<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>California Tax Attorney Blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:,2009:/36</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36" title="California Tax Attorney Blog" />
    <updated>2009-07-02T12:15:17Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Published by Mitchell A. Port</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>
 

<entry>
    <title>Self Help With California Probate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/07/self_help_with_california_prob_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=47396" title="Self Help With California Probate" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.47396</id>
    
    <published>2009-07-02T12:09:30Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-02T12:15:17Z</updated>
    
    <summary>It may be difficult for some to proceed in court without an attorney familiar with California Probate law when someone dies in Los Angeles or elsewhere in California and leaves property subject to probate. In California, only a licensed attorney...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Probate" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It may be difficult for some to proceed in court without an attorney familiar with California Probate law when someone dies in Los Angeles or elsewhere in California and leaves property subject to probate. </p>

<p>In California, only a licensed attorney can give legal advice. If you don't understand any information in this blog or if you have trouble filling out any of the <a href="http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/probate/SelfHelp.htm" target="new">forms located here</a>, see an <a href="http://www.los-angeles-lawyers.biz/lawyer-attorney-1185949.html" target="new">attorney for help</a>.</p>

<p>The Los Angeles Superior Court has <a href="http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/probate/SelfHelp.htm" target="new">a self-help website</a>.  The web site provides help with Probate matters in general and pays special attento to areas where people represent themselves without an attorney to help them. The self-help site is not supposed to be a do-it-yourself guide and is instead intended to help you help yourself through the court system and probate matters.</p>

<p>The Los Angeles</blockquote Superiour Court site has information on the following:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/probate/pdf/ProbateInformation.pdf" target="new">Probate Guardianship/Conservatorship Information Sheet</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/probate/pdf/glossary.pdf" target="new">Glossary of Probate Terms</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/probate/pdf/ConservatorshipHandbook2002.pdf" target="new">Conservatorship</a> </p>

<p><a href="http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/family/guardianship/" target="new">Guardianship</a> </p>

<p><a href="http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/probate/pdf/CreditorsClaim.pdf" target="new">Creditor's Claims</a> </p>

<p><a href="http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/probate/pdf/TransferForm.pdf" target="new">Transfer Of Small Estates Without Probate</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.calbar.ca.gov/state/calbar/calbar_generic.jsp?sImagePath=Estate_Planning.gif&sCategoryPath=/Home/Public%20Services/Consumer%20Information/Pamphlets&sHeading=Estate%20Planning&sFileType=HTML&sCatHtmlPath=html/Home_Public-Services_Consumer-Information-Pamphlets_Estate-Planning.html" target="new">Estate Planning</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/forms/main.htm" target="new">Probate Forms Packets</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/" target="new">Links To Other Probate Self-Help Web Sites</a> </blockquote></p>

<p>Still need help?  Call a qualified probate attorney.  In Los Angeles call <a href="http://www.los-angeles-lawyers.biz/lawyer-attorney-1188564.html" target="new">Mitchell A. Port</a> at (310) 559-5259.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>California Probate: What If The Will Is Lost?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/06/california_probate_what_if_the.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=46569" title="California Probate: What If The Will Is Lost?" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.46569</id>
    
    <published>2009-06-30T12:34:18Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-30T12:46:18Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Is the Will required to open a probate in California?  Do you have a &quot;lost Will&quot; situation?</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Probate" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>When opening a California probate (in Los Angeles Superiour Court, for example) believing that the will is lost, there's a rebuttable presumption that it was destroyed. What this means is that the court will presume that the the person who died destroyed the will. </p>

<p>But, to probate a lost will you may introduce evidence that the will was not destroyed. The sort of evidence that is allowed must satisfy the probate court that the will wasn't destroyed. If the evidence suggests that the will wasn't destroyed, then it will be admitted to probate.  For example, you look for a copy of the will and any reason as to why that copy should not be valid. </p>

