic Partnership" with the Secretary of State. Notwithstanding Section 299.6 of the Family Code, if you have not filed a Declaration of Domestic Partnership with the Secretary of State, you do not meet the required definition and should not use the section of the Statutory Will form that refers to domestic partners even if you have registered your domestic partnership with another governmental entity. If you are unsure if you have a domestic partner or if your domestic partnership meets the required definition, please contact the Secretary of State's office.

21. What is community property? Can I give away my share in my Will? If you are married and you or your spouse earned money during your marriage from work and wages, that money (and the assets bought with it) is community property. Your Will can only give away your one-half of community property. Your Will cannot give away your spouse's one-half of community property.

November 17, 2008

Where To Store Your Estate Plan

Where should you keep estate planning documents prepared by your attorney licensed in California? Where should people expect to find your living trust, will, durable power of attorney and advance health care directive? You want to be sure that those documents stay safe and can be easily found when your family needs to find them.

Do not keep them in a safe deposit box at the bank.

The best place is in your home where they can easily be found when they are needed. Don’t lock them into a box for safekeeping inside your home since that would be as difficult to penetrate as a safe deposit box. Simply leave them in the open inside a desk, on a shelf or somewhere else that is obvious to anyone looking for them.

Your safe deposit box won’t be easy for your friends or family to open it if you’re not there. This is true even if they are co-owners of the box. Having the key isn’t enough to get the bank to open it up for them — the bank wants you to prove that you have the legal authority to require them to open it up. So here’s the conundrum: the document granting your friends or family the right to act on your behalf as an executor or as the power of attorney/agent is inside the box, and until the box is opened, they can’t prove that they have the authority to get the bank to open it…etc.

Safe deposit boxes are often inside a bank which may be closed over the weekend. If a durable power of attorney or advance health care directive is needed over the weekend, no one will be able to get to it until Monday. In a medical emergency, the advance health care directive should be easily accessible.

To speak with a tax attorney about your estate plan, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

October 21, 2008

Californians' Tax Shelter May Double

The online Wall Street Journal said in an article posted on October 15th that estates, including those in California that may or may not go through probate, may benefit by a "portable" estate tax shelter regardless of which presidential candidate is elected.

The article says: "This issue is known as portability because the exemption per person -- $2 million this year and $3.5 million next year -- would become transferable from one spouse to the other, in effect doubling the surviving spouse's exemption. In essence, that means that spouses would be able to use each other's estate-tax exemption without first having to set up complex and costly trusts and take other steps that many people now feel obliged to do."

For us in California, the article goes on to say: "...such a change could greatly simplify estate planning and lead to fewer hassles for many married couples and their heirs." Living trusts in California may no longer be necessary to capture both spouses federal tax shelter. Nonetheless, a living trust will continue to be useful as a technique to avoid probate.

Probate in California continues to be a good reason to create a living trust. If someone you know died and did not have a living trust, call Mitchell A. Port to discuss probate.

October 13, 2008

California’s Living Trust Beneficiaries And FDIC Coverage

The financial bailout plan recently signed into law benefits Californians because bank accounts owned by living trusts can get more FDIC insurance than accounts owned by individuals. Trust accounts get the maximum FDIC insurance for every qualified beneficiary.

Until December 31, 2009, when the financial bail-out package expires, the FDIC now insures “qualifying beneficiaries” in California for $250,000 each. A qualifying beneficiary is a spouse, child, grandchild, parent, or sibling of the account owner. The account must be owned by the living trust.

This is how it works:

A single mom in Los Angeles County, Ventura County, Santa Barbara County or Orange County California sets up a living trust naming her two children as the beneficiaries after she dies, the bank account owned by the trust is insured up to $500,000: 2 beneficiaries at $250,000 each.

If my wife and I set up a living trust and all three of our children are the beneficiaries after we both die, the trust account is ensured for up to $1,500,000: $250,000 for each beneficiary and for each owner, or 6 x $250,000.

These FDIC limits are per bank not per account. If a California living trust owner has more than one account at the same bank, these limits apply to all their accounts there.

Be sure and confirm this with your banker in writing and avoid relying on any other informal sources.

To discuss your living trust, Will, durable power of attorney and advance health care, please call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

September 22, 2008

Tax Fraud Or Tax Avoidance?

The Difference Between Legal Tax Avoidance and Illegal Tax Evasion

“Anyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the treasury. There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes. Over and over again the Courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: Taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.”

The IRS has a very interesting and detailed description of the types of tax problems people often either intentionally or negligently get involved with. You can read the entire article here but you can see the topics that are discussed below.

Nonfiler Enforcement

Money Laundering

Corporate Fraud

General Tax Fraud

Employment Tax Enforcement

Abusive Tax Schemes

Abusive Return Preparer

Tax Scams - How to Recognize and Avoid Them

All About Criminal Investigation (CI)

Program and Emphasis Areas for Criminal Investigation

Report Suspected Tax Fraud Activity

IRS Wants You to Know About Schemes, Scams and Cons

Civil tax problems? Speak with Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

September 18, 2008

California Estate Planning - An Overview

Northern Trust has a brochure entitled: "Estate Planning: Strategic Wealth Transfers During Life and at Death". It contains an estate planning overview worth looking at. The topics include:

Fundamental Questions

Who Should Receive Your Assets?
Which Assets Should They Receive?
When and How Should You Transfer Wealth?

Basic Estate Planning Documents

Will
Living Trust

Recruiting the Right Team

Who Should Draft Your Estate Plan?
Who Should be Your Executors and Trustees?
Who Should be the Guardian for Your Children?

Estate Settlement

Transferring Property After Death
Receiving Benefits After Death
The Probate Process

Determining Potential Estate Taxes

How Much is Your Estate Worth?
How the Federal Estate Tax System Works
State Estate Tax
Step-up or Step-down in Basis At Death

SELECTED TRANSFER TAX SAVINGS STRATEGIES

Strategy #1: Using The Marital Deduction Wisely

Plan to Use Both The Marital Deduction and Your Estate Tax Exemption
Control Wealth With a QTIP Trust
Give Your Spouse Control with General Power of Appointment Trust
Create a Qualified Domestic Trusts

Strategy #2: Lifetime Wealth Transfers

Gift Tax Exclusion
Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA) Accounts
Qualified Trusts for Minors
Crummey Trusts
Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts

Strategy #3: Using the Gift Tax Exemption Wisely

Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT)
Family Limited Partnerships (FLP)

Strategy #4: Consider Carryover Basis

General Rule: “Carryover Basis” for Gifts
Don’t Transfer Assets With a Built-In Loss
What about Step-Up At Death?

Strategy #5: Trusts That Benefit Both Individuals and Charity During .

Life or At Death
Charitable Remainder Trust: Cash Flow and Flexibility
Charitable Lead Trusts: Passing Wealth to Future Generations

Strategy #6: Private Foundations and Donor Advised Funds

Grant Making: Private Foundations
Donor Advised Funds

Strategy #7: Focusing on the Family-Owned Business

Who Will Manage the Business?
Who Should Own Your Business?
How Will the IRS Value Your Company?

Strategy #8: Planning to Avoid Generation Skipping Transfer Tax

Allocating GST Exemption
Tax Strategies

Strategy #9: Evaluating Your Need For Life Insurance

Is Lost Earning Power an Issue?
Is Liquidity an Issue?
Choose the Best Owner
Consider an ILIT

Strategy #10: Understanding Community Property Issues

Remember, Marital Rights Are Expanded
Plan Carefully When Using a Living Trust
Community Property and Tax Cost

IMPLEMENTING AND UPDATING YOUR PLAN

Where Do You Go From Here? No endorsement of Northern Trust or its agents is intended. So, call a qualified California estate planning attorney for help with your tax planning. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

September 10, 2008

Complaints Against California Tax Attorneys

Complaints Against Enrolled Professionals

California's taxpayers who have a complaint against their attorney, accountant, enrolled agent or other practitioners who are specifically permitted to practice before the IRS can submit their complaints in writing in a letter format. The letter should include the tax practitioner's name, address, telephone number, designation (i.e., attorney, certified public accountant, enrolled agent, enrolled actuary, etc.), a detailed description of the allegations, and any documents that support those allegations.

Direct all referrals to:

Internal Revenue Service
Office of Professional Responsibility
SE:OPR, Room 7238/IR
1111 Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20224

You can send it by facsimile at 202-622-2207

Complaints Against Unenrolled Tax Return Preparers

Complaints against unenrolled tax return preparers can be reported by completing Form 3949-A and mailing it or a letter with similar information to Internal Revenue Service, Fresno, CA 93888.

For additional information, you may refer to Complaints Against Tax Professionals Frequently Asked Questions.

If you have questions concerning an allegation, you may email the IRS at OPR@irs.gov.

August 25, 2008

Where Should I Keep My California Estate Plan?

Your California estate planning documents (the living trust, will, durable power of attorney for property management and advance health care directive) are usually on paper and you want to be sure that they stay safe and can be easily found when your family needs to find them. So, where should you store them?

There are people who store them in very odd places like their freezers. It’s a better idea to keep your originals in a fire-resistant safe in your house and to notify friends and family where they are and how to get it open. Better yet, you can simply keep them in an accessible place where they can easily be found; if they are lost or destroyed before you need them, your estate planning attorney can provide you with another copy.

It is probably not a good idea to store your estate plan in a safe deposit box at the bank. Unless your friends or family are co-owners of the box (and sometimes even if they are), it won’t be easy for them to open it if you’re not there. Having the key isn’t enough to get the bank to open it up for them — the bank wants you to prove that you have the legal authority to require them to open it up. Think about it: the document granting your friends or family the right to act on your behalf as an executor is INSIDE the box, and until the box is opened, they can’t prove that they have the authority to get the bank to open it… (and so on).

Another concern about using a safe deposit box is those small keys to safeguard. Lost keys are create an expensive problem. When you rent a box from the bank, they give you two keys. The only way the box can be opened is when one of your keys and one from the bank are used at the same time. If you lose both of your keys, you have to pay the bank to drill out and replace the lock on the box.

For other information about California estate planning, call an estate tax attorney – call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

August 21, 2008

California Divorce And Estate Planning

I am often asked about restraining orders that become effective when a divorce action is filed in California and how those orders impact estate planning by my clients who live in Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County or Orange County. I am also asked about the ability of my clients to do estate planning when they terminate their marital status before the final disposition of property.

When a dissolution action is filed, pursuant to California Family Code section 2040(4)(b), parties are prevented from creating a nonprobate transfer or modifying a nonprobate transfer that could affect the disposition of the property being transferred without having first obtained the written consent of the other party or a court order. Nonprobate transfers include revocable trusts, joint tenancies and beneficiary designations such as payable on death accounts, IRAs, profit sharing pension plans and life insurance.

As a result, a trust can be created but cannot be funded. While this will allow my client to immediately fund the trust at the conclusion of the dissolution action, this does not solve the problem of dieing during the dissolution action without an estate plan in place.

Therefore, if my client has the luxury of time, creating or modifying a revocable trust should be done before a dissolution action is pending. If this is not possible, then revoking any and all family trusts should be considered and an interim Will should be created. This will insure a disposition of my client’s separate property and one-half of the community property to persons whom my client would want to receive the property should their death occur during the pending dissolution action.

Because people often choose to terminate their marriage before the final disposition of property, what about estate planning of such property once the parties divorced? The issue was that while restraining orders became effective upon the filing of the dissolution action, Probate Code section 5600 provides that spousal beneficiary designations are automatically revoked at the termination of marital status if an asset is a “non probate transfer asset,” as defined in Probate Code section 5000 unless there is either (1) clear and convincing evidence that the transferor intended to preserve the nonprobate transfer in favor of his or her former spouse, or (2) an order from the Court. Effective January 1, 2008, the California legislature resolved this question in California Family Code section 2337(c)(7A).

California Family Code section 2337 addresses the situation where a party seeks to terminate their marital status before the disposition of property and protections that may be put in place to protect the spouse that did not seek the early termination of their marital status. Section (c)(7A) now provides that the Court may specifically order a party, as a condition of their seeking to be divorced, to maintain the other party as a beneficiary of a nonprobate transfer of one-half, or upon good cause, all of a nonprobate transfer asset until a judgment is entered with regards to the property and the property is in fact distributed.

As a result of this new development, it is important that when my clients tell me they are divorced, I must inquire further. I need to know if they were divorced after January 1, 2008; and if so, if they have a final judgment on their property issues. If not, I need to see their Status Only Judgment of Dissolution to know if the Court imposed a California Family Code section 2337(c)(7A) condition on the termination of their marital status so I know how to proceed with their estate planning.

If you are contemplating a divorce and you are concerned about your spouse getting your estate upon your death because that is what your Will or living trust provides, then speak with me about resolving this issue. I am an estate planning attorney and can help.

August 13, 2008

Charitable Gift Annuity

California tax lawyers and many of their clients are familiar with the advantages of accelerating charitable bequests into charitable remainder trusts: income for life for beneficiaries of the client’s choosing, capital gains tax savings, generous income tax charitable deductions and eventual support for important charitable causes. CRTs typically involve six-figure funding amounts, however, and come burdened with a variety of complexities and reporting requirements.

On the other hand, it is possible for clients age 60 and older to blend support for their charitable cause with a simple plan that will provide significant payments for life from gifts as small as $3,000 as well as large income tax deductions, potential capital gains tax savings and payments that are partly tax free. The technique that makes these benefits possible is a charitable gift annuity.

A gift annuity is a contract between a donor and a not-for-profit organization in which the donor exchanges cash or securities for an annuity for one or two recipients.

Immediate payment gift annuities have greatest appeal to older clients who are charitably motivated and wish to add a fixed income component to their portfolios. Both payout rates and deductions are high for this age group (the average gift annuity donor is age 77).

Gift annuities seem to have appeal for women. Women continue to live longer than men by roughly 5 years and so may have a greater interest in “an income that a person cannot outlive.”

Gift annuities also can be arranged to make payments for the lifetimes of two people, such as a husband and wife, brothers and sisters, parents and children or close friends.

Investors can use gift annuities to get investment profits and receive annual payments form the charitable organization that range from 5.5% to 10.5% depending on the age or ages of the persons receiving the payments. In general, 30 to 50% of a donor’s capital gain escapes capital gains tax completely. The remaining gain will be reported in small annual installments as part of the donor’s annuity payments and taxed at only 15% or possibly less.

Retirees who are unhappy with low CD returns can increase their spendable income with gift annuities and also enjoy payments that are partly tax-free. Capital gains savings are advantageous to investors who wish to move from equities into a fixed income arrangement.

Deferred payment gift annuities provide higher payout rates and larger charitable deductions, however, tax-free payments are smaller as a percentage of the annuity payment.

For other tax planning opportunities, call your tax lawyer. Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 for a tax consultation.

August 11, 2008

Free Tax And Estate Planning Information

The American Institute for Cancer Research has developed programs to assist California's tax lawyers and financial planners in providing their clients with accurate and current information related to charitable gifts. The Institute appreciates the role that California tax attorneys and financial planning professionals play in the consideration of charitable gifts by AICR supporters.

In the AICR's Estate Planners Corner: Services for Attorneys, Financial Professionals and Investment Advisors, it provides free publications and updates on a variety of tax and gift planning issues related to charitable gifts. Some of the publications include tax topics such as:

Minimizing Gift and Estate Taxes Through Charitable Trusts

Planning and Drafting Gifts and Trusts of Closely Held Stock

Selecting Assets for Charitable Gifts - Outright and in Trust

Supplementing Retirement Savings With Charitable Gifts

Charitable Remainder Trust Agreements Approved by the IRS

Minimizing Income Taxes and Transfer Taxes with Charitable Gift Annuities

Planning and Drafting Charitable Gifts and Trusts with Real Property

Planning and Drafting a Testamentary Charitable Remainder Trust

Planning and Drafting Charitable Lead Trusts

Administration and Investment Strategies for a Charitable Remainder Trust

For more detailed information on these estate planning topics, you are invited to call Mitchell A. Port, a tax attorney in Los Angeles, California, at (310) 559-5259.

July 24, 2008

New Law Makes Bequests For Animal Care Enforceable In California

Hot news: Schwarzenegger signed a bill recently issued from the California legislature to protect pet trusts. Other blog posts on this topic include: "Estate Planning For Pets" from June 20, 2008, "California Estate Planning And Your Pets" from April 16, 2008, "No Kidding – A California Trust For Your Pet" from December 17, 2007

Under such trusts, a trustee pays a caretaker to ensure that the pets are housed, fed and otherwise maintained. Pet owners have to account for their pets during estate planning or the animal may not be cared for.