<p><a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=prob&group=06001-07000&file=6120-6124" target="new">California Probate Code  6124</a> says that: “If the testator's will was last in the testator's possession, the testator was competent until death, and neither the will nor a duplicate original of the will can be found after the testator's death, it is presumed that the testator destroyed the will with intent to revoke it.  This presumption is a presumption affecting the burden of producing evidence.”</p>

<p>Let's assume there's no copy, and that the California will is just lost. Most likely what's going to happen is the property will probably pass intestate, meaning it will go equally to whomever the natural objects of the bounty are, the natural heirs or lineal descendants.</p>

<p>For <a href="http://www.los-angeles-lawyers.biz/lawyer-attorney-1185949.html" target="new">probate help</a>, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>California Estate Planning And Your Kids</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/06/with_a_play_on_words.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=47188" title="California Estate Planning And Your Kids" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.47188</id>
    
    <published>2009-06-25T12:05:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-25T12:15:27Z</updated>
    
    <summary>With a play on words, the Wall Street Journal recently published an article entitled &quot;Deciding if Your Kid is Trust-Worthy&quot;. Estate planners in California often ask clients the same question since having a living trust may make sense depending on,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Estate Planning" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>With a play on words, the Wall Street Journal recently published an article entitled "<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124397907698178821.html" target="new">Deciding if Your Kid is Trust-Worthy</a>".  Estate planners in California often ask clients the same question since having a living trust may make sense depending on, for instance, whether their children are worthy of getting property when they are young or at an older age.</p>

<p>California Wills, living trusts, durable powers of attorney for property management and the advance health care directive are usually prepared by lawyers.  There are many forms available for free online but it is often inadvisable to use them.</p>

<p>Speak with an <a href="http://www.los-angeles-lawyers.biz/lawyer-attorney-1185955.html" target="new">estate planning</a> attorney about your own situation.  Call Mitchell A. Port at 310.559.5259.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Offer In Compromise Co-Pay Repeal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/06/offer_in_compromise_copay_repe.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=47369" title="Offer In Compromise Co-Pay Repeal" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.47369</id>
    
    <published>2009-06-23T12:10:57Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-23T12:15:29Z</updated>
    
    <summary>To submit an Offer In Compromise (OIC) with the Internal Revenue Service in order to pay pennies on the dollar, a nonrefundable 20% downpayment is required. Combined with a very low acceptance rate by the Internal Revenue Service of OICs,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Tax Controversy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>To submit an <a href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2008/02/offer_in_compromise_1.html" target="new">Offer In Compromise</a> (OIC) with the Internal Revenue Service in order to pay pennies on the dollar, a nonrefundable 20% downpayment is required.  Combined with a very low acceptance rate by the Internal Revenue Service of OICs, the downpayment has the effect of discouraging people from applying for an Offer.  </p>

<p>A <a href="http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/111/hr2343.pdf" target="new">Congressional bill</a> was recently introduced the title to which tells it all: “Repeal of the Partial Payment Requirement on Submissions of Offers in Compromise”.  If this is enacted into law, the struggle with your tax debts may be a bit easier.</p>

<p>If you have a tax problem and need <a href="http://www.los-angeles-lawyers.biz/lawyer-attorney-1185953.html" target="new">a tax lawyer</a>, call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Property Tax And California&apos;s Domestic Partners</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/06/property_tax_and_californias_d.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=48209" title="Property Tax And California's Domestic Partners" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.48209</id>
    
    <published>2009-06-19T12:12:01Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-19T12:15:17Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Domestic partners in California whose property was reassessed between January 1, 2000 and January 1, 2006 because of a change in ownership or the death of the owner can apply for an exclusion. Go to the Los Angeles county tax...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Probate" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Domestic partners in California whose property was reassessed between January 1, 2000 and January 1, 2006 because of a change in ownership or the death of the owner can apply for an exclusion.  Go to the <a href="http://assessor.lacounty.gov/extranet/default.aspx" target="new">Los Angeles county tax assessor's website</a> and apply for help before June 30, 2009.</p>

<p>The Los Angeles Times ran <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-domestic-partner16-2009jun16,0,6352508.story" target="new">a good article</a> discussing this in more detail.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>LA Estate Planning Revisited</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/06/la_estate_planning_revisited_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=47103" title="LA Estate Planning Revisited" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.47103</id>
    
    <published>2009-06-16T12:37:52Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-16T12:45:26Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Your California estate plan may need to be revisited if your economic picture or other circumstances in your life have changed.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Estate Planning" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Estate planning for those of us in Los Angeles and throughout California where property values have been significantly impacted as a result of the recent economic slump can use <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/18/pf/estate_plan.moneymag/?postversion=2009051811" target="new">this link </a>to a great article from Money magazine on rethinking your estate planning options, given the uncertainty of future tax rates and exemptions.</p>

<p>Discuss your will, living trust and other estate planning needs with a <a href="http://www.los-angeles-lawyers.biz/lawyer-attorney-1185955.html" target="new">qualified tax attorney</a>.  Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Splitting Legal Fees In California Probates</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/06/splitting_legal_fees_in_califo.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=47069" title="Splitting Legal Fees In California Probates" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.47069</id>
    
    <published>2009-06-12T12:02:01Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-12T12:15:24Z</updated>
    
    <summary>California lawyers share probate fees.  Here&apos;s why....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Probate" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>How much does a <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=prob&group=10001-11000&file=10810-10814" target="new">probate in California cost</a> when more than one attorney is involved with the same client?</p>

<p>The fee is calculated based on a percentage as follows:</p>

<p>4% of the first $100,000 of probate property pays a fee of $4,000 	<br />
3% of the next $100,000 of probate property pays a fee of $3,000 	<br />
2% of the next $800,000 of probate property pays a fee of $16,000 	<br />
1% of the next $9,000,000,000 of probate property pays a fee of $90,000	<br />
0.5% of the next $15,000,000 pays a fee of $75,000 	</p>

<p>If the estate exceeds $25,000,000 in value, the court will determine the amount of the fee for the excess.</p>

<p>Using this fee structure, an estate worth $1 million pays a fee of $23,000 ($4,000 plus $3,000 plus $16,000).</p>

<p>When more than one attorney is involved for the same estate, the fee is split between the lawyers.  For example, if three attorneys handled the same $1 million estate, the maximum statutory fee is $23,000 which is divided among the lawyers in any way that they agree.  </p>

<p>When an executor fires the first attorney during the probate proceeding, the next attorney has to negotiate his share of the statutory fee with the first lawyer.  The stage of the probate proceeding at which this occurs will impact the discussion between the attorneys.  If the new attorney is hired by the executor late in the proceeding, his or her fees negotiated with the prior attorneys probably will be relatively small; it may be difficult to hire a new attorney at this stage since the fee may be too small.</p>

<p>Speak with a competent <a href="http://www.los-angeles-lawyers.biz/lawyer-attorney-1185949.html" target="new">California probate lawyer</a> about this.  Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Unfiled Tax Return: IRS Can Collect Anywhere - Even Los Angeles</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/06/unfiled_tax_return_irs_can_col.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=47382" title="Unfiled Tax Return: IRS Can Collect Anywhere - Even Los Angeles" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.47382</id>
    
    <published>2009-06-10T12:12:08Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-10T20:03:06Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Payroll tax liens can sometimes be filed by mistake. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Tax Controversy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Internal Revenue Service has filed a <a href="http://video1.washingtontimes.com/video/Kerry04_Tax.pdf" target="new">$819,848 federal tax lien</a> against Sen. John Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign.  The campaign says the tax return was filed and lost by the IRS while the IRS says no tax return was ever filed. Sen. Kerry's office blamed IRS clerical error for the claim and said his campaign owes no penalties.</p>

<p>The liability described in the tax lien is based on <a href="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/search/display.html?terms=6721&url=/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00006721----000-.html" target="new">Internal Revenue Code Section 6721</a> entitled "Failure to File Correct Information Returns".</p>