California Senate Bill 685 removes the discretion of trustees in fulfilling the trust. It also allows courts to appoint a caregiver if the trustee does not wish to arrange for the pet care.

You may see the full Los Angeles Times article on this subject.

If you want to speak with an estate planning attorney in California about a pet trust, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

July 17, 2008

Choosing The Right Guardian For My Children

Sometimes the most difficult part of the estate planning meeting I have with my California clients concerns their choice of guardians for their minor children. Sometimes they are troubled about having too few people to choose from and at other times they are concerned about who they choose when their children are young may be different from those they would choose if their minor children were a bit older. Keep in mind that California law provides that the nomination of guardians is made in your Will (rather than in your living trust or durable powers of attorney).

A terrific blog post that may be helpful in choosing the appropriate guardian can be viewed by clicking here.

If you would like to discuss this and other California estate planning topics with a tax attorney located in Los Angeles, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

July 3, 2008

California's Durable Power Of Attorney

California's Durable Power Of Attorney for property management and personal affairs is used when you become incapacitated for any reason (e.g., Alzheimer’s, stroke, heart attack, auto accident causing a coma, etc.). It should be part of your basic California estate plan. The contents of the power of attorney ought to cover most, if not all, of the following items

1.1. Real Property Transactions.
(a) Acquisition.

(b) Transfer.

(c) Mortgages.

(d) Management.

(e) Improvements.

(f) Reorganizations.

(g) Change in Form of Title.

(h) Public Use.


1.2. Tangible Personal Property Transactions.
(a) Acquisition.

(b) Transfer.

(c) Security Interests.

(d) Management.


1.3. Stock and Bond Transactions.
(a) Acquisition and Transfer.

(b) Evidence of Ownership.

(c) Voting.


1.4. Commodity and Option Transactions.
(a) Acquisition and Transfer.

(b) Accounts.


1.5. Banking and Other Financial Institution Transactions.
(a) Existing Accounts.

(b) Opening of Accounts.

(c) Establishing and Closing Safe Deposit Boxes.

(d) Contracting Services.

(e) Making Withdrawals.

(f) Receiving Financial Statements.

(g) Entering Safe Deposit Boxes.

(h) Borrowing Money.

(i) Checks, Drafts, and Negotiable or Nonnegotiable Paper.

(j) Receiving Negotiable or Nonnegotiable Instruments.

(k) Letters of Credit, Credit Cards, and Travelers Checks.

(l) Extensions to Pay.


1.6. Business Operating Transactions.
(a) Operation and Transfer.

(b) Partnerships.

(c) Bonds, Shares, and Other Instruments.

(d) Sole Proprietorship.

(e) Expansion.

(f) Reorganization.

(g) Sale or Liquidation.

(h) Buy Out Agreements.

(i) Reports.

(j) Taxes.


1.7. Insurance and Annuity Transactions.
(a) Existing Personal Coverage.

(b) Procuring New Coverage.

(c) Paying Premiums for New Coverage.

(d) Beneficiary Designation.

(e) Borrowing.

(f) Surrendering.

(g) Elections.

(h) Manner of Paying Premiums.

(i) Conversion.

(j) Beneficiary Change.

(k) Governmental Aid.

(l) Transfer.

(m) Taxes.


1.8. Retirement Plan Transactions.
(a) Select Payment Options.

(b) Beneficiary Designations.

(c) Voluntary Contributions.

(d) Investment Powers.

(e) Rollovers.

(f) Borrow, Buy, and Sell.

(g) Waiver of Spousal Rights.


1.9. Estate, Trust, or Other Beneficiary Transactions.
(a) Payments.

(b) Claims.

(c) Participation in Proceedings.

(d) Removal of Fiduciary.

(e) Investments and Disbursements.

(f) Transfer to Revocable Trust.

(g) Contingent Interests.

(h) Probate Code Section 13502 or 13503 Election.


1.10. Power to Create, Modify, or Revoke Trusts for My Benefit and Benefit of My Dependents.

1.11. Resignation From Fiduciary Positions.

1.12. Claims and Litigation.
(a) Actions.

(b) Intervention and Interpleader.

(c) Provisional Remedies, Enforcement of Judgments, and Participation in Proceedings.

(d) Settlement.

(e) Procedure.

(f) Bankruptcy.

(g) Payments.


1.13. Tax Matters.
(a) Preparation and Filing of Documents.

(b) Paying and Contesting Amounts.

(c) Exercising Elections.

(d) Acting in Tax Matters.


1.14. Personal and Family Maintenance.
(a) Support.

(b) Domestic Help, Travel, and Necessities.

(c) Medical Care.

(d) Transportation.

(e) Charge Accounts.

(f) Church and Organization Affiliations.

(g) Religious or Spiritual Needs.

(h) Pets.

(i) Funeral and Burial.


1.15. Gifts.
(a) Attorney in Fact's Discretion.

(b) Gifts to Attorney in Fact Limited to "5 or 5" Amount.

(c) Payment of Gift Tax.

(d) Gift Splitting.


1.16. Government Benefits.
(a) Execution of Vouchers.

(b) Possession of Property.

(c) Benefits.

(d) Actions.

(e) Receipt of Proceeds.


1.17. Nomination of Conservator.

1.18. Incidental Powers.
(a) Claims.

(b) Contracts.

(c) Execution, Acknowledgment, and Delivery.

(d) Actions.

(e) Court Assistance.

(f) Employment.

(g) Recordkeeping.

(h) Preparation and Filing of Documents.

(i) Other Lawful Acts.


1.19. Restrictions on Property Management Powers.
(a) Trusts.

(b) Obligations of Attorney in Fact.

(c) Insurance on Life of Attorney in Fact.


2.1. Determination of Incapacity.

2.2. Capacity Regained.

2.3. Reimbursement for Costs and Expenses.

2.4. Compensation.

2.5. Notice to Third Party as to Amount of Compensation.

2.6. Reliance by Third Parties.

2.7. Ratification.

2.8. Exculpation of My Attorney in Fact.

2.9. Revocation and Amendment.

To find out more about estate planning, call California tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

June 27, 2008

Family-Owned Business: A California Success Story

Tax planning for family wealth transfers and California-based family owned businesses is complex and requires input from qualified advisors. Self-study may also be important: A resource for family business executives includes Fambiz.com.

That site covers topics in depth such as:

Asset Protection

Estate Planning

Family Business Trends

Inter-generational Issues

Shareholder Agreements

Strategic Planning

Succession

Tax Issues

Transfer of Ownership

Valuation

Women in Family Business

Use the Family Business Search engine to find a multitude of articles that can be searched by subject. A great resource for owners and executives of California's family businesses.

To talk to a California attorney about these and other business succession topics, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

June 25, 2008

Gifts: Who Pays The Tax?

Californians making gifts often believe the federal gift tax is paid by the recipient/beneficiary. Unfortunately, it is the one making the gift who pays the tax. Tax free gifts are possible, however.

An estate planning attorney in Florida, David M. Goldman, has a good article on the taxation of gifts and how to make tax free gifts. Those of us living in Los Angeles County, Orange County, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County and throughout California come within the rules explained in Mr. Goldman's article.

To discuss tax free gifts, taxable but tax efficient gifts or other estate planning topics, please call Mitchell A. Port, an estate planning attorney, at (310) 559-5259.

June 23, 2008

Sopisticated Estate Planning

GRATs
Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts can "leverage" your Applicable Credit and allow you to gift more at less tax cost.

QPRTs
How a Qualified Personal Residence Trust can save gift and estate taxes.

FLPs/LLCs

Using Family Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies to facilitate estate planning.

Intentionally Defective Grantor Trusts
IDGTs used as an estate freezing device. You create a trust which is defective for income tax purposes (but not for estate and gift tax purposes) for the benefit of children and/or grandchildren. You sell assets (stock in a closely held or family business, real estate, marketable securities, limited partnership interests) to the trust in exchange for an installment note with interest. IDGT works best if the sold assets are subject to discounts in determining their fair market value and if it is expected that the sold assets will appreciate in value at a rate greater than the interest rate payable on the note.

Charitable Trusts
A charitable remainder unitrust or annuity trust can provide income and estate tax benefits, avoid capital gains tax and provide funds for research, helping the needy or other philanthropic goals.