<p>The Massachusetts Democrat said the IRS mishandled payroll tax forms that he said were correctly filed by his campaign in 2005.</p>

<p>Avoid this tax problem.  Speak with <a href="http://www.los-angeles-lawyers.biz/lawyer-attorney-1185953.html" target="new">a qualified tax attorney</a> in Los Angeles from anywhere in the U.S. about your situation.  Call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Late Tax Payment - Late Filed Tax Return</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/06/late_tax_payment_late_filed_ta_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=45636" title="Late Tax Payment - Late Filed Tax Return" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.45636</id>
    
    <published>2009-06-05T11:49:27Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-05T12:01:05Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Haven&apos;t yet filed your tax return?  Haven&apos;t paid your taxes?  Here&apos;s what you can do....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Tax Controversy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Filing a past due return may not be as difficult as you think. Los Angeles, California taxpayers should <a href="http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=108326,00.html" target="new">file all tax returns that are due</a>, regardless of whether or not full payment can be made with the return. Same is true for <a href="http://www.ftb.ca.gov/aboutFTB/subscribe/index.shtml" target="new">California tax returns</a>.</p>

<p>Whether paying taxes with a timely filed tax return, or filing late and paying taxes late after receiving a bill from the IRS (and the bill is correct), LA's taxpayers are encouraged to pay the taxes they owe in full.</p>

<p>Prevent the IRS from levying bank accounts, wages, or other income, or taking other assets. Prevent the IRS from filing a Notice of Federal Tax Lien that may have a detrimental effect on your credit standing.</p>

<p>If you don't file your tax return, the IRS will file a substitute return for you, which will not include any additional exemptions or expenses you may be entitled to and may overstate your real tax liability. Once the tax is assessed the IRS will start the collection process, which can include placing a levy on wages or bank accounts or filing a federal tax lien against your property.</p>

<p>Call a tax professional - call attorney <a href="http://www.los-angeles-lawyers.biz/" target="new">Mitchell A. Port</a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Free Tax Help</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/06/free_tax_help_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=45633" title="Free Tax Help" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.45633</id>
    
    <published>2009-06-03T12:32:05Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-03T12:45:15Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The IRS can assist you with obtaining forms, publications and answers to a wide range of tax questions. The IRS can also help find free tax preparation for those who qualify.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Tax Controversy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Get Free Help.</p>

<p>The IRS offers free tax assistance in person, by telephone, computer and by fax. The IRS can assist taxpayers with obtaining forms, publications and answers to a wide range of tax questions. The IRS can also help find free tax preparation for those who qualify.</p>

<p><strong>In Person</strong></p>

<p>Taxpayers needing face-to-face help solving individual or business tax problems can get help every business day in every IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center. </p>

<p><strong>By Phone</strong></p>

<p>Call the toll-free customer service line at 1-800-829-1040.<br />
<strong><br />
Use Your Computer</strong></p>

<p>Through the Internet, you can access a wealth of free tax information on the IRS Web site. Taxpayers can check out links such as <a href="http://www.irs.gov/formspubs/index.html" target="new">Forms and Publications</a> to download necessary forms, instructions or publications; get the <a href="http://www.irs.gov/faqs/index.html" target="new">FAQ</a>s (Frequently Asked Questions) to get answers to questions</p>

<p><strong>By Fax</strong></p>

<p>You can receive faxed forms and publications by calling 1-703-368-9694 (not a toll-free call). Simply follow the directions from the prompts.</p>

<p>Be careful when providing the IRS with your information while you are trying to information from them.  <a href="http://www.los-angeles-lawyers.biz/lawyer-attorney-1185953.html" target="new">Hire a tax professional</a> if you are concerned you might inadvertantly disclose information you may not want the IRS to have at this time.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>IRS Now Hiring</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/06/irs_now_hiring.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=45579" title="IRS Now Hiring" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.45579</id>
    
    <published>2009-06-01T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-01T12:00:17Z</updated>
    
    <summary>IRS Hiring Hundreds of Revenue Agents.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Tax Controversy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>There are jobs in California. </p>