Private Foundations
Private foundations can be a philanthropic legacy for wealthy donors.

To discuss these and other estate planning techniques, call Mitchell A. Port, a California tax attorney in Los Angeles, at (310) 559-5259.

June 20, 2008

Estate Planning For Pets

The "Property & Probate" online magazine of the American Bar Association published an article by attorney Stephanie B. Casteel of Atlanta, Georgia, entitled "Estate Planning for Pets".

Estate planning topics include:

Traditional Estate Planning Options

Outright Gifts

Traditional Trusts

Fiduciaries
Terms
Distributions
Funding
Remainderman
Identification of Animal

Euthanasia

Charitable Remainder Trust

Statutory Pet Trusts

Federal Law and Tax Consequences

Income Tax
Estate Tax

Here's an interesting excerpt from the article:

"Pets are valuable members of a client’s family, as illustrated by Leona Helmsley’s $12 million bequest to a trust for her dog, and it is important for the practitioner to address the care of the client’s pets in the event of his or her earlier death. Regardless of whether the client’s jurisdiction has enacted legislation allowing the creation of statutory pet trusts, clients may make outright bequests of their pets to a trusted caregiver or establish a traditional trust for their pets’ care. Many states are enacting statutes recognizing and enforcing trusts the beneficiaries of which are pets. Accordingly, it is important for practitioners to consider the available estate planning techniques and the factors that contribute to a plan that ensures the care and protection of a client’s pets."

If you would like to set up a trust like this, please call attorney Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259 to discuss it.


June 13, 2008

California Lawyers Are Not All Alike

I read an ad and it went something like this:

"There's really no difference between law firms."

Many people believe that Los Angeles law firms are pretty much the same. I don't. I believe that what separates me from the pack is not what I do, but how I do it - aggressive not conservative, team player and not a one-man-band, problem solver not just a legal practitioner. My clients clearly understand and value this difference. How can I help you? Contact Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

I liked this because it describes me and my practice. If you need help with probate, Wills, living trusts, powers of attorney, tax problems or business transactions, please call me for your consultation.

June 9, 2008

When You Become 18: A Survival Guide For California Teenagers

The State Bar of California has a publication free for downloading called: "When You Become 18: A Survival Guide For Teenagers."

Once our children become adults, they may need to have their own set of legal documents to address their incapacity and where their property will go should they die too young. An earlier blog post discusses the benefit of having a California advance health care directive for young adults.

Speak with a California estate planning attorney about this and other tax topics. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

June 4, 2008

Developments In The IRS Estate Tax Division

Estate tax audits continue to be scattered across the country. With the drop in the number of federal estate tax returns expected to be filed because of the increased filing threshold resulting from the provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, the IRS offered voluntary early retirement to many Estate and Gift tax employees across the nation.

A great deal of employees accepted the buy-out and thereby created a coverage problem for local audits. The workload nevertheless has to be handled.

Here is a list of estate tax managers and their contact numbers located throughout the U.S.:

ESTATE TAX MANAGERS

Kym Taborn
Van Nuys, California
(Covers Los Angeles)
818 756 4522

Janet Holman
Oakland, California
(Covers Oakland, Los Angeles, San Jose)
510 637 4557

Ralph Perez
New York
212 436 1114

Virginia Hunt
New York
(Covers Albany, Syracuse, NYC)
212 436 1145

Faiza-Vardag-Muzaffar
New York
212 436 1094

Patrick Leahy
New York City
212 436 1146

Stephen Gordon
New York City
212 436 1082

Thomas Fleming
Boston
(Covers MA, ME, NH, VT)
617 316 2326

Richard Murray
Boston
(Covers MA, CT)
617 316 2328

Louis Kaufman
Philadelphia

(Covers PA, DE)
215 861 1585

Elliot Pleener
New Jersey
(Covers NJ, MD, DC, VA)
973 993 7401

Vacant
Trenton N.J.
(Covers International)

Elizabeth Williamson
NC
(Covers NC, VA)
336 378 2873

Martin Horn
Nashville
(Covers AR, GA, TN)
615 250 5573

George Dewey Jacksonville
Jacksonville
(Covers SC, N&C. FL)
904 665 1300

Martin Basson Plantation
Plantation
(Covers S. FL)
954 423 7232

Elaine McCarroll
Cleveland
(Covers MI, Cleveland OH)
216 520 7170

Donald Grigsby
Cincinnati
(Covers IN, KY, Roanoke, VA, OH)
513 263 4071

Frederick Herzog
New Orleans
(Covers LA, OK, MS)
504 558 3245

James McMullen (Acting)Chicago
Chicago
(Covers Chicago & Milwaukee)
312 566 2207

Jerry Voeller
St. Paul
(Covers MN, CO, SD, MT, ID)
651 312 7757

Vacant
MO, IA, S. IL

Michelle Moser
Omaha
(Covers KS, MO, NE, New Orleans)
402 221 3779

Lee Schwemer
Ft. Worth, TX
(Covers Dallas, Ft. Worth, Lubbock)
817 759 2900 x 620

Vacant
AZ, San Diego, Laguna Niguel

James Hammerstrom
WA
(Covers WA, OR, HI)
425 468 6009

Kyle Martin
Oakland, CA
(Covers UT, Denver, San Jose, Bakersfield)
510 637 4549

Toby Stewart
Houston
(Covers NM, Houston, Austin)
713 209 4415

If you have an estate tax problem, call Los Angeles estate tax attorney Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

June 2, 2008

Estate Planning Using A Post-Nuptial Agreement

The Washington Post online ran an interesting story about estate planning with the use of a post-nuptial agreement. The article featured a couple as they were inching toward the edge of the divorce cliff.

Here is an excerpt:

Now they are starting over. They've settled their arguments over money. They've divided up some of their assets. They are maintaining two households but agree to try to spend no more than 10 days apart in a month. They are about to celebrate their 40th wedding anniversary. "Deep down we really do love each other," she says. "If you once loved in a passionate way, you can reclaim that."

The news is the tool this 60-something couple used to reclaim their marriage: the post-nuptial agreement.

The post-nup is a contract signed during marriage to manage financial affairs and divide income and assets in the event of death or divorce.

One purpose of the post-nup is estate planning. "That is a perfectly good reason to do it," says Jeff Atkinson, principal author of "The American Bar Association Guide to Marriage, Divorce & Families" (Random House, 2006). It is a way to direct retirement benefits to children of a previous marriage, or to an adult child with special needs.

For a further discussion of this technique, call a California estate planning attorney, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.

May 30, 2008

Same-sex Domestic Partners Can Marry Without Dissolution

With the recent California Supreme Court decision overturning the ban on gay marriage, California Secretary of State Debra Bowen contacted the Legislative Counsel of California and was told that dissolving a domestic partnership would not be necessary before a same-sex couple can wed. A written opinion is expected to follow next week.

The San Francisco Chronicle ran an interesting news story about this.

May 19, 2008

California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban

On Thursday, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion legalizing gay marriage in California. The 4-3 California Supreme Court ruling found the state's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, and declared that gay couples have the same legal right to marry as heterosexual couples.

Here are some excepts from that court opinion:

Although the understanding of marriage as limited to a union of a man and a woman is undeniably the predominant one, if we have learned anything from the significant evolution in the prevailing societal views and official policies toward members of minority races and toward women over the past half-century, it is that even the most familiar and generally accepted of social practices and traditions often mask an unfairness and inequality that frequently is not recognized or appreciated by those not directly harmed by those practices or traditions. It is instructive to recall in this regard that the traditional, well-established legal rules and practices of our not-so-distant past (1) barred interracial marriage, (2) upheld the routine exclusion of women from many occupations and official duties, and (3) considered the relegation of racial minorities to separate and assertedly equivalent public facilities and institutions as constitutionally equal treatment. As the United States Supreme Court observed in its decision in Lawrence v. Texas, supra, 539 U.S. 558, 579, the expansive and protective provisions of our constitutions, such as the due process clause, were drafted with the knowledge that “times can blind us to certain truths and later generations can see that laws once thought necessary and proper in fact serve only to oppress.”

For this reason, the interest in retaining a tradition that excludes an historically disfavored minority group from a status that is extended to all others — even when the tradition is long-standing and widely shared — does not necessarily represent a compelling state interest for purposes of equal protection analysis.