<p>The IRS is recruiting hundreds of <a href="http://www.jobs.irs.gov/hiring0512.html" target="new">Internal Revenue Agents</a> with a minimum 30 hours of college-level accounting coursework for openings around the country. To apply for these and other IRS jobs, go to the IRS job search on <a href="http://jobsearch.usajobs.gov/a9trirs.aspx" target="new">USAJOBS</a>. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>IRA And Life Insurance Beneficiaries</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/05/ira_and_life_insurance_benefic.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=45065" title="IRA And Life Insurance Beneficiaries" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.45065</id>
    
    <published>2009-05-28T12:29:50Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-28T12:30:24Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Probating an IRA or a life insurance policy?  Absurd, yes.  But sometimes naming a beneficiary in California isn&apos;t enough.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Probate" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>California, like many states, abides by the contractual beneficiary designation made on your IRA and life insurance.  When you designate a specific beneficiary, then the property will go to that person without probate.  </p>

<p>Sometimes, however, the beneficiary you designate may not be the actual person you wish to receive the IRA or life insurance.  In one particular situation, a woman designated her sister as the beneficiary before the woman was married and never changed the beneficiary designation to name her husband after she was married.  As a result, when the husband tried to claim the money, neither the IRA administrator nor the insurance company would pay him since he was not the designated beneficiary despite more than two decades of marriage.  <a href="http://www.fool.com/personal-finance/retirement/2005/02/02/the-milliondollar-clerical-error.aspx" target="new">Here’s the story</a>.</p>

<p>Similarly, if an IRA or insurance beneficiary is named and dies before the IRA owner or the insured, and if there is no secondary beneficiary named, then those assets must go through a probate in California before the money is distributed.  So, when certain items of property ordinarily avoid probate because the law of contracts usually applies, California probate is required when the beneficiary designation no longer works.</p>

<p>Avoid probate in California.  <a href="http://www.los-angeles-lawyers.biz/lawyer-attorney-1185955.html" target="new">Consult with an estate planning attorney</a> – call Mitchell A. Port at (310) 559-5259.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Probate - Payment To Creditors</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/05/probate_payment_to_creditors_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=44663" title="Probate - Payment To Creditors" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.44663</id>
    
    <published>2009-05-25T12:44:42Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-25T12:45:28Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The lawyers don&apos;t always get paid before anyone else.  There is a list of priority payments out of a probate estate which is quite clear in California.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Probate" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Who does the California probate's executor pay first: the probate attorneys' fees or the IRS tax liability when there is not enough property in the estate to fully pay both debts?</p>

<p>California Probate Code Section 11420 contains a priority list of which creditors are paid and in what order they are paid.  The short answer is that the IRS is paid before the probate attorney is paid.  The long answer can't be more clear:</p>

<p>California <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=prob&group=11001-12000&file=11420-11429" target="new">Probate Code Section 11420</a> states:</p>

<p>11420.  (a) Debts shall be paid in the following order of priority among classes of debts, except that debts owed to the United States or to this state that have preference under the laws of the United States or of this state shall be given the preference required by such laws:</p>

<p>   (1) Expenses of administration.  With respect to obligations secured by mortgage, deed of trust, or other lien, including, but not limited to, a judgment lien, only those expenses of administration incurred that are reasonably related to the administration of that property by which obligations are secured shall be given priority over these obligations.</p>

<p>   (2) Obligations secured by a mortgage, deed of trust, or other lien, including, but not limited to, a judgment lien, in the order of their priority, so far as they may be paid out of the proceeds of the property subject to the lien.  If the proceeds are insufficient, the part of the obligation remaining unsatisfied shall be classed with general debts.</p>

<p>   (3) Funeral expenses.</p>

<p>   (4) Expenses of last illness.</p>

<p>   (5) Family allowance.</p>

<p>   (6) Wage claims.</p>

<p>   (7) General debts, including judgments not secured by a lien and all other debts not included in a prior class.</p>

<p>   (b) Except as otherwise provided by statute, the debts of each class are without preference or priority one over another.  No debt of any class may be paid until all those of prior classes are paid in full.  If property in the estate is insufficient to pay all debts of any class in full, each debt in that class shall be paid a proportionate share.</p>

<p>Need help with probate?  Call <a href="http://www.los-angeles-lawyers.biz/lawyer-attorney-1185949.html" target="new">Mitchell A. Port</a>, an attorney in Los Angeles, for help.  Call (310) 559-5259.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Do You Have A Foreign Financial Account?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/05/do_you_have_a_foreign_financia_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=44691" title="Do You Have A Foreign Financial Account?" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.44691</id>
    
    <published>2009-05-21T12:04:41Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-21T12:16:13Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The IRS is pursuing taxpayers who have failed to disclose the existence of foreign bank accounts. In addition to prison time, failure to disclose can result in penalties which exceed the entire balance in the account. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Tax Controversy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Do You Have a Foreign Financial Account?</p>

<p>If you have authority over or own a foreign financial account, including a brokerage account, unit trust, mutual fund, bank account or other types of financial accounts, then you may be required to report the account yearly to the IRS. Under the Bank Secrecy Act, each United States person must file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), if</p>

<blockquote>1. The value of the account exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year, and

<p>2. The person has financial interest in, signature authority (or other authority that is comparable to signature authority) over one or more accounts in a foreign country.</blockquote></p>

<p>The FBAR is a tool to help the United States government identify persons who may be using foreign financial accounts to circumvent United States law. Investigators use FBARs to help identify or trace funds used for illicit purposes or to identify unreported income maintained or generated abroad.</p>

<p>A United States person is not prohibited from owning foreign accounts. The FBAR is required because foreign financial institutions may not be subject to the same reporting requirements as domestic financial institutions. </p>

<p><a href="http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=148845,00.html" target="new"><strong>Definition of Terms</strong></a></p>

<p>What is an FBAR?</p>

<p>Who must file an FBAR?</p>

<p>When is the FBAR due?</p>

<p>Where are FBAR forms available?</p>

<p>What are the exceptions to the FBAR filing requirement?</p>

<p>How do foreign account holders report their accounts to the IRS?</p>

<p>Where do account holders file the FBAR?</p>

<p>How long should account holders retain records of the foreign accounts?</p>

<p>What is a United States person?</p>

<p>Would a foreign athlete or entertainer that occasionally visits the U.S. in order to compete or perform in an event, be considered a United States person for FBAR purposes? </p>

<p>What is a foreign country?</p>

<p>What is a financial account?</p>

<p>Does more than one form need to be filed for a husband and wife owning a joint account?</p>

<p>What constitutes signature or other authority over an account?</p>

<p>What does “maximum value of account” mean (for Box 15 on the FBAR)?</p>

<p>Is an FBAR required if the account generates neither interest nor dividend income?</p>

<p>How does an FBAR filer amend a previously filed FBAR?</p>

<p>What is the statute of limitations for assessing civil penalties for violations of the FBAR requirements?</p>

<p>What happens if an account holder is required to file an FBAR and fails to do so?</p>

<p>An American citizen, X, gives a person who is a citizen or resident of the U.S. power of attorney to X’s Canadian bank accounts.  X files an FBAR form annually.  Does the power of attorney also need to file an FBAR?</p>

<p>A fiduciary who is a U.S. person has control as a trustee for an IRA with a foreign account.   Should an FBAR be filed?</p>

<p>Does the term “other authority over a financial account” mean that a person, who has the power to direct how an account is invested, but who cannot make disbursements to the accounts, has to file an FBAR?</p>

<p>Must a U.S. person file an FBAR on a Eurodollar account in the Cayman Islands?</p>

<p>A N.Y. corporation owns a foreign company that has foreign accounts.  The corporation will file an FBAR for the foreign company’s accounts.  Do the primary owners of the U.S. Company also have to file?</p>