After carefully evaluating the pertinent considerations in the present case, we conclude that the state interest in limiting the designation of marriage exclusively to opposite-sex couples, and in excluding same-sex couples from access to that designation, cannot properly be considered a compelling state interest for equal protection purposes. To begin with, the limitation clearly is not necessary to preserve the rights and benefits of marriage currently enjoyed by opposite-sex couples. Extending access to the designation of marriage to same sex couples will not deprive any opposite-sex couple or their children of any of the rights and benefits conferred by the marriage statutes, but simply will make the benefit of the marriage designation available to same-sex couples and their children. As Chief Judge Kaye of the New York Court of Appeals succinctly observed in her dissenting opinion in Hernandez v. Robles, supra, 855 N.E.2d 1, 30 (dis. opn. of Kaye, C.J.): “There are enough marriage licenses to go around for everyone.”

Further, permitting same-sex couples access to the designation of marriage will not alter the substantive nature of the legal institution of marriage; same-sex couples who choose to enter into the relationship with that designation will be subject to the same duties and obligations to each other, to their children, and to third parties that the law currently imposes upon opposite-sex couples who marry. Finally, affording same-sex couples the opportunity to obtain the designation of marriage will not impinge upon the religious freedom of any religious organization, official, or any other person; no religion will be required to change its religious policies or practices with regard to same-sex couples, and no religious officiant will be required to solemnize a marriage in contravention of his or her religious beliefs. (Cal. Const., art. I, § 4.)

While retention of the limitation of marriage to opposite-sex couples is not needed to preserve the rights and benefits of opposite-sex couples, the exclusion of same-sex couples from the designation of marriage works a real and appreciable harm upon same-sex couples and their children. As discussed above, because of the long and celebrated history of the term “marriage” and the widespread understanding that this word describes a family relationship unreservedly sanctioned by the community, the statutory provisions that continue to limit access to this designation exclusively to opposite-sex couples — while providing only a novel, alternative institution for same-sex couples — likely will be viewed as an official statement that the family relationship of same-sex couples is not of comparable stature or equal dignity to the family relationship of opposite-sex couples. Furthermore, because of the historic disparagement of gay persons, the retention of a distinction in nomenclature by which the term “marriage” is withheld only from the family relationship of same-sex couples is all the more likely to cause the new parallel institution that has been established for same-sex couples to be considered a mark of second-class citizenship. Finally, in addition to the potential harm flowing from the lesser stature that is likely to be afforded to the family relationships of same-sex couples by designating them domestic partnerships, there exists a substantial risk that a judicial decision upholding the differential treatment of opposite-sex and same-sex couples would be understood as validating a more general proposition that our state by now has repudiated: that it is permissible, under the law, for society to treat gay individuals and same-sex couples differently from, and less favorably than, heterosexual individuals and opposite-sex couples.

In light of all of these circumstances, we conclude that retention of the traditional definition of marriage does not constitute a state interest sufficiently compelling, under the strict scrutiny equal protection standard, to justify withholding that status from same-sex couples. Accordingly, insofar as the provisions of sections 300 and 308.5 draw a distinction between opposite-sex couples and same-sex couples and exclude the latter from access to the designation of marriage, we conclude these statutes are unconstitutional.

Having concluded that sections 300 and 308.5 are unconstitutional to the extent each statute reserves the designation of marriage exclusively to opposite sex couples and denies same-sex couples access to that designation, we must determine the proper remedy.

When a statute’s differential treatment of separate categories of individuals is found to violate equal protection principles, a court must determine whether the constitutional violation should be eliminated or cured by extending to the previously excluded class the treatment or benefit that the statute affords to the included class, or alternatively should be remedied by withholding the benefit equally from both the previously included class and the excluded class. A court generally makes that determination by considering whether extending the benefit equally to both classes, or instead withholding it equally, would be most consistent with the likely intent of the Legislature, had that body recognized that unequal treatment was constitutionally impermissible.

In the present case, it is readily apparent that extending the designation of marriage to same-sex couples clearly is more consistent with the probable legislative intent than withholding that designation from both opposite-sex couples and same-sex couples in favor of some other, uniform designation. In view of the lengthy history of the use of the term “marriage” to describe the family relationship here at issue, and the importance that both the supporters of the 1977 amendment to the marriage statutes and the electors who voted in favor of Proposition 22 unquestionably attached to the designation of marriage, there can be no doubt that extending the designation of marriage to same-sex couples, rather than denying it to all couples, is the equal protection remedy that is most consistent with our state’s general legislative policy and preference.

Accordingly, in light of the conclusions we reach concerning the constitutional questions brought to us for resolution, we determine that the language of section 300 limiting the designation of marriage to a union “between a man and a woman” is unconstitutional and must be stricken from the statute, and that the remaining statutory language must be understood as making the designation of marriage available both to opposite-sex and same-sex couples. In addition, because the limitation of marriage to opposite-sex couples imposed by section 308.5 can have no constitutionally permissible effect in light of the constitutional conclusions set forth in this opinion, that provision cannot stand.

May 12, 2008

Where Should I Store My Will And To Whom Should I Give Copies Of My Estate Planning Documents?

David M. Goldman, an estate planning attorney in Florida, has an interesting article worth reading at his blog. Simply substitute "California estate planning" or "California estate planning lawyer" for the reference to "Florida" and you should be able to obtain some valuable information. Or, simply call Mitchell A. Port, a California estate planning attorney, at (310) 559-5259 to discuss your concerns.

May 9, 2008

Is Your Estate Worth $5 Million Or Less?

Jonathan G. Blattmachr and Georgiana J. Slade at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, and Bridget J. Crawford at Pace University - School of Law, have written an article in the March, 2007 edition of "Estate Planning" magazine, addressing estate planning for those of us with estates under five million dollars. I have posted the full article at the same time as this posting.

Here is an abstract for the article:

"Financial concerns may preclude people of modest wealth (defined for purposes of this article as those having a net worth between $1 million and $5 million) from making significant lifetime transfers to achieve estate planning goals. Yet lifetime transfers are among the most effective ways to reduce estate taxes. Individuals of modest wealth may experience a tension between the desire to take advantage of opportunities to reduce taxes and protect assets from other claims which may arise, on the one hand, and the need to preserve an adequate base of wealth to ensure the maintenance of a current standard of living, on the other.

"The advisor to these individuals carefully should consider what estate planning steps are most appropriate and what level of transfers, if any, the individual reasonably can afford to make.

"This article details and evaluates eleven strategies that may apply to clients in the modest wealth category:

"(1) inter vivos transfers of life insurance and other non-income producing assets;

"(2) estate building and income tax sheltering with life insurance;

"(3) qualified personal residence trusts;

"(4) effective use of annual exclusions;

"(5) self-settled trusts;

"(6) potential use of the gift tax exemption and the GST exemption;

"(7) assessing income tax-free states;

"(8) using a charitable remainder trust to build wealth and generate income;

"(9) medical care and tuition payments;

"(10) limited liability entities for asset protection and tax planning; and

"(11) special care in handling interests in qualified plans, IRAs and other IRD."

To speak with an estate planning attorney in Los Angeles, California, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

May 9, 2008

Estate Planning For Persons With Less Than $5 Million

Download file

April 23, 2008

Advance Health Care Directive For Your Child

Most would rather not think about it but if your child is 18 or older then it is appropriate for him or her to have an advance health care directive. All the same reasons that apply for older adults to have the directive also apply to a younger adult. While you're at it, perhaps a will, living trust and durable power of attorney for property management may also be a good thing.

Speak with a Los Angeles attorney to help decide what makes sense. Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

April 16, 2008

California Estate Planning And Your Pets

In this past Sunday's edition of the Los Angeles Times, David Colker wrote an interesting article about setting up a trust for your pet as provided under California law. This article is along the lines of my earlier blog entry entitled "No Kidding - A California Trust For Your Pet" written on December 17, 2007. Here is what David Colker wrote:

Leona Helmsley was a nice mom -- to her dog.

Just look at her will. The multimillionaire hotel owner, whose nickname was the Queen of Mean, left nothing to her late son's children when she died last year.

But her beloved Maltese named Trouble got $12 million to keep him in the manner to which he was accustomed.

It became a national joke, but it also put a spotlight on a serious concern.

"It raised awareness about what happens to pets if they outlive us," said Michael Markarian, executive vice president of the Humane Society of the United States.

"We think of pets as having a short life span so we assume it won't happen. But just in case, we should ensure they go to a loving home."

Without a trust fund or some other way to provide for care, a long-adored pet could end up in a shelter.

"It's not uncommon," said Ryan Drabek, spokesman for Orange County Animal Care Services. "We get calls from the coroner to come pick up a pet if there are no family members who will do it."

Pet trusts have the force of law in 39 states, including California. In general, the money is turned over to a designated caregiver -- often a family member or friend -- who takes the pet in.

But the California law, which went into effect in 1991, is considered weak compared with most of the others. It states that the wishes expressed "may be performed by the trustee for the life of the animal."

The problem is the word "may."

"It makes the law unenforceable," said Adam Keigwin, spokesman for state Sen. Leland Yee (D-San Francisco), who has introduced legislation to make pet trusts more bulletproof.

The revised law says instructions in a pet trust should not be considered a "mere request." The bill was approved by unanimous vote in the Senate in January and is awaiting action in the Assembly.

In case of a challenge, the proposal directs that courts "carry out the general intent of the trust."

Great care should be taken in planning a pet trust, Markarian said. It's important to have a detailed discussion with the designated caregiver.

"It's not something to spring on someone by surprise after you die," he said. "Suddenly, they find out they are taking care of Fido or Fluffy."

Markarian also suggested naming at least one backup in case the primary designee can't take the pet when you die.

The people you name can't be forced to take care of the animal. If you don't plan well, the pet could still end up in a shelter until a new home for it is found, if ever.

To determine the amount of money that should be set aside, a pet owner should figure out how much will be spent for food and regular medical care for the estimated life of the animal and then add a substantial amount in case of major medical problems.

Still, the funds could get depleted. At that point, all you can hope is that affection will take over.

"If you pick the right person," Markarian said, "that pet is not going to be abandoned when the money runs out."

April 9, 2008

California Advance Health Care Directive

California has a free Advance Health Care Directive form. Just click here. The California Medical Association also has a free form. Use either one - they are both good.

For more extensive estate planning that includes, in part, a living trust, a pour-over will and a durable power of attorney for property management, consult with Mitchell A. Port by calling him at 310.559.5259.

April 4, 2008

What To Do When Someone Dies

The question I sometimes hear as part of my California probate law practice from clients after the death of a loved one is: “What do I need to do now?” Not all of the points below will apply to all Decedents, but many of them will. What follows should be considered when a close friend or relative dies who owns property in Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County or Orange County, California:

1. If the death occurs at home, you may need to contact a local police officer or coroner.

2. Notify family and friends. You may want to consider having family members contact others to save yourself some time on the phone during a stressful period.

3. If the Decedent wished, a donation of body parts and tissues should be considered.

4. If a doctor is not present, notify a doctor or coroner in order to obtain a death certificate.

5. Contact a funeral home concerning burial or cremation arrangements.

6. Look for instructions which the Decedent may have left regarding preferences for funeral and burial arrangements.

7. Complete funeral and burial arrangements.

8. Determine if the Decedent belonged to a burial or memorial society that may make special arrangements for the funeral, such as military honor guards.

9. Contact the Social Security Administration and any other government agencies or benefit program that may be making payments to the Decedent. (Note that the payment for the month of death will not be made by the Social Security Administration and others.)

10. Review the Decedent’s financial affairs and look for any estate planning documents, such as Wills and Trusts, along with any other relevant documents, including:

Continue reading "What To Do When Someone Dies" »

March 31, 2008

What Is The Federal Estate Tax?

The Federal estate tax is a tax on the right to transfer property at death. The tax, reported on Form 706, United States Estate (and Generation Skipping Transfer) Tax Return, is applied to estates for which at-death gross assets, the "gross estate," exceed the filing threshold. Included in gross estate are real estate, cash, stocks, bonds, businesses, and decedent-owned life insurance policies. Deductions are allowed for administrative expenses, indebtedness, taxes, casualty loss, and charitable and marital transfers. The taxable estate is calculated as gross estate less allowable deductions.

The IRS Estate Tax page provides further information concerning the estate tax. Covered are topics including:

Frequently Asked Questions on Estate Taxes Gift Tax

Frequently Asked Questions on Gift Taxes

Filing Estate and Gift Tax Returns

Forms and Publications - Estate and Gift Tax

Publication 950, Introduction to Estate and Gift Taxes

What's New - Estate and Gift Tax

Once you have accounted for the Gross Estate, certain deductions (and in special circumstances, reductions to value) are allowed in arriving at your "Taxable Estate." These deductions may include mortgages and other debts, estate administration expenses, property that passes to surviving spouses and qualified charities. The value of some operating business interests or farms may be reduced for estates that qualify.

After the net amount is computed, the value of lifetime taxable gifts (beginning with gifts made in 1977) is added to this number and the tax is computed. The tax is then reduced by the available unified credit. Presently, the amount of this credit reduces the computed tax so that only total taxable estates and lifetime gifts that exceed $1,000,000 will actually have to pay tax. In its current form, the estate tax only affects the wealthiest 2% of all Americans.

Most relatively simple estates (cash, publicly-traded securities, small amounts of other easily-valued assets, and no special deductions or elections, or jointly-held property) with a total value under $1,000,000 do not require the filing of an estate tax return. The amount was $1,500,000 in 2004 and 2005. For 2006 through 2008, the amount is raised to $2,000,000.

To maximize your estate tax planning opportunities, call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

March 24, 2008

How To Write Your Own Will In California

This information is not intended to be a substitute for proper estate planning. Writing your own will may result in unintended consequences, misinterpretation and perhaps litigation. Probate will not be avoided. I have listed many of the steps necessary to write your own will even though I advise against it.

To write a holographic will as a California resident, the following steps should be taken:

1. Use a completely blank sheet of paper (no letterhead, no logo, nothing on it)

2. Write the entire will in your own handwriting

3. State your name and that you are of sound mind and not under any duress to write a will

4. State the county in which you reside

5. State that it is your last will and that it supersedes all prior wills

6. State who you are married to, if you are married, and if not, so state

7. State the names of your children, if any, and if none, so state. If you have children and they are minors, list those people in an order of priority who will be guardians

8. List those people in an order of priority who will be executors

9. State that bond is waived for any executor (and guardian – if you have children) who serves

10. State who is going to inherit what property, for example, “I leave my spouse all of my interest in any property whether real or personal, including but not limited to our home on _________, Drive, my nut company on __________, Drive, my real estate on ____________ Drive, all of my cash and investments, and all the rest of my property wherever located. If my spouse does not survive me, I leave all of my interest in said property in equal shares to my children.”

11. State who else gets something by mentioning their name(s) and what they get. Add that if either the person named is not living at the time of your death or if the property is no longer a part of your estate, then the gift to that person lapses.

12. If applicable, state your intent to disinherit anyone who contests the will. For instance: “Except as otherwise provided in this Will, I have with full knowledge omitted to provide for my children and heirs, or any others who might feel entitled to some portion of my estate. I have carefully considered the needs and abilities of my family and after such consideration have disposed of my estate in the manner provided in this Will. Should any beneficiary named in this Will, or the parent of any beneficiary named in this Will, or any person claiming through a beneficiary named in this Will, or any person claiming to be an heir, directly, indirectly, singly or in conjunction with other persons, attack this Will, or contest any of its provisions, or contest any trust established by me, or seek to impair or invalidate any part or provision of my estate plan, or conspire or cooperate with anyone attempting to do any of the aforesaid, such person's interest (or if such person has no interest, but his or her child has an interest in my estate or any trust established by me, then such child's interest) in my estate is revoked and shall be forfeit and distributed as if such person (or the child of such person) had predeceased me and any generation-skipping transfer taxes caused by reason of such forfeiture shall be charged to and paid from such property without the benefit of the use of any of generation-skipping transfer tax exemption.”

13. Sign and date the document without any witnesses or a notary. Do not let anyone else sign as a witness and do not have the will notarized

This does not avoid probate and should not be used as a substitute for a complete estate plan. Consultation with an estate planning attorney like Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259 is strongly advised.

March 7, 2008

IRS Publications And Forms

The Internal Revenue Service has many forms and free publications on a wide variety of topics to help you understand and meet tax obligations, reporting and filing requirements. If you need IRS materials try one of these ways:

Walk-in: During the tax-filing season, many libraries and post offices offer free tax forms. Some libraries also have copies of commonly-requested publications. Braille materials may also be available. Many large grocery stores, copy centers, and office supply stores have forms you can photocopy or print from a CD.