<p>A company has over 25 foreign accounts.  What should they enter in Part ll of the FBAR?</p>

<p>A person is a non-resident alien and only visits the United States to manage his personal interests, such as rental property.  Does that person have to file an FBAR?</p>

<p><strong>Reporting and Filing Information</strong></p>

<p>A person who holds a foreign account may have a reporting obligation even though the account produces no taxable income. Checking the appropriate block on Form 1040 Schedule B, and filing Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, satisfies the account holder’s reporting obligation.</p>

<p>A foreign account holder must mail the Form TD F 90-22.1 on or before June 30 of the following year to:</p>

<p>U.S. Department of the Treasury<br />
P.O. Box 32621<br />
Detroit, MI 48232-0621.</p>

<p>The FBAR is not to be filed with the filer’s Federal income tax return.</p>

<p>The granting, by IRS, of an extension to file Federal income tax returns does not extend the due date for filing an FBAR.  There is no extension available for filing the FBAR. </p>

<p>Account holders who do not comply with the FBAR reporting requirements may be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, or both.</p>

<p><strong>Exceptions to the Reporting Requirement</strong></p>

<p>There are exceptions to the reporting requirement.  These exceptions include:  </p>

<blockquote>1. Accounts in U.S. military banking facilities operated by a United States financial institution to serve U.S. Government installations abroad are not considered to be accounts in a foreign country for purposes of the reporting requirement.

<p>2. An officer or employee of a bank that is subject to the supervision of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of Thrift Supervision, or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, is not required to report having signature or other authority over a foreign account if the officer or employee has no personal interest in the account. </p>

<p>3. An officer or employee of a domestic corporation whose equity securities are listed on a national securities exchange or which has assets exceeding $10 million and 500 or more shareholders of record, is not required to report having signature or other authority over a foreign account if the person has no personal financial interest in the account, and the officer or employee has been advised in writing by the chief financial officer of the corporation that the corporation has filed a current report that includes the foreign account.</blockquote></p>

<p>The IRS has launched a "tax amnesty" for those who turn themselves in within the next 5 months. It is critical that clients be made aware of this program, and be counseled on whether it is in their best interest to participate.  The issues are complex, and require a balancing of a number of financial, tax and criminal considerations including the non-applicability of the federal authorized tax practitioner privilege. The "amnesty" will expire on September 22, 2009, so time is of the essence. Current year FBARs are due June 30th.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>U.S. Tax Court Announces e-Filing Pilot</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/2009/05/us_tax_court_announces_efiling.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=36/entry_id=44662" title="U.S. Tax Court Announces e-Filing Pilot" />
    <id>tag:www.californiataxattorneyblog.com,2009://36.44662</id>
    
    <published>2009-05-19T12:09:36Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-19T12:15:47Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The United States Tax Court will begin a pilot eFiling program through Practitioner Access and Petitioner Access on May 7, 2009. The pilot will be restricted to petitioners and practitioners in good standing with the Court who have registered for...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mitchell A. Port</name>
        <uri>http://www.AskMyAttorney.net</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Tax Controversy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.californiataxattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The United States Tax Court will begin a pilot eFiling program through Practitioner Access and Petitioner Access on May 7, 2009.  </p>

<p>The pilot will be restricted to petitioners and practitioners in good standing with the Court who have registered for eAccess, agreed to its Terms of Use, and consented to eService.  The pilot applies to all cases first calendared for trial or hearing after August 31, 2009.  </p>

<p>For example, if you have registered for Practitioner Access, consented to eService, and your case is first calendared for trial or hearing on September 21, 2009, you may eFile in that case during the pilot, but not if the case was set for hearing or trial before September 1, 2009.  You can also participate in the pilot if your case has not been set for trial.  If your case is set for trial or hearing before September 1, 2009, you may not eFile in that case during the pilot. </p>

<p>Please note that eFiling in a particular case can be commenced only after the petition has been filed with the Tax Court in that case.  All petitions must be submitted to the Court in paper form.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