Internet: You can access forms and publications on the IRS website 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at IRS.gov.

Mail: Send your order for tax forms and publications to National Distribution Center, P.O. Box 8903, Bloomington, IL 61702-8903. You should receive your products within 10 days after we receive your order.

Phone: Call 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676) to order current year forms, instructions and publications and prior year forms and instructions. You should receive your order within 10 days.

Try these links:

Publication 2053A, Quick and Easy Access to IRS Tax Help and Forms (PDF 40K)

Publication 910, Guide to Free Tax Services (PDF 636K)

Need other tax help? Have other tax problems you wish to discuss with a California tax attorney? Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

March 5, 2008

Gifts And Your Taxes

It is a common belief that the recipient of a taxable gift has to pay the tax.

Federal tax law is different than that: the person who receives your gift does not have to report the gift to the IRS or pay gift or income tax on its value. Instead, if you recently gave any one person gifts that are valued at more than $12,000, you - the maker of the gift - must report the total gifts to the Internal Revenue Service and you may have to pay tax on the gifts.

If you sell something at less than its value or make an interest-free or reduced-interest loan, you may be making a gift. Gifts also include money and property, including the use of property without expecting to receive something of equal value in return.

There are some exceptions to the tax rules on gifts. The following gifts generally are not taxable and do not count against the $12,000 annual limit:

Tuition or Medical Expenses that you pay directly to an educational or medical institution for someone's benefit

Gifts to your Spouse

Gifts to a Political Organization for its use

Gifts to Charities

If you are married, both you and your spouse can give separate gifts of up to the annual limit of $12,000 to the same person without making a taxable gift. In other words, you and your spouse can give one of your children (or anyone else for that matter) a $24,000 gift of cash or other property during any one year without paying any gift tax. This is commonly known as splitting gifts between spouses. Essentially, it means a gift by you or your spouse to a third person can be considered as made one-half by each of you provided there is consent by both spouses.

For more information, get the IRS Publication 950, Introduction to Estate and Gift Taxes, IRS Form 709, United States Gift Tax Return, and Instructions for Form 709. They are available at the IRS Web site at IRS.gov in the Forms and Publications section or by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676).

Gift tax planning often requires the help of a qualified tax lawyer. Please call attorney Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

February 11, 2008

Time To Choose A Tax Return Preparer - Some Advice

While most tax return preparers are professional and honest, you can use the following tips to choose a preparer who will offer the best service for your tax preparation needs.

If you choose to use a paid tax preparer, it is important that you find a qualified tax professional. Taxpayers are ultimately responsible for everything on their return even when it’s prepared by someone else.

The most reputable preparers will request to see your records and receipts and will ask you multiple questions to determine your total income and your qualifications for expenses, deductions, and other items. By doing so, they have your best interest in mind and are trying to help you avoid penalties, interest, or additional taxes that could result from later IRS contacts.

Get References. Ask questions and get references from clients who have used the tax professional before. Were they satisfied with the service received?

Plan Ahead. Choose a preparer you will be able to contact after the return is filed and one who will be responsive to your needs.

Ask about service fees. Avoid preparers who claim they can obtain larger refunds than other preparers, or those who guarantee a refund or base fees on a percentage of the amount of the refund.

Research. Check to see if the preparer has any questionable history with the Better Business Bureau, the state’s board of accountancy for CPAs or the state’s bar association for attorneys. Find out if the preparer belongs to a professional organization that requires its members to pursue continuing education and also holds them accountable to a code of ethics.

Determine if the preparer’s credentials meet your needs. Does your state have licensing or registration requirements for paid preparers? Is he or she an Enrolled Agent, Certified Public Accountant, or Attorney? If so, the preparer can represent taxpayers before the IRS on all matters – including audits, collections, and appeals. Other return preparers can represent taxpayers only in audits regarding a return signed as a preparer.

Want a referral to a qualified tax return preparer from a California tax attorney? Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

January 7, 2008

Hiring A Lawyer In California

The California State Bar has a very interesting pamphlet offering advice on finding the right lawyer for you in California.

The pamphlet asks about 16 different questions to help you find and hire the right attorney.

The California State Bar has other useful pamphlets on topics such as California Wills, whether you need estate planning and whether you need a living trust in California.

To speak with an attorney in Los Angeles, please call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

December 17, 2007

No Kidding – A California Trust For Your Pet

Pets are no longer treated like any other piece of property. California has a law on the books under California Probate Code Section 15212 passed in 1991 which provides as follows:

A trust for the care of a designated domestic or pet animal may be performed by the trustee for the life of the animal, whether or not there is a beneficiary who can seek enforcement or termination of the trust and whether or not the terms of the trust contemplate a longer duration.

This California statute provides that you can create a trust for the care of a designated domestic or pet animal for the life of the animal. The duration will only be for the life of the pet, even if the trust instrument contemplates a longer duration.

California Probate Code Section 15212 is intended to clarify the law which may have been voidable under the rule against perpetuities provided in the California Civil Code. On the death of the designated animal, the trust permitted by Section 15212 terminates.

Before this the law treated pets like any other piece of property upon the death of their owners.

As evidence of the increasing interest in estate planning for pet owners, see Roberta C. Yafie, Trust-Fund Pets, NY Post, June 24, 2007 (stating that "[m]ore and more middle-class pet owners are opting for Pet Trusts to ensure their dependant's are cared for").

With the adoption of this code, setting up a trust to care for pets became a recognized estate planning technique. This law enables pets to become the beneficiaries of your will or trust.

Continue reading "No Kidding – A California Trust For Your Pet" »

December 6, 2007

Doctrine of "Substantial Compliance" Has A High Bar To Satisfy

Those of us with federal tax problems in California are governed by the court decisions made the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; decisions by other Circuit Courts do not necessarily apply to California’s taxpayers directly. But in a recent decision Estate of Tamulis v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals involving the tax treatment of a charitable remainder trust—a trust in which the income goes to individuals during their lifetime (or some other period) but what remains after their rights expire goes to charity – the Court held against carrying out the charitable intent of the donor.

Here's the story. Father Tamulis, a Catholic priest, died in 2000, leaving an estate of $3.4 million. His will left the bulk of his estate to a living trust that he had created. The trust was to continue for the longer of 10 years or the joint lives of Tamulis’s brother and the brother’s wife. During that period they would have a life estate in a house owned by the trust and the trust would pay the real estate taxes on the house.

The net income of the trust, as “determined in accordance with normal accounting principles,” would go to two of the brother’s and sister-in-law’s grandchildren (that is, Tamulis’s grandnieces), minus $10,000 a year, which would go to their third child until she graduated from medical school. Upon the termination of the trust the assets would pass to a Catholic diocese.

The estate tax return, filed in 2001, claimed a charitable deduction of $1.5 million, represented to be the present value of the charitable remainder, which was described on the return as the “residue following 10 year term certain charitable remainder unitrust at 5% quarterly payments to two grand nieces.” In each of the years 2001 through 2004, the trust distributed no more than 5 percent of the fair market value of the trust’s assets, as valued at the beginning of each year, to the grandnieces and for the payment of the real estate taxes on their parents’ home.

The Internal Revenue Service refused to allow the charitable deduction. The charitable remainder, as defined in the trust instrument, was not a charitable remainder unitrust as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. In particular, the trust instrument did not specify either a fixed dollar amount, or the percentage of the trust’s fair market value, that would go to the income beneficiaries— to the grandnieces in cash and to their parents in the form of a life estate in the house and payment of the real estate taxes on it, which would be paid out of the trust’s income.

This was a fundamental defect, fixable only by a judicial proceeding to reform the trust, filed within 90 days after the estate tax return was due. The trustee (who was also the executor of Father Tamulis’s will) and the diocese realized that there was a problem. But more than eight months elapsed before the executor prepared a complaint to file in an Illinois state court (the trust is governed by Illinois law) to reform the trust. And for unexplained reasons the complaint was never filed. Instead, in 2003 the executor circulated to the income beneficiaries a proposed reformation of the trust to bring it into compliance with the Code. But the third grandniece did not sign it, and so the trust has never been reformed, with or without a judicial proceeding, although the trustee continues to administer it in accordance with the requirements of the Code, as her predecessor (the original trustee, who has died) had said in the estate tax return that he was doing.

Her argument, rejected by the Tax Court and renewed before the Seventh Circuit, is that the statement in the return, coupled with the trustee’s continued administration of the trust as if it were a qualified unitrust, should be deemed substantial compliance with the Code, although she concedes that it is not literal compliance.

There is a doctrine of substantial compliance with the often intricate and obscure provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The Seventh Circuit has criticized the Tax Court’s articulation of the doctrine for formlessness, and, noting that the courts of appeals do not defer to the legal rulings of that court any more than they do to the rulings of a district court, has ruled that the “doctrine of substantial compliance should not be allowed to spread beyond cases in which the taxpayer had a good excuse (though not a legal justification) for failing to comply with either an unimportant requirement or one unclearly or confusingly stated in the regulations or the statute.”

Tamulis’s charitable remainder trust flunks this test. The executor-trustee, represented by counsel, as he was, and well aware that a substantial tax deduction was at stake, had no excuse for failing to bring the required judicial proceeding to reform the trust. The requirement is not unimportant; it protects against efforts to bend trust law to get a tax benefit. Nor is the requirement stated unclearly or confusingly in the Code or in any regulation—it is perfectly clear. Until the trust was reformed, compliance with the spirit of the Code’s provisions dealing with charitable remainder trusts had depended largely on the good faith of the trustee.

When the conditions for applying the doctrine are not satisfied, it makes good sense to hold a taxpayer to the requirements of the tax code. The doctrine of substantial compliance “seeks to preserve the need to comply strictly with regulatory requirements that are important to the tax collection scheme and to forgive noncompliance for either unimportant and tangential requirements or requirements that are so confusingly written that a good faith effort at compliance should be accepted.” The doctrine is therefore inapplicable to this case.

Do you think you qualify to have the doctrine of substantial compliance apply to you? Speak with a California tax attorney and call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

November 28, 2007

California Registered Domestic Partners Exempt From Property Tax Increases

The California State Board of Equalization has promulgated a rule that grants to registered domestic partners certain property tax relief afforded to spouses. County assessors (including the assessors of Los Angeles County, Ventura County, Santa Barbara County and Orange County) unsuccessfully challenged the rule in the trial court and appealed, arguing that it was unconstitutional. The California State Court of Appeal disagreed (you may read the opinion here).

In 1978, California voters adopted Proposition 13, a constitutional amendment, which limits the amount of ad valorem tax assessed on real property unless there has been a “change in ownership.” After the California Legislature defined such a change of ownership to exclude, among other things, real property transfers between spouses, the voters adopted Proposition 58, placing the spousal transfer exclusion in the state Constitution. The California State Board of Equalization then promulgated a rule excluding from the definition of change of ownership a transfer of real property to a registered domestic partner via intestate succession upon the death of the person’s registered domestic partner. Thereafter, the California Legislature amended the statutory scheme to limit change of ownership by excluding any real property transfers between registered domestic partners from the reassessment of full cash value for property tax purposes.

Plaintiffs, who are California county assessors, filed an action for declaratory relief, asserting that neither the Legislature nor the California State Board Equalization had the authority to create the registered domestic partner exclusion from classification as a change in ownership.

As California State Court of Appeal explained, the trial court correctly held (1) the Legislature can create an exclusion from “change in ownership” for registered domestic partners, without violating the California Constitution, (2) when the Legislature amended provisions of the Family Code and Revenue and Taxation Code, it ratified the Board’s rule excluding certain real property transfers between registered domestic partners from the property tax reassessment provisions of Proposition 13, and (3) accordingly, the Board’s rule is not unconstitutional.

For estate planning and probate help involving domestic partnerships and other matters, please call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

November 14, 2007

Family Limited Partnerships Still Work

On March 30, 2005, the Tax Court ruled that a decedent’s transfer of real property to a family limited partnership (“FLP”) and later FLP gifts were includable in the decedent’s estate under Internal Revenue Code Section 2036(a)(1) which recaptures in a decedent’s gross estate certain assets transferred while alive. The Estate appealed. On September 14, 2007, the Ninth Circuit upheld the Tax Court’s decision. Read the Ninth Circuit opinion here.

Virginia Bigelow, the decedent, transferred her 98.3% interest in a single family residence to a trust (“Trust”). (The decedent’s children held the other undivided interests.) The trustees of the Trust were Virginia and her son. The following year, the parties exchanged the property held by the Trust for another rental residence (“Property”) and bought out the children’s undivided interests. Two years later, the Trust and the decedent’s children formed the FLP. The Trust contributed the Property to the FLP and the children each contributed $100. The Trust was the sole general partner. Over the next three years, numerous gifts of FLP interests occurred. At decedent’s death, the decedent owned a 44% limited partner interest in the FLP and her Trust held the sole one percent general partner interest. The 44% limited interest was valued at a 37% discount from the underlying appraised value and the one percent general partner interest was valued at a 35% premium.

In addition, the loans on the Property were retained as liabilities by the decedent. However, the Property served as the ultimate collateral for the loans. Because the decedent was left with insufficient funds to pay off the loans, the Partnership distributed funds necessary to service one of the two loans. No other distributions were made. After Ms. Bigelow’s death, a reduction in her Partnership capital account was made to reflect the loan payment distribution.

The Estate appealed the Tax Court’s decision arguing there was no “implied agreement” for the decedent to use, enjoy or have the right to the income of the Property and that the transfers were completed under the “bona fide sale” exemption of Internal Revenue Code Section 2036.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the Tax Court’s deficiency determination, finding that Ms. Bigelow and the Bigelow children had an implied agreement that Ms. Bigelow would retain income and economic enjoyment from the transferred asset, and that the inter vivos transfer was not a bona fide sale for adequate and full consideration under Internal Revenue Code Section 2036(a).

To discuss putting an effective family limited partnership in place, please call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.

November 12, 2007

California State Bar Estate Planning Website

The California State Bar maintains a very interesting website which provides information about the following California estate planning topics:

DO I NEED ESTATE PLANNING?

1. What Is Estate Planning?
2. What Is Involved in Estate Planning?
3. Who Needs Estate Planning ?
4. What Is Included in my Estate?
5. What Is a Will?
6. What Is a Revocable Living Trust?
7. What Is Probate?
8. To Whom Should I Leave My Assets?
9. Whom Should I Name as My Executor or Trustee?
10. How Should I Provide for My Minor Children?
11. When Does Estate Planning Involve Tax Planning?
12. How Does the Way in Which I Hold Title Make a Difference?
13. What Are Other Methods of Leaving Property?
14. What If I Become Unable to Care for Myself ?
15. Who Should Help Me With My Estate Planning Documents?
16. How Do I Find a Qualified Lawyer?
17. Should I Beware of Someone Who Is a "Promoter" of Financial and Estate Planning Services?
18. What Are the Costs Involved In Estate Planning?

You may also want to look at my website: www.AskMyAttorney.net for more information.

November 2, 2007

The Case Against A Holographic Will

In California, you can make a will in one of three ways:

A will prepared by a California lawyer. A qualified estate planning lawyer can make sure that your will conforms with California law. The California attorney can also offer suggestions and help you understand the many ways that property can be transferred to or for the benefit of your beneficiaries. I, as a California lawyer, can also help you develop a complete estate plan and offer alternative plans which may save taxes. This kind of planning can be extremely helpful and economical in the long run for you and your beneficiaries. No matter what kind of will you use, the will should be solely your will and not a joint will with your spouse or any other person.

Also, keep in mind that your will is not a living will. The term living will is used in many states to describe a legal document stating that you do not want life-sustaining treatment if you become terminally ill or permanently unconscious.

A statutory will. California law provides for a “fill-in-the-blanks” will form. The will form is designed for people with relatively small estates. If there is anything you do not understand or if you are making any provisions which are complicated or unusual, you should ask a qualified lawyer to advise you.

A handwritten or holographic will. This will must be completely in your own handwriting. You must date and sign the will. Your handwriting has to be legible, and the will must clearly state what you are leaving and to whom. A handwritten will does not have to be notarized or witnessed. However, any typed material in a handwritten will may invalidate the will. A typed will must be signed by two witnesses. It is a good idea to consult with a qualified lawyer to make sure your will conforms with California law and does not have any unintended consequences.

Continue reading "The Case Against A Holographic Will" »